Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LICORICE: Label-Efficient Concept-Based Interpretable Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.15786 v2 pith:JAYDVPB6 submitted 2024-07-22 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords conceptannotatorsdatainterpretablelabelinglearninglicoricetraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in reinforcement learning (RL) have predominantly leveraged neural network policies for decision-making, yet these models often lack interpretability, posing challenges for stakeholder comprehension and trust. Concept bottleneck models offer an interpretable alternative by integrating human-understandable concepts into policies. However, prior work assumes that concept annotations are readily available during training. For RL, this requirement poses a significant limitation: it necessitates continuous real-time concept annotation, which either places an impractical burden on human annotators or incurs substantial costs in API queries and inference time when employing automated labeling methods. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a novel training scheme that enables RL agents to efficiently learn a concept-based policy by only querying annotators to label a small set of data. Our algorithm, LICORICE, involves three main contributions: interleaving concept learning and RL training, using an ensemble to actively select informative data points for labeling, and decorrelating the concept data. We show how LICORICE reduces human labeling efforts to 500 or fewer concept labels in three environments, and 5000 or fewer in two more complex environments, all at no cost to performance. We also explore the use of VLMs as automated concept annotators, finding them effective in some cases but imperfect in others. Our work significantly reduces the annotation burden for interpretable RL, making it more practical for real-world applications that necessitate transparency.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning for Long-Horizon Planning via Neuro-Symbolic Abductive Imitation

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ABIL uses abductive reasoning with a supplied knowledge base to learn symbolic perception from raw observations and then trains task-specific behavior policies, yielding better data efficiency and generalization in lo...

Pith tools