Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparison of Two Analytic Energy Balance Models Shows Stable Partial Ice Cover Possible for Any Obliquity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.08671 v2 pith:JBVUBJO6 submitted 2020-08-19 astro-ph.EP

Comparison of Two Analytic Energy Balance Models Shows Stable Partial Ice Cover Possible for Any Obliquity

classification astro-ph.EP
keywords differentmodelssnowballenergyobliquitystableacrossanalytic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this study, we compare two analytic energy balance models with explicit dependence on obliquity to study the likelihood of different stable ice configurations. We compare the results of models with different methods of heat transport and different insolation distributions. We show that stable partial ice cover is possible for any obliquity, provided the insolation distribution is sufficiently accurate. Additionally, we quantify the severity of the transition to the Snowball state as different model parameters are varied. In accordance with an earlier study, transitions to the Snowball state are more severe for higher values of the albedo contrast and energy transport across latitudes in both model; however, we find that the Snowball transition is not equally likely across both models. This work is general enough to apply to any rapidly rotating planet and could be used to study the likelihood of Snowball transitions on planets within the habitable region of other stars.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.