pith. sign in

arxiv: 1908.10381 · v1 · pith:JCCCQ3LAnew · submitted 2019-08-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · hep-th· math-ph· math.MP

Distinguish modular categories and 2+1D topological orders beyond modular data: Mapping class group of higher genus manifold

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords modularcategoriesclasscounterexamplesdatadistinguishmanifoldmapping
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

It was believed that modular data are enough to distinguish different modular categories (and topological orders in 2+1-dimensions). Then counterexamples to this conjecture were found by Mignard and Schauenburg in 2017. In this work, we show that the simplest counterexamples can be distinguished by studying the representations of mapping class groups of a punctured torus or a genus-2 closed manifold.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Wormholes as red herrings: reflection positivity and the reconstruction of unitary quantum field theories

    hep-th 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Unitary QFTs are determined up to unitary isomorphism by closed-manifold partition functions; every reflection-positive partition function comes from a unitary QFT, so spatial wormholes do not break Hilbert-space fact...