pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20730 · v1 · pith:JCNWSXG7new · submitted 2026-06-17 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Scalar-scalar-tensor interaction in DHOST theories

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 20:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords DHOST theoriescubic actionscalar-scalar-tensor interactionscosmological perturbationsgravitational wave decaydark energyunitary gauge
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quadratic DHOST theories have a general cubic action for scalar-scalar-tensor perturbations around cosmological backgrounds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the general cubic action for perturbations about a cosmological background in the quadratic subclass of DHOST theories. It focuses on the scalar-scalar-tensor interactions using a fully covariant formulation and unitary gauge. This mixed sector is the key for estimating how gravitational waves decay into two scalar excitations. A sympathetic reader would care because these interactions determine the viability of DHOST models as descriptions of late-time dark energy.

Core claim

We derive the general cubic action for perturbations about a cosmological background in the quadratic subclass of degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor (DHOST) theories, focusing on scalar-scalar-tensor interactions. We adopt a fully covariant formulation and implement unitary gauge at the level of perturbations. This mixed sector provides the key ingredient for estimating the decay rate of a gravitational wave into two scalar excitations in the quadratic DHOST models of dark energy in the late-time Universe.

What carries the argument

The cubic scalar-scalar-tensor interaction terms in the perturbation action around a cosmological background, obtained via covariant formulation with unitary gauge.

If this is right

  • The derived cubic action supplies the interaction vertices needed to compute the decay rate of gravitational waves into scalar excitations.
  • The results apply to quadratic DHOST models intended as descriptions of dark energy in the late-time Universe.
  • Unitary gauge at the perturbation level isolates the scalar-scalar-tensor mixing without altering the degeneracy conditions of the original theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The explicit form of the cubic terms could be inserted into Boltzmann codes or N-body simulations to place bounds on DHOST parameters from gravitational-wave observations.
  • The same covariant-plus-unitary-gauge procedure might be applied to quartic or higher interactions to check consistency across the full effective action.

Load-bearing premise

The quadratic subclass of DHOST theories remains a valid effective description for late-time dark energy without introducing additional instabilities or degrees of freedom when the cubic scalar-scalar-tensor sector is included.

What would settle it

An explicit computation from the derived cubic action that produces ghost modes or extra propagating degrees of freedom on a late-time cosmological background would show the sector cannot be added while preserving the theory's viability.

read the original abstract

We derive the general cubic action for perturbations about a cosmological background in the quadratic subclass of degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor (DHOST) theories, focusing on scalar-scalar-tensor interactions. We adopt a fully covariant formulation and implement unitary gauge at the level of perturbations. This mixed sector provides the key ingredient for estimating the decay rate of a gravitational wave into two scalar excitations in the quadratic DHOST models of dark energy in the late-time Universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives the general cubic action for cosmological perturbations in the quadratic subclass of DHOST theories, restricting attention to the scalar-scalar-tensor sector. The derivation is performed in a fully covariant manner with unitary gauge imposed at the perturbative level; the resulting action is presented as the essential ingredient for computing the decay rate of gravitational waves into scalar modes in late-time DHOST dark-energy models.

Significance. If the derivation is correct, the work supplies a concrete, general expression for the cubic scalar-scalar-tensor vertices that can be used to evaluate interaction rates and stability properties in quadratic DHOST cosmologies. This is a technical but useful step for connecting the degeneracy conditions of DHOST theories to observable gravitational-wave phenomenology.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that the cubic action is derived but does not display the final expression or the degeneracy conditions retained at cubic order; including the explicit Lagrangian (perhaps in an appendix) would improve readability without altering the central claim.
  2. Notation for the background quantities (e.g., the Hubble parameter and scalar-field velocity) should be defined once at first appearance rather than re-introduced in each section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The work is presented as a technical contribution supplying the cubic scalar-scalar-tensor vertices for quadratic DHOST cosmologies.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper states it derives the cubic action directly from the quadratic DHOST Lagrangian via covariant formulation and unitary gauge at the perturbation level. No equations or steps are shown to reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the derivation is presented as an independent expansion of the known action. The reader's assessment of score 2.0 aligns with this being a standard non-circular derivation from established theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract; the central claim rests on the standard degeneracy conditions of DHOST theories and the choice of quadratic subclass.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The theory belongs to the quadratic subclass of DHOST theories
    Explicitly stated as the setting for the derivation and for dark energy modeling
  • domain assumption Unitary gauge can be implemented at the level of perturbations without loss of generality
    Method stated in the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5588 in / 1197 out tokens · 19123 ms · 2026-06-26T20:28:51.281599+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 25 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,

    B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], “GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) no.16, 161101 [arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]]

  2. [2]

    An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A,

    A. Goldstein, P. Veres, E. Burns, M. S. Briggs, R. Hamburg, D. Kocevski, C. A. Wilson-Hodge, R. D. Preece, S. Poolakkil and O. J. Roberts,et al.“An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A,” Astrophys. J. Lett.848(2017) no.2, L14 [arXiv:1710.05446 [astro-ph.HE]]

  3. [3]

    Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A,

    B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi-GBM and INTEGRAL], “Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A,” Astrophys. J. Lett.848(2017) no.2, L13 [arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]]

  4. [4]

    Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space,

    G. W. Horndeski, “Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space,” Int. J. Theor. Phys.10(1974), 363-384

  5. [5]

    From k-essence to generalised Galileons,

    C. Deffayet, X. Gao, D. A. Steer and G. Zahariade, “From k-essence to generalised Galileons,” Phys. Rev. D84(2011), 064039 [arXiv:1103.3260 [hep-th]]

  6. [6]

    Healthy theories beyond Horndeski,

    J. Gleyzes, D. Langlois, F. Piazza and F. Vernizzi, “Healthy theories beyond Horndeski,” Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) no.21, 211101 [arXiv:1404.6495 [hep-th]]. 8

  7. [7]

    Exploring gravitational theories beyond Horndeski,

    J. Gleyzes, D. Langlois, F. Piazza and F. Vernizzi, “Exploring gravitational theories beyond Horndeski,” JCAP02(2015), 018 [arXiv:1408.1952 [astro-ph.CO]]

  8. [8]

    Implications of the Neutron Star Merger GW170817 for Cosmological Scalar-Tensor Theories,

    J. Sakstein and B. Jain, “Implications of the Neutron Star Merger GW170817 for Cosmological Scalar-Tensor Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) no.25, 251303 [arXiv:1710.05893 [astro-ph.CO]]

  9. [9]

    Dark Energy After GW170817: Dead Ends and the Road Ahead,

    J. M. Ezquiaga and M. Zumalac´ arregui, “Dark Energy After GW170817: Dead Ends and the Road Ahead,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) no.25, 251304 [arXiv:1710.05901 [astro-ph.CO]]

  10. [10]

    Dark Energy after GW170817 and GRB170817A,

    P. Creminelli and F. Vernizzi, “Dark Energy after GW170817 and GRB170817A,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) no.25, 251302 [arXiv:1710.05877 [astro-ph.CO]]

  11. [11]

    Strong constraints on cosmological gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A,

    T. Baker, E. Bellini, P. G. Ferreira, M. Lagos, J. Noller and I. Sawicki, “Strong constraints on cosmological gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) no.25, 251301 [arXiv:1710.06394 [astro-ph.CO]]

  12. [12]

    Fate of Large-Scale Structure in Modified Gravity After GW170817 and GRB170817A,

    L. Amendola, M. Kunz, I. D. Saltas and I. Sawicki, “Fate of Large-Scale Structure in Modified Gravity After GW170817 and GRB170817A,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) no.13, 131101 [arXiv:1711.04825 [astro-ph.CO]]

  13. [13]

    Scalar-tensor theories and modified gravity in the wake of GW170817,

    D. Langlois, R. Saito, D. Yamauchi and K. Noui, “Scalar-tensor theories and modified gravity in the wake of GW170817,” Phys. Rev. D97(2018) no.6, 061501 [arXiv:1711.07403 [gr-qc]]

  14. [14]

    Dark energy in Horndeski theories after GW170817: A review,

    R. Kase and S. Tsujikawa, “Dark energy in Horndeski theories after GW170817: A review,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28 (2019) no.05, 1942005 [arXiv:1809.08735 [gr-qc]]

  15. [15]

    Essentials of k essence,

    C. Armendariz-Picon, V. F. Mukhanov and P. J. Steinhardt, “Essentials of k essence,” Phys. Rev. D63(2001), 103510 [arXiv:astro-ph/0006373 [astro-ph]]

  16. [16]

    Imperfect Dark Energy from Kinetic Gravity Braiding,

    C. Deffayet, O. Pujolas, I. Sawicki and A. Vikman, “Imperfect Dark Energy from Kinetic Gravity Braiding,” JCAP10 (2010), 026 [arXiv:1008.0048 [hep-th]]

  17. [17]

    Reviving Horndeski after GW170817 by Kaluza-Klein compactifi- cations,

    S. Mironov, A. Shtennikova and M. Valencia-Villegas, “Reviving Horndeski after GW170817 by Kaluza-Klein compactifi- cations,” Phys. Lett. B858(2024), 139058 [arXiv:2405.02281 [hep-th]]

  18. [18]

    Horndeski speed tests with scalar-photon couplings,

    E. Babichev, C. Charmousis, B. Muntz, A. Padilla and I. D. Saltas, “Horndeski speed tests with scalar-photon couplings,” JCAP01(2025), 041 [arXiv:2407.20339 [gr-qc]]

  19. [19]

    Ghost-free, gauge invariant SVT generalizations of Horndeski theory,

    S. Mironov, A. Shtennikova and M. Valencia-Villegas, “Ghost-free, gauge invariant SVT generalizations of Horndeski theory,” Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no.12, 1378 [arXiv:2509.16850 [hep-th]]

  20. [20]

    Time-dependent, spherically symmetric background in Kaluza-Klein compactified Horndeski theory and the speed of gravity waves,

    S. Mironov, M. Sharov and V. Volkova, “Time-dependent, spherically symmetric background in Kaluza-Klein compactified Horndeski theory and the speed of gravity waves,” JCAP09(2025), 047 [arXiv:2408.06329 [gr-qc]]

  21. [21]

    Luminal scalar-tensor theories for a not so dark dark energy,

    S. Mironov, A. Shtennikova and M. Valencia-Villegas, “Luminal scalar-tensor theories for a not so dark dark energy,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.10, 10 [arXiv:2412.13460 [hep-th]]

  22. [22]

    Degenerate higher derivative theories beyond Horndeski: evading the Ostrogradski instability,

    D. Langlois and K. Noui, “Degenerate higher derivative theories beyond Horndeski: evading the Ostrogradski instability,” JCAP02(2016), 034 [arXiv:1510.06930 [gr-qc]]

  23. [23]

    Extended Scalar-Tensor Theories of Gravity,

    M. Crisostomi, K. Koyama and G. Tasinato, “Extended Scalar-Tensor Theories of Gravity,” JCAP04(2016), 044 [arXiv:1602.03119 [hep-th]]

  24. [24]

    Degenerate higher order scalar-tensor theories beyond Horndeski and disformal transformations,

    J. Ben Achour, D. Langlois and K. Noui, “Degenerate higher order scalar-tensor theories beyond Horndeski and disformal transformations,” Phys. Rev. D93(2016) no.12, 124005 [arXiv:1602.08398 [gr-qc]]

  25. [25]

    Degenerate higher order scalar-tensor theories beyond Horndeski up to cubic order,

    J. Ben Achour, M. Crisostomi, K. Koyama, D. Langlois, K. Noui and G. Tasinato, “Degenerate higher order scalar-tensor theories beyond Horndeski up to cubic order,” JHEP12(2016), 100 [arXiv:1608.08135 [hep-th]]

  26. [26]

    DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints,

    M. Abdul Karimet al.[DESI], “DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints,” Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no.8, 083515 [arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]]

  27. [27]

    Gravitational Wave Decay into Dark Energy,

    P. Creminelli, M. Lewandowski, G. Tambalo and F. Vernizzi, “Gravitational Wave Decay into Dark Energy,” JCAP12 (2018), 025 [arXiv:1809.03484 [astro-ph.CO]]

  28. [28]

    Resonant Decay of Gravitational Waves into Dark Energy,

    P. Creminelli, G. Tambalo, F. Vernizzi and V. Yingcharoenrat, “Resonant Decay of Gravitational Waves into Dark Energy,” JCAP10(2019), 072 [arXiv:1906.07015 [gr-qc]]

  29. [29]

    Dark energy and modified gravity in degenerate higher-order scalar–tensor (DHOST) theories: A review,

    D. Langlois, “Dark energy and modified gravity in degenerate higher-order scalar–tensor (DHOST) theories: A review,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28(2019), 1942006 [arXiv:1811.06271 [gr-qc]]

  30. [30]

    Cosmological evolution in DHOST theories,

    M. Crisostomi, K. Koyama, D. Langlois, K. Noui and D. A. Steer, “Cosmological evolution in DHOST theories,” JCAP 01(2019), 030 [arXiv:1810.12070 [hep-th]]

  31. [31]

    Horndeski theory and beyond: a review,

    T. Kobayashi, “Horndeski theory and beyond: a review,” Rept. Prog. Phys.82(2019), 086901 [arXiv:1901.07183 [gr-qc]]

  32. [32]

    Full bispectra from primordial scalar and tensor perturbations in the most general single-field inflation model,

    X. Gao, T. Kobayashi, M. Shiraishi, M. Yamaguchi, J. Yokoyama and S. Yokoyama, “Full bispectra from primordial scalar and tensor perturbations in the most general single-field inflation model,” PTEP2013(2013), 053E03 [arXiv:1207.0588 [astro-ph.CO]]