pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08244 · v1 · pith:JF77JCUCnew · submitted 2026-06-06 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Stochastic Survival near Swampland Boundaries

Omer Guleryuz This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 19:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords swamplandstochastic cosmologysurvival probabilityDoob transformmoduli fieldsboundary layersquantum gravity constraints
0
0 comments X

The pith

Near swampland boundaries, surviving cosmological histories acquire a universal inward drift fixed only by proper distance and normal diffusion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper recasts swampland constraints as a survival problem for fluctuating moduli under stochastic evolution over cosmological timescales. A survival probability is defined from hard loss surfaces and a stochastic generator; its logarithm becomes a survival action. The Doob transform then maps this action into the drift of the ensemble conditioned to stay on the controlled side. Near any regular hard boundary with nonzero normal diffusion, the resulting drift is universal and depends solely on distance to the boundary. This supplies a stochastic interface that lets tower cutoffs, weak-coupling limits, and other control data shape viable histories without acting as microscopic forces.

Core claim

Near a regular hard boundary with nonzero normal diffusion, surviving histories develop an inward wall response fixed only by proper distance and normal diffusion. The Doob transform converts the logarithmic survival cost into the drift of the conditioned ensemble, allowing tower/species cutoffs, weak-coupling limits, string and Kaluza-Klein thresholds, and potential-based diagnostics to acquire stochastic boundary layers without becoming microscopic forces. The inverse map tests compatibility of a conditioned drift with a scalar operational loss surface and reconstructs its boundary-normal Doob class.

What carries the argument

The Doob transform applied to the survival probability, which converts the logarithmic survival cost directly into the drift of the conditioned ensemble.

If this is right

  • Tower and species cutoffs acquire stochastic boundary layers.
  • Weak-coupling limits, string thresholds, and Kaluza-Klein thresholds receive analogous treatment.
  • Potential-based diagnostics can be reconstructed from observed conditioned drifts via the inverse map.
  • The construction yields a stochastic survival interface between quantum-gravity control data and histories that remain on the landscape side.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same universality might constrain which inflationary trajectories remain viable when moduli approach control-loss boundaries.
  • The inverse map could be used to test whether a proposed effective drift is consistent with an underlying scalar loss surface.
  • Extensions to soft degradation profiles or finite horizons would likely produce additional non-universal corrections to the conditioned dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

A well-defined stochastic generator and loss surfaces exist such that the Doob transform converts the logarithmic survival cost into the drift of the conditioned ensemble.

What would settle it

A direct calculation of the conditioned drift for an explicit moduli potential near a hard boundary that fails to reproduce the predicted dependence on proper distance and normal diffusion alone.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08244 by Omer Guleryuz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Local survival benchmark for the driftless half-line model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Operational survival map. Compactification, Swampland, and diagnostic control data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Kick-normalized survival diagnostics near a hard EFT-loss wall. The panels show a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Swampland and compactification data tell us where EFT control can fail; stochastic cosmology asks which histories survive near that edge. We turn this question into a survival problem for fluctuating moduli over cosmological time scales. Hard loss surfaces, soft degradation profiles, finite horizons, and a stochastic generator define a survival probability, whose logarithm is the survival action. The Doob transform then converts this logarithmic survival cost into the drift of the ensemble conditioned to remain on the controlled side. Near a regular hard boundary with nonzero normal diffusion, the answer is universal: surviving histories develop an inward wall response fixed only by proper distance and normal diffusion. In this way, tower/species cutoffs, weak-coupling limits, string and Kaluza-Klein thresholds, and potential-based diagnostics acquire stochastic boundary layers without becoming microscopic forces. The inverse map tests when a conditioned drift is compatible with a scalar operational loss surface and reconstructs its boundary-normal Doob class. The construction therefore gives a stochastic survival interface between quantum-gravity control data and the histories that remain on the landscape side of control.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a stochastic survival framework for fluctuating moduli near swampland boundaries in cosmology. Hard loss surfaces, a stochastic generator, and finite horizons define a survival probability whose logarithm is the survival action. The Doob transform converts this into the drift of the conditioned ensemble. The central claim is that near a regular hard boundary with nonzero normal diffusion the inward wall response is universal, fixed only by proper distance and the normal diffusion component. An inverse map reconstructs the boundary-normal Doob class from a conditioned drift.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the result supplies a universal stochastic boundary layer that lets tower/species cutoffs, weak-coupling limits, and potential-based diagnostics acquire effective responses without becoming microscopic forces. The inverse map provides a consistency test between conditioned drifts and operational loss surfaces. The application of the Doob transform to logarithmic survival cost in this swampland context is a clear strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [paragraph on survival probability and Doob transform] The universality claim (that the conditioned drift depends only on proper distance and normal diffusion, independent of tangential diffusion or loss-profile details) requires explicit verification that the stochastic generator L is time-homogeneous Markov, that the loss surface imposes an absorbing boundary condition with L^*S=0 on the appropriate domain, and that the Doob h-transform h=-log S produces b_h=b+2D abla log h with no residual time-dependent or measure factors from the cosmological volume element. The manuscript states the construction but supplies no explicit generator, no Feller-regularity check on the boundary, and no demonstration that the inward response is independent of tangential components or the potential-based loss profile. This verification is load-bearing for the central claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the survival action and the reconstructed Doob class should be introduced with explicit equations rather than descriptive phrases alone.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for highlighting the need for explicit verification of the assumptions underlying the universality claim. We address the major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in a revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The universality claim (that the conditioned drift depends only on proper distance and normal diffusion, independent of tangential diffusion or loss-profile details) requires explicit verification that the stochastic generator L is time-homogeneous Markov, that the loss surface imposes an absorbing boundary condition with L^*S=0 on the appropriate domain, and that the Doob h-transform h=-log S produces b_h=b+2D abla log h with no residual time-dependent or measure factors from the cosmological volume element. The manuscript states the construction but supplies no explicit generator, no Feller-regularity check on the boundary, and no demonstration that the inward response is independent of tangential components or the potential-based loss profile. This verification is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of these technical points will strengthen the manuscript. The stochastic generator L is the time-homogeneous Markov generator given by the Laplace-Beltrami operator associated to the moduli-space metric (standard in the stochastic cosmology literature and time-independent by construction when loss surfaces carry no explicit time dependence). The absorbing boundary condition is imposed by S=0 on the loss surface, with L^*S=0 holding in the interior by the definition of the survival probability as the solution to the Kolmogorov backward equation. The Doob h-transform formula reduces to b_h = b + 2D abla log h with h = -log S precisely because the construction is performed in proper-distance coordinates on the moduli space; the cosmological volume element is already incorporated into the definition of the survival probability and does not generate additional residual factors. Independence from tangential diffusion and from the detailed shape of the loss profile follows from a local analysis near the boundary: only the normal component of the diffusion survives in the leading-order conditioned drift as the distance to the boundary tends to zero. In the revision we will add an explicit statement of L, a short Feller-regularity argument under the standard assumption that the boundary is smooth and the diffusion coefficients are locally Lipschitz, and a dedicated paragraph deriving the leading-order universality from the normal component alone. These additions address the load-bearing aspects of the claim without altering the central results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper defines a survival probability from a stochastic generator, loss surfaces, and boundary conditions, takes its logarithm as the survival action, and applies the Doob transform to obtain the conditioned drift. The claimed universality of the inward wall response (fixed only by proper distance and normal diffusion) is presented as a mathematical consequence of this standard construction near a regular hard boundary. No self-citations appear, no parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions, and no result reduces to its own inputs by definition. The derivation relies on established probabilistic tools (Doob h-transform for conditioned Markov processes) applied to the defined survival problem, remaining self-contained without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are enumerated beyond the high-level definitions of survival action and Doob class.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Existence of a stochastic generator for moduli fluctuations over cosmological time scales
    Invoked when defining the survival problem and probability
invented entities (1)
  • survival action no independent evidence
    purpose: Logarithm of the survival probability used to define the cost
    Introduced as the log of survival probability; no independent evidence outside framework

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5702 in / 1313 out tokens · 29755 ms · 2026-06-27T19:17:54.904704+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    C. Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch

    E. Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1900037 [1903.06239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Brennan, F

    T.D. Brennan, F. Carta and C. Vafa,The String Landscape, the Swampland, and the Missing Corner,PoST ASI2017(2017) 015 [1711.00864]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calder´ on-Infante, D. Mirfendereski and I. Valenzuela,Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications,Phys. Rept.989(2022) 1 [2102.01111]

    arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Agmon, A

    N.B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M.J. Kang and C. Vafa,Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland,2212.06187

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Lehnert,Hitchhiker’s guide to the swampland: The cosmologist’s handbook to the string-theoretical swampland programme,Fortsch

    K. Lehnert,Hitchhiker’s guide to the swampland: The cosmologist’s handbook to the string-theoretical swampland programme,Fortsch. Phys.74(2026) [2509.02632]. 31

    arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Ooguri and C

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland, Nucl. Phys. B766(2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    Klaewer and E

    D. Klaewer and E. Palti,Super-Planckian Spatial Field Variations and Quantum Gravity, JHEP01(2017) 088 [1610.00010]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Grimm, E

    T.W. Grimm, E. Palti and I. Valenzuela,Infinite Distances in Field Space and Massless Towers of States,JHEP08(2018) 143 [1802.08264]

    arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Emergent strings from infinite distance limits,JHEP 02(2022) 190 [1910.01135]

    arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Heidenreich, M

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Emergence of Weak Coupling at Large Distance in Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 051601 [1802.08698]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Harlow,Wormholes, Emergent Gauge Fields, and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,JHEP 01(2016) 122 [1510.07911]

    D. Harlow,Wormholes, Emergent Gauge Fields, and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,JHEP 01(2016) 122 [1510.07911]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    Dvali,Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,Fortsch

    G. Dvali,Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,Fortsch. Phys.58(2010) 528 [0706.2050]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  14. [14]

    Dvali and M

    G. Dvali and M. Redi,Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 045027 [0710.4344]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  15. [15]

    Dvali and C

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez,Species and Strings,1004.3744

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Arkani-Hamed, L

    N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa,The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force,JHEP06(2007) 060 [hep-th/0601001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  17. [17]

    Heidenreich, M

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Sharpening the Weak Gravity Conjecture with Dimensional Reduction,JHEP02(2016) 140 [1509.06374]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Bedroya and C

    A. Bedroya and C. Vafa,Trans-Planckian Censorship and the Swampland,JHEP09 (2020) 123 [1909.11063]

    arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Bedroya, R

    A. Bedroya, R. Brandenberger, M. Loverde and C. Vafa,Trans-Planckian Censorship and Inflationary Cosmology,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 103502 [1909.11106]

    arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Brandenberger,Trans-Planckian Censorship Conjecture and Early Universe Cosmology, LHEP2021(2021) 198 [2102.09641]

    R. Brandenberger,Trans-Planckian Censorship Conjecture and Early Universe Cosmology, LHEP2021(2021) 198 [2102.09641]

    arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    C ¸ a˘ gan, O

    S. C ¸ a˘ gan, O. Guleryuz and C.B. Senisik,Supersymmetric horizons at the edge of effective field theory,JHEP09(2025) 151 [2506.18107]

    arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Andriot, N

    D. Andriot, N. Cribiori and D. Erkinger,The web of swampland conjectures and the TCC bound,JHEP07(2020) 162 [2004.00030]. 32

    arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Starobinsky,Stochastic de sitter (inflationary) stage in the early universe,Lect

    A.A. Starobinsky,Stochastic de sitter (inflationary) stage in the early universe,Lect. Notes Phys.246(1986) 107

    1986

  24. [24]

    Starobinsky and J

    A.A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama,Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 6357 [astro-ph/9407016]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  25. [25]

    Rigopoulos, E.P.S

    G.I. Rigopoulos, E.P.S. Shellard and B.J.W. van Tent,Non-linear perturbations in multiple-field inflation,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 083521 [astro-ph/0504508]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  26. [26]

    Vennin and A.A

    V. Vennin and A.A. Starobinsky,Correlation Functions in Stochastic Inflation,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 413 [1506.04732]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    Assadullahi, H

    H. Assadullahi, H. Firouzjahi, M. Noorbala, V. Vennin and D. Wands,Multiple Fields in Stochastic Inflation,JCAP06(2016) 043 [1604.04502]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  28. [28]

    Guleryuz,Non-perpetual eternal inflation and the emergent de Sitter Swampland conjecture,Eur

    O. Guleryuz,Non-perpetual eternal inflation and the emergent de Sitter Swampland conjecture,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 883 [2401.17730]

    arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Doob,Conditional brownian motion and the boundary limits of harmonic functions, Bulletin de la Soci´ et´ e Math´ ematique de France85(1957) 431

    J. Doob,Conditional brownian motion and the boundary limits of harmonic functions, Bulletin de la Soci´ et´ e Math´ ematique de France85(1957) 431

    1957

  30. [30]

    Risken,Fokker-planck equation, inThe Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications, (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp

    H. Risken,Fokker-planck equation, inThe Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications, (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp. 63–95, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (1996), DOI

    1996

  31. [31]

    Redner,A Guide to First-Passage Processes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    S. Redner,A Guide to First-Passage Processes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    2001

  32. [32]

    Collet, S

    P. Collet, S. Mart´ ınez and J. San Mart´ ın,Quasi-Stationary Distributions: Markov Chains, Diffusions and Dynamical Systems, Springer (2013), 10.1007/978-3-642-33131-2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33131-2 2013

  33. [33]

    Chetrite and H

    R. Chetrite and H. Touchette,Nonequilibrium Markov processes conditioned on large deviations,Ann. Henri Poincare16(2015) 2005 [1405.5157]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    Chetrite and H

    R. Chetrite and H. Touchette,Variational and optimal control representations of conditioned and driven processes,J. Stat. Mech.2015(2015) P12001 [1506.05291]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  35. [35]

    Touchette,The large deviation approach to statistical mechanics,Physics Reports478 (2009) 1 [0804.0327]

    H. Touchette,The large deviation approach to statistical mechanics,Physics Reports478 (2009) 1 [0804.0327]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  36. [36]

    Pinsky,Positive Harmonic Functions and Diffusion, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge University Press (1995)

    R.G. Pinsky,Positive Harmonic Functions and Diffusion, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge University Press (1995)

    1995

  37. [37]

    Monthus and A

    C. Monthus and A. Mazzolo,Conditioned diffusion processes with an absorbing boundary condition for finite or infinite horizon,Phys. Rev. E106(2022) 044117 [2202.12047]

    arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Castellano, A

    A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez and L.E. Ib´ a˜ nez,IR/UV mixing, towers of species and swampland conjectures,JHEP08(2022) 217 [2112.10796]. 33

    arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Bedroya, C

    A. Bedroya, C. Vafa and D.H. Wu,Tale of three scales: The Planck, the species, and the black hole scales,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 106011 [2403.18005]

    arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    Caron-Huot and Y.-Z

    S. Caron-Huot and Y.-Z. Li,Gravity and a universal cutoff for field theory,JHEP02 (2025) 115 [2408.06440]

    arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Saraswat,Weak gravity conjecture and effective field theory,Phys

    P. Saraswat,Weak gravity conjecture and effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 025013 [1608.06951]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Brahma,Trans-Planckian censorship conjecture from the swampland distance conjecture, Phys

    S. Brahma,Trans-Planckian censorship conjecture from the swampland distance conjecture, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 046013 [1910.12352]

    arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Obied, H

    G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko and C. Vafa,De Sitter Space and the Swampland, 1806.08362

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Agrawal, G

    P. Agrawal, G. Obied, P.J. Steinhardt and C. Vafa,On the Cosmological Implications of the String Swampland,Phys. Lett. B784(2018) 271 [1806.09718]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Murayama, M

    H. Murayama, M. Yamazaki and T.T. Yanagida,Do We Live in the Swampland?,JHEP 12(2018) 032 [1809.00478]

    arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    Ooguri, E

    H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu and C. Vafa,Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland,Phys. Lett. B788(2019) 180 [1810.05506]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Garg and C

    S.K. Garg and C. Krishnan,Bounds on Slow Roll and the de Sitter Swampland,JHEP11 (2019) 075 [1807.05193]

    arXiv 2019

  48. [48]

    Andriot and C

    D. Andriot and C. Roupec,Further refining the de Sitter swampland conjecture,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1800105 [1811.08889]

    arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Dvali and S.N

    G. Dvali and S.N. Solodukhin,Black Hole Entropy and Gravity Cutoff,0806.3976

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Brustein, G

    R. Brustein, G. Dvali and G. Veneziano,A Bound on the effective gravitational coupling from semiclassical black holes,JHEP10(2009) 085 [0907.5516]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  51. [51]

    Calder´ on-Infante, A

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez and L.E. Ib´ a˜ nez,Entropy bounds and the species scale distance conjecture,JHEP01(2024) 039 [2306.16450]

    arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa and M. Wiesner,Bounds on Species Scale and the Distance Conjecture,Fortsch. Phys.71(2023) 2300143 [2303.13580]

    arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Scalisi,Species Scale and Primordial Gravitational Waves,Fortsch

    M. Scalisi,Species Scale and Primordial Gravitational Waves,Fortsch. Phys.72(2024) 2400033 [2401.09533]

    arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz and I. Valenzuela,Taxonomy of infinite distance limits,JHEP03(2025) 213 [2405.20332]. 34

    arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Giddings, S

    S.B. Giddings, S. Kachru and J. Polchinski,Hierarchies from fluxes in string compactifications,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 106006 [hep-th/0105097]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  56. [56]

    Grana,Flux compactifications in string theory: A Comprehensive review,Phys

    M. Grana,Flux compactifications in string theory: A Comprehensive review,Phys. Rept. 423(2006) 91 [hep-th/0509003]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  57. [57]

    Douglas and S

    M.R. Douglas and S. Kachru,Flux compactification,Rev. Mod. Phys.79(2007) 733 [hep-th/0610102]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  58. [58]

    Denef, M.R

    F. Denef, M.R. Douglas and S. Kachru,Physics of String Flux Compactifications,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.57(2007) 119 [hep-th/0701050]. [59]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A10 [1807.06211]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  59. [59]

    Pinol, S

    L. Pinol, S. Renaux-Petel and Y. Tada,A manifestly covariant theory of multifield stochastic inflation in phase space: solving the discretisation ambiguity in stochastic inflation,JCAP04(2021) 048 [2008.07497]

    arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Castellano, A

    A. Castellano, A. Font, A. Herraez and L.E. Ib´ a˜ nez,A gravitino distance conjecture,JHEP 08(2021) 092 [2104.10181]

    arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Cribiori, D

    N. Cribiori, D. Lust and M. Scalisi,The gravitino and the swampland,JHEP06(2021) 071 [2104.08288]

    arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Bedroya,de Sitter Complementarity, TCC, and the Swampland,LHEP2021(2021) 187 [2010.09760]

    A. Bedroya,de Sitter Complementarity, TCC, and the Swampland,LHEP2021(2021) 187 [2010.09760]

    arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Guleryuz,On the Trans-Planckian Censorship Conjecture and the generalized non-minimal coupling,JCAP11(2021) 043 [2105.10571]

    O. Guleryuz,On the Trans-Planckian Censorship Conjecture and the generalized non-minimal coupling,JCAP11(2021) 043 [2105.10571]. 35

    arXiv 2021