REVIEW 1 cited by
RBF-PINN: Non-Fourier Positional Embedding in Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
RBF-PINN: Non-Fourier Positional Embedding in Physics-Informed Neural Networks
read the original abstract
While many recent Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) variants have had considerable success in solving Partial Differential Equations, the empirical benefits of feature mapping drawn from the broader Neural Representations research have been largely overlooked. We highlight the limitations of widely used Fourier-based feature mapping in certain situations and suggest the use of the conditionally positive definite Radial Basis Function. The empirical findings demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach across a variety of forward and inverse problem cases. Our method can be seamlessly integrated into coordinate-based input neural networks and contribute to the wider field of PINNs research.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
EvoPINN: Agentic Discovery of Executable Algorithms for Physics-Informed Neural Networks
An LLM-guided, execution-verified evolutionary search discovered PINN training algorithms that beat the seed network on four PDE benchmarks and matched expert-designed baselines on three.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.