Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the Representation Collapse of Sparse Mixture of Experts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.09179 v3 pith:JGJCN27P submitted 2022-04-20 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords routingexpertsrepresentationcollapseachievesconsistentmechanismmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sparse mixture of experts provides larger model capacity while requiring a constant computational overhead. It employs the routing mechanism to distribute input tokens to the best-matched experts according to their hidden representations. However, learning such a routing mechanism encourages token clustering around expert centroids, implying a trend toward representation collapse. In this work, we propose to estimate the routing scores between tokens and experts on a low-dimensional hypersphere. We conduct extensive experiments on cross-lingual language model pre-training and fine-tuning on downstream tasks. Experimental results across seven multilingual benchmarks show that our method achieves consistent gains. We also present a comprehensive analysis on the representation and routing behaviors of our models. Our method alleviates the representation collapse issue and achieves more consistent routing than the baseline mixture-of-experts methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Neural Inhibition Improves Dynamic Routing and Mixture of Experts

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Neural inhibition gating on MoE router inputs improves a synthetic digit/squares benchmark by about four points over plain MoE, but the language-model evidence is unreliable.

Pith tools