Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

FinDABench: Benchmarking Financial Data Analysis Ability of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.02982 v4 pith:JGK7I3YM submitted 2024-01-01 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords analysisfinancialabilitydatafindabenchmodelsllmstexttt
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a wide range of tasks. However, their proficiency and reliability in the specialized domain of financial data analysis, particularly focusing on data-driven thinking, remain uncertain. To bridge this gap, we introduce \texttt{FinDABench}, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the financial data analysis capabilities of LLMs within this context. \texttt{FinDABench} assesses LLMs across three dimensions: 1) \textbf{Foundational Ability}, evaluating the models' ability to perform financial numerical calculation and corporate sentiment risk assessment; 2) \textbf{Reasoning Ability}, determining the models' ability to quickly comprehend textual information and analyze abnormal financial reports; and 3) \textbf{Technical Skill}, examining the models' use of technical knowledge to address real-world data analysis challenges involving analysis generation and charts visualization from multiple perspectives. We will release \texttt{FinDABench}, and the evaluation scripts at \url{https://github.com/cubenlp/BIBench}. \texttt{FinDABench} aims to provide a measure for in-depth analysis of LLM abilities and foster the advancement of LLMs in the field of financial data analysis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AI Analyst: Framework and Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models for Financial Time Series Report Generation

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs such as GPT-4o can generate coherent financial reports from time series data, and a proposed highlighting system categorizes report segments by whether they stem from data, reasoning, or external knowledge.

  2. Expect the Unexpected: FailSafe Long Context QA for Finance

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FailSafeQA, a 220-example financial long-context benchmark, shows no tested LLM can both stay robust to input perturbations and refuse to hallucinate when context is missing or irrelevant.

  3. Harnessing Generative LLMs for Enhanced Financial Event Entity Extraction Performance

    cs.CL 2025-04 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A LoRA-fine-tuned generative LLM that outputs JSON entities and spans achieves F1 0.945 on CCKS 2019, beating the previous best 0.934.

Pith tools