Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 1 cited by

Gravitational-wave standard sirens and application in cosmology

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-30 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Gravitational-wave signals from compact binary mergers provide luminosity distances that can be paired with redshifts to measure the Universe's expansion history independently.

desk verdict This is a review paper restating the standard-siren framework with no new results or derivations. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.08595 v2 pith:JH4MCCVM submitted 2026-05-09 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Wen Zhao , Liang-Gui Zhu , Youjun Lu This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords gravitationalwavesstandardsirenscosmologyHubbleconstantdarkenergybinarymergersluminositydistancemulti-messengerastronomy
topics Dark Energy
open problems Dark Energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reviews how gravitational-wave observations from merging neutron stars and black holes yield a direct measurement of luminosity distance based on the waveform amplitude. When this distance is combined with a redshift obtained either from electromagnetic counterparts or statistical host-galaxy associations, the events function as standard sirens for cosmology. The review examines three classes of sirens and projects the precision reachable with second- and third-generation ground-based detectors plus space-based observatories on parameters such as the Hubble constant and dark-energy equation of state. A reader cares because the method supplies a distance indicator that bypasses the usual electromagnetic distance ladder and its calibration uncertainties. The discussion also outlines the main technical challenges in waveform modeling, counterpart identification, and selection effects.

What carries the argument

The standard siren method, which extracts luminosity distance directly from the gravitational-wave waveform and pairs it with redshift information to infer cosmological parameters.

What would settle it

A catalog of dozens of standard-siren events that yields a Hubble-constant value discrepant from both cosmic-microwave-background and local-distance-ladder results at more than 3-sigma significance would indicate that the pairing or distance extraction step is systematically biased.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Observations of gravitational-wave signals from compact binary mergers enable an independent measurement of the luminosity distance to the source. This implies that gravitational-wave sources can serve as standard sirens to probe the expansion history of the Universe, providing a new approach to constrain cosmological parameters such as the Hubble constant and dark energy properties.

Load-bearing premise

The luminosity distance extracted from the gravitational-wave waveform can be reliably paired with a redshift measurement without large systematic biases from waveform modeling or selection effects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Bright sirens from binary neutron star mergers with electromagnetic counterparts can deliver sub-percent measurements of the Hubble constant once a sufficient number of events are detected.
  • Dark sirens from stellar-mass binary black hole mergers can be used statistically even without counterparts, albeit with larger uncertainties that decrease as detector sensitivity improves.
  • Lensed gravitational-wave events add an independent magnification-based distance probe that can tighten dark-energy constraints.
  • Third-generation ground-based detectors and space-based observatories are projected to reach percent-level precision on the dark-energy equation-of-state parameter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the method reaches the forecasted precision, it could provide an independent cross-check on the current tension between early- and late-Universe Hubble-constant measurements.
  • Statistical redshift assignment for dark sirens may require careful population modeling to avoid selection biases that mimic changes in cosmological parameters.
  • Combining standard-siren data with traditional probes could reduce the impact of any single-method systematic error on dark-energy inferences.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review of gravitational-wave standard sirens, covering the extraction of luminosity distance from compact binary merger waveforms, methods for obtaining redshifts (electromagnetic counterparts or statistical host association), and the cosmological constraining power of bright sirens (BNS with EM counterparts), dark sirens (stellar-mass BBH), and dark lensed sirens. It discusses second- and third-generation ground-based detectors as well as space-based detectors for measuring the Hubble constant and dark energy parameters.

Significance. As a review that consolidates the standard-siren framework already validated by events such as GW170817, the paper provides a useful synthesis of established methods and detector prospects. It does not advance new derivations or falsifiable predictions but offers a consolidated overview of the three siren classes and their application to cosmology.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrasing 'providing a new approach' could be clarified to emphasize that the method is an established extension of GR waveform analysis rather than a novel theoretical framework.
  2. The manuscript should include a dedicated section or table comparing the systematic uncertainties (waveform modeling, selection effects, host-galaxy matching) across the three siren types to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of our review manuscript on gravitational-wave standard sirens and for recommending minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Review paper restates established framework with no derivation chain

full rationale

This is a review article that summarizes the standard-siren method (luminosity distance from GW waveform amplitude paired with redshift) without advancing any new derivation, ansatz, or prediction. The central claim reduces to the GR result already validated externally by GW170817 and subsequent analyses; no equations or steps in the provided text reduce by construction to fitted inputs or self-citations. All referenced methods are drawn from prior independent literature.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational-wave standard sirens and application in cosmology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JH4MCCVM

@misc{pith2026260508595,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational-wave standard sirens and application in cosmology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JH4MCCVM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.08595}
}
read the original abstract

The discovery of the gravitational-wave event GW170817 from a binary neutron star merger, together with its multi-wavelength electromagnetic counterparts, marks the beginning of the era of multi-messenger gravitational-wave astronomy. Observations of gravitational-wave signals from compact binary mergers enable an independent measurement of the luminosity distance to the source. This implies that gravitational-wave sources can serve as "standard sirens" to probe the expansion history of the Universe, providing a new approach to constrain cosmological parameters. In this paper, we review the basic principles of using gravitational-wave standard sirens to constrain cosmology. We discuss various methods for determining the source distance and redshift, as well as the capabilities of second- and third-generation ground-based detectors and space-based detectors in constraining cosmological parameters, especially the Hubble constant and dark energy parameters. By examining three types of standard sirens: binary neutron star mergers with electromagnetic counterparts as bright sirens, stellar-mass binary black hole mergers as dark sirens, and the dark lensed sirens, we illustrate the methodology, challenges, and future prospects of the standard siren approach.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Model-independent H0 from GWTC-4 standard sirens and TDCOSMO 2025 strong lensing time delays

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Combining GWTC-4 standard sirens with TDCOSMO2025 lensing data under the distance sum rule yields H0 = 83.78 +12.53/-10.23 km/s/Mpc (13.6% precision) in one configuration, consistent with both Planck and SH0ES.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · 138 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2026, JCAP , 2026, 0 81 3, 16

    Abac, A., Abramo, R., Albanesi, S., et al. 2026, JCAP , 2026, 0 81 3, 16

    work page 2026

  2. [2]

    GWTC-4.0: Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion Rate and Modified Gravitational-wave Propagation

    Abac, A. G., Abouelfettouh, I., Acernese, F., et al. 2025a, a rXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.04348 15

    work page Pith review arXiv

  3. [4]

    P ., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P ., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2016, Phys. Re v. Lett., 116, 061102 2, 3

    work page 2016

  4. [5]

    P ., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P ., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2019, Astroph ys. J. Lett., 882, L24 15, 16

    work page 2019

  5. [6]

    D., Abraham, S., et al

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., et al. 2021, Astrophy s. J. Lett., 915, L5 3

    work page 2021

  6. [7]

    2025, Phys

    Abbott, R., Abe, H., Acernese, F., et al. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 1 12, 084080 2

    work page 2025

  7. [8]

    E., Drever, R

    Abramovici, A., Althouse, W . E., Drever, R. W . P ., et al. 1992, Science, 256, 325 3

    work page 1992

  8. [9]

    2015, Classi cal and Quantum Gravity, 32, 024001 3

    Acernese, F., Agathos, M., Agatsuma, K., et al. 2015, Classi cal and Quantum Gravity, 32, 024001 3

    work page 2015

Show all 138 references
  1. [10]

    2004, Classical a nd Quantum Gravity, 21, S385 3

    Acernese, F., Amico, P ., Arnaud, N., et al. 2004, Classical a nd Quantum Gravity, 21, S385 3

    2004

  2. [11]

    M., et al

    Agazie, G., Anumarlapudi, A., Archibald, A. M., et al. 2023, Astrophys. J. Lett., 951, L8 5

    2023

  3. [12]

    2023, L iving Reviews in Relativity, 26, 2 4, 21

    Amaro-Seoane, P ., Andrews, J., Arca Sedda, M., et al. 2023, L iving Reviews in Relativity, 26, 2 4, 21

    2023

  4. [13]

    2017, arXiv e -prints, arXiv:1702.00786 3, 22 36 W

    Amaro-Seoane, P ., Audley, H., Babak, S., et al. 2017, arXiv e -prints, arXiv:1702.00786 3, 22 36 W. Zhao et al

    2017 arXiv

  5. [14]

    G., Iyer, B

    Arun, K. G., Iyer, B. R., Sathyaprakash, B. S., Sinha, S., & va n den Broeck, C. 2007, Phys. Rev. D, 76, 104016 21

    2007

  6. [15]

    T., Blumer, H., et al

    Arzoumanian, Z., Baker, P . T., Blumer, H., et al. 2020, Astro phys. J. Lett., 905, L34 5

    2020

  7. [16]

    2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1705.04397 2

    Asmodelle, E. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1705.04397 2

    2017 arXiv

  8. [17]

    2023, Living Reviews in Relativity, 26, 5 4, 5, 22

    Auclair, P ., Bacon, D., Baker, T., et al. 2023, Living Reviews in Relativity, 26, 5 4, 5, 22

    2023

  9. [18]

    D., Barbier, L

    Barthelmy, S. D., Barbier, L. M., Cummings, J. R., et al. 2005 , Space Sci. Rev., 120, 143 27

    2005

  10. [19]

    2016, Astron

    Belczynski, K., Heger, A., Gladysz, W ., et al. 2016, Astron. Astrophys., 594, A97 15

    2016

  11. [20]

    C., Kulkarni, S

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Barlow, T., et al. 2019, Publ. A stron. Soc. Pac., 131, 068003 25

    2019

  12. [21]

    G., & Sathyapra kash, B

    Borhanian, S., Dhani, A., Gupta, A., Arun, K. G., & Sathyapra kash, B. S. 2020, Astrophys. J. Lett., 905, L28 17

    2020

  13. [22]

    A., Keane, E., & Wagg, J

    Braun, R., Bourke, T., Green, J. A., Keane, E., & Wagg, J. 2015, in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), 174 5, 11

    2015

  14. [23]

    R., Charisi, M., et al

    Burke-Spolaor, S., Taylor, S. R., Charisi, M., et al. 2019, A stron. Astrophys. Rev., 27, 5 5

    2019

  15. [24]

    2024, Fundamental Rese arch, 4, 1072 24

    Cai, R.-G., Guo, Z.-K., Hu, B., et al. 2024, Fundamental Rese arch, 4, 1072 24

    2024

  16. [25]

    2017, JCAP , 2017, 03123

    Cai, R.-G., Tamanini, N., & Y ang, T. 2017, JCAP , 2017, 03123

    2017

  17. [26]

    2017, Phys

    Cai, R.-G., & Y ang, T. 2017, Phys. Rev. D, 95, 044024 21

    2017

  18. [27]

    2023, Phys

    Califano, M., de Martino, I., V ernieri, D., & Capozziello, S . 2023, Phys. Rev. D, 107, 123519 17

    2023

  19. [28]

    R., Rossi, L

    Chattopadhyay, D., Stevenson, S., Hurley, J. R., Rossi, L. J ., & Flynn, C. 2020, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 494, 1587 15

    2020

  20. [29]

    Chen, H.-Y ., Fishbach, M., & Holz, D. E. 2018, Nature, 562, 54 5 18

    2018

  21. [30]

    2019, Physical Review X, 9, 031028 8

    Chen, H.-Y ., Vitale, S., & Narayan, R. 2019, Physical Review X, 9, 031028 8

    2019

  22. [31]

    N., Guo, Y

    Chen, S., Caballero, R. N., Guo, Y . J., et al. 2021, Mon. Not. R . Astron. Soc., 508, 4970 5

    2021

  23. [32]

    2001, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 10, 213 20

    Chevallier, M., & Polarski, D. 2001, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 10, 213 20

    2001

  24. [33]

    2025, Astrophys

    Chu, Q., Lu, Y ., & Y u, S. 2025, Astrophys. J., 980, 181 15

    2025

  25. [34]

    2022, Mon

    Chu, Q., Y u, S., & Lu, Y . 2022, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 509, 1557 15

    2022

  26. [35]

    2024, arXiv e-p rints, arXiv:2402.07571 3

    Colpi, M., Danzmann, K., Hewitson, M., et al. 2024, arXiv e-p rints, arXiv:2402.07571 3

    2024 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Cutler, C., & Holz, D. E. 2009, Phys. Rev. D, 80, 104009 11, 24 Del Pozzo, W . 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 86, 043011 12 Del Pozzo, W ., Li, T. G. F., & Messenger, C. 2017, Phys. Rev. D, 95, 043502 13

    2009

  28. [37]

    E., Hall, P

    Dewdney, P . E., Hall, P . J., Schilizzi, R. T., & Lazio, T. J. L.W . 2009, IEEE Proceedings, 97, 1482 5, 11 Di V alentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., et al. 2021, Classical an d Quantum Gravity, 38, 153001 17

    2009

  29. [38]

    2019, JCAP , 2019, 03 3 12

    Ding, X., Biesiada, M., Zheng, X., et al. 2019, JCAP , 2019, 03 3 12

    2019

  30. [39]

    2025, Philosophical Transactions of the Roy al Society of London Series A, 383, 20240022 2 EPTA Collaboration, Antoniadis, J., Babak, S., et al

    Efstathiou, G. 2025, Philosophical Transactions of the Roy al Society of London Series A, 383, 20240022 2 EPTA Collaboration, Antoniadis, J., Babak, S., et al. 2023, Astron. Astrophys., 678, A48 5 Gravitational-wave standard sirens and application in cos mology 37

    2025

  31. [40]

    X., Afle, C., et al

    Evans, M., Adhikari, R. X., Afle, C., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prin ts, arXiv:2109.09882 3, 16

    2021 arXiv

  32. [41]

    M., & Holz, D

    Ezquiaga, J. M., & Holz, D. E. 2022, Phys. Rev. Lett., 129, 061 102 15, 16

    2022

  33. [42]

    Fan, X., Messenger, C., & Heng, I. S. 2014, Astrophys. J., 795 , 43 8

    2014

  34. [43]

    Fan, X., Messenger, C., & Heng, I. S. 2017, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1 19, 181102 8

    2017

  35. [44]

    M., Fishbach, M., Y e, J., & Holz, D

    Farr, W . M., Fishbach, M., Y e, J., & Holz, D. E. 2019, Astrophys. J. Lett., 883, L42 15

    2019

  36. [45]

    M., Peiris, H

    Feeney, S. M., Peiris, H. V ., Williamson, A. R., et al. 2019, P hys. Rev. Lett., 122, 061105 17

    2019

  37. [46]

    Ferreira, P . G. 2019, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 57, 335 2

    2019

  38. [47]

    Fishbach, M., & Holz, D. E. 2017, Astrophys. J. Lett., 851, L2 5 15

    2017

  39. [48]

    S., & Backer, D

    Foster, R. S., & Backer, D. C. 1990, Astrophys. J., 361, 300 5

    1990

  40. [49]

    Freedman, W . L. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0169 17

    2017

  41. [50]

    L., Belczynski, K., Wiktorowicz, G., et al

    Fryer, C. L., Belczynski, K., Wiktorowicz, G., et al. 2012, A strophys. J., 749, 91 15

    2012

  42. [51]

    M., Reardon, D

    Goncharov, B., Shannon, R. M., Reardon, D. J., et al. 2021, As trophys. J. Lett., 917, L19 5

    2021

  43. [52]

    2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 881 24 G¨ otz, D., Paul, J., Basa, S., et al

    Gong, Y ., Luo, J., & Wang, B. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 881 24 G¨ otz, D., Paul, J., Basa, S., et al. 2009, in Gamma-ray Burst : Sixth Huntsville Symposium, American Institute of Physics Conference Series , vol. 1133, edited by C. Meegan, C. Kouveliotou, & N. Gehrels , 25–30...

    2021

  44. [53]

    J., Ford, K

    Graham, M. J., Ford, K. E. S., McKernan, B., et al. 2020, Phys. Rev. Lett., 124, 251102 10

    2020

  45. [54]

    J., Kulkarni, S

    Graham, M. J., Kulkarni, S. R., Bellm, E. C., et al. 2019, Publ . Astron. Soc. Pac., 131, 078001 25

    2019

  46. [55]

    2023, JCAP , 2023, 023 15

    Gray, R., Beirnaert, F., Karathanasis, C., et al. 2023, JCAP , 2023, 023 15

    2023

  47. [56]

    2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 1879 2

    Gu, G., Wang, X., Wang, Y ., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 1879 2

    2025

  48. [57]

    2017, Astrophy s

    Guidorzi, C., Margutti, R., Brout, D., et al. 2017, Astrophy s. J. Lett., 851, L36 8

    2017

  49. [58]

    M., Fritschel, P ., Shaddock, D

    Harry, G. M., Fritschel, P ., Shaddock, D. A., Folkner, W ., & P hinney, E. S. 2006, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 23, 4887 4, 24

    2006

  50. [59]

    2026, Astrophys

    He, L., Liu, Z.-Y ., Niu, R., et al. 2026, Astrophys. J. Suppl. , 282, 13 10

    2026

  51. [60]

    2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.05144 10

    He, L., Zhu, L.-G., Liu, Z.-Y ., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.05144 10

    arXiv

  52. [61]

    Heger, A., & Woosley, S. E. 2002, Astrophys. J., 567, 532 15

    2002

  53. [62]

    D., Lang, R

    Hinderer, T., Lackey, B. D., Lang, R. N., & Read, J. S. 2010, Ph ys. Rev. D, 81, 123016 13

    2010

  54. [63]

    E., & Hughes, S

    Holz, D. E., & Hughes, S. A. 2005, Astrophys. J., 629, 15 5

    2005

  55. [64]

    2017, National Science Review, 4, 6854, 23 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S

    Hu, W .-R., & Wu, Y .-L. 2017, National Science Review, 4, 6854, 23 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, Astrophys. J., 873, 111 11, 25, 27

    2017

  56. [65]

    2026, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 69, 220401 2

    Jin, S.-J., Song, J.-Y ., Sun, T.-Y ., et al. 2026, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 69, 220401 2

    2026

  57. [66]

    2024, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 67, 220412 24 Kagra Collaboration, Akutsu, T., Ando, M., et al

    Jin, S.-J., Zhang, Y .-Z., Song, J.-Y ., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang , X. 2024, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 67, 220412 24 Kagra Collaboration, Akutsu, T., Ando, M., et al. 2019, Natu re Astronomy, 3, 35 3

    2024

  58. [67]

    2017, Nature, 551, 80 10

    Kasen, D., Metzger, B., Barnes, J., Quataert, E., & Ramirez- Ruiz, E. 2017, Nature, 551, 80 10

    2017

  59. [68]

    2006, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 23, S125 4, 24 38 W

    Kawamura, S., Nakamura, T., Ando, M., et al. 2006, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 23, S125 4, 24 38 W. Zhao et al

    2006

  60. [69]

    Kiziltan, B., Kottas, A., De Y oreo, M., & Thorsett, S. E. 2013 , Astrophys. J., 778, 66 14

    2013

  61. [70]

    2016, Phys

    Klein, A., Barausse, E., Sesana, A., et al. 2016, Phys. Rev. D , 93, 024003 6, 12, 21

    2016

  62. [71]

    2021, Mon

    Laghi, D., Tamanini, N., Del Pozzo, W ., et al. 2021, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 508, 4512 5

    2021

  63. [72]

    2022, Phys

    Leandro, H., Marra, V ., & Sturani, R. 2022, Phys. Rev. D, 105, 023523 16

    2022

  64. [73]

    2025, Reports on Progress in Physics, 88, 056901 4, 23

    Li, E.-K., Liu, S., Torres-Orjuela, A., et al. 2025, Reports on Progress in Physics, 88, 056901 4, 23

    2025

  65. [74]

    Q., Wen, X

    Li, X. Q., Wen, X. Y ., An, Z. H., et al. 2022, Radiation Detecti on Technology and Methods, 6, 12 27

    2022

  66. [75]

    2024, Astrophys

    Li, Y .-J., Tang, S.-P ., Wang, Y .-Z., & Fan, Y .-Z. 2024, Astrophys. J., 976, 153 15

    2024

  67. [76]

    201 7, Nature Communications, 8, 1148 8, 9 LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Aasi, J., Abbott, B

    Liao, K., Fan, X.-L., Ding, X., Biesiada, M., & Zhu, Z.-H. 201 7, Nature Communications, 8, 1148 8, 9 LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Aasi, J., Abbott, B. P ., et al . 2015, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32, 074001 3

    2015

  68. [77]

    Linder, E. V . 2003, Phys. Rev. Lett., 90, 091301 20

    2003

  69. [78]

    2026, Astrophys

    Liu, Z., Xu, Z., Jiang, J.-a., et al. 2026, Astrophys. J. Lett ., 1000, L20 10, 25

    2026

  70. [79]

    2023, Astrophys

    Liu, Z.-Y ., Lin, Z.-Y ., Y u, J.-M., et al. 2023, Astrophys. J., 947, 59 10

    2023

  71. [80]

    2025, JCAP , 2025, 0 62 2

    Louis, T., La Posta, A., Atkins, Z., et al. 2025, JCAP , 2025, 0 62 2

    2025

  72. [81]

    2026, Living Reviews in Relat ivity, 29, 1 4, 23

    Luo, J., An, H., Bian, L., et al. 2026, Living Reviews in Relat ivity, 29, 1 4, 23

    2026

  73. [82]

    2025, Classical and Quantum G ravity, 42, 173001 4, 23

    Luo, J., Bai, S., Bai, Y ., et al. 2025, Classical and Quantum G ravity, 42, 173001 4, 23

    2025

  74. [83]

    2016, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33, 035010 4, 23

    Luo, J., Chen, L.-S., Duan, H.-Z., et al. 2016, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33, 035010 4, 23

    2016

  75. [84]

    2022, Chinese Journal of Space Sci ence, 42, 536 4, 23

    Luo, Z., Zhang, M., & Wu, Y . 2022, Chinese Journal of Space Sci ence, 42, 536 4, 23

    2022

  76. [85]

    L., & Hogan, C

    MacLeod, C. L., & Hogan, C. J. 2008, Phys. Rev. D, 77, 043512 5, 12

    2008

  77. [86]

    P ., Keane, E., Grainge, K., et al

    Macquart, J. P ., Keane, E., Grainge, K., et al. 2015, in Advan cing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), 55 5, 11 Maga˜ na Hernandez, I., & Palmese, A. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.03607 15

    2015

  78. [87]

    2020, JC AP , 2020, 050 3

    Maggiore, M., V an Den Broeck, C., Bartolo, N., et al. 2020, JC AP , 2020, 050 3

    2020

  79. [88]

    2025, Astrophys

    Mali, U., & Essick, R. 2025, Astrophys. J., 980, 85 15

    2025

  80. [89]

    2021, Annu

    Margutti, R., & Chornock, R. 2021, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrop hys., 59, 155 25

    2021

  81. [90]

    2023, Phys

    Mastrogiovanni, S., Laghi, D., Gray, R., et al. 2023, Phys. R ev. D, 108, 042002 15

    2023

  82. [91]

    N., et al

    Meegan, C., Lichti, G., Bhat, P . N., et al. 2009, Astrophys. J ., 702, 791 27

    2009

  83. [92]

    2012, Phys

    Messenger, C., & Read, J. 2012, Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 091101 13

    2012

  84. [93]

    Messenger, C., Takami, K., Gossan, S., Rezzolla, L., & Sathy aprakash, B. S. 2014, Phys. Rev. X, 4, 041004 14

    2014

  85. [94]

    Metzger, B. D. 2020, Living Reviews in Relativity, 23, 1 25

    2020

  86. [95]

    D., & Berger, E

    Metzger, B. D., & Berger, E. 2012, Astrophys. J., 746, 48 25

    2012

  87. [96]

    T., Shannon, R

    Miles, M. T., Shannon, R. M., Reardon, D. J., et al. 2025, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 536, 1489 5

    2025

  88. [97]

    P ., Deller, A

    Mooley, K. P ., Deller, A. T., Gottlieb, O., et al. 2018, Natur e, 561, 355 26

    2018

  89. [98]

    2022, Mon

    Mukherjee, S. 2022, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 515, 5495 16

    2022

  90. [99]

    2007, Phys

    Nakar, E. 2007, Phys. Rept., 442, 166 9, 11

    2007

  91. [100]

    2012, Phys

    Nishizawa, A., Y agi, K., Taruya, A., & Tanaka, T. 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 85, 044047 16, 24

    2012

  92. [101]

    2023, Contemporary Physics, 64, 47 11 Gravitational-wave standard sirens and application in cos mology 39

    Padovani, P ., & Cirasuolo, M. 2023, Contemporary Physics, 64, 47 11 Gravitational-wave standard sirens and application in cos mology 39

    2023

  93. [102]

    Palmese, A., deVicente, J., Pereira, M. E. S., et al. 2020, As trophys. J. Lett., 900, L33 5, 12

    2020

  94. [103]

    Perera, B. B. P ., DeCesar, M. E., Demorest, P . B., et al. 2019, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 490, 4666 5

    2019

  95. [104]

    2022, New Astron

    Perivolaropoulos, L., & Skara, F. 2022, New Astron. Rev., 95 , 101659 17

    2022

  96. [105]

    2011, Astrophys

    Petiteau, A., Babak, S., & Sesana, A. 2011, Astrophys. J., 73 2, 82 5, 12 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y ., et al. 2020a, Astron. Astrophys., 641, A6 2 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y ., et al. 2020b, Astron. Astrophys., 641, A6 2, 17

    2011

  97. [106]

    2010, Class

    Punturo, M., Abernathy, M., Acernese, F., et al. 2010, Class . Quant. Grav., 27, 194002 3

    2010

  98. [107]

    J., Zic, A., Shannon, R

    Reardon, D. J., Zic, A., Shannon, R. M., et al. 2023, Astrophy s. J. Lett., 951, L6 5

    2023

  99. [108]

    G., Y uan, W ., Macri, L

    Riess, A. G., Y uan, W ., Macri, L. M., et al. 2022, Astrophys. J. Lett., 934, L7 2, 17

    2022

  100. [109]

    S., Schutz, B

    Sathyaprakash, B. S., Schutz, B. F., & V an Den Broeck, C. 2010 , Class. Quant. Grav., 27, 215006 20

    2010

  101. [110]

    Schutz, B. F. 1986, Nature, 323, 310 2, 6

    1986

  102. [111]

    2001, Phys

    Seto, N., Kawamura, S., & Nakamura, T. 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 87, 221103 16, 24

    2001

  103. [112]

    J., Chen, T.-W ., Jerkstrand, A., et al

    Smartt, S. J., Chen, T.-W ., Jerkstrand, A., et al. 2017, Natu re, 551, 75 10

    2017

  104. [113]

    2019, As trophys

    Soares-Santos, M., Palmese, A., Hartley, W ., et al. 2019, As trophys. J. Lett., 876, L7 5, 12

    2019

  105. [114]

    2025, Astro phys

    Song, J.-Y ., Qi, J.-Z., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. 2025, Astro phys. J. Lett., 985, L44 12

    2025

  106. [115]

    2024, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 67, 230411 12

    Song, J.-Y ., Wang, L.-F., Li, Y ., et al. 2024, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 67, 230411 12

    2024

  107. [116]

    2017, Mon

    Spera, M., & Mapelli, M. 2017, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 470, 4739 16

    2017

  108. [117]

    Takahashi, R., & TAMA Collaboration 2004, Classical and Qua ntum Gravity, 21, S403 3

    2004

  109. [118]

    2016, JCAP , 2 016, 002 5, 12, 21

    Tamanini, N., Caprini, C., Barausse, E., et al. 2016, JCAP , 2 016, 002 5, 12, 21

    2016

  110. [119]

    M., Kramer, M., Freire, P

    Tauris, T. M., Kramer, M., Freire, P . C. C., et al. 2017, Astro phys. J., 846, 170 15

    2017

  111. [120]

    R., & Gair, J

    Taylor, S. R., & Gair, J. R. 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 86, 023502 14

    2012

  112. [121]

    R., Gair, J

    Taylor, S. R., Gair, J. R., & Mandel, I. 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 85, 023535 14 The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration , the KAGRA Collaboration, et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.18083 6 The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration , the KAGR...

    2012 arXiv

  113. [122]

    2024 , Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 67, 259511 24

    Torres-Orjuela, A., Huang, S.-J., Liang, Z.-C., et al. 2024 , Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 67, 259511 24

    2024

  114. [123]

    2017, Nature, 551, 71 9

    Troja, E., Piro, L., van Eerten, H., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 71 9

    2017

  115. [124]

    Unnikrishnan, C. S. 2013, International Journal of Modern P hysics D, 22, 1341010 3 van den Broeck, C., Trias, M., Sathyaprakash, B. S., & Sintes , A. M. 2010, Phys. Rev. D, 81, 124031 21 V erde, L., Treu, T., & Riess, A. G. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 891 2

    2013

  116. [125]

    2018, Phys

    Vitale, S., & Chen, H.-Y . 2018, Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 021303 5

    2018

  117. [126]

    2020, Astrophys

    Wang, B., Zhu, Z., Li, A., & Zhao, W . 2020, Astrophys. J. Suppl ., 250, 6 14

    2020

  118. [127]

    2021, Phys

    Wang, G., Ni, W .-T., Han, W .-B., Xu, P ., & Luo, Z. 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 104, 024012 24 40 W. Zhao et al

    2021

  119. [128]

    2019, Phys

    Wang, H.-T., Jiang, Z., Sesana, A., et al. 2019, Phys. Rev. D, 100, 043003 23

    2019

  120. [129]

    2022, National Science Review, 9, nwab054 23, 24

    Wang, R., Ruan, W .-H., Y ang, Q., et al. 2022, National Science Review, 9, nwab054 23, 24

    2022

  121. [130]

    2023, Science China Physics , Mechanics, and Astronomy, 66, 109512 10, 11, 25, 28

    Wang, T., Liu, G., Cai, Z., et al. 2023, Science China Physics , Mechanics, and Astronomy, 66, 109512 10, 11, 25, 28

    2023

  122. [131]

    Will, C. M. 2001, Living Reviews in Relativity, 4, 4 2

    2001

  123. [132]

    2002, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 19, 1377 3

    Willke, B., Aufmuth, P ., Aulbert, C., et al. 2002, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 19, 1377 3

    2002

  124. [133]

    Woosley, S. E. 2017, Astrophys. J., 836, 244 15

    2017

  125. [134]

    2023, Research in Astronomy a nd Astrophysics, 23, 075024 5 Y an, C., Zhao, W ., & Lu, Y

    Xu, H., Chen, S., Guo, Y ., et al. 2023, Research in Astronomy a nd Astrophysics, 23, 075024 5 Y an, C., Zhao, W ., & Lu, Y . 2020, Astrophys. J., 889, 795 Y u, J., Liu, Z., Y ang, X., et al. 2024, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 270, 24 10 Y u, J., Song, H., Ai, S., et al. 2021, Astrop...

    2023

  126. [135]

    Zhao, W ., van den Broeck, C., Baskaran, D., & Li, T. G. F. 2011, Phys. Rev. D, 83, 023005 7, 16, 21

    2011

  127. [136]

    2018, Phys

    Zhao, W ., & Wen, L. 2018, Phys. Rev. D, 97, 064031 7, 11, 16, 19, 21, 22

    2018

  128. [137]

    J., et al

    Zhao, W ., Zhang, X., Liu, X. J., et al. 2017, Progress in Astro nomy, 35, 316 5

    2017

  129. [138]

    2020, Science Bulletin, 65, 1340 23

    Zhao, Z.-W ., Wang, L.-F., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. 2020, Science Bulletin, 65, 1340 23

    2020

  130. [139]

    2022, Physical Review Research, 4, 013247 23, 24

    Zhu, L.-G., Hu, Y .-M., Wang, H.-T., et al. 2022, Physical Review Research, 4, 013247 23, 24

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed June 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.