Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 60 references

One Yukawa coupling ties dark matter to B-decay anomalies.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 00:05 UTC pith:JHZHQHCU

load-bearing objection The central new interaction in Eq. (2.5) is not gauge invariant under the paper's own charge assignments, so the claimed S1-mediated DM–flavor link does not exist; the reader's rejection is right, but the deeper problem is the one flagged in the stress-test note. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2602.11571 v2 pith:JHZHQHCU submitted 2026-02-12 hep-ph

Probing mixed-state dark matter and flavor observables in a scalar-assisted baryonic gauge theory

Taramati , Manas Kumar Mohapatra , Utkarsh Patel , Rukmani Mohanta , Sudhanwa Patra This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords dark matterU(1)_B gauge symmetryb→s μ+μ− anomaliesflavor-changing neutral currentscoannihilationcolored scalar mediatorrelic densitydirect detection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish that a single extension of the Standard Model—gauging baryon number and adding a colored scalar S1—can simultaneously govern the dark-matter relic abundance and the flavor-changing neutral-current transitions behind b→s μ+μ− anomalies. The load-bearing step is that the same Yukawa coupling Y_S1 controls both the DM annihilation/coannihilation strengths mediated by S1 and the loop-induced contributions to the Wilson coefficients C9 and C10. If true, flavor and dark-matter measurements are not independent probes: they carve out one common allowed parameter space. The paper further claims that within this space the DM constraints are the stronger ones, while flavor observables stay close to their Standard Model predictions, and that upcoming direct-detection and gamma-ray searches can falsify the model.

Core claim

The central claim is that the Yukawa interaction Y_S1 q̄ S1 Ψ_R connects the quark sector to the dark sector so tightly that one coupling sets the scale of both B-meson flavor anomalies and DM freeze-out. The dark-matter candidate is a mixed fermion, dominantly singlet-like, stabilized by residual symmetry after U(1)_B breaking. The scalar S1 opens coannihilation channels that make relic density achievable for DM masses of roughly 100 GeV to 2 TeV with gauge coupling g_B between about 0.02 and 0.06 and Y_S1 between about 0.005 and 1. Flavor constraints from b→s μ+μ− observables allow a broad region, but the combined DM+flavor allowed region is cut down mostly by DM constraints; the resulting

What carries the argument

The colored scalar S1, a color-triplet singlet under electroweak SU(2)_L, with the Yukawa term Y_S1 q̄ S1 Ψ_R. This single interaction generates both the one-loop penguin contributions to b→s ℓ+ℓ− Wilson coefficients C9 and C10 (through dark fermion Ψ1, Ψ2 loops) and the S1-mediated DM annihilation/coannihilation channels—where coannihilation means DM freeze-out is helped by annihilations of the slightly heavier dark partner Ψ2 or S1. The dark-sector mass splittings ΔM(Ψ2,Ψ1) and ΔM(S1,Ψ1) control how efficient coannihilation is at freeze-out, so they shape the allowed DM mass window.

Load-bearing premise

The Z′ boson is assumed to couple to muons with effective strengths 0.015 (vector) and 0.008 (axial) in the flavor analysis, although the model sets kinetic mixing to zero; under that symmetry, SM leptons carry no baryon number and the coupling would be zero, so the C9/C10 predictions hinge on this unstated lepton coupling.

What would settle it

Recompute C9^NP and C10^NP with the Z′–μμ couplings set to zero (as zero kinetic mixing implies) and redo the b→s μ+μ− fit; if the overlapping DM+flavor region in (M_Z′, g_B) disappears or shifts, the paper's central correlated-parameter claim is refuted.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The same Y_S1 that satisfies the relic density automatically fixes the size of b→s μ+μ− new-physics contributions, making the two sectors mutually constraining.
  • Allowed DM emerges for m_DM ≈ 100–2000 GeV, g_B ≈ 0.02–0.06, Y_S1 ≈ 0.005–1, with small dark-sector mass splittings widening the allowed window.
  • When both DM and flavor constraints are imposed, the common parameter space in the (M_Z′, g_B) plane is narrower for larger ΔM(Ψ2,Ψ1), because coannihilation via Ψ2 changes the relic density.
  • Flavor observables remain close to their Standard Model predictions in the surviving region; DM relic and direct detection set the dominant bounds.
  • The model can be tested by future direct-detection and gamma-ray observatories and by high-energy collider searches for jets plus missing energy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Z′–muon coupling is really zero under zero kinetic mixing, then the paper's C9/C10 predictions rest on an unstated extra assumption; the flavor part of the correlation would need the scalar loop alone, changing the calibrated regions.
  • A natural extension the authors only mention in passing is a first-order U(1)_B phase transition; if the allowed parameter space is also the one producing gravitational waves, the model could be probed by future space-based interferometers.
  • The framework's prediction that flavor stays near the SM while DM dominates the combined bounds could be tested by measuring the lepton-universality ratios in the same M_Z′ window: a deviation there would immediately disfavor this scenario.
  • One could scan Y_S1 and the mass splittings in dedicated Monte Carlo runs and look for the S1 partner at future colliders; jets-plus-missing-energy searches would directly discover the mediator if it exists.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a gauged U(1)_B extension of the Standard Model with a singlet-doublet fermionic dark sector and a new colored scalar S1. The stated goal is to correlate dark matter phenomenology (relic density, direct and indirect detection) with b → s μ+μ− flavor observables through the common Yukawa coupling Y_S1 in Eq. (2.5). Numerical scans with SARAH/SPheno/micrOMEGAs and flavio identify viable regions in the M_Z′–g_B and M_DM–Y_S1 planes, with benchmark points summarized in Tables 2 and 3. The paper claims that the same coupling controls both the S1-mediated DM annihilation/coannihilation and the loop-induced flavor-changing Wilson coefficients.

Significance. If the model were internally consistent, the framework would provide a falsifiable link between DM searches and flavor measurements, and the use of standard numerical tools (SARAH, SPheno, micrOMEGAs, flavio) together with explicit benchmark tables is a strength. However, the central interaction in Eq. (2.5) is not invariant under the gauge symmetries stated in Section 2, and the flavor section inserts ad hoc Z′–muon couplings that are incompatible with the zero kinetic-mixing, baryon-only gauge setup. These issues invalidate the core claim of a unified DM–flavor parameter space, so the numerical results do not follow from a well-defined model.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2, Eq. (2.5)] Using the quantum numbers stated in §2, the Yukawa term Y_S1 q S1 ΨR is not gauge invariant. With q = (3,2,1/6,1/3), S1 = (3,1,−1/3,−5/3), and ΨR = (1,2,1/2,2), the U(1)_Y charges sum to 1/3, the U(1)_B charges sum to 2/3, and the SU(3)_C product 3 ⊗ 3 = 6 ⊕ 3̄ contains no singlet with a color-singlet fermion. This is the only S1–quark–dark-sector interaction in the Lagrangian. Without it, the S1-mediated DM coannihilations and the loop-induced b→s transitions do not exist. This is an internal inconsistency, not a matter of parameter tuning.
  2. [§2.1 and §4.3, Eqs. (4.17)–(4.24)] The zero kinetic mixing assumption means the U(1)_B gauge boson does not couple to SM leptons, since B(μ) = B(e) = 0. The numerical Z′–muon vector/axial couplings (0.015, 0.008) inserted into Eqs. (4.17)–(4.24) are therefore not part of the model, and no loop-level derivation is supplied. These couplings directly control C9^{NP,Z′} and C10^{NP,Z′}, so the flavor fit and the combined regions in Figs. 9–11 depend on an unmodeled input. The statement that the Z′ contribution is retained 'for completeness' does not justify retaining an inconsistent coupling.
  3. [§4.3, Eqs. (4.25)–(4.27)] The functions R_{Z′−ψ}(a,b) and R_{γ−ψ}(a,b) are printed as identical equations. A photon penguin has different gauge quantum numbers and loop structure from a Z′ penguin, and C9^{NP,γ} in Eq. (4.22) uses this function. The equality appears to be a copy-paste error, and no independent loop computation is shown for the γ contribution. Since C9^{NP} sums the Z′, Z, and γ pieces in Eq. (4.29), the flavor predictions are not substantiated.
  4. [§4.2, Eq. (4.7)] In the B→K ℓ+ℓ− expression, the form-factor contribution is written with m_{Bc} and m_{Ds}; no charmed mesons appear in this decay and the expected masses are m_B and m_K. If these are not typos, the numerical implementation is inconsistent with the effective Hamiltonian; if they are typos, the formulas need correction. Either way the central flavor numerics require rechecking.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure 5 caption] The caption says 'top row corresponds to MDM = 10 GeV' and 'bottom row corresponds to MDM = 1 GeV', but the text and axis variable indicate the rows differ by g_B = 0.01 and 0.05. Please correct the caption to match the scan variables.
  2. [Figure 2 caption] The relic-density band is quoted as Ωh² ≃ 0.110 ± 0.012, which is not the Planck 2018 value quoted in the text. Please specify the origin of this criterion.
  3. [References [5, 6]] The anomaly cancellation, fermion charge assignments, and mass matrices are taken from Refs. [5, 6], which appear as arXiv preprints. If the present model depends on unpublished details, those details should be summarized or the references should be updated to peer-reviewed versions.
  4. [Tables 2 and 3] The entries in Tables 2 and 3 are selected 'allowed points', but the selection criteria are not fully specified (e.g., whether they are random, representative, or best-fit). Please clarify how these benchmark points were chosen.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the S1-mediated DM–flavor correlation is a genuine model prediction; existing self-citations are background, and the main caveats are consistency issues, not circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular in the sense defined. The new scalar S1 and its Yukawa interaction (Eq. 2.5) are model inputs; the DM observables (Sec. 3) and the flavor Wilson coefficients (Eqs. 4.17–4.30) are computed from those inputs and then compared with external data (Planck, LZ, LHC, LHCb/Belle, flavio). The central claim that Y_S1 controls both the FCNC and DM coannihilation amplitudes is a consequence of the single interaction term being used in both loop calculations; this is a prediction/correlation, not a fit or a renamed input. No equation reduces to another by construction, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The paper does rely on the authors' earlier works [5,6] for the U(1)_B fermion content, anomaly cancellation, and mass matrices, but those are background model-building input rather than a uniqueness theorem invoked to force the new S1 result, and the new numerical analysis is implemented with SARAH/SPheno/micrOMEGAs and flavio. Serious internal-consistency questions exist (the gauge quantum numbers of Eq. (2.5) do not obviously allow the stated Yukawa term, and the U(1)_B Z' couplings to muons used in Eqs. (4.17)–(4.24) are not justified under the stated zero-kinetic-mixing assumption), but these are correctness/falsifiability problems, not circularity, and therefore do not raise the circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

10 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model contains a large number of free parameters (masses, couplings, splittings, mixing angle) that are scanned or fixed by hand. Most are inherited from the earlier U(1)_B SDFDM framework; the genuinely new object is the colored scalar S1. The most serious ledger entry is the implied Z′–lepton coupling: it is not a derived output but a necessary input for the flavor calculation, and it conflicts with the stated zero-kinetic-mixing assumption.

free parameters (10)
  • Y_S1 (S1–quark–Ψ Yukawa) = benchmark 0.1; scanned 0.001–3; favored ~0.005–1
    Central coupling that controls both DM coannihilation and the b→sμμ Wilson coefficients; fixed by hand in scans.
  • g_B (U(1)_B gauge coupling) = benchmark 0.05; scanned 0.001–0.15; favored 0.02–0.06
    Controls Z′ mass/couplings and DM annihilation; scanned against constraints.
  • M_Z′ (Z′ mass) = scanned 500–2000 GeV
    Equivalent to varying the U(1)_B breaking scale v_B through M_Z′=3g_B v_B.
  • M_DM (M_Ψ1) = scanned 1–2000 GeV
    Dark matter mass; key free parameter in relic and direct-detection scans.
  • ΔM(Ψ2,Ψ1) = benchmarks 1 and 10 GeV
    Fermionic mass splitting controlling coannihilation efficiency.
  • ΔM(S1,Ψ1) = varied in scans
    Mass gap controlling S1-assisted coannihilation.
  • sin θ_DM = fixed at 0.001
    DM mixing angle chosen small to evade direct detection.
  • m_s and m_S1 = m_s=800 GeV, m_S1=2 TeV
    Scalar masses chosen by hand as representative benchmarks.
  • Scalar quartic couplings λ_S, λ_HS, λ_S1, λ_HS1, λ_SS1 = 0.32, 1.29e-2, 1e-2, 1e-4, 1e-10
    Chosen partly from earlier work and partly 'within allowed ranges'; not derived.
  • Effective Z′–lepton couplings (0.015 vector, 0.008 axial) = 0.015 and 0.008
    Asserted in Eqs. (4.17)–(4.24) without a derived mechanism; inconsistent with zero kinetic mixing and zero lepton baryon number.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Anomaly-free U(1)_B fermion content and singlet-doublet mixing from refs. [5,6].
    The paper imports the entire dark-sector framework, anomaly cancellation, and mass diagonalization from earlier papers by the same group.
  • domain assumption Zero kinetic mixing between U(1)_Y and U(1)_B.
    Stated in §2.1 and the Conclusion; used to set M_Z′=3g_B v_B and to motivate leptophobia.
  • ad hoc to paper Z′ couples to SM muons with small nonzero strength.
    Required by Eqs. (4.17)–(4.24) but forbidden by the zero-kinetic-mixing U(1)_B charge assignment; no mechanism is given.
  • ad hoc to paper Loop functions in Eqs. (4.25)–(4.27) are correct as written.
    The functions contain unexplained numerical constants (0.00028, 0.017, 0.366, etc.) with no derivation or reference; the flavor predictions depend on them.
  • domain assumption Standard cosmological freeze-out and galactic DM profiles for indirect detection.
    Relic density and gamma-ray flux calculations use conventional assumptions (Planck cosmology, standard halo profile) via micrOMEGAs and CTA sensitivity curves.
invented entities (1)
  • Colored scalar S1 no independent evidence
    purpose: Mediates DM–quark interactions and generates loop-level b→sμμ Wilson coefficients; the key new ingredient of the paper.
    S1 is postulated with charge (3,1,-1/3,-5/3) and a Yukawa coupling to the existing dark sector. No direct experimental evidence is presented; its only handles are the model's own predictions, which are not uniquely calibrated to an external observation.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 30909 in / 18548 out tokens · 203350 ms · 2026-08-03T00:05:49.750120+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We explore a {standard model} extension based on a local $U(1)_B$ symmetry, where a baryon-charged scalar mediates interactions between a fermionic dark matter candidate and {standard model} quarks. In this setup, the dark matter relic abundance is shaped not only by standard annihilation channels but also by additional coannihilation processes induced by a new scalar. The presence of this mediator provides a unified link between {dark sector} and flavor physics, yielding distinctive phenomenological consequences. We conduct a detailed study of dark matter phenomenology, emphasizing the role of the mass splitting between the dark matter particles and the scalar mediator in determining the efficiency of coannihilation. The parameter space is examined in light of existing constraints from cosmological observations, direct and indirect detection experiments, as well as the collider searches at the {\text{LHC}}. Our analysis shows that the extended scalar sector opens up viable regions of parameter space beyond those accessible in minimal \(U(1)_B\) realizations, many of which are expected to be tested by forthcoming searches at {\text{XENONnT}} and {the \text{Cherenkov Telescope Array}}. Moreover, the model induces correlated signatures from flavor observables associated with the $b \to s $ transitions as well, serving as complementary tests of the underlying framework.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 50 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Cirelli, A

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan,Dark Matter,2406.01705

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Abercrombie et al.,Dark Matter benchmark models for early LHC Run-2 Searches: Report of the ATLAS/CMS Dark Matter Forum,Phys

    D. Abercrombie et al.,Dark Matter benchmark models for early LHC Run-2 Searches: Report of the ATLAS/CMS Dark Matter Forum,Phys. Dark Univ.27(2020) 100371 [1507.00966]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Fileviez P´ erez, E

    P. Fileviez P´ erez, E. Golias, R.-H. Li, C. Murgui and A.D. Plascencia,Anomaly-free dark matter models,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 015017 [1904.01017]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Murgui Galvez,Phenomenological and cosmological aspects of electroweak models beyond the Standard Model, Ph.D

    C. Murgui Galvez,Phenomenological and cosmological aspects of electroweak models beyond the Standard Model, Ph.D. thesis, Valencia U., 2020

    2020

  5. [5]

    Taramati, R. Sahu, U. Patel, K. Ghosh and S. Patra,Singlet-doublet fermionic dark matter in gauge theory of baryons,2408.12424

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Malhotra, Z.A

    Taramati, L. Malhotra, Z.A. Borboruah and S. Patra,Probing Leptophobic Dark Sectors via Gravitational Wave Signatures,2508.17476

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  8. [8]

    Bertone and D

    G. Bertone and D. Hooper,History of dark matter,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) 045002 [1605.04909]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    A. Das, S. Gola, S. Mandal and N. Sinha,Two-component scalar and fermionic dark matter candidates in a generic U(1)X model,Phys. Lett. B829(2022) 137117 [2202.01443]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Patra, W

    S. Patra, W. Rodejohann and C.E. Yaguna,A new B−L model without right-handed neutrinos,JHEP09(2016) 076 [1607.04029]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    Patel, Avnish, S

    U. Patel, Avnish, S. Patra and K. Ghosh,Multipartite dark matter in a gauge theory of leptons,JHEP04(2025) 079 [2407.06737]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    A. Das, S. Goswami, K.N. Vishnudath and T. Nomura,Constraining a general U(1) ′ inverse seesaw model from vacuum stability, dark matter and collider,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 055026 [1905.00201]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Alves, A

    A. Alves, A. Berlin, S. Profumo and F.S. Queiroz,Dirac-fermionic dark matter in U(1) X models,JHEP10(2015) 076 [1506.06767]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    Okada, S

    N. Okada, S. Okada and Q. Shafi,Lightz ′ and dark matter from u(1)x gauge symmetry, Physics Letters B810(2020) 135845

    2020

  15. [15]

    Neves, N

    M.J. Neves, N. Okada and S. Okada,Majorana fermion dark matter in minimally extended left-right symmetric model,JHEP09(2021) 038 [2103.08873]. – 35 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    J. Lao, C. Cai, Z.-H. Yu, Y.-P. Zeng and H.-H. Zhang,Fermionic and scalar dark matter with hidden u(1) gauge interaction and kinetic mixing,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 095031

    2020

  17. [17]

    Biswas, S

    A. Biswas, S. Ganguly and S. Roy,Fermionic dark matter via uv and ir freeze-in and its possible x-ray signature,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2020(2020) 043

    2020

  18. [18]

    Das, S.K

    A. Das, S.K. Gola, S. Mandal and N. Sinha,Two-component scalar and fermionic dark matter candidates in a generic u(1) model,Physics Letters B(2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    S´ anchez-Vega and E.R

    B.L. S´ anchez-Vega and E.R. Schmitz,Fermionic dark matter and neutrino masses in a B − Lmodel,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 053007

    2015

  20. [20]

    Mishra, M.K

    S. Mishra, M.K. Behera, R. Mohanta, S. Patra and S. Singirala,Neutrino phenomenology and dark matter in anA 4 flavour extendedB−Lmodel,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 420 [1907.06429]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    E. Ma, P.K. Paul and N. Sahu,Naturally small Dirac neutrino mass andB−Ldark matter, 2601.05926

    arXiv

  22. [22]

    Mahapatra, P.K

    S. Mahapatra, P.K. Paul, N. Sahu and P. Shukla,Verifiable type-III seesaw and dark matter in a gaugedU(1) B−L symmetric model,2504.00109. [23]CCM Collaborationcollaboration,First leptophobic dark matter search from the coherent–captain-mills liquid argon detector,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 021801

    arXiv 2022

  23. [24]

    Fileviez Perez and M.B

    P. Fileviez Perez and M.B. Wise,Breaking Local Baryon and Lepton Number at the TeV Scale,JHEP08(2011) 068 [1106.0343]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [25]

    Ma,Gauged baryon number and dibaryonic dark matter,Phys

    E. Ma,Gauged baryon number and dibaryonic dark matter,Phys. Lett. B813(2021) 136066 [2011.13887]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  25. [26]

    Michaels and F

    L. Michaels and F. Yu,Probing newU(1)gauge symmetries via exoticZ→Z ′γdecays, JHEP03(2021) 120 [2010.00021]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  26. [27]

    Boos, C.D

    J. Boos, C.D. Carone, N.L. Donald and M.R. Musser,Asymptotically safe dark matter with gauged baryon number,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 035018 [2209.14268]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  27. [28]

    Fileviez P´ erez, E

    P. Fileviez P´ erez, E. Golias, R.-H. Li and C. Murgui,Leptophobic Dark Matter and the Baryon Number Violation Scale,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 035009 [1810.06646]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [29]

    Butterworth, H

    J. Butterworth, H. Debnath, P. Fileviez Perez and Y. Yeh,Dark matter from anomaly cancellation at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 075001 [2405.03749]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [30]

    Butterworth, H

    J. Butterworth, H. Debnath, J. Egan and P. Fileviez Perez,Local baryon number at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 015012 [2505.06341]. [31]DAR WINcollaboration,DAR WIN: direct dark matter search with the ultimate detector,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.1468(2020) 012068. [32]DarkSide-20kcollaboration,DarkSide-20k: A 20 tonne two-phase LAr TPC for direct dark matter det...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [35]

    Bordone, G

    M. Bordone, G. Isidori and A. Pattori,On the Standard Model predictions forR K andR K∗ , Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 440 [1605.07633]. – 36 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [36]

    Hiller and F

    G. Hiller and F. Kruger,More model-independent analysis ofb→sprocesses,Phys. Rev. D 69(2004) 074020 [hep-ph/0310219]. [37]LHCbcollaboration,Measurement of lepton universality parameters inB + →K +ℓ+ℓ− and B0 →K ∗0ℓ+ℓ− decays,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 032002 [2212.09153]. [38]LHCbcollaboration,Tests of lepton universality usingB 0 →K 0 Sℓ+ℓ− andB + →K ∗+ℓ+ℓ− d...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  32. [39]

    Straub,flavio: a Python package for flavour and precision phenomenology in the Standard Model and beyond,1810.08132

    D.M. Straub,flavio: a Python package for flavour and precision phenomenology in the Standard Model and beyond,1810.08132. [40]LHCbcollaboration,Test of Lepton Flavor Universality with Bs0→ϕℓ+ℓ- Decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 121803 [2410.13748]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [41]

    Descotes-Genon, T

    S. Descotes-Genon, T. Hurth, J. Matias and J. Virto,Optimizing the basis ofB→K ∗ll observables in the full kinematic range,JHEP05(2013) 137 [1303.5794]. [42]LHCbcollaboration,Measurement ofCP-Averaged Observables in theB 0 →K ∗0µ+µ− Decay,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 011802 [2003.04831]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  34. [43]

    Descotes-Genon, J

    S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, M. Ramon and J. Virto,Implications from clean observables for the binned analysis ofB−> K∗µ +µ− at large recoil,JHEP01(2013) 048 [1207.2753]. [44]CMScollaboration,Measurement of angular parameters from the decayB 0 →K ∗0µ+µ− in proton-proton collisions at √s=8 TeV,Phys. Lett. B781(2018) 517 [1710.02846]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  35. [45]

    Descotes-Genon, L

    S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias and J. Virto,On the impact of power corrections in the prediction ofB→K ∗µ+µ− observables,JHEP12(2014) 125 [1407.8526]. [46]Bellecollaboration,Angular analysis ofB 0 →K ∗(892)0ℓ+ℓ−, inLHC Ski 2016: A First Discussion of 13 TeV Results, 4, 2016 [1604.04042]. [47]HPQCDcollaboration,Standard Model predictions for B→Kℓ+ℓ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  36. [48]

    Bharucha, D.M

    A. Bharucha, D.M. Straub and R. Zwicky,B→V ℓ +ℓ− in the Standard Model from light-cone sum rules,JHEP08(2016) 098 [1503.05534]. [49]LHCbcollaboration,Measurements of the S-wave fraction inB 0 →K +π−µ+µ− decays and theB 0 →K ∗(892)0µ+µ− differential branching fraction,JHEP11(2016) 047 [1606.04731]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [50]

    Aebischer, J

    J. Aebischer, J. Kumar, P. Stangl and D.M. Straub,A Global Likelihood for Precision Constraints and Flavour Anomalies,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 509 [1810.07698]. [51]LHCbcollaboration,Branching Fraction Measurements of the RareB 0 s →ϕµ +µ− and B0 s →f ′ 2(1525)µ+µ−- Decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 151801 [2105.14007]. [52]LHCbcollaboration,Differential br...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [54]

    Bobeth, M

    C. Bobeth, M. Gorbahn, T. Hermann, M. Misiak, E. Stamou and M. Steinhauser, Bs,d →l +l− in the Standard Model with Reduced Theoretical Uncertainty,Phys. Rev. Lett. 112(2014) 101801 [1311.0903]. – 37 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  39. [55]

    Beneke, C

    M. Beneke, C. Bobeth and R. Szafron,Power-enhanced leading-logarithmic QED corrections toB q →µ +µ−,JHEP10(2019) 232 [1908.07011]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [56]

    Greljo, J

    A. Greljo, J. Salko, A. Smolkoviˇ c and P. Stangl,Rare b decays meet high-mass Drell-Yan, JHEP05(2023) 087 [2212.10497]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [57]

    Singirala, S

    S. Singirala, S. Sahoo and R. Mohanta,Exploring dark matter, neutrino mass andR K(∗),ϕ anomalies inL µ −L τ model,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 035042 [1809.03213]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [58]

    Singirala, S

    S. Singirala, S. Sahoo and R. Mohanta,Light dark matter, rare B decays with missing energy in Lµ-Lτmodel with a scalar leptoquark,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 015033 [2106.03735]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [59]

    Mohapatra, S

    M.K. Mohapatra, S. Singirala, D. Panda and R. Mohanta,Correlative study of flavor anomalies and dark matter in the light of scalar leptoquark,2409.16961

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [60]

    W. Chao, H. Wang, L. Wang and Y. Zhang,Dark matter,Z ′, vector-like quark at the LHC andb→sµµanomaly,Chin. Phys. C45(2021) 083105 [2102.07518]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  45. [61]

    P. Ko, T. Nomura and H. Okada,Muon g−2, B→K (∗)µ+µ− anomalies, and leptophilic dark matter in U(1) µ−τ gauge symmetry,JHEP05(2022) 098 [2110.10513]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  46. [62]

    Sahoo, S

    S. Sahoo, S. Singirala and R. Mohanta,Dark matter and flavor anomalies in the light of vector-like fermions and scalar leptoquark,2112.04382

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [63]

    A. Hook, E. Izaguirre and J.G. Wacker,Model Independent Bounds on Kinetic Mixing,Adv. High Energy Phys.2011(2011) 859762 [1006.0973]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  48. [64]

    Gherghetta, J

    T. Gherghetta, J. Kersten, K. Olive and M. Pospelov,Evaluating the price of tiny kinetic mixing,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 095001

    2019

  49. [65]

    Napsuciale, S

    M. Napsuciale, S. Rodr ´ ıguez and H. Hern´ andez-Arellano,Kinetic mixing, custodial symmetry, and a lower bound on the mass of a dark gauge boson,Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2022(2022) 093E01 [https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article-pdf/2022/9/093E01/45911873/ptac117.pdf]

    2022

  50. [66]

    Staub,SARAH 4 : A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders,Comput

    F. Staub,SARAH 4 : A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders,Comput. Phys. Commun. 185(2014) 1773 [1309.7223]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  51. [67]

    Porod and F

    W. Porod and F. Staub,SPheno 3.1: Extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM,Comput. Phys. Commun.183(2012) 2458 [1104.1573]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  52. [68]

    B´ elanger, F

    G. B´ elanger, F. Boudjema, A. Goudelis, A. Pukhov and B. Zaldivar,micrOMEGAs5.0 : Freeze-in,Comput. Phys. Commun.231(2018) 173 [1801.03509]. [69]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]. [70]LZcollaboration,First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,Phys. R...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [73]

    Strong, R

    A.W. Strong, R. Diehl, H. Halloin, V. Schoenfelder, L. Bouchet, P. Mandrou et al., Gamma-ray continuum emission from the inner galactic region as observed with integral/spi, Astron. Astrophys.444(2005) 495 [astro-ph/0509290]. – 38 – [74]VERITAScollaboration,Observation of Galactic Gamma-ray Sources with VERITAS,AIP Conf. Proc.1085(2009) 187 [0810.0515]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  54. [75]

    Thompson,Gamma ray astrophysics: the EGRET results,Rept

    D.J. Thompson,Gamma ray astrophysics: the EGRET results,Rept. Prog. Phys.71(2008) 116901 [0811.0738]. [76]Fermi-LATcollaboration,Constraining Dark Matter Models from a Combined Analysis of Milky Way Satellites with the Fermi Large Area Telescope,Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 241302 [1108.3546]. [77]Fermi-LATcollaboration,Fermi Large Area Telescope Third Sourc...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  55. [82]

    A. Ali, P. Ball, L.T. Handoko and G. Hiller,A Comparative study of the decaysB→(K, K ∗)ℓ+ℓ− in standard model and supersymmetric theories,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 074024 [hep-ph/9910221]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  56. [83]

    Altmannshofer, P

    W. Altmannshofer, P. Ball, A. Bharucha, A.J. Buras, D.M. Straub and M. Wick, Symmetries and Asymmetries ofB→K ∗µ+µ− Decays in the Standard Model and Beyond, JHEP01(2009) 019 [0811.1214]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  57. [84]

    Sahoo and R

    S. Sahoo and R. Mohanta,Study of the rare semileptonic decaysB 0 d →K ∗l+l− in scalar leptoquark model,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 034018 [1507.02070]. [85]HPQCDcollaboration,Rare decayB→Kℓ +ℓ− form factors from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 054509 [1306.2384]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  58. [86]

    Descotes-Genon, L

    S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias and J. Virto,Global analysis ofb→sℓℓanomalies, JHEP06(2016) 092 [1510.04239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [87]

    Capdevila, S

    B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias and J. Virto,Assessing lepton-flavour non-universality fromB→K ∗ℓℓangular analyses,JHEP10(2016) 075 [1605.03156]. [88]LHCbcollaboration,Measurement of theB 0 s →µ +µ− decay properties and search for the B0 →µ +µ− andB 0 s →µ +µ−γdecays,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 012010 [2108.09283]. [89]ATLAScollaboration,Study of the...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [97]

    Ebert, R.N

    D. Ebert, R.N. Faustov and V.O. Galkin,Rare Semileptonic Decays ofBandB c Mesons in the Relativistic Quark Model,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 034032 [1006.4231]. – 40 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010