REVIEW 10 cited by
Augmenting Greybox Fuzzing with Generative AI
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Real-world programs expecting structured inputs often has a format-parsing stage gating the deeper program space. Neither a mutation-based approach nor a generative approach can provide a solution that is effective and scalable. Large language models (LLM) pre-trained with an enormous amount of natural language corpus have proved to be effective for understanding the implicit format syntax and generating format-conforming inputs. In this paper, propose ChatFuzz, a greybox fuzzer augmented by generative AI. More specifically, we pick a seed in the fuzzer's seed pool and prompt ChatGPT generative models to variations, which are more likely to be format-conforming and thus of high quality. We conduct extensive experiments to explore the best practice for harvesting the power of generative LLM models. The experiment results show that our approach improves the edge coverage by 12.77\% over the SOTA greybox fuzzer (AFL++) on 12 target programs from three well-tested benchmarks. As for vulnerability detection, \sys is able to perform similar to or better than AFL++ for programs with explicit syntax rules but not for programs with non-trivial syntax.
Forward citations
Cited by 10 Pith papers
-
Locus: Agentic Predicate Synthesis for Directed Fuzzing
Locus uses an LLM agent to synthesize and validate intermediate predicates that make directed fuzzing reach target bug states faster, reporting an average 41.6x speedup across eight fuzzers.
-
Ensemble Fuzzing with Dynamic Resource Scheduling and Multidimensional Seed Evaluation
Legion dynamically reallocates CPU cores among a set of fuzzers using a multi-armed-bandit scheduler and a five-metric seed evaluation, improving coverage and bug detection over existing ensemble fuzzing.
-
Directed Greybox Fuzzing via Large Language Model
HGFuzzer uses an LLM to generate harnesses, reachable seeds, and custom mutators for directed greybox fuzzing, and reports triggering 17/20 known vulnerabilities plus finding 9 new ones with CVE IDs.
-
Harnessing Large Language Models for Seed Generation in Greybox Fuzzing
SeedMind generates fuzzing seeds by having an LLM write a seed generator and iteratively refine it using code coverage feedback.
-
CKGFuzzer: LLM-Based Fuzz Driver Generation Enhanced By Code Knowledge Graph
CKGFuzzer uses a code knowledge graph to guide LLM agents in generating, repairing, and mutating fuzz drivers, reporting a pooled 8.73% relative coverage gain over PromptFuzz on eight libraries and 9 new bugs.
-
MultiFuzz: A Dense Retrieval-based Multi-Agent System for Network Protocol Fuzzing
MultiFuzz combines retrieval-augmented generation and multiple LLM agents within the ChatAFL protocol fuzzer, reporting marginal and statistically unsupported gains in branch coverage and state exploration for RTSP.
-
Pixels to Play: A Foundation Model for 3D Gameplay
Pixels2Play-0.1 is a decoder-only transformer trained via behavior cloning and inverse-dynamics-imputed actions to play 3D games from pixels, with only qualitative results reported.
-
An Agentic Flow for Finite State Machine Extraction using Prompt Chaining
A three-stage LLM prompt-chaining system extracts FSM rulebooks from RFC documents, achieving F1 scores near 85% on FTP and RTSP.
-
Retrieval Augmented Generation Based LLM Evaluation For Protocol State Machine Inference With Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
A RAG-plus-chain-of-thought agent improves BLEU, ROUGE, and WER scores for RTSP packet seed generation over Gemma-2-9B and Llama-3-8B baselines, though the evaluation does not test actual fuzzing effectiveness.
-
A Contemporary Survey of Large Language Model Assisted Program Analysis
A review that catalogs how large language models are used in static, dynamic, and hybrid program analysis, and outlines open challenges.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.