Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Principal Fairness for Human and Algorithmic Decision-Making

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.10400 v5 pith:JO5OZXWV submitted 2020-05-21 cs.CY cs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.CYcs.LGstat.ML
keywords fairnessprincipaldecisionalgorithmiccriteriadecision-makingexistinghuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Using the concept of principal stratification from the causal inference literature, we introduce a new notion of fairness, called principal fairness, for human and algorithmic decision-making. The key idea is that one should not discriminate among individuals who would be similarly affected by the decision. Unlike the existing statistical definitions of fairness, principal fairness explicitly accounts for the fact that individuals can be impacted by the decision. Furthermore, we explain how principal fairness differs from the existing causality-based fairness criteria. In contrast to the counterfactual fairness criteria, for example, principal fairness considers the effects of decision in question rather than those of protected attributes of interest. We briefly discuss how to approach empirical evaluation and policy learning problems under the proposed principal fairness criterion.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Position: Beyond Sensitive Attributes, ML Fairness Should Quantify Structural Injustice via Social Determinants

    cs.CY 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fairness auditing should target social determinants that carry structural injustice, because mitigating on sensitive attributes alone can create new harms.

Pith tools