REVIEW
Comparison of Neuronal Attention Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent models for image processing are using the Convolutional neural network (CNN) which requires a pixel per pixel analysis of the input image. This method works well. However, it is time-consuming if we have large images. To increase the performance, by improving the training time or the accuracy, we need a size-independent method. As a solution, we can add a Neuronal Attention model (NAM). The power of this new approach is that it can efficiently choose several small regions from the initial image to focus on. The purpose of this paper is to explain and also test each of the NAM's parameters.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.