Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 136 references

A frustrated one-dimensional spin chain forms macroscopic cat states on one side of a first-order quantum phase transition and four-channel entanglement on the other.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 09:25 UTC pith:JQXASQO3

load-bearing objection Solid multi-probe numerics on a known-style frustrated chain: real cat/QFI resource near a first-order point, but “prove” and thermodynamic-limit wording outrun N≤40 data. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.28373 v1 pith:JQXASQO3 submitted 2026-07-30 quant-ph

Emergence of a Macroscopic Cat State and Multi-Channel Entanglement in a Frustrated Cluster Spin Chain

Mohit Lal Bera , Andreu Angl\'es-Castillo , Alberto Acevedo Mel\'endez , Rafael G\'omez-Lurbe , Luca Ion , Rodrigo M. Sanz , Somayeh Mehrabankar , Tanmoy Pandit
show 3 more authors
Carmen G. Almud\'ever Armando P\'erez Miguel Angel Garcia-March
This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords macroscopic cat statesfirst-order quantum phase transitionfrustrated spin chaincluster-Ising modelincommensurate phaseSchmidt entanglement channelsquantum Fisher informationquantum metrology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies a one-dimensional frustrated spin chain that mixes ordinary Ising couplings, next-nearest-neighbor couplings, and a three-spin cluster term. It argues that the ground state undergoes a first-order quantum phase transition at a single control parameter value near zero. On the ferromagnetic side the ground state becomes a macroscopic Schrödinger cat—an equal superposition of all spins up and all spins down—with an energy gap that closes exponentially with system size, two dominant entanglement channels, and quantum Fisher information that saturates the Heisenberg limit. On the other side competing interactions produce a gapped incommensurate phase that is not a simple paramagnet: correlations oscillate with a continuously tunable wave vector, and four bipartite entanglement channels share the ground state. The authors present this as a route to high-quality cat states for metrology that appear from the bare Hamiltonian rather than from elaborate state engineering, and they outline experimental platforms where the same terms already exist.

Core claim

The model realizes a first-order quantum phase transition at δ ≃ 0 that cleanly separates two phases: a ferromagnetic phase whose ground state approaches the macroscopic cat |Φ+⟩ = (|↑…↑⟩ + |↓…↓⟩)/√2 with fidelity above 0.999, exponential gap closure, two dominant Schmidt coefficients, and Heisenberg-limited quantum Fisher information F_Q → 4N²; and a gapped incommensurate phase with split structure-factor peaks at ±q*(δ), four dominant Schmidt channels, and no long-range magnetic order.

What carries the argument

The expanded Glauber–Ising Hamiltonian combining transverse field, nearest-neighbor Ising, next-nearest-neighbor Ising, and cluster three-body (ZXZ) terms, diagnosed by the simultaneous collapse of the periodic-boundary spectral gap as ΔE ∼ e^{−αN}, saturation of the Binder cumulant to 2/3, splitting of the static structure factor, and the jump from two to four dominant Schmidt coefficients.

Load-bearing premise

That numerical data on chains up to forty sites, plus an exponential fit of the gap at one point on the ordered side, are enough to prove true thermodynamic-limit first-order behavior, ideal cat fidelity, and a permanently open gap on the disordered side.

What would settle it

Compute or measure the periodic-boundary gap and cat-state overlap for substantially larger N across δ < 0: if the gap fails to close exponentially or the overlap fails to approach one, or if the gap for δ > 0 closes with size, the claimed first-order transition and macroscopic cat are falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Near δ → 0− the ground state is a ready-made Heisenberg-limited metrology resource without gate-sequence engineering.
  • The incommensurate wave vector q*(δ) is continuously tunable, offering a simulator of modulated magnetic order.
  • Four-channel bipartite entanglement in the disordered phase is a diagnostic that distinguishes it from a paramagnet or an SPT phase.
  • Platforms already hosting cluster, NN, and NNN terms (superconducting circuits, Rydberg arrays, trapped ions, ultracold lattices) can test the phase diagram directly.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the exponential gap scaling survives at larger N, the same criticality could serve as a passive GHZ factory whose fidelity improves automatically with system size.
  • The jump from two to four Schmidt channels suggests a design rule: frustration that multiplies entanglement pathways may be harnessed for parallel quantum communication or error-correction encodings.
  • Because the cat appears only under periodic (or translationally symmetric) conditions, any experimental realization must protect bulk coherence against edge pinning.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a one-dimensional frustrated spin chain that combines cluster-Ising three-body terms with anisotropic next-nearest-neighbor Ising couplings (the Glauber–Ising Hamiltonian at γ=1). Using DMRG (N≤40) and exact diagonalization benchmarks, the authors map two regimes separated near δ=0: for δ<0 a ferromagnetic phase whose ground state approaches the macroscopic cat |Φ+⟩ with high fidelity, exponential PBC gap closure, two dominant Schmidt coefficients, and Heisenberg-limited quantum Fisher information; for δ>0 a gapped phase with oscillatory short-range correlations, split structure-factor peaks at ±q*(δ), four dominant Schmidt coefficients, and no long-range magnetic order, which they name an incommensurate phase and distinguish from a simple paramagnet. They argue the transition is first-order and discuss metrological utility and experimental platforms.

Significance. If the thermodynamic-limit claims hold, the work offers a concrete, relatively simple spin-chain route to near-ideal macroscopic cat states and Heisenberg-limited QFI without elaborate state engineering, together with a frustration-driven multi-channel entanglement structure that is cleanly diagnosed by several independent probes (Czz, S(q), Binder cumulant, gap, overlaps, QFI, Schmidt spectrum). The multi-probe consistency on accessible sizes, ED–DMRG agreement to ~10^{-9}, and the experimental-feasibility discussion are genuine strengths. The historical Glauber motivation is optional but does not undermine the many-body results. The main value is phenomenological and technological rather than a new exact solution.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. IIID–IIIF] Abstract and Sec. IIID–IIIF: the manuscript repeatedly states that the authors “prove” a first-order QPT, that the gap closes in the thermodynamic limit for δ<0, and that the δ>0 phase remains gapped with non-closing gap. The only explicit exponential fit is ΔE_PBC∼e^{-αN} at a single point δ=−0.05 (N=16–34, α≈0.26); cat fidelity and F_Q/N²→4 are shown approaching ideal values only as δ→0− on N≤40. For δ>0 the gap is finite on the same sizes but no systematic N→∞ lower bound or scaling collapse rules out slow closure or weak criticality. Soften “prove”/thermodynamic-limit wording to match the finite-N evidence, or supply gap scaling across a grid of δ<0 and a clearer non-closure argument for δ>0.
  2. [Sec. IIIH; Abstract] Sec. IIIH and abstract: four large Schmidt coefficients are interpreted as “four distinct bipartite entanglement channels” that characterize the incommensurate phase and rule out SPT/VBS/spin-liquid alternatives. The numerical observation (λ_α≈0.4–0.5 for four values) is clear and useful, but the channel language is an interpretive axiom rather than a derived classification. Either define operationally what constitutes a distinct channel (e.g., via Schmidt vectors or correlation patterns) or present the four-coefficient structure as a diagnostic signature without over-claiming a new entanglement taxonomy.
  3. [Sec. IIIB–IIID] Sec. IIIB–IIID: the first-order assignment rests heavily on abrupt drops in S(q*) and U_z plus exponential gap closure under PBC. Continuous evolution of q*(δ) for δ>0 is compatible with incommensurate order but does not by itself fix the order of the transition at δ=0. A short additional diagnostic (e.g., ground-state energy density or its derivative across δ=0 for several N, or level spectroscopy of the low-lying tower) would make the discontinuous character more robust on the sizes already studied.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. I] The long historical introduction (Glauber, Manhattan Project, Monte Carlo) is engaging but disproportionate to the technical contribution; consider shortening and moving non-essential biography to a footnote or appendix so the model definition appears earlier.
  2. [Abstract; Fig. 6; Sec. IV] Typos and wording: “inconmensurate” / “inconmensurate” appear in places (e.g. abstract vicinity and Fig. 6 caption); “renomarlization”; “describd”; “presenceofmacroscopiccatstates” spacing artifacts in the abstract block. Standardize to “incommensurate” throughout.
  3. [Sec. II] Eq. (1)–(3): Γ is set to 1 without loss of generality for statics; state explicitly that γ is fixed to 1 for all numerics (mentioned in the motivation) so readers do not search for a γ scan.
  4. [Sec. IIID–IIIF] Fig. 4(c–d) and Fig. 5: report fit uncertainties and the precise N range on the figure or caption; for QFI, clarify that ⟨σ^z⟩=0 by Z2 so F_Q=4⟨(σ^z)^2⟩ is used consistently.
  5. [Sec. IIIE; Appendix A] Appendix A (N=6 density matrices) usefully illustrates dressing away from δ=0−; cross-reference it earlier in Sec. IIIE when “dressed ferromagnetic state” is introduced.
  6. [Bibliography; Sec. I] References to a 2025 Nobel Prize and arXiv-dated 2026 items will need journal-style updating at acceptance; ensure consistency of citation keys (e.g. incomplete “52?”).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: fixed Hamiltonian, forward ED/DMRG diagnostics; phases and cat/QFI claims are computed outputs, not inputs renamed.

full rationale

The model Hamiltonian (Eqs. 1–3) is fixed by historical Glauber–Ising plus cluster/ANNNI terms with parameters γ=1, Γ=1; A(γ,δ) and B(γ,δ) define coefficients, not the phase structure. All load-bearing claims—long-range FM order vs incommensurate correlations, first-order QPT at δ≃0, macroscopic cat fidelity, Heisenberg QFI, two- vs four-channel Schmidt structure—are obtained by direct numerical evaluation (ED/DMRG) of Czz(r), S(q), Uz, ΔE, overlaps with |Φ±⟩, FQ, Sv, and {λα}. The exponential gap fit ΔE∼e^{-αN} at one point (δ=−0.05) is evidence for thermodynamic-limit character, not a fitted parameter later re-sold as an independent prediction of the same data. No uniqueness theorem, self-citation chain, or definitional identity forces the cat or four-channel conclusions. Finite-size extrapolation risk is a correctness/evidence issue, not circularity. Derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The work is numerical many-body physics on a postulated spin Hamiltonian. Load-bearing inputs are the Glauber-inspired coefficient structure, the restriction γ=1, standard Z2 symmetry and bipartition definitions, and the usual DMRG/ED completeness assumptions. No new particles or forces are invented; the 'incommensurate phase' name is a classification of observed correlators, not a new ontological entity. Free parameters are few and mostly fixed by convention rather than fit to external data.

free parameters (3)
  • γ (bath/temperature parameter) = 1 (fixed)
    Fixed to 1 throughout (classical zero-temperature Glauber limit). Authors state lowering γ only softens the transition; the reported sharp first-order picture and cat fidelities are therefore conditioned on this choice.
  • Γ (overall rate) = 1
    Set to 1 without loss of generality for statics; harmless for spectra up to scale but defines energy units of all reported gaps.
  • Exponential gap fit α at δ=−0.05 = α≈0.26±0.01
    α≈0.26±0.01 extracted from ln(ΔE) vs N used to claim correlation length ξ≈3.8 and first-order tunneling character; the thermodynamic extrapolation leans on this fit.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Standard quantum spin-1/2 Hilbert space, Pauli algebra, and variational/DMRG convergence to the true ground state for the reported N.
    Implicit throughout Sec. II–III; ED cross-check only for N=20.
  • domain assumption The generalized Glauber–Ising Hamiltonian (Eqs. 1–3) with cluster ZXZ, NNN ZIZ, NN ZZ, and transverse field is the physical model of interest.
    Sec. II; motivated historically but not derived from a microscopic open-system limit for δ≠0 in this work.
  • domain assumption Exponential gap closure under PBC plus Binder crossing and discontinuous diagnostics imply a first-order QPT in the thermodynamic limit.
    Sec. IIID and discussion; standard lore for 1D first-order transitions but not a theorem proved here for this model.
  • domain assumption For pure states, F_Q(σ^z)=4 Var(σ^z) witnesses multipartite entanglement and metrological usefulness at the Heisenberg limit when F_Q=4N².
    Sec. IIIF; standard QFI results assumed without re-derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper Four large Schmidt coefficients constitute 'four distinct bipartite entanglement channels' characterizing the phase (vs SPT/VBS/spin liquid).
    Sec. IIIH interpretive framework; the counting is numerical, the channel language is the paper’s classification choice.
invented entities (1)
  • Named 'incommensurate phase' of this cluster–ANNNI chain no independent evidence
    purpose: Label the δ>0 gapped regime with oscillatory Czz, split S(q) peaks, and four Schmidt channels as distinct from a paramagnet or topological cluster phase.
    Not a new microscopic degree of freedom; a phase name for observed correlators. Independent evidence would be experimental structure-factor peaks in a realized device.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 33942 in / 4054 out tokens · 74049 ms · 2026-07-31T09:25:03.423303+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study a one-dimensional frustrated spin chain, which combines cluster-Ising and anisotropic next-nearest neighbor Ising models. We first offer a historical perspective that justifies the studied model. Then we study in detail the two quantum phases and prove that they are separated by a first order quantum phase transition. On one side, the ground state corresponds to a ferromagnetic phase, shows the presence of macroscopic cat states, and a small gap that closes in the thermodynamic limit. On the other phase, competing interactions avoid the establishment of a topological phase, though it conserves large incommensurate quantum correlations. We prove it is fundamentally distinct from a simple paramagnet, and we name it an incommensurate phase. This is a gapped phase, which gap does not close in the thermodynamic limit. While in the ferromagnetic phase there are two dominant Schmidt coefficients, in the incommensurate phase there are four. This corresponds to four distinct bipartite entanglement channels contributing substantially to the ground state. Finally, we discuss the utility of the macroscopic cat states for quantum metrology applications and the experimental feasibility of the system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28373 by Alberto Acevedo Mel\'endez, Andreu Angl\'es-Castillo, Armando P\'erez, Carmen G. Almud\'ever, Luca Ion, Miguel Angel Garcia-March, Mohit Lal Bera, Rafael G\'omez-Lurbe, Rodrigo M. Sanz, Somayeh Mehrabankar, Tanmoy Pandit.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Spin-spin correlation function Czz(r) versus distance r for selected δ in a N = 20 chain (PBC). For δ < 0, Czz(r) saturates to a distance-independent constant at large r, confirming long-range ferromagnetic order despite ⟨σ z k⟩ = 0 in finite systems. The saturation value increases monotonically from ≈ 0.85 at δ = −0.6 to ≈ 0.97 at δ = −0.2, approaching unity as δ → 0 − (see main text for clarification… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Static spin structure factor S(q) peaks Spk versus wave vector q for selected δ in a N = 20 chain (PBC). For δ < 0, a single sharp peak appears at q = 0, the definitive Fourier signature of ferromagnetic order. As δ increases beyond zero, the single peak splits into two symmetric peaks at q = ±q ∗ , with q ∗ increasing continuously with δ. This peak splitting is the unambiguous signature of an incommen… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Fourth-order Binder cumulant Uz, characterizing four-point correlation structure relative to two-point correlations. (a) Uz for N = 20 under PBC and OBC. For δ < 0, Uz rises from ≈ 0.27 at δ = −1 and saturates to 2/3 (PBC) for |δ| ≲ 0.05, remaining pinned up to δ = 0−, confirming perfectly factorizable four-point correlations consistent with long￾range ferromagnetic order. PBC and OBC yield identical resul… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spectral gap ∆E = E1 − E0 versus δ for N = 20 chains under PBC and OBC. (a) ∆E across full parameter range. At δ = −1, ∆EPBC = 0.157, ∆EOBC = 0.299, reflecting boundary-induced suppression of tunneling. As δ → 0 −, ∆EPBC collapses to ≈ 5 × 10−5 within |δ| ≤ 0.02, while ∆EOBC ≈ 0.008. For δ > 0, gaps reopen: ∆EPBC = 0.482, ∆EOBC = 0.025 at δ = 1.0. (b) Heatmap of ∆E versus δ and system size, showing dramati… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Characterization of Schrödinger cat states. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Bipartite von Neumann entanglement entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Entanglement structure analysis via Schmidt coefficients for a half-chain bipartition. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of ground-state expectation values of individual Hamiltonian terms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: City plot of the density matrix of the ground state for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

136 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in mathematical physics48, 119 (1976)

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in mathematical physics48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  2. [2]

    Carmichael,An open systems approach to quantum optics: lectures presented at the Université Libre de Bruxelles October 28 to November 4, 1991(Springer, 1993)

    H. Carmichael,An open systems approach to quantum optics: lectures presented at the Université Libre de Bruxelles October 28 to November 4, 1991(Springer, 1993)

    1991

  3. [3]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of open quantum systems(OUP Oxford, 2002)

    2002

  4. [4]

    Weiss,Quantum dissipative systems(World Scientific, 2012)

    U. Weiss,Quantum dissipative systems(World Scientific, 2012)

    2012

  5. [5]

    R. J. Glauber, Time-dependent statistics of the ising model, Journal of Mathematical Physics4, 294 (1963)

    1963

  6. [6]

    J. I. Latorre and M. T. Soto-Sanfiel,The Last Voice: Roy J. Glauber and the Dawn of the Atomic Age(Springer, 2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    C. W. Gardineret al.,Handbook of stochastic methods, Vol. 3 (springer Berlin, 2004)

    2004

  8. [8]

    M. L. Miller, K. Reygers, S. J. Sanders, and P. Steinberg, Glauber modeling in high-energy nuclear collisions, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.57, 205 (2007)

    2007

  9. [9]

    Haake and K

    F. Haake and K. Thol, Universality classes for one dimensional kinetic ising models, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter40, 219 (1980)

    1980

  10. [10]

    Cirauqui, M

    D. Cirauqui, M. Á. García-March, G. Guigó Corominas, T. Graß, P. R. Grzybowski, G. Muñoz-Gil, J. Saavedra, and M. Lewenstein, Comparing pseudo-and quantum-random number generators with monte carlo simulations, APL Quantum 1(2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Felderhof, Spin relaxation of the ising chain, Reports on Mathematical Physics1, 215 (1971)

    B. Felderhof, Spin relaxation of the ising chain, Reports on Mathematical Physics1, 215 (1971)

    1971

  12. [12]

    Hilhorst, M

    H. Hilhorst, M. Suzuki, and B. Felderhof, Kinetics of the stochastic ising chain in a two-flip model, Physica60, 199 (1972)

    1972

  13. [13]

    E. D. Siggia, Pseudospin formulation of kinetic ising models, Phys. Rev. B16, 2319 (1977)

    1977

  14. [14]

    Augusiak, F

    R. Augusiak, F. M. Cucchietti, F. Haake, and M. Lewenstein, Quantum kinetic ising models, New Journal of Physics12, 025021 (2010)

    2010

  15. [15]

    Das and B

    A. Das and B. K. Chakrabarti,Quantum Annealing and Other Optimization Methods(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005)

    2005

  16. [16]

    Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions(Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    S. Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions(Cambridge University Press, 2011). 22

    2011

  17. [17]

    Smacchia, L

    P. Smacchia, L. Amico, P. Facchi, R. Fazio, G. Florio, S. Pascazio, and V. Vedral, Statistical mechanics of the cluster ising model, Phys. Rev. A84, 022304 (2011)

    2011

  18. [18]

    Becker, P

    C. Becker, P. Soltan-Panahi, J. Kronjäger, S. Dörscher, K. Bongs, and K. Sengstock, Ultracold quantum gases in triangular optical lattices, New Journal of Physics12, 065025 (2010)

    2010

  19. [19]

    X.-J. Yu, L. Xu, and H.-Q. Lin, Topological physics in quantum critical systems, Physics Reports1160, 1 (2026), topological physics in quantum critical systems

    2026

  20. [20]

    Herrmann, S

    J. Herrmann, S. M. Llima, A. Remm, P. Zapletal, N. A. McMahon, C. Scarato, F. Swiadek, C. K. Andersen, C. Hellings, S. Krinner, N. Lacroix, S. Lazar, M. Kerschbaum, D. C. Zanuz, G. J. Norris, M. J. Hartmann, A. Wallraff, and C. Eichler, Realizing quantum convolutional neural networks on a superconducting quantum processor to recognize quantum phases, Natu...

    2022

  21. [21]

    W. Li, Z. Lu, and D.-L. Deng, Quantum Neural Network Classifiers: A Tutorial, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 61 (2022)

    2022

  22. [22]

    Tanaka, R

    S. Tanaka, R. Tamura, and B. K. Chakrabarti,Quantum spin glasses, annealing and computation(Cambridge University Press, 2017)

    2017

  23. [23]

    Selke and P

    W. Selke and P. Duxbury, The mean field theory of the three-dimensional annni model, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter57, 49 (1984)

    1984

  24. [24]

    Selke, The annni model - theoretical analysis and experimental application, Physics Reports170, 213 (1988)

    W. Selke, The annni model - theoretical analysis and experimental application, Physics Reports170, 213 (1988)

    1988

  25. [25]

    R. J. Elliott, Phenomenological discussion of magnetic ordering in the heavy rare-earth metals, Physical Review124, 346–353 (1961)

    1961

  26. [26]

    M. E. Fisher and W. Selke, Infinitely many commensurate phases in a simple ising model, Physical Review Letters44, 1502 (1980)

    1980

  27. [27]

    Bak, Commensurate phases, incommensurate phases and the devil’s staircase, Reports on Progress in Physics45, 587 (1982)

    P. Bak, Commensurate phases, incommensurate phases and the devil’s staircase, Reports on Progress in Physics45, 587 (1982)

    1982

  28. [28]

    G. D. Price and J. Yeomans, The application of the annni model to polytypic behaviour, Structural Science40, 448 (1984)

    1984

  29. [29]

    J. K. Pachos and M. B. Plenio, Three-spin interactions in optical lattices and criticality in cluster hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 056402 (2004)

    2004

  30. [30]

    S. O. Skrøvseth and S. D. Bartlett, Phase transitions and localizable entanglement in cluster-state spin chains with ising couplings and local fields, Phys. Rev. A80, 022316 (2009)

    2009

  31. [31]

    Li and H.-Q

    Y.-C. Li and H.-Q. Lin, Thermal quantum and classical correlations and entanglement in theXYspin model with three-spin interaction, Phys. Rev. A83, 052323 (2011)

    2011

  32. [32]

    A. J. Leggett, Macroscopic quantum systems and the quantum theory of measurement, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement69, 80 (2013)

    2013

  33. [33]

    schrödinger cat

    C. Monroe, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, and D. J. Wineland, A “schrödinger cat” superposition state of an atom, Science 272, 1131–1136 (1996)

    1996

  34. [34]

    W. H. Zurek, Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 715 (2003)

    2003

  35. [35]

    Schlosshauer, Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics, Rev

    M. Schlosshauer, Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1267 (2005)

    2005

  36. [36]

    D. J. Wineland, Nobel lecture: Superposition, entanglement, and raising schrödinger’s cat, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 1103 (2013)

    2013

  37. [37]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum-enhanced measurements: Beating the standard quantum limit, Science306, 1330 (2004)

    2004

  38. [38]

    J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Haroche, Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 565 (2001)

    2001

  39. [39]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information(Cambridge University Press, 2012)

    2012

  40. [40]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  41. [41]

    Hofheinz, H

    M. Hofheinz, H. Wang, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, A. D. O’Connell, D. Sank, J. Wenner, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Synthesizing arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator, Nature459, 546–549 (2009)

    2009

  42. [42]

    Gisin, New additions to the schrödinger cat family, Science312, 63–64 (2006)

    N. Gisin, New additions to the schrödinger cat family, Science312, 63–64 (2006)

    2006

  43. [43]

    A. D. O’Connell, M. Hofheinz, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, M. Lenander, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, D. Sank, H. Wang, M.Weides, J.Wenner, J.M.Martinis,andA.N.Cleland,Quantumgroundstateandsingle-phononcontrolofamechanical resonator, Nature464, 697–703 (2010)

    2010

  44. [44]

    The Nobel Foundation, The nobel prize in physics 2012 - press release (2012), press release

    2012

  45. [45]

    A.J.Leggett,Testingthelimitsofquantummechanics: motivation, stateofplay, prospects,JournalofPhysics: Condensed Matter14, R415 (2002)

    2002

  46. [46]

    The Nobel Foundation, The nobel prize in physics 2025 - press release (2025), press release

    2025

  47. [47]

    Miyashita and N

    S. Miyashita and N. Nagaosa, Quantum tunneling in half-integer spin systems, Progress of Theoretical Physics106, 533–549 (2001)

    2001

  48. [48]

    A. J. Leggett, Realism and the physical world, Reports on Progress in Physics71, 022001 (2008)

    2008

  49. [49]

    Hyllus, W

    P. Hyllus, W. Laskowski, R. Krischek, C. Schwemmer, W. Wieczorek, H. Weinfurter, L. Pezzé’, and A. Smerzi, Fisher information and multiparticle entanglement, Physical Review A85, 10.1103/physreva.85.022321 (2012)

    doi:10.1103/physreva.85.022321 2012

  50. [50]

    A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A86, 032324 (2012). 23

    2012

  51. [51]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimbène, Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases, Nature Physics8, 267–276 (2012)

    2012

  52. [52]

    J. C. Kimball, The kinetic ising model: Exact susceptibilities of two simple examples, Journal of Statistical Physics21, 289 (1979)

    1979

  53. [53]

    Deker and F

    U. Deker and F. Haake, Renormalization group transformation for the master equation of a kinetic ising chain, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter35, 281 (1979)

    1979

  54. [54]

    Z. Tan, K. Wang, S. Yang, F. Shen, F. Jin, X. Zhu, Y. Ji, S. Xu, J. Chen, Y. Wu, C. Zhang, Y. Gao, N. Wang, Y. Zou, A. Zhang, T. Li, Z. Bao, Z. Zhu, J. Zhong, Z. Cui, Y. Han, Y. He, H. Wang, J. Yang, Y. Wang, J. Shen, G. Liu, Z. Song, J. Deng, H. Dong, P. Zhang, S.-K. Jian, H. Li, Z. Wang, J. Zhang, Q. Guo, H.-Q. Lin, C. Song, X.-J. Yu, H. Wang, and F. Wu...

    2026

  55. [55]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calculations, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022)

    2022

  56. [56]

    Weinberg and M

    P. Weinberg and M. Bukov, QuSpin: a Python package for dynamics and exact diagonalisation of quantum many body systems. Part II: bosons, fermions and higher spins, SciPost Phys.7, 020 (2019)

    2019

  57. [57]

    S. R. White, Spin gaps in a frustrated heisenberg model forcav4O9, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3633 (1996)

    1996

  58. [58]

    H. A. Kramers and G. H. Wannier, Statistics of the two-dimensional ferromagnet. part i, Phys. Rev.60, 252 (1941)

    1941

  59. [59]

    Onsager, Crystal statistics

    L. Onsager, Crystal statistics. i. a two-dimensional model with an order-disorder transition, Phys. Rev.65, 117 (1944)

    1944

  60. [60]

    Pfeuty, The one-dimensional ising model with a transverse field, Annals of Physics57, 79 (1970)

    P. Pfeuty, The one-dimensional ising model with a transverse field, Annals of Physics57, 79 (1970)

    1970

  61. [61]

    M. Suzuki, Generalized trotter’s formula and systematic approximants of exponential operators and inner derivations with applications to many-body problems, Communications in Mathematical Physics51, 183 (1976)

    1976

  62. [62]

    R. J. Baxter, Exactly solved models in statistical mechanics, inIntegrable Systems in Statistical Mechanics(WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 1985) pp. 5–63

    1985

  63. [63]

    Dutta, G

    A. Dutta, G. Aeppli, B. K. Chakrabarti, U. Divakaran, T. F. Rosenbaum, and D. Sen,Quantum Phase Transitions in Transverse Field Spin Models: From Statistical Physics to Quantum Information(Cambridge University Press, 2015)

    2015

  64. [64]

    Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations, Physical Review Letters91, 10.1103/physrevlett.91.147902 (2003)

    G. Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations, Physical Review Letters91, 10.1103/physrevlett.91.147902 (2003)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.147902 2003

  65. [65]

    Mussardo,Statistical field theory: an introduction to exactly solved models in statistical physics(Oxford University Press, 2010)

    G. Mussardo,Statistical field theory: an introduction to exactly solved models in statistical physics(Oxford University Press, 2010)

    2010

  66. [66]

    Tasaki, Physics and mathematics of quantum many-body systems, Graduate Texts in Physics (2020)

    H. Tasaki, Physics and mathematics of quantum many-body systems, Graduate Texts in Physics (2020)

    2020

  67. [67]

    Papanikolaou,Studies of Topology and Order in Frustrated Spin Systems, Ph.d

    S. Papanikolaou,Studies of Topology and Order in Frustrated Spin Systems, Ph.d. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2008), 192 p

    2008

  68. [68]

    F. C. Alcaraz, M. N. Barber, M. T. Batchelor, R. J. Baxter, and G. R. W. Quispel, Surface exponents of the quantum xxz, ashkin-teller and potts models, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General20, 6397 (1987)

    1987

  69. [69]

    H. Q. Lin, Exact diagonalization of quantum-spin models, Phys. Rev. B42, 6561 (1990)

    1990

  70. [70]

    M. N. Barber, Finite-size scaling, inPhase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Vol. 8, edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic Press, London, 1983) pp. 145–266

    1983

  71. [71]

    Cardy, Finite-size scaling (1988)

    J. Cardy, Finite-size scaling (1988)

    1988

  72. [72]

    M. B. Hastings, An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Exper- iment2007, P08024 (2007)

    2007

  73. [73]

    Eisert, M

    J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy, Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 277 (2010)

    2010

  74. [74]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature464, 199–208 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature464, 199–208 (2010)

    2010

  75. [75]

    L. Lyu, D. Chandorkar, S. Kapoor, S. Takei, E. S. Sorensen, and W. Witczak-Krempa, Multiparty entanglement loops in quantum spin liquids (2025), arXiv:2505.18124 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    J. B. Kogut, An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.51, 659 (1979)

    1979

  77. [77]

    Binder, Finite size scaling analysis of ising model block distribution functions, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter43, 119 (1981)

    K. Binder, Finite size scaling analysis of ising model block distribution functions, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter43, 119 (1981)

    1981

  78. [78]

    Binder, ed.,MONTE CARLO METHODS IN STATISTICAL PHYSICS, Topics in Current Physics, Vol

    K. Binder, ed.,MONTE CARLO METHODS IN STATISTICAL PHYSICS, Topics in Current Physics, Vol. 7 (Springer- Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1986)

    1986

  79. [79]

    enrico fermi

    D. Vollhardt, Strong-coupling approaches to correlated fermions, inProceedings of the international school of physics "enrico fermi", CXXI course, Varenna on lake Como, 7-17 July 1992: perspectives in many-particle physics, edited by R. A. Broglia, J. R. Schrieffer, and P. F. Bortignon (North-Holland, 1994)

    1992

  80. [80]

    Binder, Theory of first-order phase transitions, Reports on Progress in Physics50, 783–859 (1987)

    K. Binder, Theory of first-order phase transitions, Reports on Progress in Physics50, 783–859 (1987)

    1987

Showing first 80 references.