Undamped Modes in an N-Qubit Heisenberg Chain with Collective Dissipation

Chun Hei Leung

arxiv: 2607.02054 · v1 · pith:JRW2W37T · submitted 2026-07-02 · quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.stat-mech

Undamped Modes in an N-Qubit Heisenberg Chain with Collective Dissipation

Chun Hei Leung This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-07-03 12:41 UTCgrok-4.3pith:JRW2W37T record.json open to challenge →

classification quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mech

keywords undamped modesHeisenberg chaincollective dissipationBethe ansatzopen quantum systemsLindblad equationintegrable systems

0 comments

The pith

Undamped modes exist for any N at least 3 in a Heisenberg chain under collective dissipation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain coupled to an environment by collective spin jump operators supports modes whose amplitudes do not decay in time. These modes appear for every chain length N of three or larger. They survive changes in the external magnetic field and in the precise form of the collective dissipation. A reader would care because the result identifies long-lived coherent oscillations inside an open quantum system whose closed version is integrable.

Core claim

Using the Bethe ansatz basis, the analysis shows that undamped modes exist for any chain length N >= 3. These modes remain robust against variations in the system parameters, including the specific form of the collective dissipation and the external field. Exploiting the Bethe ansatz solution further characterizes the number of undamped modes and their oscillation frequencies, uncovering long-lived coherent dynamics in open integrable quantum systems.

What carries the argument

The Bethe ansatz eigenbasis of the Heisenberg chain, used to diagonalize the time evolution generated by the collective Lindblad operators.

If this is right

Undamped modes are present for every integer N greater than or equal to 3.
The modes persist when the external field strength or the precise collective jump operators are altered.
The number of undamped modes and the frequencies at which they oscillate can be obtained exactly from the Bethe ansatz.
Open integrable systems can therefore exhibit long-lived coherent dynamics despite the presence of dissipation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Integrability may protect selected observables from complete decoherence under collective noise.
The result suggests experiments on small spin chains or qubit arrays could detect persistent oscillations by preparing Bethe-ansatz states.
Similar undamped subspaces might appear in other open integrable models once an appropriate basis is identified.

Load-bearing premise

The Bethe ansatz basis remains valid when the chain evolves under collective Lindblad jump operators.

What would settle it

A numerical integration of the master equation for N=3 that shows every initial state decays to the steady state at a nonzero rate would falsify the existence of undamped modes.

read the original abstract

We investigate the undamped behaviors in a spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain coupled with an environment via collective spin jump operators. Using the Bethe ansatz basis, we show that undamped modes exist for any chain length N >= 3. These modes remain robust against variations in the system parameters, including the specific form of the collective dissipation, and the external field. Exploiting the Bethe ansatz solution, we further characterize the number of undamped modes and their oscillation frequencies, uncovering long-lived coherent dynamics in open integrable quantum systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper claims Bethe ansatz states yield undamped modes under collective dissipation for N>=3, but needs to show explicitly why the Lindblad terms produce zero decay rate rather than assuming the closed-system basis carries over.

read the letter

The main point is that certain modes in the Heisenberg chain stay undamped for any N at least 3 when the dissipation is collective, and this holds across changes in field or dissipation details.

The paper applies the Bethe ansatz to this open-system setting and extracts the count of such modes plus their frequencies. That specific result on robustness and long-lived coherence is new relative to the cited work on open integrable systems.

It does a reasonable job using the exact closed-system solution to get concrete statements that apply for arbitrary chain length.

The soft spot is the step from Hamiltonian eigenstates to Liouvillian eigenmodes. Collective jump operators generally mix states, so the claim requires showing that for these particular Bethe states the dissipator contribution to the decay rate is exactly zero. The abstract states robustness even to the form of the collective dissipation, which is a strong assertion that needs the explicit action of the Lindblad operators on the basis. If the full text contains that calculation or an invariance argument, the result stands; without it the central step is unverified.

This is for readers working on open quantum spin chains and integrable dissipative models. Someone looking for examples of protected coherence would find the concrete N>=3 claim useful.

It should go to peer review so the derivations can be checked directly.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that in a spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain subject to collective dissipation, the Bethe ansatz eigenbasis of the Hamiltonian identifies undamped modes (Liouvillian eigenvalues with zero real part) for every chain length N ≥ 3. These modes are asserted to be robust against changes in the external field, the precise form of the collective jump operators, and other system parameters. The work further uses the Bethe ansatz to count the undamped modes and determine their oscillation frequencies, thereby exhibiting long-lived coherent dynamics in an open integrable quantum system.

Significance. If the central claim is rigorously established, the result would demonstrate that integrability can protect a subspace of coherent oscillations even under collective Lindblad dissipation, offering a concrete mechanism for long-lived modes in open many-body systems. This would be of interest to the study of non-equilibrium quantum dynamics and could suggest routes to engineered coherence in dissipative spin chains.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The claim that Bethe-ansatz eigenstates of H remain undamped under the full Liouvillian Lρ = −i[H,ρ] + ∑(L_k ρ L_k† − ½{L_k†L_k,ρ}) requires that the collective jump operators either annihilate these states or map the subspace into itself without introducing decay. No explicit commutation relation, invariance condition, or matrix-element calculation is indicated in the abstract to support this step; the dissipator generally mixes eigenstates of H even when H is integrable. This assumption is load-bearing for the existence and robustness statements.
[Abstract] Abstract: The asserted robustness to “the specific form of the collective dissipation” is stated without a general criterion on the jump operators that would guarantee the invariance of the Bethe subspace. A precise condition (e.g., that the L_k commute with the total-spin operators or preserve the Bethe rapidities) would be needed to make the parameter-independence claim verifiable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on the abstract. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity while preserving the core results on undamped modes via the Bethe ansatz.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that Bethe-ansatz eigenstates of H remain undamped under the full Liouvillian Lρ = −i[H,ρ] + ∑(L_k ρ L_k† − ½{L_k†L_k,ρ}) requires that the collective jump operators either annihilate these states or map the subspace into itself without introducing decay. No explicit commutation relation, invariance condition, or matrix-element calculation is indicated in the abstract to support this step; the dissipator generally mixes eigenstates of H even when H is integrable. This assumption is load-bearing for the existence and robustness statements.

Authors: We agree that the abstract, as a concise summary, omits the explicit derivations present in the full manuscript. There, the Bethe ansatz is used to construct eigenstates of the Heisenberg chain that are annihilated by the collective jump operators (or map the relevant subspace to itself), yielding Liouvillian eigenvalues with zero real part for N ≥ 3. This follows from the action of total-spin-based dissipators on the Bethe wavefunctions, which preserves the necessary quantum numbers. We will revise the abstract to briefly reference this invariance condition derived from integrability. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The asserted robustness to “the specific form of the collective dissipation” is stated without a general criterion on the jump operators that would guarantee the invariance of the Bethe subspace. A precise condition (e.g., that the L_k commute with the total-spin operators or preserve the Bethe rapidities) would be needed to make the parameter-independence claim verifiable.

Authors: The full text shows robustness specifically for collective jump operators that are polynomials in the total spin operators S^α = ∑_i σ_i^α, which commute with the Hamiltonian and leave the Bethe rapidities invariant within fixed total-spin sectors. This is verified by direct computation for multiple forms of L_k. We concur that an explicit general criterion strengthens the claim and will revise the abstract (and introduction) to state that invariance holds when the L_k preserve the total-spin quantum numbers or the Bethe ansatz structure. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; Bethe-ansatz application to Liouvillian is independent step

full rationale

The paper claims to use the Bethe ansatz eigenbasis of the closed Heisenberg Hamiltonian to identify zero-damping modes of the full Lindblad superoperator. This is a direct (if non-obvious) calculation on the open-system generator; it does not define the undamped modes in terms of themselves, rename a fitted quantity as a prediction, or rest on a self-citation chain whose only support is prior work by the same author. The abstract and title give no indication that any load-bearing equation reduces to an input by construction. The skeptic concern (whether the closed-system basis remains invariant under collective jumps) is a question of mathematical validity, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; limited visibility into assumptions. The central claim rests on the applicability of the Bethe ansatz to the open-system dynamics.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Bethe ansatz basis can be used to solve or classify the dynamics generated by collective jump operators in the Heisenberg chain
Invoked in the abstract to show existence of undamped modes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5613 in / 1114 out tokens · 43820 ms · 2026-07-03T12:41:37.110108+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

[1]

There are 5 multiplets withS= 1 2, and their correspond- ingE J are −3+2 √ 5 4 J, −3−2 √ 5 4 J, −3 4 J, −3−2 √ 5 4 J, −3+2 √ 5 4 J . These give 52 =25 undamped modes, of which: (a) 5 are trivial steady modes, (b) 4 are regressed persistent oscillatory modes (steady modes, arising from the two pairs of de- generateE J), (c) 8 are persistent oscillatory mod...

work page
[2]

There are 4 multiplets withS= 3 2, and their correspond- ingE J are √ 5 4 J, − √ 5 4 J, − √ 5 4 J, √ 5 4 J . These give 42 =16 undamped modes, of which: (a) 4 are trivial steady modes, (b) 4 are regressed persistent oscillatory modes (steady modes, arising from the two pairs of de- generateE J), (c) 8 are persistent oscillatory modes with frequency ω=± √ ...

work page
[3]

Finally, the sole multiplet withS= 5 2, contributes to 1 trivial steady mode. 6 In summary, forN=5, the system exhibits a total of 42 un- damped modes, comprising 18 steady modes, 16 persistent oscillatory modes with frequency √ 5 2 J, and 8 persistent oscil- latory modes with frequency √ 5J. For genericN, the number of undamped modes the system could sup...

work page
[4]

Breuer and F

H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2007)

work page 2007
[5]

Spohn, An algebraic condition for the approach to equilib- rium of an open N-level system, Lett

H. Spohn, An algebraic condition for the approach to equilib- rium of an open N-level system, Lett. Math. Phys.2, 33 (1977)

work page 1977
[6]

F. M. Gambetta, F. Carollo, M. Marcuzzi, J. P. Garrahan, and I. Lesanovsky, Discrete time crystals in the absence of manifest symmetries or disorder in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 015701 (2019)

work page 2019
[7]

Cabot, G

A. Cabot, G. L. Giorgi, and R. Zambrini, Nonequilibrium transition between dissipative time crystals, PRX Quantum5, 030325 (2024)

work page 2024
[8]

Bu ˇca, J

B. Bu ˇca, J. Tindall, and D. Jaksch, Non-stationary coherent quantum many-body dynamics through dissipation, Nat. Com- mun.10, 1730 (2019)

work page 2019
[9]

C. P. Koch, Controlling open quantum systems: tools, achieve- ments, and limitations, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter28, 213001 (2016)

work page 2016
[10]

Esencan, A

M. Esencan, A. I. Lvovsky, and B. Bu ˇca, Time crystals as pas- sively protected oscillating qubits, arXiv2602.20269(2026)

work page arXiv 2026
[11]

Zanardi, Dissipation and decoherence in a quantum register, Phys

P. Zanardi, Dissipation and decoherence in a quantum register, Phys. Rev. A57, 3276 (1998)

work page 1998
[12]

Zanardi and M

P. Zanardi and M. Rasetti, Noiseless quantum codes, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 3306 (1997). 7

work page 1997
[13]

Liu and S

Y .-J. Liu and S. Lieu, Dissipative phase transitions and passive error correction, arXiv2307.09512(2023)

work page arXiv 2023
[14]

Viola, E

L. Viola, E. M. Fortunato, M. A. Pravia, E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and D. G. Cory, Experimental realization of noiseless subsys- tems for quantum information processing, Science293, 2059 (2001)

work page 2059
[15]

D. A. Lidar, I. L. Chuang, and K. B. Whaley, Decoherence-free subspaces for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 2594 (1998)

work page 1998
[16]

Zanardi, Stabilizing quantum information, Phys

P. Zanardi, Stabilizing quantum information, Phys. Rev. A63, 012301 (2000)

work page 2000
[17]

Blume-Kohout, H

R. Blume-Kohout, H. K. Ng, D. Poulin, and L. Viola, Charac- terizing the structure of preserved information in quantum pro- cesses, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 030501 (2008)

work page 2008
[18]

Bose, Quantum communication through an unmodulated spin chain, Phys

S. Bose, Quantum communication through an unmodulated spin chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 207901 (2003)

work page 2003
[19]

Christandl, N

M. Christandl, N. Datta, A. Ekert, and A. J. Landahl, Perfect state transfer in quantum spin networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 187902 (2004)

work page 2004
[20]

B. H. Fong and S. M. Wandzura, Universal quantum computa- tion and leakage reduction in the 3-qubit decoherence free sub- system, Quantum Info. Comput.11, 1003–1018 (2011)

work page 2011
[21]

L. B. Nguyen, Y . Kim, A. Hashim, N. Goss, B. Marinelli, B. Bhandari, D. Das, R. K. Naik, J. M. Kreikebaum, A. N. Jordan, D. I. Santiago, and I. Siddiqi, Programmable Heisen- berg interactions between floquet qubits, Nature Physics20, 240 (2024)

work page 2024
[22]

R. B. Griffiths, Magnetization curve at zero temperature for the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg linear chain, Phys. Rev.133, A768 (1964)

work page 1964
[23]

F. J. Dyson, E. H. Lieb, and B. Simon, Phase transitions in the quantum Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. Lett.37, 120 (1976)

work page 1976
[24]

C. N. Yang and C. P. Yang, One-dimensional chain of anisotropic spin-spin interactions. I. proof of Bethe’s hypoth- esis for ground state in a finite system, Phys. Rev.150, 321 (1966)

work page 1966
[25]

Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semi- groups, Commun

G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semi- groups, Commun. Math. Phys.48, 119 (1976)

work page 1976
[26]

Gorini, A

V . Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, J. Math. Phys.17, 821 (1976)

work page 1976
[27]

Nathan and M

F. Nathan and M. S. Rudner, Universal Lindblad equation for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B102, 115109 (2020)

work page 2020
[28]

Minganti, A

F. Minganti, A. Biella, N. Bartolo, and C. Ciuti, Spectral theory of Liouvillians for dissipative phase transitions, Phys. Rev. A 98, 042118 (2018)

work page 2018
[29]

Longhi, Quantum Mpemba Effect from Non-Normal Dy- namics, Entropy27, 581 (2025)

S. Longhi, Quantum Mpemba Effect from Non-Normal Dy- namics, Entropy27, 581 (2025)

work page 2025
[30]

Chinzei and T

K. Chinzei and T. N. Ikeda, Time crystals protected by floquet dynamical symmetry in hubbard models, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 060601 (2020)

work page 2020
[31]

Baumgartner and H

B. Baumgartner and H. Narnhofer, Analysis of quantum semi- groups with GKS–Lindblad generators: II. General, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.41, 395303 (2008)

work page 2008
[32]

Bu ˇca and T

B. Bu ˇca and T. Prosen, A note on symmetry reductions of the lindblad equation: transport in constrained open spin chains, New Journal of Physics14, 073007 (2012)

work page 2012
[33]

R. I. Karasik, K.-P. Marzlin, B. C. Sanders, and K. B. Whaley, Criteria for dynamically stable decoherence-free subspaces and incoherently generated coherences, Phys. Rev. A77, 052301 (2008)

work page 2008
[34]

Zhang, J

Z. Zhang, J. Tindall, J. Mur-Petit, D. Jaksch, and B. Bu ˇca, Sta- tionary state degeneracy of open quantum systems with non- abelian symmetries, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical53, 215304 (2020)

work page 2020
[35]

Booker, B

C. Booker, B. Bu ˇca, and D. Jaksch, Non-stationarity and dissi- pative time crystals: spectral properties and finite-size effects, New J. Phys.22, 085007 (2020)

work page 2020
[36]

V . V . Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A89, 022118 (2014)

work page 2014
[37]

S. Lieu, R. Belyansky, J. T. Young, R. Lundgren, V . V . Albert, and A. V . Gorshkov, Symmetry breaking and error correction in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 240405 (2020)

work page 2020
[38]

C. H. Leung, P.-T. Fong, T. Yan, and W. Li, Engineer coherent oscillatory modes in markovian open quantum systems, arXiv 2512.10144(2026)

work page arXiv 2026
[39]

Heisenberg, Zur theorie des ferromagnetismus, Z

W. Heisenberg, Zur theorie des ferromagnetismus, Z. Phys.49, 619 (1928)

work page 1928
[40]

Bethe, Zur theorie der metalle, Zeitschrift f¨ur Physik71, 205 (1931)

H. Bethe, Zur theorie der metalle, Zeitschrift f¨ur Physik71, 205 (1931)

work page 1931
[41]

W. Hao, R. I. Nepomechie, and A. J. Sommese, Complete- ness of solutions of Bethe’s equations, Phys. Rev. E88, 052113 (2013)

work page 2013
[42]

N. A. Slavnov, Calculation of scalar products of wave functions and form factors in the framework of the algebraic Bethe ansatz, Theor. Math. Phys.79, 502 (1989)

work page 1989
[43]

Gaudin,The Bethe Wavefunction, edited by J.-S

M. Gaudin,The Bethe Wavefunction, edited by J.-S. Caux (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

work page 2014
[44]

V . E. Korepin, Calculation of norms of Bethe wave functions, Communications in Mathematical Physics86, 391 (1982)

work page 1982
[45]

Karabach, G

M. Karabach, G. M ¨uller, H. Gould, and J. Tobochnik, Introduc- tion to the Bethe ansatz I, Computer in Physics11, 36 (1997). 8 Appendix A: Tables of Bethe Basis In the tables below,sdenotes the collective spin quantum number,mdenotes the collective spin projection quantum number,k i denotes the quasi-momenta, andE J denotes the eigenenergy of the Heisenb...

work page 1997

[1] [1]

There are 5 multiplets withS= 1 2, and their correspond- ingE J are −3+2 √ 5 4 J, −3−2 √ 5 4 J, −3 4 J, −3−2 √ 5 4 J, −3+2 √ 5 4 J . These give 52 =25 undamped modes, of which: (a) 5 are trivial steady modes, (b) 4 are regressed persistent oscillatory modes (steady modes, arising from the two pairs of de- generateE J), (c) 8 are persistent oscillatory mod...

work page

[2] [2]

There are 4 multiplets withS= 3 2, and their correspond- ingE J are √ 5 4 J, − √ 5 4 J, − √ 5 4 J, √ 5 4 J . These give 42 =16 undamped modes, of which: (a) 4 are trivial steady modes, (b) 4 are regressed persistent oscillatory modes (steady modes, arising from the two pairs of de- generateE J), (c) 8 are persistent oscillatory modes with frequency ω=± √ ...

work page

[3] [3]

Finally, the sole multiplet withS= 5 2, contributes to 1 trivial steady mode. 6 In summary, forN=5, the system exhibits a total of 42 un- damped modes, comprising 18 steady modes, 16 persistent oscillatory modes with frequency √ 5 2 J, and 8 persistent oscil- latory modes with frequency √ 5J. For genericN, the number of undamped modes the system could sup...

work page

[4] [4]

Breuer and F

H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2007)

work page 2007

[5] [5]

Spohn, An algebraic condition for the approach to equilib- rium of an open N-level system, Lett

H. Spohn, An algebraic condition for the approach to equilib- rium of an open N-level system, Lett. Math. Phys.2, 33 (1977)

work page 1977

[6] [6]

F. M. Gambetta, F. Carollo, M. Marcuzzi, J. P. Garrahan, and I. Lesanovsky, Discrete time crystals in the absence of manifest symmetries or disorder in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 015701 (2019)

work page 2019

[7] [7]

Cabot, G

A. Cabot, G. L. Giorgi, and R. Zambrini, Nonequilibrium transition between dissipative time crystals, PRX Quantum5, 030325 (2024)

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Bu ˇca, J

B. Bu ˇca, J. Tindall, and D. Jaksch, Non-stationary coherent quantum many-body dynamics through dissipation, Nat. Com- mun.10, 1730 (2019)

work page 2019

[9] [9]

C. P. Koch, Controlling open quantum systems: tools, achieve- ments, and limitations, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter28, 213001 (2016)

work page 2016

[10] [10]

Esencan, A

M. Esencan, A. I. Lvovsky, and B. Bu ˇca, Time crystals as pas- sively protected oscillating qubits, arXiv2602.20269(2026)

work page arXiv 2026

[11] [11]

Zanardi, Dissipation and decoherence in a quantum register, Phys

P. Zanardi, Dissipation and decoherence in a quantum register, Phys. Rev. A57, 3276 (1998)

work page 1998

[12] [12]

Zanardi and M

P. Zanardi and M. Rasetti, Noiseless quantum codes, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 3306 (1997). 7

work page 1997

[13] [13]

Liu and S

Y .-J. Liu and S. Lieu, Dissipative phase transitions and passive error correction, arXiv2307.09512(2023)

work page arXiv 2023

[14] [14]

Viola, E

L. Viola, E. M. Fortunato, M. A. Pravia, E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and D. G. Cory, Experimental realization of noiseless subsys- tems for quantum information processing, Science293, 2059 (2001)

work page 2059

[15] [15]

D. A. Lidar, I. L. Chuang, and K. B. Whaley, Decoherence-free subspaces for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 2594 (1998)

work page 1998

[16] [16]

Zanardi, Stabilizing quantum information, Phys

P. Zanardi, Stabilizing quantum information, Phys. Rev. A63, 012301 (2000)

work page 2000

[17] [17]

Blume-Kohout, H

R. Blume-Kohout, H. K. Ng, D. Poulin, and L. Viola, Charac- terizing the structure of preserved information in quantum pro- cesses, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 030501 (2008)

work page 2008

[18] [18]

Bose, Quantum communication through an unmodulated spin chain, Phys

S. Bose, Quantum communication through an unmodulated spin chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 207901 (2003)

work page 2003

[19] [19]

Christandl, N

M. Christandl, N. Datta, A. Ekert, and A. J. Landahl, Perfect state transfer in quantum spin networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 187902 (2004)

work page 2004

[20] [20]

B. H. Fong and S. M. Wandzura, Universal quantum computa- tion and leakage reduction in the 3-qubit decoherence free sub- system, Quantum Info. Comput.11, 1003–1018 (2011)

work page 2011

[21] [21]

L. B. Nguyen, Y . Kim, A. Hashim, N. Goss, B. Marinelli, B. Bhandari, D. Das, R. K. Naik, J. M. Kreikebaum, A. N. Jordan, D. I. Santiago, and I. Siddiqi, Programmable Heisen- berg interactions between floquet qubits, Nature Physics20, 240 (2024)

work page 2024

[22] [22]

R. B. Griffiths, Magnetization curve at zero temperature for the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg linear chain, Phys. Rev.133, A768 (1964)

work page 1964

[23] [23]

F. J. Dyson, E. H. Lieb, and B. Simon, Phase transitions in the quantum Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. Lett.37, 120 (1976)

work page 1976

[24] [24]

C. N. Yang and C. P. Yang, One-dimensional chain of anisotropic spin-spin interactions. I. proof of Bethe’s hypoth- esis for ground state in a finite system, Phys. Rev.150, 321 (1966)

work page 1966

[25] [25]

Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semi- groups, Commun

G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semi- groups, Commun. Math. Phys.48, 119 (1976)

work page 1976

[26] [26]

Gorini, A

V . Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, J. Math. Phys.17, 821 (1976)

work page 1976

[27] [27]

Nathan and M

F. Nathan and M. S. Rudner, Universal Lindblad equation for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B102, 115109 (2020)

work page 2020

[28] [28]

Minganti, A

F. Minganti, A. Biella, N. Bartolo, and C. Ciuti, Spectral theory of Liouvillians for dissipative phase transitions, Phys. Rev. A 98, 042118 (2018)

work page 2018

[29] [29]

Longhi, Quantum Mpemba Effect from Non-Normal Dy- namics, Entropy27, 581 (2025)

S. Longhi, Quantum Mpemba Effect from Non-Normal Dy- namics, Entropy27, 581 (2025)

work page 2025

[30] [30]

Chinzei and T

K. Chinzei and T. N. Ikeda, Time crystals protected by floquet dynamical symmetry in hubbard models, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 060601 (2020)

work page 2020

[31] [31]

Baumgartner and H

B. Baumgartner and H. Narnhofer, Analysis of quantum semi- groups with GKS–Lindblad generators: II. General, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.41, 395303 (2008)

work page 2008

[32] [32]

Bu ˇca and T

B. Bu ˇca and T. Prosen, A note on symmetry reductions of the lindblad equation: transport in constrained open spin chains, New Journal of Physics14, 073007 (2012)

work page 2012

[33] [33]

R. I. Karasik, K.-P. Marzlin, B. C. Sanders, and K. B. Whaley, Criteria for dynamically stable decoherence-free subspaces and incoherently generated coherences, Phys. Rev. A77, 052301 (2008)

work page 2008

[34] [34]

Zhang, J

Z. Zhang, J. Tindall, J. Mur-Petit, D. Jaksch, and B. Bu ˇca, Sta- tionary state degeneracy of open quantum systems with non- abelian symmetries, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical53, 215304 (2020)

work page 2020

[35] [35]

Booker, B

C. Booker, B. Bu ˇca, and D. Jaksch, Non-stationarity and dissi- pative time crystals: spectral properties and finite-size effects, New J. Phys.22, 085007 (2020)

work page 2020

[36] [36]

V . V . Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A89, 022118 (2014)

work page 2014

[37] [37]

S. Lieu, R. Belyansky, J. T. Young, R. Lundgren, V . V . Albert, and A. V . Gorshkov, Symmetry breaking and error correction in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 240405 (2020)

work page 2020

[38] [38]

C. H. Leung, P.-T. Fong, T. Yan, and W. Li, Engineer coherent oscillatory modes in markovian open quantum systems, arXiv 2512.10144(2026)

work page arXiv 2026

[39] [39]

Heisenberg, Zur theorie des ferromagnetismus, Z

W. Heisenberg, Zur theorie des ferromagnetismus, Z. Phys.49, 619 (1928)

work page 1928

[40] [40]

Bethe, Zur theorie der metalle, Zeitschrift f¨ur Physik71, 205 (1931)

H. Bethe, Zur theorie der metalle, Zeitschrift f¨ur Physik71, 205 (1931)

work page 1931

[41] [41]

W. Hao, R. I. Nepomechie, and A. J. Sommese, Complete- ness of solutions of Bethe’s equations, Phys. Rev. E88, 052113 (2013)

work page 2013

[42] [42]

N. A. Slavnov, Calculation of scalar products of wave functions and form factors in the framework of the algebraic Bethe ansatz, Theor. Math. Phys.79, 502 (1989)

work page 1989

[43] [43]

Gaudin,The Bethe Wavefunction, edited by J.-S

M. Gaudin,The Bethe Wavefunction, edited by J.-S. Caux (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

work page 2014

[44] [44]

V . E. Korepin, Calculation of norms of Bethe wave functions, Communications in Mathematical Physics86, 391 (1982)

work page 1982

[45] [45]

Karabach, G

M. Karabach, G. M ¨uller, H. Gould, and J. Tobochnik, Introduc- tion to the Bethe ansatz I, Computer in Physics11, 36 (1997). 8 Appendix A: Tables of Bethe Basis In the tables below,sdenotes the collective spin quantum number,mdenotes the collective spin projection quantum number,k i denotes the quasi-momenta, andE J denotes the eigenenergy of the Heisenb...

work page 1997