Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.00429 v5 pith:JSVLEIM4 submitted 2023-09-30 cs.LG stat.ML

On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Data

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords modelsdatagenerativetrainingsyntheticcleanenoughiterative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep generative models have made tremendous progress in modeling complex data, often exhibiting generation quality that surpasses a typical human's ability to discern the authenticity of samples. Undeniably, a key driver of this success is enabled by the massive amounts of web-scale data consumed by these models. Due to these models' striking performance and ease of availability, the web will inevitably be increasingly populated with synthetic content. Such a fact directly implies that future iterations of generative models will be trained on both clean and artificially generated data from past models. In this paper, we develop a framework to rigorously study the impact of training generative models on mixed datasets -- from classical training on real data to self-consuming generative models trained on purely synthetic data. We first prove the stability of iterative training under the condition that the initial generative models approximate the data distribution well enough and the proportion of clean training data (w.r.t. synthetic data) is large enough. We empirically validate our theory on both synthetic and natural images by iteratively training normalizing flows and state-of-the-art diffusion models on CIFAR10 and FFHQ.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Unlearning with Asymmetric Sources: Improved Unlearning-Utility Trade-off with Public Data

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Asymmetric Langevin Unlearning uses public data to suppress unlearning noise costs by O(1/n_pub²), enabling practical mass unlearning with preserved utility under distribution mismatch.

  2. Unlearning with Asymmetric Sources: Improved Unlearning-Utility Trade-off with Public Data

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ALU uses public data to suppress unlearning cost quadratically while characterizing distribution mismatch effects, enabling mass unlearning with maintained utility.

  3. Can Generative Artificial Intelligence Survive Data Contamination? Theoretical Guarantees under Contaminated Recursive Training

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0

    Contaminated recursive training converges to the true distribution at rate t^{-min(p, α)} — the slower of the model's baseline rate p and the real-data fraction α.

  4. Self-Poisoning in Adaptive Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Sharp-Threshold Theory and Certified Label-Free Calibration

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    In adaptive OOD detection, bank impurity follows a mean-field urn law whose kernel slope acts as a reproduction number; a frozen-reserve gate removes the supercritical collapse, and a two-world theorem caps label-free...

  5. Forgetting is Everywhere

    cs.LG 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    Forgetting is defined as violation of predictive self-consistency under self-generated updates, yielding the measure Γ_k(t); exact Bayesian learners are shown to have Γ = 0.

  6. Epistemic diversity across language models mitigates knowledge collapse

    cs.LG 2025-12 reject novelty 5.0

    In repeated self-training loops on Wikitext2, ecosystems of four small language models show lower average perplexity than one, two, or sixteen models, but the paper's broader claims about monotonic optima, robustness,...