Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 68 references

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

In 229Th ions the electron shell and nuclear states exchange energy coherently over long times without exact resonance, enabling a nuclear quantum battery under laser drive.

2026-07-02 04:50 UTC pith:JT6SNYL3

load-bearing objection The paper frames 229Th ions as a nuclear quantum battery via off-resonant coherent electron bridge but supplies no calculation showing the coupling overcomes detuning and damping. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.00607 v1 pith:JT6SNYL3 submitted 2026-07-01 nucl-th

Long Time Energy Oscillation Between Electron Shell and Nucleus in ²²⁹Th Ions and Coherent Electron Bridge for Nuclear Quantum Battery

E. V. Tkalya This is my paper
classification nucl-th
keywords 229Thnuclear isomerelectron bridgequantum batterycoherent oscillationsM1 transitionion trapenergy transfer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that the 8.4 eV M1 transition in the thorium-229 ion electron shell and the similar nuclear transition act as two nested qubits. When the transition energies are relatively close, the interaction between electron and nuclear currents allows repeated coherent transfers of energy back and forth, so the shell periodically shrinks and expands. This oscillation can be detected through the intensity of light scattered by ions held in a trap. The same coupling widens the energy window for exciting the nuclear isomer via an electron bridge and converts the driven ion into a nuclear quantum battery that is charged by first exciting the shell coherently and then transferring the energy to the nucleus.

Core claim

In 229Th ions the electron shell with its M1 transition at 8.4 eV and the nuclear ground-state doublet form spatially nested qubits. Relative proximity of the transition energies together with the sizable interaction between electron and nuclear currents produces weakly damped oscillations in which excitation energy moves repeatedly from shell to nucleus and back. The shell therefore breathes in size periodically. The same mechanism extends the usable energy window for isomer excitation via the electron bridge and, under coherent laser illumination, converts the ion into a nuclear quantum battery that can be charged by first driving the shell and then transferring the energy coherently to th

What carries the argument

Coherent energy oscillation between the electron-shell qubit and the nuclear qubit, driven by their mutual current interaction without requiring resonance within level widths.

Load-bearing premise

The energies of the electron-shell and nuclear transitions are close enough and their interaction strong enough for weakly damped oscillations without exact resonance.

What would settle it

Absence of periodic modulation in scattered-light intensity from trapped 229Th ions at the frequency set by the energy difference between the two transitions would falsify the long-time oscillation prediction.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The energy range for 229mTh isomer excitation via the electron bridge is extended beyond exact resonance.
  • Exposure to coherent laser radiation turns the ion into a nuclear quantum battery.
  • The battery is charged by coherent excitation of the electron shell followed by coherent transfer of energy to the nucleus.
  • The breathing of the electron shell produces observable changes in scattered-light intensity inside an ion trap.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Varying laser frequency or intensity could map how the effective coupling strength depends on detuning from the shell transition.
  • The oscillation period itself offers a direct readout of the shell-nucleus interaction energy in a single trapped ion.
  • Similar nested-qubit behavior might appear in other ions where an atomic transition lies near a low-energy nuclear transition.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that in ^{229}Th ions the 8.4 eV M1 electron-shell transition and the nuclear ground-state doublet transition, being energetically proximate, permit weakly damped coherent energy oscillations (multiple transfers) between the electron shell and nucleus without requiring resonance within the level widths, owing to a relatively high electron-nuclear current interaction. This extends the usable energy range for ^{229m}Th(3/2^+, 8.4 eV) isomer excitation via an electron bridge. The system is further proposed to function as a nuclear quantum battery when driven by coherent laser radiation, charged by coherent electron-shell excitation followed by coherent transfer to the nucleus; the effect is said to be observable via scattered light intensity in an ion trap.

Significance. If the central claims were quantitatively substantiated, the work would extend the parameter space for nuclear-isomer excitation and introduce a nuclear-scale quantum battery concept accessible with current laser technology. No such substantiation (matrix elements, coupling-to-detuning ratios, or efficiency estimates) is supplied, so the potential significance remains speculative and cannot be evaluated against existing electron-bridge or quantum-battery literature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that oscillations occur 'due to the relatively high interaction energy of the electron and nuclear currents' and 'does not require resonant coincidence within the width of the levels' is unsupported; no matrix element, no comparison of interaction strength V to detuning Δ or widths Γ_e, Γ_n, and no estimate of the resulting Rabi period or damping are provided.
  2. [Abstract] The manuscript supplies neither rate equations nor a master-equation treatment that would demonstrate weakly damped, multi-cycle coherent transfer; consequently the transformation into a 'nuclear quantum battery' and the charging protocol via coherent electron bridge rest on unquantified assumptions.
  3. [Abstract] No numerical estimate or derivation of the electron-nuclear coupling (e.g., M1-M1 magnetic interaction via electron density at the nucleus) is given, leaving the claim that the interaction is 'relatively high' and sufficient for off-resonant oscillations unverifiable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The term 'nuclear quantum battery' is introduced without reference to the existing quantum-battery literature, which may confuse readers.
  2. [Abstract] Notation for the nuclear state (^{229m}Th(3/2^+,8.4 eV)) is used without defining the isomer energy or confirming consistency with accepted values.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive criticism. We address each major comment below, agreeing that quantitative support is currently lacking and outlining revisions to provide it.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that oscillations occur 'due to the relatively high interaction energy of the electron and nuclear currents' and 'does not require resonant coincidence within the width of the levels' is unsupported; no matrix element, no comparison of interaction strength V to detuning Δ or widths Γ_e, Γ_n, and no estimate of the resulting Rabi period or damping are provided.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript, as a concise conceptual proposal, does not supply explicit matrix elements or comparisons of V to Δ and the widths. In the revised version we will add order-of-magnitude estimates of the M1-M1 coupling derived from the nuclear magnetic moment and the electron probability density at the nucleus, together with a comparison showing that multiple coherent cycles remain possible for detunings several times larger than the level widths. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The manuscript supplies neither rate equations nor a master-equation treatment that would demonstrate weakly damped, multi-cycle coherent transfer; consequently the transformation into a 'nuclear quantum battery' and the charging protocol via coherent electron bridge rest on unquantified assumptions.

    Authors: We agree that a dynamical treatment is needed to substantiate the claims. The revised manuscript will include a simple coherent two-qubit model (electron shell and nuclear states) under the interaction Hamiltonian, with estimates of the Rabi period and damping from spontaneous emission, thereby supporting the proposed charging protocol for the nuclear quantum battery. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] No numerical estimate or derivation of the electron-nuclear coupling (e.g., M1-M1 magnetic interaction via electron density at the nucleus) is given, leaving the claim that the interaction is 'relatively high' and sufficient for off-resonant oscillations unverifiable.

    Authors: This overlaps with the first comment. We will add a brief derivation and numerical estimate of the coupling strength in the revision, showing that the interaction is large enough relative to the energy mismatch in 229Th to permit the off-resonant oscillations described. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; conceptual proposal without load-bearing derivation chain

full rationale

The visible text consists of qualitative assertions about energy oscillations enabled by 'relatively high interaction energy' between electron and nuclear currents, without any equations, fitted parameters, or explicit derivations. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked in a load-bearing way. The central claims (weakly damped oscillations without resonance, coherent electron bridge for nuclear quantum battery) are presented as physical consequences of known level proximity rather than results derived from the paper's own inputs. This matches the default case of a self-contained conceptual suggestion with no reduction of predictions to fitted quantities or self-referential steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The proposal rests on the unquantified assumption that transition energies are sufficiently close and that electron-nuclear current interaction is strong enough to support coherent transfer; these quantities are not derived from first principles in the visible text.

free parameters (1)
  • energy detuning between electron and nuclear transitions
    The abstract invokes relative proximity without supplying a numerical value or derivation.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quantum mechanics permits coherent energy exchange between electron currents and nuclear currents when transition energies are proximate
    Implicit foundation for treating the shell and nucleus as coupled qubits.
invented entities (1)
  • nuclear quantum battery no independent evidence
    purpose: Conceptual device that stores energy in the excited nuclear isomer state after coherent transfer from the electron shell
    New label introduced to describe the charged nuclear state; no independent falsifiable signature supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5811 in / 1325 out tokens · 32193 ms · 2026-07-02T04:50:08.913733+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The electron shell of the Thorium ion with the $M$1(8.4~eV) transition between levels and the doublet of the $^{229}$Th nucleus ground state with the similar transition represent two qubits spatially inserted one within the other. In the case of relative proximity of the energies of these transitions, weakly damped energy oscillations can be excited between qubits, namely, multiple coherent energy transfer from the electron shell to the nucleus and vice versa. This process in the $^{229}$Th ions does not require resonant (within the width of the levels) coincidence of the transition energies due to the relatively high interaction energy of the electron and nuclear currents. The electron shell ``breathes'', periodically decreasing and increasing in size. The effect can be observed in an ion trap by the intensity of light scattered by thorium-229 ions. This extends the energy range for the $^{229m}$Th$(3/2^+,8.4$~eV) isomer excitation via an electron bridge. Furthermore, the system under consideration is transformed into a nuclear quantum battery when exposed to coherent laser radiation. To ``charge'' the battery, i.e. to excite $^{229m}$Th, one can use developed methods for charging quantum batteries, in particular, coherent excitation of the electron shell followed by coherent transfer of excitation energy to the nucleus (the coherent electron bridge). This opens the way for the design of the $^{229}$Th nuclear quantum battery at the current level of technological development.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00607 by E. V. Tkalya.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Scheme of energy exchange between the electron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The probability to find the system in the states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a) The probability to find the system in different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    breathes

    This value of the matrix element can be considered reliable: similar calculations reproduces the experimen- tal data on the probability of internal electron conversion for the isomer 229mTh [58, 59]. Thus, the coherent part of the interaction energyg AN =ℜ[E int]≃10 −6 eV, that is, the same order of magnitude as in the Th 39+ ion. The incoherent part of t...

    work page

  2. [2]

    L. A. Kroger and C. W. Reich, Features of the low-energy level scheme of 229Th as observed in theα-decay of 233U., Nucl. Phys. A259, 29 (1976)

    work page 1976

  3. [3]

    C. W. Reich and R. G. Helmer, Energy separation of the doublet of intrinsic states at the ground state of 229Th, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 271 (1990)

    work page 1990

  4. [4]

    R. G. Helmer and C. W. Reich, An excited state of 229Th at 3.5 eV, Phys. Rev. C49, 1845 (1994)

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    B. R. Beck, J. A. Becker, P. Beiersdorfer, G. V. Brown, K. J. Moody, J. B. Wilhelmy, F. S. Porter, C. A. Kil- bourne, and R. L. Kelley, Energy splitting of the ground- state doublet in the nucleus 229Th, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 142501 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Seiferle, L

    B. Seiferle, L. von der Wense, P. V. Bilous, I. Amersdorf- fer, C. Lemell, F. Libisch, S. Stellmer, T. Schumm, C. E. Dullmann, A. Palffy, and P. G. Thirolf, Energy of the 229Th nuclear clock transition, Nature573, 243 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Kraemer, J

    S. Kraemer, J. Moens, M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis, S. Bara, K. Beeks, P. Chhetri, K. Chrysalidis, A. Claessens, T. E. Cocolios, J. G. M. Correia, H. D. Witte, R. Ferrer, S. Geldhof, R. Heinke, N. Hosseini, M. Huyse, U. Koster, Y. Kudryavtsev, M. Laatiaoui, R. Lica, G. Magchiels, V. Manea, C. Merckling, L. M. C. Pereira, S. Raeder, T. Schumm, S. Sels, P. G...

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Tiedau, M

    J. Tiedau, M. Okhapkin, K. Zhang, J. Thielk- ing, G. Zitzer, E. Peik, F. Schaden, T. Proneb- ner, I. Morawetz, L. Col, F. Schneider, A. Leitner, M. Pressler, G. Kazakov, K. Beeks, T. Sikorsky, and T. Schumm, Laser excitation of the th-229 nucleus, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 182501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Elwell, C

    R. Elwell, C. Schneider, J. Jeet, J. Terhune, H. Morgan, A. Alexandrova, H. Tan, A. Derevianko, and E. Hudson, Laser excitation of the 229Th nuclear isomeric transition in a solid-state host, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 013201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Yamaguchi, Y

    A. Yamaguchi, Y. Shigekawa, H. Haba, H. Kikunaga, K. Shirasaki, M. Wada, and H. Katori, Laser spec- troscopy of triply charged 229Th isomer for a nuclear clock, Nature.629, 62 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Zhang, T

    C. Zhang, T. Ooi, J. Higgins, J. Doyle, L. Wense, K. Beeks, A. Leitner, G. Kazakov, P. Li, P. Thirolf, T. Schumm, and J. Ye, Frequency ratio of the 229mTh nuclear isomeric transition and the 87Sr atomic clock, Nature633, 63 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Zhang, L

    C. Zhang, L. von der Wense, J. F. Doyle, J. S. Higgins, T. Ooi, H. U. Friebel, J. Ye, R. Elwell, J. E. S. Terhune, H. W. T. Morgan, A. N. Alexandrova, H. B. T. Tan, A. Derevianko, and E. R. Hudson, 229ThF4 thin films for solid-state nuclear clocks, Nature636, 603 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    E. V. Tkalya, Spontaneous emission probability forM1 transition in a dielectric medium: 229mTh (3/2+,3.5±1.0 eV) decay, JETP Lett.71, 311 (2000)

    work page 2000

  14. [14]

    E. V. Tkalya, A. N. Zherikhin, and V. I. Zhudov, Decay of the low-energy nuclear isomer 229mTh (3/2+,3.5±1.0 eV) in solids, dielectrics and metals: A new scheme of experimental research, Phys. Rev. C61, 064308 (2000)

    work page 2000

  15. [15]

    E. V. Tkalya, V. O. Varlamov, V. V. Lomonosov, and S. A. Nikulin, Processes of the nuclear isomer 229mTh (3/2+,3.5±1.0 eV) resonant excitation by optical pho- tons, Phys. Scr.53, 296 (1996)

    work page 1996

  16. [16]

    Peik and C

    E. Peik and C. Tamm, Nuclear laser spectroscopy of the 3.5 eV transition in Th-229, Europhys. Lett.61, 181 (2003)

    work page 2003

  17. [17]

    W. G. Rellergert, D. DeMille, R. R. Greco, M. P. Hehlen, J. R. Torgerson, and E. R. Hudson, Constraining the evo- lution of the fundamental constants with a solid-state optical frequency reference based on the 229Th nucleus, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 200802 (2010)

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    C. J. Campbell, A. G. Radnaev, A. Kuzmich, V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, and A. Derevianko, Single-ion nuclear clock for metrology at the 19th decimal place, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 120802 (2012)

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    Peik and M

    E. Peik and M. Okhapkin, Nuclear clocks based on res- onant excitation ofγ-transitions, C. R. Phys.16, 516 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Beeks, T

    K. Beeks, T. Sikorsky, T. Schumm, J. Thielking, M. V. Okhapkin, and E. Peik, The thorium-229 low-energy iso- mer and the nuclear clock, Nature Rev. Phys.3, 238 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    E. V. Tkalya, Proposal for a nuclear gamma-ray laser of optical range, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 162501 (2011)

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    E. V. Tkalya and L. P. Yatsenko, Creation of inverse population in the 229Th ground-state doublet by means of 7 a narrowband laser, Laser Phys. Lett.10, 105808 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    V. V. Flambaum, Enhanced effect of temporal variation of the fine structure constant and the strong interaction in 229Th, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 092502 (2006)

    work page 2006

  24. [24]

    Litvinova, H

    E. Litvinova, H. Feldmeier, J. Dobaczewski, and V. Flam- baum, Nuclear structure of lowest 229Th states and time- dependent fundamental constants, Phys. Rev. C79, 064303 (2009)

    work page 2009

  25. [25]

    J. C. Berengut, V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, and S. G. Porsev, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 210801 (2009)

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    M. S. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, D. F. J. Kimball, A. Derevianko, and C. W. Clark, Search for new physics with atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 025008 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    E. Peik, T. Schumm, M. Safronova, A. Palffy, J. Weiten- berg, and P. G. Thirolf, Nuclear clocks for testing funda- mental physics, Quantum Sci. Technol.6, 034002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    A. M. Dykhne, N. V. Eremin, and E. V. Tkalya, Alpha decay of the first excited state of the Th-229 nucleus, JETP Lett.64, 345 (1996)

    work page 1996

  29. [29]

    Pachucki, S

    K. Pachucki, S. Wycech, J. Zylicz, and M. Pfutzner, Nuclear-spin mixing oscillations in 229Th89+, Phys. Rev. C64, 064301 (2001)

    work page 2001

  30. [30]

    E. V. Tkalya, Anomalous magnetic hyperfine structure of the 229Th ground-state doublet in muonic atoms, Phys. Rev. A94, 012510 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    E. V. Tkalya, Decay rate of the nuclear isomer 229Th (3/2+,7.8 eV) in a dielectric sphere, thin film, and metal cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 122501 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    E. V. Tkalya, Theory of the nuclear excitation by electron transition process near the K edge, Phys. Rev. A75, 022509 (2007)

    work page 2007

  33. [33]

    Morita, Nuclear excitation by electron transition and its application to Uranium 235 separation, Progr

    M. Morita, Nuclear excitation by electron transition and its application to Uranium 235 separation, Progr. Theor. Phys.49, 1574 (1973)

    work page 1973

  34. [34]

    E. V. Tkalya, Accelerated decay of nuclear isomers during atomic-shell ionization, JETP Lett.60, 627 (1994)

    work page 1994

  35. [35]

    V. A. Dzuba and V. V. Flambaum, Resonance nuclear excitation of the 229Th nucleus via electronic bridge pro- cess in Th II , Phys. Rev. A111, L041103 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    V. A. Dzuba and V. V. Flambaum, Using the Th III ion for a nuclear clock and searches for new physics, Phys. Rev. A111, 053109 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    S. Yu, X. Hua, X. Tong, C. Li, and S. Lei, Highly charged 229Th6+ ions as the candidate platform for nuclear clock, Chin. Phys. Lett.42, 120302 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Koziol and J

    K. Koziol and J. Rzadkiewicz, Nuclear excitation by near-resonant electron transition in 229Th39+ ions, Phys. Rev. C111, 064302 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    E. V. Tkalya, Excitation of low-lying isomer level of the nucleus 229Th by optical photons, JETP Lett.55, 211 (1992)

    work page 1992

  40. [40]

    E. V. Tkalya, Cross section for excitation of the low-lying (<5 eV) 229Th isomer with laser radiation by the inverse electron bridge, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.55, 1611 (1992)

    work page 1992

  41. [41]

    Kalman and T

    P. Kalman and T. Keszthelyi, Laser-driven inverse elec- tronic bridge process: An optical tool for determining low-energy separation of nearby nuclear station., Phys. Rev. C49, 324 (1994)

    work page 1994

  42. [42]

    S. G. Porsev, V. V. Flambaum, E. Peik, and C. Tamm, Excitation of the isomeric 229mTh nuclear state via an electronic bridge process in 229Th+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 182501 (2010)

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    F. F. Karpeshin and M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, Bound in- ternal conversion versus nuclear excitation by electron transition: Revision of the theory of optical pumping of the 229mTh isomer, Phys. Rev. C95, 034310 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    P. V. Bilous, E. Peik, and A. Palffy, Laser-induced elec- tronic bridge for characterization of the 229mTh→229Th nuclear transition with a tunable optical laser, New J. Phys.20, 013016 (2018)

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    P. V. Borisyuk, N. N. Kolachevsky, A. V. Taichenachev, E. V. Tkalya, I. Y. Tolstikhina, and V. I. Yudin, Exci- tation of the low-energy 229mTh isomer in the electron bridge process via the continuum, Phys. Rev. C100, 044306 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    P. V. Bilous, H. Bekker, J. C. Berengut, B. Seiferle, L. von der Wense, P. G. Thirolf, T. Pfeifer, J. R. C. Lopez-Urrutia, and A. Palffy, Electronic bridge excita- tion in highly charged 229Th ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 192502 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    A. Y. Dzyublik, Excitation of 229mTh in the electron bridge via continuum, as a scattering process, Phys. Rev. C102, 024604 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Shigekawa, A

    Y. Shigekawa, A. Yamaguchi, K. Tokoi, N. Sato, H. Kiku- naga, K. Shirasaki, Y. Kasamatsu, M. Wada, and H. Haba, Lifetime of the singly charged 229Th nuclear isomer, Nat. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-026- 03251-1 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-026- 2026

  49. [49]

    von der Wense, Thorium-229 lifetime locked down, Nat

    L. von der Wense, Thorium-229 lifetime locked down, Nat. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-026-03310-7 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-026-03310-7 2026

  50. [50]

    Ficek and R

    Z. Ficek and R. Tanas, Entangled states and collective nonclassical effects in two-atom systems, Phys. Rep.372, 369 (2002)

    work page 2002

  51. [51]

    Gonzalez-Tudela, D

    A. Gonzalez-Tudela, D. Martin-Cano, E. Moreno, L. Martin-Moreno, C. Tejedor, and F. Garcia-Vidal, En- tanglement of two qubits mediated by one-dimensional plasmonic waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 020501 (2011)

    work page 2011

  52. [52]

    J. Ren, T. Chen, B. Wang, and X. Zhang, Ultrafast coherent energy transfer with high efficiency based on plasmonic nanostructures, J. Chem. Phys.146, 144101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    Novotny and B

    L. Novotny and B. Hecht,Principles of Nano-Optics (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006)

    work page 2006

  54. [54]

    E. V. Tkalya, Nuclear excitation in atomic transitions (NEET process analysis), Nucl. Phys. A539, 209 (1992)

    work page 1992

  55. [55]

    E. V. Tkalya, Probability of nonradiative excitation of nuclei in transitions of an electron in an atomic shell, Sov. Phys. JETP75, 200 (1992)

    work page 1992

  56. [56]

    E. V. Tkalya, Dynamical effect of finite nuclear size in the nuclear excitation process during electron transitions in an atomic shell, JETP78, 239 (1994)

    work page 1994

  57. [57]

    A. Y. Dzyublik, Photo-induced nuclear excitation by electron transition, JETP Lett.93, 489 (2011)

    work page 2011

  58. [58]

    A. Y. Dzyublik, General theory of nuclear excitation by electron transitions, Phys. Rev. C188, 054616 (2013)

    work page 2013

  59. [59]

    V. F. Strizhov and E. V. Tkalya, Decay channel of low- lying isomer state of the 229Th nucleus. possibilities of experimental investigation, Sov. Phys. JETP72, 387 (1991)

    work page 1991

  60. [60]

    Seiferle, L

    B. Seiferle, L. von der Wense, and P. G. Thirolf, Lifetime measurement of the 229Th nuclear isomer, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 042501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    G. H. Gossel, V. A. Dzuba, and V. V. Flambaum, Calcu- lation of strongly forbidden M1 transitions and g-factor anomalies in atoms considered for parity-nonconservation 8 measurements, Phys. Rev. A88, 034501 (2013)

    work page 2013

  62. [62]

    I. M. Savukov, A. Derevianko, H. G. Berry, and W. R. Johnson, Large contributions of negative-energy states to forbidden magnetic-dipole transition amplitudes in alkali-metal atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 2914 (1999)

    work page 1999

  63. [63]

    D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Kher- sonslii,Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum(World Scientific Publ., London, 1988)

    work page 1988

  64. [64]

    Farina, G

    D. Farina, G. M. Andolina, A. Mari, M. Polini, and V. Giovannetti, Charger-mediated energy transfer for quantum batteries: An open-system approach, Phys. Rev. B99, 035421 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    C. L. Cortes, W. Sun, and Z. Jacob, Fundamental ef- ficiency bound for quantum coherent energy transfer in nanophotonics, Optics Express30, 34725 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    C. A. Downing, E. del Valle, and A. I. Fernandez- Dominguez, Resonance fluorescence of two asymmetri- cally pumped and coupled two-level systems, Phys. Rev. A107, 023717 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    Ahmadi, P

    B. Ahmadi, P. Mazurek, P. Horodecki, and S. Barzanjeh, Nonreciprocal quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 210402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    von der Wense and B

    L. von der Wense and B. Seiferle, The 229Th isomer: prospects for a nuclear optical clock, Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 277 (2020)

    work page 2020