Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

The $SO(1,4)$ flux-balance laws of de Sitter at quadrupolar order

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives the full set of SO(1,4) flux-balance laws for quadrupolar perturbations around de Sitter, recovering the standard Poincaré laws in the flat limit.

desk verdict New SO(1,4) flux-balance laws at quadrupolar order with a clean flat limit, but the charge/flux split is explicitly non-unique and the central formulas are one member of an equivalence class; still a solid paper worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16215 v2 pith:JURIC2EM submitted 2024-11-25 gr-qc hep-th

Geoffrey Compère , Sk Jahanur Hoque , Emine Şeyma Kutluk This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th MSC 83C3083C3583C25 PACS 04.30.-w04.20.Ha98.80.-k
keywords deSitterspacetimeflux-balancelawsquadrupoleradiationgravitationalwavescosmologicalconstantSO(14)symmetryBondigaugemultipolemoments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives the complete set of flux-balance laws for quadrupolar gravitational radiation around de Sitter spacetime, one for each of the ten background symmetries: dilatation (energy), rotations (angular momentum), spatial translations (linear momentum), and cosmological boosts. The laws express the change of a charge between two cuts of future null infinity as a flux built from the source quadrupole moments, and they reproduce the standard Poincaré flux-balance laws in the flat limit. The paper also provides the first linear-momentum and cosmological-boost loss formulas in this setting. A reader should care because the positive cosmological constant dominates the late universe; any gravitational-wave extraction from cosmological sources ultimately needs balance laws adapted to de Sitter rather than flat space.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the flux-balance formula for the holographic stress-energy tensor evaluated on the future boundary of asymptotically de Sitter spacetime, written in $\Lambda$-BMS gauge. The ten SO(1,4) background symmetries act on the boundary metric as conformal Killing vectors (dilatations and rotations as isometries, spatial translations and cosmological boosts as proper conformal transformations), and the quadratic flux is the overlap of the boundary shear with the higher Bondi moment built from the perturbed stress tensor. The multipole truncation uses the even and odd source quadrupole moments $Q^{(\rho+p)}_{ij}$ and $J_{ij}$ and the auxiliary field $\zeta_{ij}$ solving the equation of motion, which allows every Bondi field to be expressed in terms of these moments. The non-uniqueness in splitting the balance law into charge and flux is handled by shifting the charge with an $O((\delta g)^2)$ term, chosen so that the energy flux is negative definite and the flat limit is standard.

What would settle it

For a concrete quadrupolar waveform, compute the two proposed energy fluxes (3.29) and (4.5): they differ by Hubble-constant terms, so an independent gauge-invariant definition that picks one would either confirm or falsify the uniqueness of the balance laws. Alternatively, computing the adjusted bracket of the shifted charges would settle whether they form an SO(1,4) representation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Eqs. (3.21), (3.26), (3.35), and (3.46) give the even- and odd-parity quadrupolar flux-balance laws for the SO(1,4) background symmetries of de Sitter, with charges defined in (3.28), (3.36), and (3.47). The dilatation (energy) balance law is written in two distinct ways, corresponding to two proposals for a negative-definite energy flux; the second proposal matches the total energy loss derived independently in earlier work. In the flat limit $H \to 0$, the laws reduce to the standard Poincaré energy, momentum, and angular-momentum balance laws under the dictionary $I^{\mathrm{PM}}_{ij} = Q^{(\rho+p)}_{ij} - \tfrac{1}{3}\delta_{ij} Q^{(\rho+p)}_{kk}$ and $J^{\mathrm{PM}}_{ij} = \tfrac{3}{4} J_{ij}$. The paper therefore supplies, at quadrupolar order, the entire set of de Sitter flux-balance laws together with the charge definitions that make each flux manifestly negative definite.

Load-bearing premise

The balance laws depend on a particular way of splitting the total change into a charge time-derivative and a flux; the paper fixes that split by demanding the energy flux be negative definite and the flat limit be the standard one, but it does not prove that this choice is unique or physically singled out.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The full set of SO(1,4) balance laws at quadrupolar order is now available, including the first linear-momentum and cosmological-boost loss formulas.
  • In the flat limit, the laws reproduce the standard Poincaré flux-balance laws, so the de Sitter formulas are consistent extensions of the known flat-space results.
  • The integrated energy flux matches the total energy loss derived independently from de Sitter Teukolsky waves, showing that the boundary-gauge choice does not affect the total loss.
  • The charges give a fixed-cut definition of energy and angular momentum at any retarded time on future null infinity, not just after integrating over all time.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the two energy-flux proposals are not gauge-equivalent, then the energy loss of a de Sitter source is defined only up to Hubble-radius corrections, and a gauge-invariant definition is needed before these formulas can be applied unambiguously to waveform analysis.
  • The boost balance law resembles the flat-space center-of-mass and radiation-recoil balance law, so it may yield a de Sitter recoil formula for compact binaries, which the paper does not derive.
  • The normalization $J^{\mathrm{PM}}_{ij} = \tfrac{3}{4} J_{ij}$ implies that numerical comparisons of the current quadrupole in de Sitter must rescale the odd-parity source moment by $4/3$, a statement that can be tested in a code comparison.
  • The open question of whether the shifted charges close into an SO(1,4) algebra means the ten balance laws could be merely ten scalar identities; proving closure would turn them into a genuine conserved-quantity framework.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper derives flux-balance laws for linear quadrupolar perturbations around de Sitter spacetime, associated with the ten background SO(1,4) symmetries. Starting from the holographic stress tensor and the Λ-BMS framework, the authors define charges with an O((δg)^2) shift and derive balance laws for energy (dilatations), angular momentum, spatial translations, and cosmological boosts. The expressions are evaluated on the quadrupolar solution space of the authors' earlier work [57], and the flat spacetime limit is shown to reproduce the standard Poincaré flux-balance laws with a dictionary between de Sitter source moments and flat-space multipole moments. The paper also compares its energy flux with the BBP quadrupolar waves and de Sitter Teukolsky waves, finding agreement for the integrated energy loss, and it explicitly acknowledges the non-uniqueness of the charge/flux split.

Significance. If the results hold, this is the first complete set of quadrupolar-order SO(1,4) flux-balance laws, including the previously missing linear momentum and cosmological boost loss formulas. The derivation is systematic: it starts from the identity (2.7), evaluates the quadratic flux on a known solution space, and performs the angular integrals and flat limit in detail. The comparison with BBP and Teukolsky results is a valuable cross-check, and the paper is honest about the charge/flux ambiguity. However, the central formulas are underdetermined by the stated criteria because the shift ΔQξ in Eq. (2.25) is fixed only by requiring negative-definite energy flux and a standard flat limit, and the paper itself shows two inequivalent energy proposals satisfying both criteria. This makes the significance conditional on either a physical selection principle or a reframing of the results as an equivalence class of balance laws.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (2.25); Section 5] The charge Qξ is defined only up to an O((δg)^2) shift ΔQξ, and Section 5 explicitly concedes that the split into a time derivative of the charge and a flux is not unique. The two selection criteria invoked—negative-definite quadratic energy flux and standard flat limit—are both satisfied by the two energy proposals (3.29) and (4.5), which differ by the total u-derivative ∂u[G/2 ∮ δ(Ee+Eo)]. Hence the individual balance laws (3.21), (3.26), (3.35), and (3.46) are not uniquely determined by the dynamics or by the stated criteria. Because the abstract and introduction present these as "the" SO(1,4) flux-balance laws, this underdetermination is load-bearing. Please either add a physical principle that fixes ΔQξ (for example, a charge-algebra or covariance requirement), or systematically characterize the equivalence class and state the invariant content—total integrated losses, flat limits, and charge combinations that are independent of the shift—as the primary results.
  2. [Section 3, Eqs. (3.33) and (3.44)] The transitions from Eq. (3.32) to Eq. (3.33) and from Eq. (3.43) to Eq. (3.44) are described only as "after some algebra." These steps are essential because the final angular momentum and linear-momentum/boost laws, Eqs. (3.35)–(3.36) and (3.46)–(3.47), depend directly on them. Please include the full intermediate computation in an appendix or supplementary material, or at least list the sphere integrals and integration-by-parts identities that produce the quoted expressions, so that the central formulas can be independently verified.
  3. [Section 4, Eqs. (4.13)–(4.26)] The comparison with BBP and de Sitter Teukolsky waves demonstrates agreement for the integrated energy flux after translating variables via Eqs. (4.14)–(4.16). This is a valuable consistency check, but it does not select between the two energy-flux proposals (3.29) and (4.5), because those proposals differ by a boundary term that vanishes after integration over u. Please state explicitly that the comparison constrains only the total integrated loss, not the per-cut flux-balance law, and clarify the implications for the status of the individual balance laws.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.4, text before Eq. (3.48)] The sentence "The flat tensors I PM ij, I PM ij are symmetric and tracefree" should read "I PM ij and J PM ij"; additionally, ensure the notation for the current-type moment is typeset consistently to avoid confusion with the paper's Jij.
  2. [Section 3, Eqs. (3.4)–(3.9)] The quantities Pi, Qi(ρ), Kij, and the moment Qij(ρ+p) are imported from [57]; please provide their definitions or add a short appendix so that the paper is self-contained for readers who do not have that reference at hand.
  3. [Section 5] The conclusion refers to "two distinct proposals for the energy loss," but (3.29) and (4.5) are flux-balance laws; please clarify whether the two proposals differ in the charge, the flux, or both, and consistently use that terminology throughout.
  4. [Section 2, Eq. (2.15)] The matrix form of the stress-energy tensor in Eq. (2.15) is visually unclear; please specify the missing entries explicitly or write the expression componentwise.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No hidden circularity: the flux-balance laws are derived from the stress-tensor identity (2.7), matched against the independent BBP flux formula [55], and reduced to the standard flat laws with a single dictionary; the only by-construction element is the disclosed non-unique charge/flux split, which the paper itself flags in Section 5.

  1. other [Section 2 after Eq. (2.25); Section 3.1.1, Eqs. (3.17)-(3.19), (3.28)-(3.29); Section 4, Eq. (4.5); Section 5]
    "There is an ambiguity in defining this shift. We will partially fix this ambiguity by requiring that the energy is positive definite. ... Even though the flux-balance laws have been determined, their split into the time derivative of the charge (left-hand side) and the flux (right-hand side) is not unique."

    In (2.25) the charge is redefined as Qξ = QTξ + ΔQξ, and in Section 3 the shift is implemented by moving exact u-derivative terms out of the quadratic flux and into the charge, so each flux-balance law dQ/du = F is an identity by construction of Q rather than an independent dynamical prediction. The paper exhibits this explicitly: the two energy proposals (3.29) and (4.5) differ by the boundary term ∂u[G/2∮δ(Ee+Eo)], and both satisfy the same two selection criteria (negative-definite flux and standard flat limit). Hence the finite-H part of each individual balance law is one member of an equivalence class modulo boundary terms; only the flat-limit content is split-independent.

full rationale

The derivation chain is largely self-contained. The flux-balance laws start from the trace-free, divergence-free stress-tensor identity (2.7) and the boundary charge (2.10); the quadratic flux (2.24) is computed, and Section 3 evaluates it on the quadrupolar solution space of the authors' prior paper [57] via Eqs. (3.4)-(3.9). The central flux content is then verified against independent work: Section 4 matches the energy flux exactly to the BBP formula [55] (Eqs. (4.13)-(4.26)) using the dictionary established in [58], and the flat limit reproduces the standard Poincaré flux-balance laws (3.48)-(3.51) with a single dictionary (3.52)-(3.53) that consistently maps the energy, momentum and boost fluxes. This is a genuine consistency check, not a per-law fit: no parameter is tuned to a target output, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work; the paper instead explicitly denies uniqueness of the charge/flux split. The only by-construction element is the charge shift (2.25) and the associated absorption of total derivatives into the charges (3.28), (3.36) and (3.47), which the authors disclose, including the two distinct energy proposals (3.29) and (4.5). Since the BBP-matched energy flux and the flat-limit content survive independently of that split, the central claim does not reduce to its inputs. The self-citations [36], [57] and [58] are load-bearing for the solution and charge framework but are anchored by the external BBP comparison and the flat-limit consistency check, so they do not raise the circularity score further.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central formulas rest on the dynamical framework imported from prior work: the Starobinsky expansion, the Λ-BMS gauge, the quadrupolar solution space of [57], and the holographic charge definition. The only genuinely new choice made here is the charge shift ΔQξ, which is fixed by positivity and the flat-limit requirement rather than derived. No new particles or fields are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Charge shift ΔQξ = chosen by hand: ensures negative-definite energy flux and standard flat limit
    The paper defines Qξ = QT_ξ + ΔQξ (Eq. 2.25) and states the shift is ambiguous, partially fixed by requiring positive energy (Section 2). The resulting energy flux has two variants (Eqs. 3.29 and 4.5), so this choice directly affects the central balance law.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Starobinsky expansion (2.1) of asymptotically de Sitter metrics with fall-offs in 1/τ.
    Assumes the class of physical metrics admits this expansion; this is the standard framework for asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes, taken from [67].
  • domain assumption Background boundary metric on R × S² (2.4) and Λ-BMS gauge fixing (2.5).
    Models spatially compact binary systems reaching I+ at a single point; removes two points from I+_dS. This choice is motivated in Section 2 but is a restriction on the physical setup.
  • domain assumption Quadrupolar solution space (3.4)-(3.9) from [57].
    The flux-balance laws are evaluated on this solution space; its validity is established in [57] and matched to Teukolsky waves in [58]. The present paper does not re-derive it.
  • ad hoc to paper Charge formula (2.10) from the holographic stress tensor, with the shift (2.25).
    The paper states in Section 4 that it started from this charge formula as an initial ansatz for positive cosmological constant, and the shift is ambiguous, partially fixed by positivity and the flat limit.
  • ad hoc to paper Setting δξa = 0, i.e., background symmetries are undeformed in the linear theory.
    Stated in Section 2 as a conventional choice; the dual vector perturbations are fixed to vanish so that only background symmetries act.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The $SO(1,4)$ flux-balance laws of de Sitter at quadrupolar order." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JURIC2EM

@misc{pith2026241116215,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The $SO(1,4)$ flux-balance laws of de Sitter at quadrupolar order},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JURIC2EM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16215}
}
abstract

The linear solution for quadrupolar perturbations around de Sitter spacetime was recently constructed. In this paper, we provide the flux-balance laws for each background symmetry (dilatations, rotations, spatial translations and cosmological boosts) in terms of source moments at quadrupolar order. We write the dilatation flux-balance law in two distinct ways, which allows to contrast two distinct proposals for the negative definite energy flux. The standard Poincar\'e flux balance laws at future null infinity are recovered in the flat limit of the $SO(1,4)$ flux-balance laws.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Octupolar Gravitational Radiation in de Sitter Spacetime

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The metric perturbation from a localized source in de Sitter spacetime is derived at octupolar order in generalized harmonic gauge, including the cosmological tail, the first extension beyond quadrupole order.

  2. Twisting asymptotically-flat spacetimes

    gr-qc 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Twisting asymptotically-flat spacetimes are brought into a generalized Bondi gauge with finite radial expansion, producing new flux-balance laws, Carroll-boost symmetries, and finite supertranslated Kerr–Taub–NUT metrics.

  3. Across the Horizon: On Gravitational Wave Flux Laws and Tests of Gravity

    gr-qc 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dissertation deriving BMS flux laws, using them to test waveform models, and forecasting LISA observations of echoes and a stochastic background.

  4. Field-dependent diffeomorphisms and the transformation of surface charges between gauges

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The Weyl charge in (A)dS3 gravity is kinematical: it can be toggled on or off by a field-dependent diffeomorphism between Bondi-Sachs and Fefferman-Graham gauges.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [57]

    Compère, S

    G. Compère, S. J. Hoque and E. c. Kutluk, Quadrupolar radiation in de Sitter: displacement memory and Bondi metric , Class. Quant. Grav. 41 (2024), no. 15 155006 [2309.02081]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [55]

    Bonga, C

    B. Bonga, C. Bunster and A. Pérez, Gravitational radiation with Λ >0, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 6 064039 [ 2306.08029]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [58]

    Harsh, S. J. Hoque, S. P. Kashyap and A. Virmani, de Sitter Teukolsky waves , Class. Quant. Grav. 41 (2024), no. 22 225011 [ 2405.10777]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [1]

    Supernova Search Team Collaboration, A. G. Riess et. al., Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmolog ical constant, Astron. J. 116 (1998) 1009–1038 [ astro-ph/9805201]

    arXiv 1998

  5. [2]

    Perlmutter et

    Supernova Cosmology Project Collaboration, S. Perlmutter et. al., Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High Redshift Supernovae , Astrophys. J. 517 (1999) 565–586 [astro-ph/9812133]

    arXiv 1999

  6. [3]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et. al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 6 061102 [ 1602.03837]

    arXiv 2016

  7. [4]

    Ashtekar, B

    A. Ashtekar, B. Bonga and A. Kesavan, Asymptotics with a positive cosmological constant: I. Basic framework , Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015), no. 2 025004 [1409.3816]

    arXiv 2015

  8. [5]

    C. G. Böhmer and M. Wright, Slowly rotating perfect fluids with a cosmological constant, Gen. Rel. Grav. 47 (2015), no. 12 143 [ 1411.5486]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

Show all 78 references
  1. [6]

    Chu, Transverse traceless gravitational waves in a spatially fla t FLR W universe: Causal structure from dimensional reduction , Phys

    Y.-Z. Chu, Transverse traceless gravitational waves in a spatially fla t FLR W universe: Causal structure from dimensional reduction , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 12 124038 [1504.06337]

    2015 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Ashtekar, B

    A. Ashtekar, B. Bonga and A. Kesavan, Asymptotics with a positive cosmological constant: III. The quadrupole formula , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 10 104032 [1510.05593]

    2015 arXiv

  3. [8]

    Ashtekar, B

    A. Ashtekar, B. Bonga and A. Kesavan, Gravitational waves from isolated systems: Surprising consequences of a positive cosmological consta nt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 5 051101 [ 1510.04990]

    2016 arXiv

  4. [9]

    L. B. Szabados and P. Tod, A positive Bondi–type mass in asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015), no. 20 205011 [ 1505.06637]

    2015 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Date and S

    G. Date and S. J. Hoque, Gravitational waves from compact sources in a de Sitter background, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016), no. 6 064039 [ 1510.07856]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [11]

    N. T. Bishop, Gravitational waves in a de Sitter universe , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016), no. 4 044025 [ 1512.05663]. 20

    2016 arXiv

  7. [12]

    P. T. Chruściel and L. Ifsits, The cosmological constant and the energy of gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016), no. 12 124075 [ 1603.07018]

    2016 arXiv

  8. [13]

    Saw, Mass-loss of an isolated gravitating system due to energy ca rried away by gravitational waves with a cosmological constant , Phys

    V.-L. Saw, Mass-loss of an isolated gravitating system due to energy ca rried away by gravitational waves with a cosmological constant , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016), no. 10 104004 [ 1605.05151]

    2016 arXiv

  9. [14]

    Kesavan, Asymptotic structure of space-time with a positive cosmolo gical constant, other thesis, Penn State U., Penn State U., 6, 2016

    A. Kesavan, Asymptotic structure of space-time with a positive cosmolo gical constant, other thesis, Penn State U., Penn State U., 6, 2016

    2016

  10. [15]

    Saw, Behavior of asymptotically electro- Λ spacetimes, Phys

    V.-L. Saw, Behavior of asymptotically electro- Λ spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017), no. 8 084038 [ 1608.06886]

    2017 arXiv

  11. [16]

    Schlue, Decay of the Weyl curvature in expanding black hole cosmolog ies, Ann

    V. Schlue, Decay of the Weyl curvature in expanding black hole cosmolog ies, Ann. PDE 8 (2022), no. 1 9 [ 1610.04172]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [17]

    Date and S

    G. Date and S. J. Hoque, Cosmological Horizon and the Quadrupole Formula in de Sitter Background , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 4 044026 [ 1612.09511]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [18]

    Viaggiu, Axial and polar gravitational wave equations in a de Sitter e xpanding universe by Laplace transform , Class

    S. Viaggiu, Axial and polar gravitational wave equations in a de Sitter e xpanding universe by Laplace transform , Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017), no. 3 035018 [1701.02491]

    2017 arXiv

  14. [19]

    Hamada, M.-S

    Y. Hamada, M.-S. Seo and G. Shiu, Memory in de Sitter space and Bondi-Metzner-Sachs-like supertranslations, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 2 023509 [1702.06928]

    2017 arXiv

  15. [20]

    S. J. Hoque, Physics of gravitational waves in presence of positive cosm ological constant. PhD thesis, HBNI, Mumbai, 2017

    2017

  16. [21]

    Saw, Mass loss due to gravitational waves with Λ > 0, Mod

    V.-L. Saw, Mass loss due to gravitational waves with Λ > 0, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 32 (2017), no. 22 1730020 [ 1704.07514]

    2017 arXiv

  17. [22]

    Saw, Asymptotically simple spacetimes and mass loss due to gravi tational waves , Int

    V.-L. Saw, Asymptotically simple spacetimes and mass loss due to gravi tational waves , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27 (2017), no. 01 1730027 [ 1706.00160]

    2017 arXiv

  18. [23]

    Saw, Bondi mass with a cosmological constant , Phys

    V.-L. Saw, Bondi mass with a cosmological constant , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 8 084017 [ 1711.01808]

    2018 arXiv

  19. [24]

    Ashtekar and B

    A. Ashtekar and B. Bonga, On the ambiguity in the notion of transverse traceless modes of gravitational waves , Gen. Rel. Grav. 49 (2017), no. 9 122 [ 1707.09914]. 21

    2017 arXiv

  20. [25]

    Ashtekar and B

    A. Ashtekar and B. Bonga, On a basic conceptual confusion in gravitational radiation theory, Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017), no. 20 20LT01 [ 1707.07729]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [26]

    B. P. Bonga, Gravitational radiation with a positive cosmological cons tant. PhD thesis, Penn State U., Penn State U., 6, 2017

    2017

  22. [27]

    Ashtekar, Implications of a positive cosmological constant for gener al relativity, Rept

    A. Ashtekar, Implications of a positive cosmological constant for gener al relativity, Rept. Prog. Phys. 80 (2017), no. 10 102901 [ 1706.07482]

    2017 arXiv

  23. [28]

    Viaggiu, A possible new cosmological redshift effect due to Λ on traveling gravitational waves in Friedmann universes , Int

    S. Viaggiu, A possible new cosmological redshift effect due to Λ on traveling gravitational waves in Friedmann universes , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 26 (2017), no. 14 1750168 [ 1708.00176]

    2017 arXiv

  24. [29]

    Bonga and J

    B. Bonga and J. S. Hazboun, Power radiated by a binary system in a de Sitter Universe, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 6 064018 [ 1708.05621]

    2017 arXiv

  25. [30]

    S. J. Hoque and A. Virmani, On Propagation of Energy Flux in de Sitter Spacetime , Gen. Rel. Grav. 50 (2018), no. 4 40 [ 1801.05640]

    2018 arXiv

  26. [31]

    L. B. Szabados and P. Tod, A review of total energy–momenta in GR with a positive cosmological constant, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28 (2018), no. 01 1930003 [ 1808.09265]

    2018 arXiv

  27. [32]

    Poole, K

    A. Poole, K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, (A)dS4 in Bondi gauge , Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019), no. 9 095005 [ 1812.05369]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [33]

    Mao, Asymptotics with a cosmological constant: The solution spa ce, Phys

    P. Mao, Asymptotics with a cosmological constant: The solution spa ce, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 10 104024 [ 1901.04010]

    2019 arXiv

  29. [34]

    Prema Balakrishnan, S

    A. Prema Balakrishnan, S. J. Hoque and A. Virmani, Conserved charges in asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes , Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019), no. 20 205008 [1902.07415]

    2019 arXiv

  30. [35]

    Ashtekar and S

    A. Ashtekar and S. Bahrami, Asymptotics with a positive cosmological constant. IV. The no-incoming radiation condition , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 2 024042 [1904.02822]

    2019 arXiv

  31. [36]

    Compère, A

    G. Compère, A. Fiorucci and R. Ruzziconi, The Λ -BMS4 group of dS 4 and new boundary conditions for AdS 4, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019), no. 19 195017 [1905.00971]. [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 38, 229501 (2021)]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [37]

    Ruzziconi, Asymptotic Symmetries in the Gauge Fixing Approach and the B MS Group, PoS Modave2019 (2020) 003 [ 1910.08367]

    R. Ruzziconi, Asymptotic Symmetries in the Gauge Fixing Approach and the B MS Group, PoS Modave2019 (2020) 003 [ 1910.08367]. 22

    2020 arXiv

  33. [38]

    P. T. Chruściel, S. J. Hoque and T. Smołka, Energy of weak gravitational waves in spacetimes with a positive cosmological constant , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 6 064008 [ 2003.09548]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [39]

    Compère, A

    G. Compère, A. Fiorucci and R. Ruzziconi, The Λ -BMS4 charge algebra, JHEP 10 (2020) 205 [ 2004.10769]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [40]

    Fernández-Álvarez and J

    F. Fernández-Álvarez and J. M. M. Senovilla, Gravitational radiation condition at infinity with a positive cosmological constant , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 10 101502 [2007.11677]

    2020 arXiv

  36. [41]

    Kolanowski and J

    M. Kolanowski and J. Lewandowski, Energy of gravitational radiation in the de Sitter universe at I + and at a horizon , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 12 124052 [2008.13753]

    2020 arXiv

  37. [42]

    Bonga and K

    B. Bonga and K. Prabhu, BMS-like symmetries in cosmology , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 10 104043 [ 2009.01243]

    2020 arXiv

  38. [43]

    J. Fier, X. Fang, B. Li, S. Mukohyama, A. Wang and T. Zhu, Gravitational wave cosmology: High frequency approximation , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 12 123021 [2102.08968]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [44]

    P. T. Chruściel, S. J. Hoque, M. Maliborski and T. Smołka , On the canonical energy of weak gravitational fields with a cosmological constant Λ ∈ R, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021), no. 8 696 [ 2103.05982]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [45]

    Kolanowski and J

    M. Kolanowski and J. Lewandowski, Hamiltonian charges in the asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes, JHEP 05 (2021) 063 [ 2103.14674]

    2021 arXiv

  41. [46]

    J. R. Fier, Gravitational waves and cosmology. PhD thesis, Baylor U., B aylor U., 2021

    2021

  42. [47]

    Chakraborty, S

    S. Chakraborty, S. J. Hoque and R. Oliveri, Gravitational multipole moments for asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 6 064019 [2105.09971]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [48]

    Fiorucci, Leaky covariant phase spaces: Theory and application to Λ -BMS symmetry

    A. Fiorucci, Leaky covariant phase spaces: Theory and application to Λ -BMS symmetry. PhD thesis, Brussels U., Intl. Solvay Inst., Brussels, 2021. 2112.07666

    2021 arXiv

  44. [49]

    Poole, K

    A. Poole, K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, Charges, conserved quantities, and fluxes in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022), no. 6 L061901 [ 2112.14210]. 23

    2022 arXiv

  45. [50]

    Dobkowski-Ryłko and J

    D. Dobkowski-Ryłko and J. Lewandowski, Generalization of the quadrupole formula for the energy of gravitational radiation in de Sitter space time, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022), no. 4 044047 [ 2205.09050]

    2022 arXiv

  46. [51]

    Geiller and C

    M. Geiller and C. Zwikel, The partial Bondi gauge: Further enlarging the asymptotic structure of gravity , SciPost Phys. 13 (2022) 108 [ 2205.11401]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [52]

    Kamiński, M

    W. Kamiński, M. Kolanowski and J. Lewandowski, Symmetries of the asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes , Class. Quant. Grav. 39 (2022), no. 19 195009 [ 2205.14093]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [53]

    A. M. Grant, A. Saffer, L. C. Stein and S. Tahura, Gravitational-wave energy and other fluxes in ghost-free bigravity , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023), no. 4 044041 [ 2208.02123]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [54]

    J. M. M. Senovilla, Gravitational Radiation at Infinity with Non-Negative Cosm ological Constant, Universe 8 (2022), no. 9 478 [ 2208.05436]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [56]

    Fernández-Álvarez, Degrees of freedom of gravitational radiation with positiv e cosmological constant, Phys

    F. Fernández-Álvarez, Degrees of freedom of gravitational radiation with positiv e cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 6 064028 [ 2307.02919]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Fernández-Álvarez, J

    F. Fernández-Álvarez, J. Podolský and J. M. M. Senovill a, Analysis of gravitational radiation generated by type D black holes with positive cosm ological constant, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 10 104029 [ 2407.14863]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Dobkowski-Ryłko and J

    D. Dobkowski-Ryłko and J. Lewandowski, Quadrupole formulae with cosmological constant: comparison , 2407.20800

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    Bondi, M

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg and A. W. K. Metzner, Gravitational Waves in General Relativity. VII. Waves from Axi-Symmetric Isolate d Systems , Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 269 (Aug., 1962) 21–52

    1962

  54. [62]

    Sachs, Asymptotic Symmetries in Gravitational Theory , Physical Review 128 (Dec., 1962) 2851–2864

    R. Sachs, Asymptotic Symmetries in Gravitational Theory , Physical Review 128 (Dec., 1962) 2851–2864. 24

    1962

  55. [63]

    Kastor and J

    D. Kastor and J. H. Traschen, A Positive energy theorem for asymptotically de Sitter space-times, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 5901–5920 [ hep-th/0206105]

    2002 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Luo, N.-q

    M.-x. Luo, N.-q. Xie and X. Zhang, Positive mass theorems for asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes, Nucl. Phys. B 825 (2010) 98–118 [ 0712.4113]

    2010 arXiv

  57. [65]

    W. R. Kelly and D. Marolf, Phase Spaces for asymptotically de Sitter Cosmologies , Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 205013 [ 1202.5347]

    2012 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Zhang, Recent progress on the positive energy theorem , Int

    X. Zhang, Recent progress on the positive energy theorem , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30 (2015), no. 28n29 1545018 [ 1508.04230]

    2015 arXiv

  59. [67]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Isotropization of arbitrary cosmological expansion given an effective cosmological constant, JETP Lett. 37 (1983) 66–69

    1983

  60. [68]

    Compère, S

    G. Compère, S. E. Gralla and H. Wei, An asymptotic framework for gravitational scattering, Class. Quant. Grav. 40 (2023), no. 20 205018 [ 2303.17124]

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Barnich and C

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, BMS charge algebra , JHEP 12 (2011) 105 [ 1106.0213]

    2011 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Compère, R

    G. Compère, R. Oliveri and A. Seraj, The Poincaré and BMS flux-balance laws with application to binary systems , JHEP 10 (2020) 116 [ 1912.03164]. [Erratum: JHEP 06, 045 (2024)]

    2020 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Epstein and R

    R. Epstein and R. V. Wagoner, Post-Newtonian generation of gravitational waves. , Astro. J. 197 (May, 1975) 717–723

    1975

  64. [72]

    Peres, Classical radiation recoil, Phys

    A. Peres, Classical radiation recoil, Phys. Rev. 128 (Dec, 1962) 2471–2475

    1962

  65. [73]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Gravitational-Radiation Recoil and Runaway Black Holes , Astro. J. 183 (July, 1973) 657–664

    1973

  66. [74]

    K. S. Thorne, Multipole expansions of gravitational radiation , Rev. Mod. Phys. 52 (Apr, 1980) 299–339

    1980

  67. [75]

    C. N. Kozameh, J. I. Nieva and G. D. Quiroga, Spin and center of mass comparison between the post-Newtonian approach and the asymptotic for mulation, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 6 064005 [ 1711.11375]

    2018 arXiv

  68. [76]

    S. J. Hoque and A. Aggarwal, Quadrupolar power radiation by a binary system in de Sitter Background , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28 (2018), no. 01 1950025 [ 1710.01357]

    2018 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Balasubramanian and P

    V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, A Stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity , Commun. Math. Phys. 208 (1999) 413–428 [ hep-th/9902121]. 25

    1999 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Maggiore, Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments. Oxfor d University Press, 2007. 26

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.