REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by
Vacuum Cherenkov radiation for nonminimal dimension-5 Lorentz violation
T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Vacuum Cherenkov radiation from isotropic dim-5 Lorentz violation would drain a charged particle's surplus energy within a second; its absence in cosmic-ray and PeV-photon data bounds the coefficients to 1e-18–3e-28 GeV.
desk verdict Vacuum Cherenkov for isotropic dim-5 SME fermion operators yields new constraints, but the uneliminated extra time derivatives in the m0/a0 sectors are a real open question. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing objects are the isotropic dimension-5 nonminimal SME operators bQ = (m(5))_{αβ} ∂^α∂^β (CPT-even, coefficients ˚m0, ˚m2) and bQ = (a(5))_{μαβ} γ^μ ∂^α∂^β (CPT-odd, coefficients ˚a0, ˚a2) inside the modified Dirac operator. The dispersion relations (spurious Planck-scale modes discarded) feed the energy balance ΔE = E(q) − |k| − E(q−k) = 0, which fixes emission angles, thresholds, and the shutoff momenta q_max beyond which the ˚m0/˚a0 energies become complex. Modified spinor solutions and a Ward-identity-preserving vertex Γ^μ build the tree-level decay-rate integral, whose asymptotic forms — Γ = ξα ˚X^s q^t and dW/dt = ζα ˚X^s q^{t+1} (Table I) — drive the energy-loss ODE ˙E
What would settle it
Two checks would settle the central claim. Observationally: a single ultrahigh-energy proton reaching Earth above the predicted threshold Eth = (mψ/(3˚X))^{1/2} for a claimed bound ˚X would falsify it, since the energy-loss argument requires it to decelerate within about a second. Theoretically: repeat the computation in a quantization that eliminates the additional time derivatives (as is standard for minimal SME operators); if the rates differ from Eq. (54) or the thresholds shift, the bounds of Table III change. The predicted shutoff above q_max in the ˚m0/˚a0 sectors is also directly check
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that for positive isotropic dimension-5 coefficients ˚m0,2 and ˚a0,2, vacuum Cherenkov radiation occurs above thresholds q_th ≈ (mψ/(3˚X))^{1/2} for the ˆm sector and q_th ≈ (mψ²/(4˚X))^{1/3} for the ˆa sector, with decay rates that asymptotically scale as Γ = ξα ˚X^s q^t — for example Γ ≈ (27/20) α ˚m0² q³ and Γ ≈ (25/12) α ˚a0 q² at high energy, with radiated-energy rates one power of q higher. Solving the resulting energy-loss equation shows a fermion above threshold sheds its surplus energy in fractions of a second. Since cosmic rays and astrophysical electrons arrive at Earth undegraded, each observed event above threshold bounds the corresponding coefficient from a
Load-bearing premise
The paper keeps the extra time derivatives introduced by the nonminimal operators instead of eliminating them, trusting the results because the computed rates look well-behaved below a maximum momentum — if a rigorous quantization must remove those derivatives, the decay rates and all derived bounds could change.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Positive isotropic dim-5 coefficients are excluded above ~1e-18 GeV⁻¹ (˚m0,2) and ~3e-28 GeV⁻¹ (˚a0,2) in protons, with analogous one-sided constraints on u and d quarks and electrons (Table III).
- Threshold passivity becomes a general probe: any charged fermion observed at Earth above its Cherenkov threshold would have radiated away its surplus energy within fractions of a second, so clean arrival translates directly into a coefficient bound.
- For ˚m2 and ˚a2 the decay rate exhibits two distinct asymptotic regimes — for ˚m2, proportional to q³ then q²; for ˚a2, two q² regimes with different normalizations — a structural feature absent in minimal-sector computations.
- The derived radiative bounds on ˚a0,2 in quarks (≈10⁻²⁹ GeV) are orders of magnitude stronger than Drell-Yan and deep-inelastic limits (≈10⁻⁶–10⁻⁷ GeV), though they rest on additional assumptions about quark energy fractions and nucleon structure.
- Because the tree-level process depends only on the free-fermion dispersion relations, dim-5 operators built from the field-strength tensor F^μν do not contribute to vacuum Cherenkov radiation at this order.
Reading between the lines
- I would expect the same threshold-passivity logic to generalize to anisotropic dim-5 coefficients and to higher-dimension operators: any LV dispersion that lets a fermion outrun the photon yields comparable bounds from existing UHECR and gamma-ray data, making this calculation a template rather than an isolated result.
- The bounds here are one-sided (only positive coefficients are excluded); combining them with a complementary process such as photon decay — which the paper flags as future work — should close two-sided windows on each isotropic coefficient.
- The electron-sector bounds should sharpen faster than the proton ones as TeV–PeV photon observatories accumulate data, because the electron constraint scales with the parent-particle energy while the proton bound is anchored to a single 212 EeV event.
- The predicted shutdown of Cherenkov emission above q_max in the ˚m0 and ˚a0 sectors is a checkable signature: same-species particles with momenta straddling q_max should show abruptly different radiative behavior, offering a direct test of the additional-time-derivative treatment.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper studies vacuum Cherenkov radiation in a modified QED with isotropic dimension-5 Lorentz-violating operators in the fermion sector. For the four coefficient sectors ˚m0, ˚m2, ˚a0, and ˚a2, the authors derive modified dispersion relations, threshold momenta, decay rates, and radiated-energy rates, combining analytic asymptotic expansions with numerical phase-space integrations. They then use the absence of vacuum Cherenkov radiation in the Pierre Auger event 737165 (assuming a hadronic primary of 212 EeV and N=56 nucleons) and in LHAASO Crab Nebula photons (parent electron at 2.3 PeV) to place one-sided 2σ upper bounds on the coefficients in protons, u/d quarks, and electrons, e.g., ˚m0 < 1e-18 GeV^-1 and ˚a0 < 3e-28 GeV^-1 for protons. The paper concludes that isotropic dim-5 Lorentz violation is excluded near the Planck scale in these sectors.
Significance. If the results hold, this is the first calculation of vacuum Cherenkov decay rates for nonminimal dim-5 fermion operators, and the resulting constraints improve on existing laboratory bounds for the dim-5 a coefficients by many orders of magnitude. The derivation chain is coherent and largely explicit: a Ward identity for the modified vertex, spin sums computed from modified spinors, and phase-space integrations. The paper is transparent about its main assumptions, including the treatment of additional time derivatives and the model dependence of the quark and nucleus composition. These strengths make the manuscript valuable, but the validity of the ˚m0 and ˚a0 sectors is currently conditional on a nonstandard quantization choice.
major comments (3)
- [Sec. II (paragraph on additional time derivatives)] The paper explicitly leaves the extra time derivatives introduced by the ˚m0 and ˚a0 operators uneliminated, stating that the procedure will be judged by physical results. This is load-bearing: the modified dispersion relations (Eqs. (21) and (39)), thresholds (Eqs. (25) and (42)), decay rates (Eqs. (27) and (45)), and the resulting constraints (Table III) for these sectors all depend on this choice. A first-order p0→E0 elimination, as in Ref. [85], could alter on-shell energies, spinor normalization, or the vertex factor, thereby changing rate prefactors and bounds. The agreement with the ˚m2/˚a2 sectors for q<qmax is suggestive, but it is not a derivation. Please provide a rigorous justification (for example, by performing the leading-order elimination and showing the rates are unchanged) or remove the affected sectors from the phenomenological claims.
- [Secs. IV.A and V.A, Eqs. (28) and (46)] The exact dispersion relations for ˚m0 and ˚a0 become complex above qmax and q̃max, respectively, so the theory as treated has no one-particle states above those momenta. The paper truncates the allowed range to q∈[qth,qmax] without a formal justification of this cutoff. Since the appearance of qmax is itself a consequence of the uneliminated time derivatives, this reinforces the previous concern. The constraints in Table III use the thresholds of these sectors; the authors should demonstrate that the relevant UHECR and electron energies lie below qmax for the quoted bounds and that the cutoff does not affect the decay or radiated-energy rates.
- [Secs. VI and VII (electron constraints)] The energy-loss argument that justifies the electron bounds rests on the asymptotic radiated-energy rates in Eq. (54) and Table I, with the paper noting that a reasonable initial energy is E0=2Eth. For the LHAASO parent electron used in Sec. VII, E0≈2.3 PeV while the threshold for the quoted ˚m0,2 and ˚a0,2 bounds is approximately 1.7–1.9 PeV, i.e., E0/Eth≈1.3, outside the stated asymptotic regime. Near threshold the decay rate is suppressed, so the claim of energy loss within fractions of a second is not established for this case. Please integrate Eq. (55) numerically for the actual electron parameters, or restrict the electron bounds accordingly.
minor comments (5)
- [Sec. V.B] The sentence 'we will continue with Eq. (39) expanded at first order in Lorentz violation' appears to reference the wrong equation; the ˚a2 dispersion is given in Eq. (47). Please correct.
- [Throughout] There are several wording/typo issues: 'space phase' should be 'phase space'; 'matrizes' should be 'matrices'; 'markant' should be 'marked'; 'terns' should be 'terms'. A careful proofread is needed.
- [Eqs. (24)–(25)] The leading-order estimate from kmax=0 gives qth≈√(mψ/(2˚m0)), while Eq. (25) states qth=√(mψ/(3˚m0)) after a numerical treatment. This discrepancy should be explained explicitly.
- [Eq. (10a)] The notation ¯|M|2 is nonstandard. Consider using ⟨|M|^2⟩ or defining the bar notation explicitly before first use.
- [Sec. VII] The quark bounds assume a fixed energy fraction r=0.1 and an iron primary with N=56 nucleons. A brief sensitivity discussion, showing how the bounds vary with r and N, would help the reader assess the robustness of the quoted numbers.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the decay rates, radiated-energy rates, and bounds are derived from the stated Lagrangian and dispersion relations, then compared with external Auger and LHAASO data. The uneliminated-time-derivative caveat is a physical/correctness assumption, not a circular reduction.
full rationale
The derivation chain is self-contained: the modified Dirac operator of Eq. (4) yields the dispersion relations (21), (29), (39), (47); the energy balance (3) gives the thresholds (25), (32), (42), (50); the tree-level amplitude (8) together with the explicit spinor sums (11), (43), (51) and phase-space integrals (16), (17) produce the decay and radiated-energy rates, whose asymptotics are summarized in Eq. (54) and Table I. No parameter is fitted to the final bounds. Table III follows by substituting external, independently measured energies (Pierre Auger event 737165, LHAASO Crab photons) into Eq. (60). The cited prior works by the authors ([79], [81], [85]) provide computational tools and the spurious-branch classification, but the spurious branches are identified in the paper by their explicit singular behavior (no consistent Lorentz-invariant limit), so the classification is not imported as an unverified premise that presupposes the Cherenkov rates. The p0-elimination alternative of Ref. [85] is mentioned but not used. The main caveat, that additional time derivatives are not eliminated for ˚m0 and ˚a0 and that the dispersion branches become complex above qmax, is a substantive physical assumption about the validity of the effective theory's asymptotic states; the paper validates it only by internal consistency with the ˚m2/˚a2 sectors. That is a correctness risk, not a case of the output being equivalent to the input by construction. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited, and the circularity score is 0.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (2)
- quark energy fraction r =
0.1
- nucleon count N of primary =
56 (iron)
assumptions (5)
- domain assumption Vacuum Cherenkov radiation is a physical observable process for stable LV theories (the second viewpoint)
- ad hoc to paper The additional time derivatives from nonminimal operators can be left uneliminated and the modified spinor solutions remain valid for tree-level decay rates
- domain assumption The UHECR primary is hadronic and the iron-nucleus composition assumption applies to event 737165
- domain assumption The 2.3 PeV parent electron energy is correctly inferred from the 1.1 PeV LHAASO photon via inverse-Compton scattering
- domain assumption Parton model with noninteracting quarks, each carrying r = 0.1 of nucleon energy, and with strong interactions neglected
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Vacuum Cherenkov radiation for nonminimal dimension-5 Lorentz violation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JW2YNOQS
@misc{pith2026250821212,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Vacuum Cherenkov radiation for nonminimal dimension-5 Lorentz violation},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JW2YNOQS}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.21212}
}
abstract
Vacuum Cherenkov radiation is investigated in the Lorentz-violating Standard-Model Extension for isotropic dim-5 operators $\hat{m}$ and $\hat{a}^{\mu}$ in the fermion sector. Both the kinematics and dynamics of this process are analyzed by analytical and numerical means, leading to its decay and radiated-energy rates as functions of the initial-fermion momentum. We adopt the point of view that vacuum Cherenkov radiation is actually a physical phenomenon expected to occur for a charged, massive fermion in the presence of Lorentz violation, when some additional requirements are satisfied. The absence of this effect in ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays detected on Earth allows us to infer stringent bounds on isotropic dim-5 Lorentz violation in protons, quarks, and electrons.
Figures
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Crystallography, Lorentz violation, and the Standard-Model Extension
Crystal point groups parametrize SME Lorentz-violating coefficients in electromagnetic media, turning birefringent and multiferroic crystals into analogs for high-energy symmetry violations.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[85]
Cross Sections and Lorentz Violation
D. Colladay and V.A. Kostelecký, “Cross sections and Lorentz violation,” Phys. Lett. B 511, 209 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0104300
work page Pith review arXiv 2001
-
[1]
Spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry in string theory,
V.A. Kostelecký and S. Samuel, “Spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry in string theory,” Phys. Rev. D39, 683 (1989)
1989
-
[2]
(30c) Unlike for the isotropic coefficient ˚m0 of the previous section, it is possible to solve the energy balance equation for θ at all orders in Lorentz violation
+ 4E˚m2 (q) + q2f 2 o1/2 , (30b) where f = f (mψ, ˚m2, q) ≡ 4k2 ˚m2 2 + 4mψ ˚m2 + 4˚m2 2q2 + 2 . (30c) Unlike for the isotropic coefficient ˚m0 of the previous section, it is possible to solve the energy balance equation for θ at all orders in Lorentz violation. The maximum value for the photon momentum can be directly obtained from Eq. (30) and it reads ...
2023
-
[3]
Phenomenological grav- itational constraints on strings and higher-dimensional theories,
V.A. Kostelecký and S. Samuel, “Phenomenological grav- itational constraints on strings and higher-dimensional theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 224 (1989)
1989
-
[4]
Gravitational phe- nomenology in higher-dimensional theories and strings,
V.A. Kostelecký and S. Samuel, “Gravitational phe- nomenology in higher-dimensional theories and strings,” Phys. Rev. D40, 1886 (1989)
1989
-
[5]
CPT and strings,
V.A. Kostelecký and R. Potting, “CPT and strings,” Nucl. Phys. B359, 545 (1991)
1991
-
[6]
CPT, strings, and me- son factories,
V.A. Kostelecký and R. Potting, “CPT, strings, and me- son factories,” Phys. Rev. D51, 3923 (1995), arXiv:hep- ph/9501341
arXiv 1995
-
[7]
Nonstandard optics from quantum space-time,
R. Gambini and J. Pullin, “Nonstandard optics from quantum space-time,” Phys. Rev. D59, 124021 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9809038 [gr-qc]
arXiv 1999
Show all 98 references
-
[8]
On loop quantum gravity phenomenology and the issue of Lorentz invariance,
M. Bojowald, H.A. Morales-Técotl, and H. Sahlmann, “On loop quantum gravity phenomenology and the issue of Lorentz invariance,” Phys. Rev. D71, 084012 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0411101 [gr-qc]
2005 arXiv
-
[9]
Noncommutative field theory and Lorentz violation,
S.M. Carroll, J.A. Harvey, V.A. Kostelecký, C.D. Lane, and T. Okamoto, “Noncommutative field theory and Lorentz violation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 141601 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0105082
2001 arXiv
-
[10]
Space-time foam, CPT anomaly, and photon propagation,
F.R. Klinkhamer and C. Rupp, “Space-time foam, CPT anomaly, and photon propagation,” Phys. Rev. D 70, 045020 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0312032
2004 arXiv
-
[11]
Bounds on length- scales of classical spacetime foam models,
S. Bernadotte and F.R. Klinkhamer, “Bounds on length- scales of classical spacetime foam models,” Phys. Rev. D 75, 024028 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0610216
2007 arXiv
-
[12]
Z-string global gauge anomaly and Lorentz non-invariance,
F.R. Klinkhamer, “Z-string global gauge anomaly and Lorentz non-invariance,” Nucl. Phys. B535, 233 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9805095
1998 arXiv
-
[13]
A CPT anomaly,
F.R. Klinkhamer, “A CPT anomaly,” Nucl. Phys. B578, 277 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9912169
2000 arXiv
-
[14]
CPT anomaly: A rigorous result in four dimensions,
F.R. Klinkhamer and J. Schimmel, “CPT anomaly: A rigorous result in four dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B639, 241 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0205038
2002 arXiv
-
[15]
Anomalous Lorentz and CPT violation from a local Chern-Simons-like term in the effective gauge-field action,
K.J.B. Ghosh and F.R. Klinkhamer, “Anomalous Lorentz and CPT violation from a local Chern-Simons-like term in the effective gauge-field action,” Nucl. Phys. B926, 335 (2018), arXiv:1706.07025 [hep-th]
2018 arXiv
-
[16]
CPT violation and the standard model,
D. Colladay and V.A. Kostelecký, “CPT violation and the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9703464
1997 arXiv
-
[17]
Lorentz-violating ex- tension of the standard model,
D. Colladay and V.A. Kostelecký, “Lorentz-violating ex- tension of the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D58, 116002 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9809521
1998 arXiv
-
[18]
Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model,
V.A. Kostelecký, “Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D 69, 105009 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0312310
2004 arXiv
-
[19]
Explicit versus spontaneous diffeomorphism breaking in gravity,
R. Bluhm, “Explicit versus spontaneous diffeomorphism breaking in gravity,” Phys. Rev. D91, 065034 (2015), arXiv:1401.4515 [gr-qc]
2015 arXiv
-
[20]
Spacetime symmetry breaking and Einstein- Maxwell theory,
R. Bluhm, “Spacetime symmetry breaking and Einstein- Maxwell theory,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 085015 (2015), arXiv:1508.03888 [gr-qc]
2015 arXiv
-
[21]
Noether identities in grav- ity theories with nondynamical backgrounds and explicit spacetime symmetry breaking,
R. Bluhm and A. Sehic, “Noether identities in grav- ity theories with nondynamical backgrounds and explicit spacetime symmetry breaking,” Phys. Rev. D94, 104034 (2016), arXiv:1610.02892 [hep-th]
2016 arXiv
-
[22]
Gravity with ex- plicit spacetime symmetry breaking and the Standard- Model Extension,
R. Bluhm, H. Bossi, and Y. Wen, “Gravity with ex- plicit spacetime symmetry breaking and the Standard- Model Extension,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 084022 (2019), arXiv:1907.13209 [gr-qc]
2019 arXiv
-
[23]
Backgrounds in gravitational effective field theory,
V.A. Kostelecký and Z. Li, “Backgrounds in gravitational effective field theory,” Phys. Rev. D103, 024059 (2021), arXiv:2008.12206 [gr-qc]
2021 arXiv
-
[24]
Ex- plicit diffeomorphism violation no-go constraints and discontinuities,
Q.G. Bailey, K. O’Neal-Ault, and N.A. Nilsson, “Ex- plicit diffeomorphism violation no-go constraints and discontinuities,” Phys. Rev. D 110, 084066 (2024), arXiv:2407.04918 [gr-qc]
2024 arXiv
-
[25]
Reduced geometry and its role in explicit spacetime symmetry violation,
C.M. Reyes, C. Riquelme, M. Schreck, and A. Soto, “Reduced geometry and its role in explicit spacetime symmetry violation,” Phys. Rev. D111, 124011 (2025), arXiv:2407.19264 [gr-qc]
2025 arXiv
-
[26]
Data tables for Lorentz and CPT violation,
V.A. Kostelecký and N. Russell, “Data tables for Lorentz and CPT violation,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 11 (2011), arXiv:0801.0287 [hep-ph]
2011
-
[27]
Mariz, J.R
T. Mariz, J.R. Nascimento, and A.Yu. Petrov,Lorentz Symmetry Breaking — Classical and Quantum Aspects (Springer, 2023, ISBN 978-3-031-20119-6, 978-3-031- 20120-2) arXiv:2205.02594 [hep-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[28]
Jelley, Čerenkov Radiation and Its Applications (Pergamon Press, London, 1958)
J.V. Jelley, Čerenkov Radiation and Its Applications (Pergamon Press, London, 1958)
1958
-
[29]
Signals for Lorentz vi- olation in electrodynamics,
V.A. Kostelecký and M. Mewes, “Signals for Lorentz vi- olation in electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 66, 056005 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0205211
2002 arXiv
-
[30]
Stability, causality, and Lorentz and CPT violation,
V.A.KosteleckýandR.Lehnert, “Stability, causality, and Lorentz and CPT violation,” Phys. Rev. D63, 065008 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0012060
2001 arXiv
-
[31]
Measuring the gravitational interaction of elementary particles,
E.F. Beall, “Measuring the gravitational interaction of elementary particles,” Phys. Rev. D1, 961 (1970)
1970
-
[32]
Cosmic ray and neu- trino tests of special relativity,
S.R. Coleman and S. L. Glashow, “Cosmic ray and neu- trino tests of special relativity,” Phys. Lett. B405, 249 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9703240
1997 arXiv
-
[33]
The Cerenkov effect in Lorentz-violating vacua,
R. Lehnert and R. Potting, “The Cerenkov effect in Lorentz-violating vacua,” Phys. Rev. D70 125010 (2004) [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D70, 129906 (2004)], arXiv:hep- ph/0408285
2004
-
[34]
Vacuum Cerenkov radia- tion,
R. Lehnert and R. Potting, “Vacuum Cerenkov radia- tion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 110402 (2004), arXiv:hep- ph/0406128
2004
-
[35]
Vacuum Cerenkov radiation in Maxwell-Chern-Simons electrodynamics,
R. Lehnert and R. Potting, “Vacuum Cerenkov radiation in Maxwell-Chern-Simons electrodynamics,” Proceedings of theThird Meeting on CPT and Lorentz Symmetry, 211 (2005). arXiv:hep-ph/0511265
2005 arXiv
-
[36]
Physical interpretation of large Lorentz violation via Weyl semimetals,
V.A. Kostelecký, R. Lehnert, M. Schreck, and B. Ser- adjeh, “Physical interpretation of large Lorentz violation via Weyl semimetals,” New J. Phys.27, 073901 (2025), arXiv:2412.18034 [hep-ph]
2025
-
[37]
Nonperturbative Lorentz violation and field quantization,
V.A. Kostelecký, R. Lehnert, M. Schreck, and B. Ser- adjeh, “Nonperturbative Lorentz violation and field quantization,” Phys. Lett. B 865, 139414 (2025), arXiv:2412.19733 [hep-th]
2025 arXiv
-
[38]
Vacuum Cherenkov radiation and photon triple-splitting in a Lorentz- noninvariant extension of quantum electrodynamics,
C. Kaufhold and F.R. Klinkhamer, “Vacuum Cherenkov radiation and photon triple-splitting in a Lorentz- noninvariant extension of quantum electrodynamics,” Nucl. Phys. B734, 1 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0508074
2006 arXiv
-
[39]
Vacuum Cherenkov radiation in spacelike Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory,
C. Kaufhold and F.R. Klinkhamer, “Vacuum Cherenkov radiation in spacelike Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory,” 14 Phys. Rev. D76, 025024 (2007), arXiv:0704.3255 [hep- th]
2007 arXiv
-
[40]
Causality and CPT vi- olation from an Abelian Chern-Simons like term,
C. Adam and F.R. Klinkhamer, “Causality and CPT vi- olation from an Abelian Chern-Simons like term,” Nucl. Phys. B607, 247 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0101087
2001 arXiv
-
[41]
No vacuum Cerenkov ra- diation losses in the timelike Lorentz-violating Chern- Simons theory,
K. Schober and B. Altschul, “No vacuum Cerenkov ra- diation losses in the timelike Lorentz-violating Chern- Simons theory,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 125016 (2015), arXiv:1510.05571 [hep-th]
2015 arXiv
-
[42]
Absence of long-wavelength Cerenkov radi- ation with isotropic Lorentz and CPT violation,
B. Altschul, “Absence of long-wavelength Cerenkov radi- ation with isotropic Lorentz and CPT violation,” Phys. Rev. D90, 021701(R) (2014), arXiv:1405.6189 [hep-th]
2014 arXiv
-
[43]
Cherenkov radiation with massive, CPT-violating photons,
D. Colladay, P. McDonald, and R. Potting, “Cherenkov radiation with massive, CPT-violating photons,” Phys. Rev. D93, 125007 (2016), arXiv:1603.00308 [hep-th]
2016 arXiv
-
[44]
CPT-Violating, Massive Photons and Cherenkov Radiation,
D. Colladay, “CPT-Violating, Massive Photons and Cherenkov Radiation,” Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting on CPT and Lorentz Symmetry, 157 (2017), arXiv:1608.02834 [hep-ph]
2017 arXiv
-
[45]
Unitarity in Stück- elberg electrodynamics modified by a Carroll-Field- Jackiw term,
M.M. Ferreira Jr., J.A. Helayël-Neto, C.M. Reyes, M. Schreck, and P.D.S. Silva, “Unitarity in Stück- elberg electrodynamics modified by a Carroll-Field- Jackiw term,” Phys. Lett. B 804, 135379 (2020), arXiv:2001.04706 [hep-th]
2020 arXiv
-
[46]
Covariant quantization of CPT-violating photons,
D. Colladay, P. McDonald, J. P. Noordmans, and R. Pot- ting, “Covariant quantization of CPT-violating photons,” Phys. Rev. D95, 025025 (2017), arXiv:1610.00169 [hep- th]
2017 arXiv
-
[47]
Cerenkov-like emission of pions by photons in a Lorentz-violating theory,
B. Altschul, “Cerenkov-like emission of pions by photons in a Lorentz-violating theory,” Phys. Rev. D93, 105007 (2016), arXiv:1603.04491 [hep-ph]
2016 arXiv
-
[48]
Vacuum Cerenkov radiation in Lorentz- violating theories without CPT violation,
B. Altschul, “Vacuum Cerenkov radiation in Lorentz- violating theories without CPT violation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 041603 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0609030
2007 arXiv
-
[49]
Limits on isotropic Lorentz violation in QED from collider physics,
M.A. Hohensee, R. Lehnert, D.F. Phillips, and R.L. Walsworth, “Limits on isotropic Lorentz violation in QED from collider physics,” Phys. Rev. D80, 036010 (2009), arXiv:0809.3442 [hep-ph]
2009 arXiv
-
[50]
New two-sided bound on the isotropic Lorentz-violating parameter of modified- Maxwell theory,
F.R. Klinkhamer and M. Schreck, “New two-sided bound on the isotropic Lorentz-violating parameter of modified- Maxwell theory,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 085026 (2008), arXiv:0809.3217 [hep-ph]
2008 arXiv
-
[51]
Parton-model calcula- tion of a nonstandard decay process in isotropic modi- fied Maxwell theory,
J.S. Díaz and F.R. Klinkhamer, “Parton-model calcula- tion of a nonstandard decay process in isotropic modi- fied Maxwell theory,” Phys. Rev. D92, 025007 (2015), arXiv:1504.01324 [hep-ph]
2015 arXiv
-
[52]
Ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray bounds on nonbirefringent modified- Maxwell theory,
F.R. Klinkhamer and M. Risse, “Ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray bounds on nonbirefringent modified- Maxwell theory,” Phys. Rev. D 77, 016002 (2008), arXiv:0709.2502 [hep-ph]
2008 arXiv
-
[53]
Addendum: Ultrahigh- energy cosmic-ray bounds on nonbirefringent modified- Maxwell theory,
F.R. Klinkhamer and M. Risse, “Addendum: Ultrahigh- energy cosmic-ray bounds on nonbirefringent modified- Maxwell theory,” Phys. Rev. D 77, 117901 (2008), arXiv:0806.4351 [hep-ph]
2008 arXiv
-
[54]
UHECR Bounds on Lorentz Violation in the Photon Sector,
F.R. Klinkhamer, “UHECR Bounds on Lorentz Violation in the Photon Sector,” Proceedings of theXXth Rencon- tres de Blois, arXiv:0807.2147 [hep-ph]
-
[55]
Improved bound on isotropic Lorentz violation in the photon sector from extensive air showers,
F.R. Klinkhamer, M. Niechciol, and M. Risse, “Improved bound on isotropic Lorentz violation in the photon sector from extensive air showers,” Phys. Rev. D 96, 116011 (2017), arXiv:1710.02507 [hep-ph]
2017 arXiv
-
[56]
Photon de- cay in ultrahigh-energy air showers: Stringent bound on Lorentz violation,
F. Duenkel, M. Niechciol, and M. Risse, “Photon de- cay in ultrahigh-energy air showers: Stringent bound on Lorentz violation,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 015010 (2021), arXiv:2106.01012 [hep-ph]
2021 arXiv
-
[57]
Using Ultrahigh-Energy Cosmic Rays and Air Showers to Test Lorentz Invariance Within Modified Maxwell Theory,
M. Risse, “Using Ultrahigh-Energy Cosmic Rays and Air Showers to Test Lorentz Invariance Within Modified Maxwell Theory,” Proceedings of theNinth Meeting on CPT and Lorentz Symmetry, arXiv:2208.08747 [hep-ph]
-
[58]
New bound on Lorentz violation based on the absence of vacuum Cherenkov radiation in ultrahigh energy air showers,
F. Duenkel, M. Niechciol, and M. Risse, “New bound on Lorentz violation based on the absence of vacuum Cherenkov radiation in ultrahigh energy air showers,” Phys. Rev. D107, 083004 (2023), arXiv:2303.05849 [hep- ph]
2023 arXiv
-
[59]
Threshold effects and Planck scale Lorentz violation: Combined constraints from high-energy astrophysics,
T. Jacobson, S. Liberati, and D. Mattingly, “Threshold effects and Planck scale Lorentz violation: Combined constraints from high-energy astrophysics,” Phys. Rev. D 67, 124011 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0209264
2003 arXiv
-
[60]
Lorentz vi- olation at high energy: Concepts, phenomena and as- trophysical constraints,
T. Jacobson, S. Liberati, and D. Mattingly, “Lorentz vi- olation at high energy: Concepts, phenomena and as- trophysical constraints,” Annals Phys.321, 150 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0505267
2006 arXiv
-
[61]
Modi- fied energy-momentum conservation laws and vacuum Cherenkov radiation,
J.M. Carmona, J.L. Cortés, and B. Romeo, “Modi- fied energy-momentum conservation laws and vacuum Cherenkov radiation,” Astropart. Phys. 71, 21 (2015), arXiv:1409.8181 [hep-ph]
2015 arXiv
-
[62]
Effects of Lorentz invariance violation on cosmic ray photon emis- sion and gamma ray decay processes,
H. Martínez-Huerta and A. Pérez-Lorenzana, “Effects of Lorentz invariance violation on cosmic ray photon emis- sion and gamma ray decay processes,” PoSICRC2017, 556 (2018), arXiv:1709.08247 [astro-ph.HE]
2018 arXiv
-
[63]
Photon emission and decay from generic Lorentz invariance violation,
H. Martínez-Huerta and A. Pérez-Lorenzana, “Photon emission and decay from generic Lorentz invariance violation,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 866, 012006 (2017), arXiv:1702.00913 [hep-ph]
2017 arXiv
-
[64]
Vacuum Cherenkov radiation and photon decay rates from generic Lorentz invariance violation,
H. Martínez-Huerta and A. Pérez-Lorenzana, “Vacuum Cherenkov radiation and photon decay rates from generic Lorentz invariance violation,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser.761, 012035 (2016), arXiv:1609.07185 [astro-ph.HE]
2016 arXiv
-
[65]
Spec- tra for reactions in astrophysical electromagnetic cas- cades with Lorentz invariance violation: The vacuum Cherenkov effect,
A. Saveliev, R. Alves Batista, and F. Mishin, “Spec- tra for reactions in astrophysical electromagnetic cas- cades with Lorentz invariance violation: The vacuum Cherenkov effect,” Phys. Rev. D 111, 083001 (2025), arXiv:2412.17514 [astro-ph.HE]
2025 arXiv
-
[66]
Constraints to Lorentz violation and ultrahigh-energy electrons in D-foamy space-times,
C. Li and B.-Q. Ma, “Constraints to Lorentz violation and ultrahigh-energy electrons in D-foamy space-times,” arXiv:2505.06121 [hep-ph]
-
[67]
Gravitational mass of relativistic mat- ter and antimatter,
T. Kalaydzhyan, “Gravitational mass of relativistic mat- ter and antimatter,” Phys. Lett. B 751, 29 (2015), arXiv:1506.08063 [hep-ph]
2015 arXiv
-
[68]
Testing Gravity on Accelerators,
T. Kalaydzhyan, “Testing Gravity on Accelerators,” Pro- ceedings of the Seventh Meeting on CPT and Lorentz Symmetry, 283 (2017), arXiv:1608.07458 [hep-ph]
2017 arXiv
-
[69]
New constraints on Planck-scale Lorentz violation in QED from the Crab Nebula,
L. Maccione, S. Liberati, A. Celotti, and J.G. Kirk, “New constraints on Planck-scale Lorentz violation in QED from the Crab Nebula,” JCAP 10, 013 (2007), arXiv:0707.2673 [astro-ph]
2007 arXiv
-
[70]
Vacuum Cherenkov ra- diation in quantum electrodynamics with high-energy Lorentz violation,
D. Anselmi and M. Taiuti, “Vacuum Cherenkov ra- diation in quantum electrodynamics with high-energy Lorentz violation,” Phys. Rev. D 83, 056010 (2011), arXiv:1101.2019 [hep-ph]
2011 arXiv
-
[71]
On calcula- tion of cross sections in Lorentz-violating theories,
G. Rubtsov, P. Satunin, and S. Sibiryakov, “On calcula- tion of cross sections in Lorentz-violating theories,” Phys. Rev. D86, 085012 (2012), arXiv:1204.5782 [hep-ph]
2012 arXiv
-
[72]
On the vacuum Cerenkov radiation and the elusive effects of Lorentz vi- olation,
P. Castorina, A. Iorio, and D. Zappala, “On the vacuum Cerenkov radiation and the elusive effects of Lorentz vi- olation,” EPL69, 912 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0411197
2005 arXiv
-
[73]
Cherenkov radiation from the quantum vacuum,
A.J. Macleod, A. Noblem, and D.A. Jaroszynski, “Cherenkov radiation from the quantum vacuum,” Phys. 15 Rev. Lett. 122, 161601 (2019), arXiv:1810.05027 [hep- ph]
2019 arXiv
-
[74]
Vacuum radiation in z = 2 Lifshitz QED,
R. Bufalo and T. Cardoso e Bufalo, “Vacuum radiation in z = 2 Lifshitz QED,” Phys. Rev. D103, 125016 (2021), arXiv:2105.13848 [hep-th]
2021 arXiv
-
[75]
Vacuum Cherenkov radiation and bremsstrahlung from disformal couplings,
C. van de Bruck, C. Burrage, and J. Morrice, “Vacuum Cherenkov radiation and bremsstrahlung from disformal couplings,” JCAP 08, 003 (2016), arXiv:1605.03567 [gr- qc]
2016 arXiv
-
[76]
Lower bound on the prop- agation speed of gravity from gravitational Cherenkov ra- diation,
G.D. Moore and A.E. Nelson, “Lower bound on the prop- agation speed of gravity from gravitational Cherenkov ra- diation,”, JHEP09, 023 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0106220
2001 arXiv
-
[77]
(Gravitational) Vacuum Cherenkov radia- tion,
M. Schreck, “(Gravitational) Vacuum Cherenkov radia- tion,” Symmetry10, 424 (2018), arXiv:1909.11045 [hep- th]
2018 arXiv
-
[78]
Constraints on Lorentz violation from gravitational Čerenkov radiation,
V.A. Kostelecký and J.D. Tasson, “Constraints on Lorentz violation from gravitational Čerenkov radiation,” Phys. Lett. B749, 551 (2015), arXiv:1508.07007 [gr-qc]
2015 arXiv
-
[79]
Gravitational and electromagnetic Cherenkov radiation constraints in modified dispersion relations,
M. Artola, J.A.R. Cembranos, and P. Martín-Moruno, “Gravitational and electromagnetic Cherenkov radiation constraints in modified dispersion relations,” Phys. Rev. D 110, 124060 (2024), arXiv:2410.18544 [gr-qc]
2024 arXiv
-
[80]
Lorentz-violating modifi- cation of Dirac theory based on spin-nondegenerate operators,
J.A.A.S. Reis and M. Schreck, “Lorentz-violating modifi- cation of Dirac theory based on spin-nondegenerate operators,” Phys. Rev. D 95, 075016 (2017), arXiv:1612.06221 [hep-th]
2017 arXiv
-
[81]
Vacuum Cherenkov radiation for Lorentz- violating fermions,
M. Schreck, “Vacuum Cherenkov radiation for Lorentz- violating fermions,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 952, 012018 (2018), arXiv:1711.11167 [hep-ph]
2018 arXiv
-
[82]
Vacuum Cherenkov radiation for Lorentz- violating fermions,
M. Schreck, “Vacuum Cherenkov radiation for Lorentz- violating fermions,” Phys. Rev. D 96, 095026 (2017), arXiv:1702.03171 [hep-ph]
2017 arXiv
-
[83]
Radiation of an electron in a Lorentz- violating vacuum,
A.V. Borisov, “Radiation of an electron in a Lorentz- violating vacuum,” Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 20, 425 (2023)
2023
-
[84]
Photon emission by an electron in a con- stant background field modeling a Lorentz-noninvariant vacuum,
A.V. Borisov, “Photon emission by an electron in a con- stant background field modeling a Lorentz-noninvariant vacuum,” PTEP2024, 083B04 (2024), arXiv:2405.19557 [hep-ph]
2024 arXiv
-
[86]
Quantum field theoretic properties of Lorentz-violating operators of nonrenormalizable dimen- sion in the fermion sector,
M. Schreck, “Quantum field theoretic properties of Lorentz-violating operators of nonrenormalizable dimen- sion in the fermion sector,” Phys. Rev. D 90, 085025 (2014), arXiv:1403.6766 [hep-th]
2014 arXiv
-
[87]
Peskin and D.V
M.E. Peskin and D.V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Perseus Books Publishing, L.L.C., Reading; Massachusetts, 1995)
1995
-
[88]
Gauge field theories with Lorentz-violating operators of arbitrary dimension,
V.A. Kostelecký and Z. Li, “Gauge field theories with Lorentz-violating operators of arbitrary dimension,” Phys. Rev. D99, 056016 (2019), arXiv:1812.11672 [hep- ph]
2019 arXiv
-
[89]
Fermions with Lorentz- violating operators of arbitrary dimension,
V.A. Kostelecký and M. Mewes, “Fermions with Lorentz- violating operators of arbitrary dimension,” Phys. Rev. D 88, 096006 (2013), arXiv:1308.4973 [hep-ph]
2013 arXiv
-
[90]
On perturbative aspects of a nonmini- mal Lorentz-violating QED with CPT-odd dimension-5 terms,
T. Mariz, R. Martinez, J.R. Nascimento, and A.Yu. Petrov, “On perturbative aspects of a nonmini- mal Lorentz-violating QED with CPT-odd dimension-5 terms,” Eur. Phys. J. C81, 974 (2021), arXiv:2104.05681 [hep-th]
2021 arXiv
-
[91]
On perturbative aspects of a nonminimal Lorentz- violating QED with CPT-even dimension-5 terms,
T. Mariz, M. Melo, J.R. Nascimento, and A.Yu. Petrov, “On perturbative aspects of a nonminimal Lorentz- violating QED with CPT-even dimension-5 terms,” Eur. Phys. J. C84, 50 (2024), arXiv:2308.02876 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[92]
An upper limit to the photon fraction in cosmic rays above1019-eV from the Pierre Auger Observatory,
J. Abraham et al. [Pierre Auger], “An upper limit to the photon fraction in cosmic rays above1019-eV from the Pierre Auger Observatory,” Astropart. Phys.27, 155 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0606619
2007 arXiv
-
[93]
Review of particle physics,
S. Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)
2024
-
[94]
Peta–electron volt gamma-ray emissionfromtheCrabNebula,
Z. Caoet al.[LHAASO], “Peta–electron volt gamma-ray emissionfromtheCrabNebula,” Science 373, 425(2021), arXiv:2111.06545 [astro-ph.HE]
2021
-
[95]
Search for effective Lorentz and CPT violation using ZEUS data,
I. Abt et al. [ZEUS], “Search for effective Lorentz and CPT violation using ZEUS data,” Phys. Rev. D 107, 092008 (2023), arXiv:2212.12750 [hep-ex]
2023 arXiv
-
[96]
Signals of nonrenormalizable Lorentz and CPT violation at the LHC,
E. Lunghi and N. Sherrill, “Signals of nonrenormalizable Lorentz and CPT violation at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B 862, 139366 (2025), arXiv:2412.14305 [hep-ph]
2025 arXiv
-
[97]
Observational limits on quantum geometry effects,
T.J. Konopka and S.A. Major, “Observational limits on quantum geometry effects,” New J. Phys.4, 57 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0201184
2002 arXiv
-
[98]
A Strong astrophysical constraint on the violation of special rel- ativity by quantum gravity,
T. Jacobson, S. Liberati, and D. Mattingly, “A Strong astrophysical constraint on the violation of special rel- ativity by quantum gravity,” Nature424, 1019 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0212190
2003 arXiv
Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.