Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Field-free Superconducting Diode Effect and Topological Fulde-Ferrell Superconductivity in Altermagnetic Shiba Chains

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A helical Shiba chain proximitized by a d-wave altermagnet hosts a field-free topological Fulde–Ferrell superconducting state with tunable Majorana zero modes and nonreciprocal supercurrents that reach diode efficiencies above 45%.

desk verdict A plausible symmetry-based model for a field-free Shiba-chain diode, but the advertised coexistence of topological FF pairing and >45% efficiency is not actually demonstrated because the two effects are computed in different parameter regimes. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21446 v2 pith:JXHA5KEJ submitted 2025-07-29 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Dibyendu Samanta , Sudeep Kumar Ghosh This is my paper
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords superconductingdiodeeffectaltermagnetShibachainMajoranazeromodesFulde-Ferrellsuperconductivityfinite-momentumpairingtopologicalBogoliubov-deGennes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a one-dimensional chain of magnetic adatoms on an s-wave superconductor, when brought into proximity with a d-wave altermagnet, forms a Fulde–Ferrell superconductor with finite Cooper-pair momentum without any applied magnetic field. In that state the chain is topologically nontrivial: it has bulk polarization $P_x = 0.5$, a finite minigap, and Majorana zero modes localized at its ends, all tunable through the injected supercurrent. The same topological phase carries direction-dependent critical currents, giving a field-free, junction-free superconducting diode effect with efficiencies above 45% for a helical spin texture and above 35% for a conical one. If true, this would unify topological Majorana physics and supercurrent rectification in one zero-field device, removing the magnetic-field bottlenecks that plague scalable superconducting electronics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the real-space Bogoliubov–de Gennes Hamiltonian of Eq. (2), in which the altermagnet proximity effect is encoded as a uniform spin-dependent hopping $(J_A/2)\sigma_z$ along the chain, and magnetism enters as a classical spin spiral $\mathbf{S}_n=\{\sin\theta\cos[g n], \sin\theta\sin[g n], \cos\theta\}$. A local spin-dependent gauge transformation maps this to a translation-invariant nanowire model with an effective spin–orbit coupling proportional to $g\,k\,\sigma_z$ and an altermagnetic correction to the kinetic energy, making the symmetry structure transparent. The superconducting order parameter is solved self-consistently for each Cooper-pair momentum $q$ from the gap equation, and the physical ground state minimizes the condensation energy $\Omega(q,\Delta)$, selecting the finite momentum $q_0$ of the FF state. Topology is diagnosed by the bulk polarization $P_x$, with $P_x=0.5$ marking the Majorana phase, and by the minigap $\delta_m$; the diode effect is quantified by the supercurrent $I(q)=-2e\,\partial\Omega/\partial q$ and the efficiency $\eta=(|I_c^-|-|I_c^+|)/(|I_c^+|+|I_c^-|)$.

What would settle it

Measure the zero-field critical currents of a helical Fe/Co/Mn Shiba chain on a superconductor proximitized by a $d$-wave altermagnet such as RuO$_2$; if $|I_c^+|$ equals $|I_c^-|$ within experimental error while both $J$ and $J_A$ are finite, the predicted field-free diode effect is absent. On the theory side, a first-principles electronic-structure calculation of the altermagnet/superconductor interface that yields an effective coupling different from the uniform hopping of Eq. (2) would break the mechanism that sets the finite Cooper-pair momentum $q_0$ and with it the topological FF phase.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a d-wave altermagnet, through its momentum-dependent spin splitting, can simultaneously supply the two symmetry breakings that a helical Shiba chain otherwise lacks. Time-reversal symmetry is broken by the altermagnetic exchange even at zero net magnetization, and inversion symmetry is broken when this altermagnetic coupling coexists with the spin-spiral exchange, i.e., when both $J$ and $J_A$ are finite. The resulting self-consistent Bogoliubov–de Gennes ground state is a Fulde–Ferrell superconductor whose Cooper-pair momentum $q_0$ grows with $J_A$; this state is gapped, topologically nontrivial with $P_x = 0.5$, and supports Majorana zero modes at the chain ends. The same FF state makes the supercurrent–momentum relation nonreciprocal, $|I_c^+| \neq |I_c^-|$, producing diode efficiencies that reach about 45% for the helical texture and about 35% for the conical one. The conical texture already breaks inversion on its own, so it shows the diode effect even without the altermagnet, while the helical texture requires both $J$ and $J_A$.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the altermagnet proximity effect taking the form of a uniform spin-dependent hopping $(J_A/2)\sigma_z$ along the chain (Eq. 2) and on that coupling not reorienting the classical spin spiral; if a real $d$-wave altermagnet interface instead induces a local on-site spin splitting or a spatially varying coupling, the finite FF momentum, the Majorana phase, and the diode effect could all disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cooper-pair momentum $q_0$ becomes an in-situ tuning knob: changing the injected supercurrent shifts the topological phase boundaries, allowing the Majorana phase to be switched on and off in a single device.
  • The helical-texture diode requires both magnetic exchange $J$ and altermagnet coupling $J_A$; the conical texture works with $J$ alone, so the two textures offer complementary field-free diode mechanisms with opposite signs of $\eta$.
  • Because no Zeeman field is needed, the proximity-induced superconducting gap is not suppressed, so the Majorana minigap $\delta_m$ and the diode efficiency should survive in parameter regimes where conventional field-driven proposals fail.
  • Quantitatively, efficiencies above 45% (helical) and above 35% (conical) place this mechanism in the range of practical superconducting diodes, and the model uses weak-coupling BCS parameters ($\Delta_0 \sim 1$ meV) compatible with existing adatom chains on Pb, Nb, or Re surfaces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the uniform $(J_A/2)\sigma_z$ proximity coupling is replaced by a more realistic interface model with position-dependent $J_A$ or local spin splitting, the predicted $q_0$ and diode efficiency would likely shift; computing that coupling from first principles is the natural next step and would turn the present prediction into a quantitative materials forecast.
  • The conical-chain result, with a diode effect from $J$ alone and a topological phase even without $J_A$, suggests that the altermagnet's special role is to make the helical texture field-free as well, and that other noncollinear textures or spin-orbit-coupled magnets might achieve similar field-free diodes without altermagnets.
  • Extending the calculation to a two-dimensional Shiba lattice could produce chiral FF phases with chiral Majorana edge modes and possibly a field-free perfect diode ($\eta \to 1$), an outcome hinted at by the strengthening of the one-dimensional efficiency as $J_A$ and $J$ grow.
  • A zero-field critical-current measurement on an existing Fe-on-Pb(110) chain capped with RuO$_2$ would be a cheap falsifier and could be done before any Majorana detection, since the diode signal is a DC transport measurement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a one-dimensional Shiba chain with helical or conical spin texture on an s-wave superconductor proximitized by a d-wave altermagnet, and studies it with a self-consistent real-space BdG mean-field approach using an FF pairing ansatz Δ_n ∝ e^{iqn}. The central claims are that (i) a field-free topological FF superconducting phase with bulk polarization P_x = 0.5 and finite minigap hosts tunable end Majorana zero modes, with the Cooper pair momentum controlled by an injected supercurrent, and (ii) this same phase supports a field-free superconducting diode effect with efficiencies exceeding 45% in the helical case and about 35% in the conical case. The authors support these claims with self-consistent gap and condensation-energy calculations, open-boundary spectra, LDOS profiles, a bulk-polarization phase diagram, and supercurrent-versus-q curves, supplemented by a gauge-transformed momentum-space analysis in the Supplementary Material.

Significance. If the coexistence claim is established, the proposal would be a notable step toward unifying field-free topological superconductivity and the superconducting diode effect in a single junction-free architecture, which is relevant for scalable Majorana-based and low-dissipation quantum devices. The paper's strengths include the self-consistent BdG treatment, the explicit use of P_x and δ_m to characterize the topological phase, open-boundary and LDOS checks of the Majorana modes, and a clear symmetry discussion distinguishing helical from conical spin textures. The model produces concrete quantitative predictions such as q0(J_A), P_x=0.5 regions, and diode efficiencies that are falsifiable by scanning-tunneling and transport experiments. The significance is currently limited by two internal gaps: the topological and SDE calculations are not performed in the same parameter regime, and the abstract's 45% efficiency is not reconciled with the body's reported 40% maximum from the momentum-space analysis.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; §III B; SM S2] The headline claim that the same topological FF phase supports both Majorana zero modes and a ~45% diode efficiency is not demonstrated, because the topological and SDE calculations use disjoint parameter sets. Topology is established only for the helical chain at (t/Δ0, g, U/Δ0, μ/Δ0, (βΔ0)^{-1}) = (0.5, π/2, 1.38, 1.0, 0.01) in Figs. 3–4, whereas the SDE in Fig. 5 is computed at (1.0, 2π/3, 1.574, 1.0, 0.1) with J and J_A varied. No P_x or δ_m is reported in the Fig. 5 parameter region, so the high-efficiency regime could be topologically trivial or gapless. The same mismatch exists for the conical case between SM S3 and Fig. 7. Please compute and report P_x, δ_m, and the zero-energy LDOS at the SDE-optimal parameters, and state explicitly whether the topological FF phase and the high-η regime overlap in the (J, J_A, q) phase diagram.
  2. The abstract and introduction claim diode efficiencies exceeding 45% for the helical texture, but §III B states that the momentum-space analysis yields a maximum of 40%, and SM S2 reports a maximum of about 40%. Figure 5's color scale saturates at 45% but no concrete maximum value is given in the text. The abstract's 'exceeding 45%' claim is not supported unless the real-space Fig. 5 reaches a value strictly above 45%, which is not reported. Please give the exact maximum η and the parameters at which it occurs for both the real-space and momentum-space calculations, then adjust the abstract and conclusion to the supported value.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract, Introduction] The text repeatedly uses 'ad-wave' where 'a d-wave' is intended; similar typos appear in the Fig. 3 caption ('T opological') and the SM S3 heading ('W ave').
  2. [Eq. (2)] The spin-dependent hopping term containing J_A is written without its Hermitian conjugate; as displayed the Hamiltonian is not manifestly Hermitian. Please add the conjugate explicitly or state that it is implied.
  3. [§IV, Fig. 7] The conclusion reports 'η ≳ 35%' for the conical texture, but Fig. 7(b,c) shows negative-valued efficiencies. Please state explicitly whether the quoted number is |η| and define the sign convention consistently with Eq. (11).
  4. [Introduction, Ref. [61]] Reference [61] already studies topological Majorana zero modes and the superconducting diode effect driven by FFLO pairing in a helical Shiba chain. The introduction should state explicitly that the new element here is the altermagnetic proximity and the resulting field-free operation, rather than the FFLO-SDE phenomenon itself.
  5. [SM S2 vs §III B] The momentum-space SM uses U/Δ0 = 0.2985 and 0.279, which differ by roughly a factor of five from the real-space U/Δ0 = 1.574 used in Fig. 5. Please clarify whether the gauge-transformed momentum-space model is meant to be quantitatively equivalent to Eq. (2) or is used only for qualitative insight.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; central results are computed self-consistently from the model, with only a minor non-load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The BdG Hamiltonian in Eq. (2) is a model with parameters t, J, J_A, mu, U, and g; the FF order parameter is assumed as a finite-momentum ansatz, and the gap Delta(q) is obtained by self-consistently solving Eq. (6). The topological invariant P_x (Eq. (9)), minigap, supercurrent I(q) (Eq. (10)), and diode efficiency eta (Eq. (11)) are all computed as outputs of this self-consistent solution, not fitted to the claimed predictions. The helical-chain SDE asymmetry is tied to the simultaneous presence of J and J_A in the spectrum, and the conical-chain asymmetry to the intrinsic breaking by the spin texture; these are model consequences, not inputs. The only self-citation is Ref. [57], used for the supercurrent formula I(q) = -2e dOmega/dq and for justifying the induced-pairing self-consistency approximation. That formula is standard (also cited to Refs. [25,28]), and the prior work provides external support rather than defining the target result in terms of itself. The FF ansatz is imposed rather than derived, but that is a stated modeling assumption, not circularity. The skeptic's concern that topology and SDE are demonstrated at different parameter sets is a numerical-evidence gap about whether the same point simultaneously hosts both effects; it does not mean any prediction reduces by construction to its inputs. Overall, the central claims are derived quantities of the model and do not collapse into a fit or a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model contains several hand-chosen parameters (J, J_A, g, U, μ) that set the scale of the effects, but no parameters are fitted to experimental data. The key structural assumptions are the FF pairing ansatz, the classical spin approximation, and the idealized uniform altermagnetic proximity. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Exchange coupling J = J/Δ0 = 0.5 to 0.65
    The magnitude of the SDE and the topological phase window depend on J; the quoted 45% efficiency is obtained at specific J choices typical in Shiba chain literature.
  • Altermagnetic coupling J_A = J_A/Δ0 = 0.0 to 0.6
    The field-free SDE for the helical chain arises only when J_A is finite; the claimed over-45% efficiency uses J_A/Δ0 near 0.6.
  • Spin spiral pitch g = g = π/2, 2π/3, 3π/4
    The pitch controls the effective spin-orbit coupling; the SDE vanishes for g = 0 and g = π, so specific noncollinear textures are required.
  • Hubbard interaction U = U/Δ0 = 1.38 to 1.574
    Chosen to place the bulk superconductor in the weak-coupling BCS regime (Δ0 ~ 1 meV); the exact value tunes the self-consistent gap and affects the efficiency.
  • Chemical potential μ = μ/Δ0 = 1.0 (also scanned)
    The diode efficiency and its sign depend on μ (Fig. 6a); the headline numbers are quoted at μ/Δ0 = 1.0.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Mean-field BdG decoupling of the attractive Hubbard interaction in the s-wave FF channel
    The pairing is treated at mean-field level with a homogeneous amplitude and a phase winding e^{iqn}; fluctuations are assumed suppressed by the bulk 3D superconductor (Sec. II and footnote [70]).
  • domain assumption Classical spin approximation for the magnetic adatoms; the spin spiral remains unchanged by the altermagnetic proximity
    The impurities are treated as classical spins and the altermagnetic exchange is assumed not to reorient them (Sec. II).
  • domain assumption Uniform altermagnetic coupling with a smooth interface
    The authors state 'we assume a smooth interface yielding a uniform coupling'; spatial variation could alter the physics (Sec. II).
  • ad hoc to paper FF ansatz: the superconducting order parameter is a single plane wave e^{iqn} with a uniform amplitude
    The paper does not consider Larkin-Ovchinnikov or other spatially modulated gap profiles; the FF ansatz is imposed rather than derived.
  • standard math Resta polarization P_x as a valid topological invariant for the BdG spectrum
    The formalism of the bulk dipole moment (Eq. 9) is invoked following refs [74-76].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Field-free Superconducting Diode Effect and Topological Fulde-Ferrell Superconductivity in Altermagnetic Shiba Chains." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JXHA5KEJ

@misc{pith2026250721446,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Field-free Superconducting Diode Effect and Topological Fulde-Ferrell Superconductivity in Altermagnetic Shiba Chains},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JXHA5KEJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21446}
}
abstract

The superconducting diode effect (SDE), characterized by a directional asymmetry in the critical supercurrents, typically requires external magnetic fields to break time-reversal symmetry -- posing challenges for scalability and device integration. Here, we demonstrate a field-free realization of the SDE in a helical Shiba chain proximitized by a $d$-wave altermagnet. Using a self-consistent Bogoliubov-de Gennes approach, we uncover a topological Fulde-Ferrell (FF) superconducting state that hosts tunable Majorana zero modes at the chain ends. The Cooper pair momentum is directly controlled by an externally injected supercurrent providing an experimentally accessible tuning parameter for driving and manipulating the topological FF phase. This state is stabilized by the interplay between the exchange coupling of magnetic adatoms and the induced altermagnetic spin splitting. Crucially, the same topological FF phase supports strong nonreciprocal supercurrents, achieving diode efficiencies exceeding $45\%$ without applied magnetic fields. The $d$-wave altermagnet plays a dual role: it intrinsically breaks time-reversal symmetry, enabling topological superconductivity, and introduces inversion symmetry breaking via momentum-dependent spin-splitting, driving the field-free SDE in a junction-free architecture. Our results establish the Shiba chain-altermagnet heterostructure as a promising platform for realizing topological superconducting devices with efficient, intrinsic superconducting diode functionality -- offering a scalable pathway towards dissipationless quantum technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.21446 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. First-Order Topological FFLO Transition and Superconducting Diode Sign Reversal in Altermagnetic Nanowires

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Altermagnetic coupling in a 1D SOC nanowire is predicted to drive a first-order transition between conventional (Z2=+1) and topological (Z2=-1) FFLO superconductivity, marked by a sign-reversing superconducting diode ...

  2. UI-Venus Technical Report: Building High-performance UI Agents with RFT

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    UI-Venus, a screenshot-only multimodal agent trained with reinforcement fine-tuning, reports SOTA grounding and navigation results on Screenspot-V2/Pro and AndroidWorld.

  3. Field-free superconducting diode effect in two-dimensional Shiba lattices

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A conical magnetic texture on a 2D Shiba lattice is predicted to give a field-free superconducting diode with efficiency above 40 percent and a strong dependence on current direction.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Case-A: In-plane helical spin texture The behavior of the supercurrent densityI(q) and the diode efficiencyηfor the Shiba chain with helical spin texture under different system parameters are shown in Fig. 5. Fig. 5(a) demonstrates thatI(q) remains sym- metric with respect toqwhen the induced altermag- netic strengthJ A = 0, even if the in-plane exchange ...

  2. [2]

    Case-B: Out of plane conical spin texture We analyzeI(q) andηfor a Shiba chain with a conical spin texture, shown in Fig. 7. As seen in Fig. 7(a), the supercurrent is asymmetric even whenJ A = 0, providedJis finite. This contrasts with the helical case, where bothJandJ A are needed to break inversion and time-reversal symmetries. In the conical texture, t...

    work page arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Unpaired majorana fermions in quantum wires,

    A Yu Kitaev, “Unpaired majorana fermions in quantum wires,” Physics-Uspekhi44, 131 (2001)

    2001

  4. [4]

    Majorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures,

    Roman M. Lutchyn, Jay D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, “Majorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 077001 (2010)

    2010

  5. [5]

    Helical liquids and majorana bound states in quantum wires,

    Yuval Oreg, Gil Refael, and Felix von Oppen, “Helical liquids and majorana bound states in quantum wires,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 177002 (2010)

    2010

  6. [6]

    Topological in- sulators and superconductors,

    Xiao-Liang Qi and Shou-Cheng Zhang, “Topological in- sulators and superconductors,” Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057–1110 (2011)

    2011

  7. [7]

    New directions in the pursuit of majorana fermions in solid state systems,

    Jason Alicea, “New directions in the pursuit of majorana fermions in solid state systems,” Reports on Progress in Physics75, 076501 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    Introduction to topological superconductivity and majorana fermions,

    Martin Leijnse and Karsten Flensberg, “Introduction to topological superconductivity and majorana fermions,” Semiconductor Science and Technology27, 124003 (2012)

    2012

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    Search for majorana fermions in su- perconductors,

    C.W.J. Beenakker, “Search for majorana fermions in su- perconductors,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics4, 113–136 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Non-abelian statistics of half-quantum vortices inp-wave superconductors,

    D. A. Ivanov, “Non-abelian statistics of half-quantum vortices inp-wave superconductors,” Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 268–271 (2001)

    2001

  3. [11]

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons,

    A.Yu. Kitaev, “Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons,” Annals of Physics303, 2–30 (2003)

    2003

  4. [12]

    Non-abelian states of matter,

    Ady Stern, “Non-abelian states of matter,” Nature464, 187–193 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    Non-abelian anyons and topological quantum computation,

    Chetan Nayak, Steven H. Simon, Ady Stern, Michael Freedman, and Sankar Das Sarma, “Non-abelian anyons and topological quantum computation,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083–1159 (2008)

    2008

  6. [14]

    Superconducting proximity effect and majorana fermions at the surface of a topolog- ical insulator,

    Liang Fu and C. L. Kane, “Superconducting proximity effect and majorana fermions at the surface of a topolog- ical insulator,” Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 096407 (2008)

    2008

  7. [15]

    Josephson current and noise at a superconductor/quantum-spin-hall- insulator/superconductor junction,

    Liang Fu and C. L. Kane, “Josephson current and noise at a superconductor/quantum-spin-hall- insulator/superconductor junction,” Phys. Rev. B79, 161408 (2009)

    2009

  8. [16]

    Majorana quasiparticles in atomic spin chains on superconductors,

    Stephan Rachel and Roland Wiesendanger, “Majorana quasiparticles in atomic spin chains on superconductors,” Physics Reports1099, 1–28 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    Colloquium: Atomic spin chains on surfaces,

    Deung-Jang Choi, Nicolas Lorente, Jens Wiebe, Kirsten von Bergmann, Alexander F. Otte, and Andreas J. Hein- rich, “Colloquium: Atomic spin chains on surfaces,” Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 041001 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Topological superconducting phase in helical shiba chains,

    Falko Pientka, Leonid I. Glazman, and Felix von Op- pen, “Topological superconducting phase in helical shiba chains,” Phys. Rev. B88, 155420 (2013)

    2013

  11. [19]

    Altermagnetic routes to majorana modes in zero net magnetization,

    Sayed Ali Akbar Ghorashi, Taylor L. Hughes, and Jen- nifer Cano, “Altermagnetic routes to majorana modes in zero net magnetization,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 106601 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Cre- ation and manipulation of higher-order topological states by altermagnets,

    Yu-Xuan Li, Yichen Liu, and Cheng-Cheng Liu, “Cre- ation and manipulation of higher-order topological states by altermagnets,” Phys. Rev. B109, L201109 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Zero-field finite-momentum and field-induced supercon- ductivity in altermagnets,

    Debmalya Chakraborty and Annica M. Black-Schaffer, “Zero-field finite-momentum and field-induced supercon- ductivity in altermagnets,” Phys. Rev. B110, L060508 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Distinguishing between topological majorana and trivial zero modes via transport and shot noise study in an altermagnet heterostructure,

    Debashish Mondal, Amartya Pal, Arijit Saha, and Tanay Nag, “Distinguishing between topological majorana and trivial zero modes via transport and shot noise study in an altermagnet heterostructure,” Phys. Rev. B111, L121401 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism,

    Libor ˇSmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth, “Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism,” Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromag- netism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry,

    Libor ˇSmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth, “Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromag- netism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry,” Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022). 9

    2022

  17. [25]

    Ferroically or- dered magnetic octupoles ind-wave altermagnets,

    Sayantika Bhowal and Nicola A. Spaldin, “Ferroically or- dered magnetic octupoles ind-wave altermagnets,” Phys. Rev. X14, 011019 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Altermagnetism in MnTe: Origin, predicted manifestations, and routes to detwinning,

    I. I. Mazin, “Altermagnetism in MnTe: Origin, predicted manifestations, and routes to detwinning,” Phys. Rev. B 107, L100418 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Intrin- sic superconducting diode effect,

    Akito Daido, Yuhei Ikeda, and Youichi Yanase, “Intrin- sic superconducting diode effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 037001 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    The superconducting diode effect,

    Muhammad Nadeem, Michael S Fuhrer, and Xiaolin Wang, “The superconducting diode effect,” Nature Re- views Physics5, 558–577 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Superconducting diode effects: Mechanisms, materials and applications,

    Jiajun Ma, Ruiya Zhan, and Xiao Lin, “Superconducting diode effects: Mechanisms, materials and applications,” Advanced Physics Research4, 2400180 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Nonreciprocal transport and optical phenomena in quantum materials,

    Naoto Nagaosa and Youichi Yanase, “Nonreciprocal transport and optical phenomena in quantum materials,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics15, 63–83 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Critical currents in sputtered nb-ta multilayers,

    P. R. Broussard and T. H. Geballe, “Critical currents in sputtered nb-ta multilayers,” Phys. Rev. B37, 68–74 (1988)

    1988

  24. [32]

    Asymmetric current-voltage characteristics in type-ii superconductors,

    Xiuguang Jiang, P. J. Connolly, S. J. Hagen, and C. J. Lobb, “Asymmetric current-voltage characteristics in type-ii superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B49, 9244–9247 (1994)

    1994

  25. [33]

    Asymmetric critical current of niobium microbridges with ferromag- netic stripe,

    A. Papon, K. Senapati, and Z. H. Barber, “Asymmetric critical current of niobium microbridges with ferromag- netic stripe,” Applied Physics Letters93, 172507 (2008)

    2008

  26. [34]

    Superconducting diode effect in artificial superlattices,

    Hideki Narita and Teruo Ono, “Superconducting diode effect in artificial superlattices,” JSAP Review2024, 240206 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Observation of super- conducting diode effect,

    Fuyuki Ando, Yuta Miyasaka, Tian Li, Jun Ishizuka, Tomonori Arakawa, Yoichi Shiota, Takahiro Moriyama, Youichi Yanase, and Teruo Ono, “Observation of super- conducting diode effect,” Nature584, 373–376 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Diamagnetic mech- anism of critical current non-reciprocity in multilay- ered superconductors,

    Ananthesh Sundaresh, Jukka I V¨ ayrynen, Yuli Lyanda- Geller, and Leonid P Rokhinson, “Diamagnetic mech- anism of critical current non-reciprocity in multilay- ered superconductors,” Nature Communications14, 1628 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Nonreciprocal charge trans- port in noncentrosymmetric superconductors,

    Ryohei Wakatsuki, Yu Saito, Shintaro Hoshino, Yuki M. Itahashi, Toshiya Ideue, Motohiko Ezawa, Yoshihiro Iwasa, and Naoto Nagaosa, “Nonreciprocal charge trans- port in noncentrosymmetric superconductors,” Science Advances3, e1602390 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Nonreciprocal transport in gate-induced polar superconductor SrTiO 3,

    Yuki M Itahashi, Toshiya Ideue, Yu Saito, Sunao Shimizu, Takumi Ouchi, Tsutomu Nojima, and Yoshi- hiro Iwasa, “Nonreciprocal transport in gate-induced polar superconductor SrTiO 3,” Science advances6, eaay9120 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Possible signatures of mixed- parity superconductivity in doped polar SrTiO 3 films,

    Timo Schumann, Luca Galletti, Hanbyeol Jeong, Kaveh Ahadi, William M. Strickland, Salva Salmani-Rezaie, and Susanne Stemmer, “Possible signatures of mixed- parity superconductivity in doped polar SrTiO 3 films,” Phys. Rev. B101, 100503 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Zero-field superconducting diode effect in small-twist-angle trilayer graphene,

    Jiang-Xiazi Lin, Phum Siriviboon, Harley D Scammell, Song Liu, Daniel Rhodes, K Watanabe, T Taniguchi, James Hone, Mathias S Scheurer, and JIA Li, “Zero-field superconducting diode effect in small-twist-angle trilayer graphene,” Nature Physics18, 1221–1227 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Symmetry- broken josephson junctions and superconducting diodes in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Jaime Diez-Merida, Andr´ es D ´ ıez-Carl´ on, SY Yang, Y-M Xie, X-J Gao, Jorden Senior, K Watanabe, T Taniguchi, X Lu, Andrew P Higginbotham,et al., “Symmetry- broken josephson junctions and superconducting diodes in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature Com- municatio...

    2023

  34. [42]

    Intrinsic superconducting diode effect and non- reciprocal superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene multilayers,

    Yinqi Chen, Mathias S. Scheurer, and Constantin Schrade, “Intrinsic superconducting diode effect and non- reciprocal superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene multilayers,” Phys. Rev. B112, L060505 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Supercurrent diode effect and magne- tochiral anisotropy in few-layer nbse2,

    Lorenz Bauriedl, Christian B¨ auml, Lorenz Fuchs, Chris- tian Baumgartner, Nicolas Paulik, Jonas M Bauer, Kai- Qiang Lin, John M Lupton, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe,et al., “Supercurrent diode effect and magne- tochiral anisotropy in few-layer nbse2,” Nature commu- nicat...

    2022

  36. [44]

    Magnetic proximity-induced superconduct- ing diode effect and infinite magnetoresistance in a van der waals heterostructure,

    Jonginn Yun, Suhan Son, Jeacheol Shin, Giung Park, Kaixuan Zhang, Young Jae Shin, Je-Geun Park, and Dohun Kim, “Magnetic proximity-induced superconduct- ing diode effect and infinite magnetoresistance in a van der waals heterostructure,” Phys. Rev. Res.5, L022064 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Finite-momentum superconductivity from chiral bands in twisted mote 2,

    Yinqi Chen, Cheng Xu, Yang Zhang, and Con- stantin Schrade, “Finite-momentum superconductivity from chiral bands in twisted mote 2,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18886 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Ubiquitous superconduct- ing diode effect in superconductor thin films,

    Yasen Hou, Fabrizio Nichele, Hang Chi, Alessandro Lodesani, Yingying Wu, Markus F. Ritter, Daniel Z. Haxell, Margarita Davydova, Stefan Ili´ c, Ourania Glezakou-Elbert, Amith Varambally, F. Sebastian Berg- eret, Akashdeep Kamra, Liang Fu, Patrick A. Lee, and Jagadeesh S. Moode...

    2023

  39. [47]

    Gate-tunable superconducting diode ef- fect in a three-terminal josephson device,

    Mohit Gupta, Gino V Graziano, Mihir Pendharkar, Ja- son T Dong, Connor P Dempsey, Chris Palmstrøm, and Vlad S Pribiag, “Gate-tunable superconducting diode ef- fect in a three-terminal josephson device,” Nature com- munications14, 3078 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Phase asymmetry of andreev spectra from cooper-pair momentum,

    Abhishek Banerjee, Max Geier, Md Ahnaf Rahman, Can- dice Thomas, Tian Wang, Michael J. Manfra, Karsten Flensberg, and Charles M. Marcus, “Phase asymmetry of andreev spectra from cooper-pair momentum,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 196301 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    Field-free superconduct- ing diode effect in noncentrosymmetric superconduc- tor/ferromagnet multilayers,

    Hideki Narita, Jun Ishizuka, Ryo Kawarazaki, Daisuke Kan, Yoichi Shiota, Takahiro Moriyama, Yuichi Shi- makawa, Alexey V Ognev, Alexander S Samar- dak, Youichi Yanase,et al., “Field-free superconduct- ing diode effect in noncentrosymmetric superconduc- tor/ferromagnet multilay...

    2022

  42. [50]

    Direct observation of a superconducting vor- tex diode,

    Alon Gutfreund, Hisakazu Matsuki, Vadim Plastovets, Avia Noah, Laura Gorzawski, Nofar Fridman, Guang Yang, Alexander Buzdin, Oded Millo, Jason W A Robin- son,et al., “Direct observation of a superconducting vor- tex diode,” Nature Communications14, 1630 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Recent progress on superconductors with time-reversal symmetry breaking,

    S. K. Ghosh, M. Smidman, T. Shang, J. F. Annett, A. D. Hillier, J. Quintanilla, and H. Yuan, “Recent progress on superconductors with time-reversal symmetry breaking,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter33, 033001 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    Spin-triplet superconductivity in Weyl nodal-line semimetals,

    Tian Shang, Sudeep K Ghosh, Michael Smidman, Dar- iusz Jakub Gawryluk, Christopher Baines, An Wang, Wu Xie, Ye Chen, Mukkattu O Ajeesh, Michael Nick- las, Ekaterina Pomjakushina, Marisa Medarde, Ming Shi, James F. Annett, Huiqiu Yuan, Jorge Quintanilla, and Toni Shiroka, “Spin...

    2022

  45. [53]

    Time-reversal sym- metry breaking in re-based superconductors,

    T. Shang, M. Smidman, S. K. Ghosh, C. Baines, L. J. Chang, D. J. Gawryluk, J. A. T. Barker, R. P. Singh, D. McK. Paul, G. Balakrishnan, E. Pomjakushina, M. Shi, M. Medarde, A. D. Hillier, H. Q. Yuan, J. Quin- tanilla, J. Mesot, and T. Shiroka, “Time-reversal sym- metry breakin...

    2018

  46. [54]

    Time- reversal symmetry breaking in the noncentrosymmetric zr3Ir superconductor,

    T. Shang, S. K. Ghosh, J. Z. Zhao, L.-J. Chang, C. Baines, M. K. Lee, D. J. Gawryluk, M. Shi, M. Medarde, J. Quintanilla, and T. Shiroka, “Time- reversal symmetry breaking in the noncentrosymmetric zr3Ir superconductor,” Phys. Rev. B102, 020503 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    Time- reversal symmetry breaking superconductivity in hfrhge: A noncentrosymmetric weyl semimetal,

    P Sajilesh K, Roshan Kumar Kushwaha, Dibyendu Samanta, Tymoteusz Tula, Pavan Kumar Meena, Shashank Srivastava, Deepak Singh, Pabitra Kumar Biswas, Amit Kanigel, Adrian D Hillier,et al., “Time- reversal symmetry breaking superconductivity in hfrhge: A noncentrosymmetric weyl se...

    2025

  48. [56]

    General theory of josephson diodes,

    Yi Zhang, Yuhao Gu, Pengfei Li, Jiangping Hu, and Kun Jiang, “General theory of josephson diodes,” Phys. Rev. X12, 041013 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    Josephson diode effect in supercurrent inter- ferometers,

    Rub´ en Seoane Souto, Martin Leijnse, and Constantin Schrade, “Josephson diode effect in supercurrent inter- ferometers,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 267702 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    Diode ef- fects in current-biased josephson junctions,

    Jacob F. Steiner, Larissa Melischek, Martina Trahms, Katharina J. Franke, and Felix von Oppen, “Diode ef- fects in current-biased josephson junctions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 177002 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Optimizing one dimensional superconducting diodes: interplay of rashba spin-orbit coupling and magnetic fields,

    Sayak Bhowmik, Dibyendu Samanta, Ashis K Nandy, Ar- ijit Saha, and Sudeep Kumar Ghosh, “Optimizing one dimensional superconducting diodes: interplay of rashba spin-orbit coupling and magnetic fields,” Communica- tions Physics8, 260 (2025)

    2025

  52. [60]

    Enhanced su- perconducting diode effect due to coexisting phases,

    Sayan Banerjee and Mathias S. Scheurer, “Enhanced su- perconducting diode effect due to coexisting phases,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 046003 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Supercurrent diode effect and finite-momentum superconductors,

    Noah F. Q. Yuan and Liang Fu, “Supercurrent diode effect and finite-momentum superconductors,” Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2119548119 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    Theory of the supercurrent diode effect in rashba superconductors with arbitrary dis- order,

    S. Ili´ c and F. S. Bergeret, “Theory of the supercurrent diode effect in rashba superconductors with arbitrary dis- order,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 177001 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    Topological majo- rana zero modes and the superconducting diode effect driven by fulde-ferrell-larkin-ovchinnikov pairing in a he- lical shiba chain,

    Sayak Bhowmik and Arijit Saha, “Topological majo- rana zero modes and the superconducting diode effect driven by fulde-ferrell-larkin-ovchinnikov pairing in a he- lical shiba chain,” Phys. Rev. B111, L161402 (2025)

    2025

  56. [64]

    The supercurrent diode effect and nonreciprocal paraconduc- tivity due to the chiral structure of nanotubes,

    James Jun He, Yukio Tanaka, and Naoto Nagaosa, “The supercurrent diode effect and nonreciprocal paraconduc- tivity due to the chiral structure of nanotubes,” Nature Communications14, 3330 (2023)

    2023

  57. [65]

    Superconducting diode effect in quasi-one-dimensional systems,

    Tatiana de Picoli, Zane Blood, Yuli Lyanda-Geller, and Jukka I. V¨ ayrynen, “Superconducting diode effect in quasi-one-dimensional systems,” Phys. Rev. B107, 224518 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    Efficient superconducting diodes and rectifiers for quantum circuitry,

    Josep Ingla-Ayn´ es, Yasen Hou, Sarah Wang, En-De Chu, Oleg A Mukhanov, Peng Wei, and Jagadeesh S Mood- era, “Efficient superconducting diodes and rectifiers for quantum circuitry,” Nature Electronics , 1–6 (2025)

    2025

  59. [67]

    A superconducting full-wave bridge rectifier,

    Matteo Castellani, Owen Medeiros, Alessandro Buzzi, Reed A Foster, Marco Colangelo, and Karl K Berggren, “A superconducting full-wave bridge rectifier,” Nature Electronics , 1–9 (2025)

    2025

  60. [68]

    In- terplay of the inverse proximity effect and magnetic field in out-of-equilibrium single-electron devices,

    Shuji Nakamura, Yuri A. Pashkin, Mathieu Taupin, Ville F. Maisi, Ivan M. Khaymovich, Alexander S. Mel’nikov, Joonas T. Peltonen, Jukka P. Pekola, Yuma Okazaki, Satoshi Kashiwaya, Shiro Kawabata, Andrey S. Vasenko, Jaw-Shen Tsai, and Nobu-Hisa Kaneko, “In- terplay of the invers...

    2017

  61. [69]

    Evo- lution of 1/fflux noise in superconducting qubits with weak magnetic fields,

    David A. Rower, Lamia Ateshian, Lauren H. Li, Max Hays, Dolev Bluvstein, Leon Ding, Bharath Kannan, Aziza Almanakly, Jochen Braum¨ uller, David K. Kim, Alexander Melville, Bethany M. Niedzielski, Mollie E. Schwartz, Jonilyn L. Yoder, Terry P. Orlando, Joel I- Jan Wang, Simon G...

    2023

  62. [70]

    Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials,

    Cheng Song, Hua Bai, Zhiyuan Zhou, Lei Han, Helena Reichlova, J Hugo Dil, Junwei Liu, Xianzhe Chen, and Feng Pan, “Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials,” Nature Reviews Materials , 1–13 (2025)

    2025

  63. [71]

    Electrical switching of altermagnetism,

    Yiyuan Chen, Xiaoxiong Liu, Hai-Zhou Lu, and X. C. Xie, “Electrical switching of altermagnetism,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 016701 (2025)

    2025

  64. [72]

    As such, the induced gap can be treated as self-consistent up to a renormalization that accounts for interface properties and coupling strength

    While the induced pairing in the chain does not origi- nate from a condensate intrinsic to the 1D system, the approximation remains valid to leading order because the 3D bulk superconductor suppresses order parameter fluc- tuations [57, 63]. As such, the induced gap can be tre...

  65. [73]

    Prevalence of trivial zero-energy subgap states in nonuniform helical spin chains on the surface of superconductors,

    Richard Hess, Henry F. Legg, Daniel Loss, and Je- lena Klinovaja, “Prevalence of trivial zero-energy subgap states in nonuniform helical spin chains on the surface of superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B106, 104503 (2022)

    2022

  66. [74]

    Topological super- conductivity by engineering noncollinear magnetism in magnet/superconductor heterostructures: A realistic prescription for the two-dimensional kitaev model,

    Pritam Chatterjee, Sayan Banik, Sandip Bera, Arnob Kumar Ghosh, Saurabh Pradhan, Arijit Saha, and Ashis K. Nandy, “Topological super- conductivity by engineering noncollinear magnetism in magnet/superconductor heterostructures: A realistic prescription for the two-dimensional ...

    2024

  67. [75]

    Supercurrent-induced topological phase transitions,

    Kazuaki Takasan, Shuntaro Sumita, and Youichi Yanase, “Supercurrent-induced topological phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. B106, 014508 (2022)

    2022

  68. [76]

    Quantum-mechanical position operator in extended systems,

    Raffaele Resta, “Quantum-mechanical position operator in extended systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1800–1803 (1998)

    1998

  69. [77]

    Many-body electric multipole operators in ex- tended systems,

    William A. Wheeler, Lucas K. Wagner, and Taylor L. Hughes, “Many-body electric multipole operators in ex- tended systems,” Phys. Rev. B100, 245135 (2019)

    2019

  70. [78]

    Many-body order parameters for multipoles in solids,

    Byungmin Kang, Ken Shiozaki, and Gil Young Cho, “Many-body order parameters for multipoles in solids,” Phys. Rev. B100, 245134 (2019)

    2019

  71. [79]

    Topological fulde–ferrell–larkin– ovchinnikov states in spin–orbit-coupled fermi gases,

    Wei Zhang and Wei Yi, “Topological fulde–ferrell–larkin– ovchinnikov states in spin–orbit-coupled fermi gases,” Nature communications4, 2711 (2013)

    2013

  72. [80]

    Topo- logical superfluids with finite-momentum pairing and ma- jorana fermions,

    Chunlei Qu, Zhen Zheng, Ming Gong, Yong Xu, Li Mao, Xubo Zou, Guangcan Guo, and Chuanwei Zhang, “Topo- logical superfluids with finite-momentum pairing and ma- jorana fermions,” Nature communications4, 2710 (2013). 11

    2013

  73. [81]

    Magnet- superconductor hybrid quantum systems: a materials platform for topological superconductivity,

    Roberto Lo Conte, Jens Wiebe, Stephan Rachel, Dirk K Morr, and Roland Wiesendanger, “Magnet- superconductor hybrid quantum systems: a materials platform for topological superconductivity,” La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento47, 453–554 (2024)

    2024

  74. [82]

    Observation of majo- rana fermions in ferromagnetic atomic chains on a super- conductor,

    Stevan Nadj-Perge, Ilya K. Drozdov, Jian Li, Hua Chen, Sangjun Jeon, Jungpil Seo, Allan H. MacDonald, B. An- drei Bernevig, and Ali Yazdani, “Observation of majo- rana fermions in ferromagnetic atomic chains on a super- conductor,” Science346, 602–607 (2014)

    2014

  75. [83]

    Precursors of majorana modes and their length-dependent energy oscillations probed at both ends of atomic shiba chains,

    Lucas Schneider, Philip Beck, Jannis Neuhaus- Steinmetz, Levente R´ ozsa, Thore Posske, Jens Wiebe, and Roland Wiesendanger, “Precursors of majorana modes and their length-dependent energy oscillations probed at both ends of atomic shiba chains,” Nature nanotechnology17, 384–3...

    2022

  76. [84]

    To- ward tailoring majorana bound states in artificially con- structed magnetic atom chains on elemental supercon- ductors,

    Howon Kim, Alexandra Palacio-Morales, Thore Posske, Levente R´ ozsa, Kriszti´ an Palot´ as, L´ aszl´ o Szunyogh, Michael Thorwart, and Roland Wiesendanger, “To- ward tailoring majorana bound states in artificially con- structed magnetic atom chains on elemental supercon- ducto...

    2018

  77. [85]

    End states and subgap structure in proximity-coupled chains of magnetic adatoms,

    Michael Ruby, Falko Pientka, Yang Peng, Felix von Op- pen, Benjamin W. Heinrich, and Katharina J. Franke, “End states and subgap structure in proximity-coupled chains of magnetic adatoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 197204 (2015)

    2015

  78. [86]

    Perfect superconducting diode effect in altermagnets,

    Debmalya Chakraborty and Annica M. Black-Schaffer, “Perfect superconducting diode effect in altermagnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 026001 (2025)

    2025

  79. [87]

    Superconducting phenomena in systems with unconventional magnets,

    Yuri Fukaya, Bo Lu, Keiji Yada, Yukio Tanaka, and Jorge Cayao, “Superconducting phenomena in systems with unconventional magnets,” Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter (2025)

    2025

  80. [88]

    Third-order and fifth-order nonlinear spin-current generation ing-wave andi-wave altermag- nets and perfectly nonreciprocal spin current inf-wave magnets,

    Motohiko Ezawa, “Third-order and fifth-order nonlinear spin-current generation ing-wave andi-wave altermag- nets and perfectly nonreciprocal spin current inf-wave magnets,” Phys. Rev. B111, 125420 (2025). 12 SUPPLEMENT AR Y MA TERIAL This supplementary text provides additional...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.