Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 55 references

A copper haloscope split along its electric-field plane tunes continuously over roughly 800 MHz near 8.5 GHz while preserving quality factor, and is ready for a 12 T axion search.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 01:25 UTC pith:JXUGD2VU

load-bearing objection Solid engineering paper: sliding split-cavity tuner works at RT/4K and moves at mK, but the central mK performance claim rests on a two-port benchmark, not on the final three-port cavity. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.28883 v1 pith:JXUGD2VU submitted 2026-07-30 physics.ins-det hep-ex

The VORTEX cavity for the RADES axion haloscope

Jose Mar\'ia Garc\'ia-Barcel\'o , Cristian Cogollos , Babette D\"obrich , David Kittlinger , Diego Nicolas Lobato-De La Cruz , Walter Wuensch This is my paper
classification physics.ins-det hep-ex
keywords axion dark matterhaloscopetunable microwave cavityvertical-cut tuningsplit-cavity resonatorquality factorbead-pull measurementdilution refrigerator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports a solution to one of the main bottlenecks in axion dark matter searches: tuning a high-frequency microwave cavity over a wide frequency range without inserting lossy rods that lower its quality factor. The authors built and tested VORTEX, a cylindrical copper haloscope centred at about 8.5 GHz whose two halves slide apart along a plane parallel to the TM010 electric field. Opening the gap shifts the resonance from about 9 GHz down to 8.2 GHz, a tuning range of roughly 800 MHz, with a simulated maximum quality-factor loss of 15.6% at cryogenic temperatures. The mechanism is shown to work at room temperature, at 4 K, and in a dilution refrigerator at millikelvin temperatures, together with a motorised antenna that keeps coupling near its optimal value across the sweep; bead-pull measurements confirm the expected field pattern. The paper concludes that the cavity is ready for a data-taking campaign in a 12 T solenoid, with the caveat that the millikelvin quality-factor data come from an earlier two-port version rather than from the final three-port cavity.

Core claim

The central claim is that the vertical-cut split-cavity design gives wide, continuous frequency tuning without the quality-factor penalty of rod-based tuners. The authors demonstrate this in three copper prototypes, with measurements of the TM010 resonant mode showing a continuous tuning range of about 800 MHz centred near 8.5 GHz and quality factors that stay close to simulation across the sweep: about 17,000 at room temperature, 17,000–39,000 at 4 K, and about 48,000 for the two-port version at roughly 0.4 K in a 6 T field (66% of simulation). They also show that a movable antenna, driven by a second nanopositioner, recouples the cavity so the coupling parameter remains near β ≈ 2 over the

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the vertical cut: the cylindrical cavity is split in half along a longitudinal plane that is parallel to the electric field of the TM010 mode, the axion-sensitive resonance whose field runs along the solenoid axis. Separating the halves opens a gap at the split; because the field lines stay parallel to the cut, power does not radiate into the gap, so the resonant frequency drops while the quality factor degrades only gradually. The frequency-versus-gap relation, together with misalignment simulations, sets the tuning range and its tolerances. A movable antenna port — a semi-rigid coaxial line whose penetration into the cavity is adjusted by a nanopositioner — ke

Load-bearing premise

The millikelvin performance claim rests on the assumption that the final three-port cavity at 44 mK behaves like the earlier two-port cavity whose Q0 of about 48,000 was measured at roughly 0.4 K and 6 T, since Table II lists no quality-factor-versus-frequency data for the 44 mK configuration and the text reports only “similar” cavity responses.

What would settle it

Measure the unloaded quality factor and tuning curve of the fully assembled three-port VORTEX cavity at 44 mK, with the nanopositioners and movable antenna in place and, ideally, at 12 T. A Q0 substantially below the roughly 48,000 value measured on the two-port cavity at 0.4 K and 6 T, or a usable tuning range much smaller than 800 MHz, would falsify the readiness and scan-rate claims.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A single VORTEX cavity can cover roughly 800 MHz of axion mass parameter space around 8.5 GHz without retuning hardware or sacrificing much quality factor.
  • Continuous antenna recoupling holds β near 2 over the sweep, so the scan-rate figure of merit stays high across the whole tuning range.
  • Bead-pull mapping of the open cavity gives an empirical form factor and can flag misalignments that simulations would miss.
  • Thermal recovery times of about two minutes after tuning steps make a stepped frequency scan practical at millikelvin temperatures.
  • The 12 T campaign has a projected sensitivity curve over the 8–9 GHz band, benchmarked against standard QCD axion model bands.
  • Because the tuning gap doubles as an access slot, the design removes the usual need for cut-off holes to probe the internal field, a feature other haloscope geometries could borrow.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The missing 44 mK quality-factor dataset is the most direct next measurement: if it reproduces the roughly 48,000 Q0 seen on the two-port cavity at 0.4 K, the projected scan rate is realistic; if not, the millikelvin readiness claim would need revision.
  • The second-mode field asymmetry identified in bead-pull simulations could be automated into a real-time in-situ alignment monitor during physics data taking, reducing form-factor systematic uncertainty without interrupting the scan.
  • Because the tuning mechanism inserts nothing lossy into the cavity, the same vertical-cut geometry is a natural host for superconducting coatings; the measured Q-degradation fraction across the tuning range would likely carry over.
  • The fact that even the closed cavity reaches only about 66% of simulated Q0 suggests the dominant residual loss is in the material and assembly surfaces rather than in the tuning mechanism itself, so surface treatment may be the highest-leverage improvement.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the design, construction, and cryogenic characterization of VORTEX, an 8.5 GHz cylindrical TM010 haloscope tuned by separating two longitudinal halves (vertical-cut mechanism). CST simulations predict an 800 MHz tuning range (9.0-8.2 GHz) with a maximum 15.6% Q0 degradation at cryogenic temperatures. Room-temperature and 4 K measurements on two- and three-port OFHC prototypes show Q0 values within roughly 8-15% of CST and a smooth Q0 variation across the tuning range. A mK test of the static two-port cavity gives Q0=48262 at 6 T (66% of simulation). The three-port cavity with JPE nanopositioners reached 44-134 mK, demonstrated beta readjustment and thermal recovery after stepping, but no Q0-vs-frequency dataset is reported at mK for this final configuration. Bead-pull measurements are compared with CST and analytic Bessel profiles.

Significance. If the mK performance claim is fully supported, the vertical-cut mechanism is an important alternative to rod tuning for high-frequency haloscopes: it sweeps about 10% bandwidth without introducing lossy dielectrics in the cavity, and the direct bead-pull field mapping is a useful validation tool. The paper's strengths include the systematic comparison with independent CST simulations without fitted parameters, the detailed mechanical/cryogenic implementation, and the first bead-pull comparison for this cavity class. However, the final configuration's mK Q0-vs-frequency behavior is not reported, so the central 'mK-ready' claim is not yet fully evidenced.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2.2, Table II] The abstract and conclusions claim mK-range performance, but no Q0-vs-frequency dataset exists for the final three-port VORTEX cavity at mK. Table II lists Cav.#3(mK) Q0 as '-' and 'Not enough data for plots'; Section 3.2.2 reports only that S-parameters were 'similar to those shown in Figure 20b', which is a closed-gap two-port measurement at 0-6 T (Q0=48262, 66% of CST). The 15.6% maximum Q0 degradation is a CST simulation (Section 2.2.1), not a measured mK value for the sliding three-port cavity. The JPE nanopositioners, finger gaskets, third port, and movable antenna add loss/leakage channels absent in the benchmark, so 'poised to be used in an upcoming data-taking campaign' is not yet supported. Either provide the mK Q0(f) data or soften the claim.
  2. [Section 4.3, Eq. (4.1)] The bead-pull extraction uses the perturbative relation |E| ∝ sqrt(Δf/f0) even though the measured perturbation is explicitly described as 'excessive' and produces large spurious off-resonance lobes. The statement that 'for the resonant frequency, a reasonable distribution' is obtained is an assertion, not a validation. This is load-bearing for the claimed 'satisfactory agreement' with simulation. Please provide a control with a smaller bead, or quantify the systematic uncertainty due to perturbative breakdown; alternatively, use the simulated bead-pull response to calibrate the extraction.
  3. [Figure 30, Section 5] The projected sensitivity uses 'the measured cryogenic quality factor' and assumes Tcav=20 mK, but at mK the only measured Q0 is for the static two-port Cav.#2 at 6 T (48262); no mK Q0 is reported for the tunable three-port cavity. Section 3.2.2 reports cavity temperatures of 44 mK and 134 mK, not 20 mK. The projection should state exactly which Q0(f) profile and cavity temperature are assumed, and should include a systematic band reflecting the missing mK tunable-cavity data.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2.2] The text says 'The temperature of sensor 1 is higher because this is where the RF cables are physically connected', but the preceding sentence gives sensor 1 = 44 mK and sensor 2 = 134 mK. The sensor labels or the sentence need correction.
  2. [Eq. (4.2)] The formula 'Δf/f0 = (εr-1)r_b^3' is dimensionally inconsistent as written. It should be a proportionality, and the full expression for a dielectric sphere includes the depolarization factor (εr-1)/(εr+2) and a geometrical prefactor.
  3. [Table II] The Cav.#3(mK) row lists Outcomes as 'Full fr and beta control' but the fr-tuning column is '-' and Limitations state 'Not enough data for plots'. Please reconcile this inconsistency and clarify what 'full control' means without Q0/fr data.
  4. [Section 3.2.2] Referring to 'responses similar to those shown in Figure 20b' is imprecise because Figure 20b is a static closed-gap two-port measurement; please specify the actual frequency span and coupling states for the three-port mK run.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the tuning range, Q0 behaviour, and bead-pull field maps are measured against independent CST/analytical benchmarks, with no fitted parameter or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The central claims are a roughly 800 MHz vertical-cut tuning range, moderate Q0 degradation while tuning, and successful field-profile verification by bead pull. None of these is constructed from the quantity it is used to predict. The tuning simulation in Section 2.2.1 is a CST eigenvalue sweep over gap, and the same range is independently measured at room temperature and 4 K (e.g., Cavity #2 spans 8.12–8.93 GHz in Table II and Figures 14/17), so the experimental '~800 MHz' statement is not a restatement of the simulation input. The 15.6% Q0 decrease is explicitly labelled as a CST result for cryogenic copper conductivity, while the measured Q0 values are extracted from VNA transmission/reflection data using ARPE and standard resonance-fitting methods, not adjusted to force agreement with simulation. The bead-pull analysis uses Slater perturbation (Eq. 4.1) to convert measured frequency shifts into field amplitudes, then compares those profiles with CST simulations and the analytic cylindrical Bessel solution; the simulated bead-pull data are generated independently, not fed with measured values, so the agreement is a genuine comparison rather than a tautology. The prior RADES split-cavity works [33,34] are cited for concept credit and qualitative comparison, but the load-bearing electrical and mechanical validation is performed in this paper via CST and direct measurement. The real weakness is the absence of a full mK tuning dataset for the final three-port cavity: Section 3.2.2 reports only that responses 'similar' to Figure 20b were obtained, and Table II lists 'No tuning' and 'Not enough data for plots' for Cav#3 at mK. That is a data-completeness and support gap, not circularity by construction. The 12 T / mK-readiness claim is therefore under-supported but not derived from itself or from a fitted parameter.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard microwave theory, CST simulation as a benchmark, and the assumption that the measured higher-temperature performance transfers to the final mK configuration. The bead-pull validation additionally depends on unmeasured bead properties and a post-hoc restriction to resonant-frequency data.

free parameters (2)
  • Bead radius (r_b) and permittivity (ε_r) of the probe bead = r_b ≈ 1.5 mm (3 mm diameter toroid), ε_r not measured (simulations use 9.8 and 25)
    Used in the bead-pull comparison (Section 4.1-4.3); the actual bead parameters are not measured, and the observed spurious lobes are attributed to 'excessive perturbation' whose magnitude depends on these unmeasured values.
  • Sensitivity projection parameters = SNR=1.28, Δt_tot=30 d, β=2, T_cav=20 mK, T_amp=4.62 K (LNA) or 452 mK (TWPA)
    Chosen by hand in Section 5 for the projected reach in Fig. 30; they do not affect the cavity characterization but determine the projected sensitivity curve.
axioms (6)
  • standard math Slater perturbation theory: Δf/f0 = (ε_r−1) r_b^3 and |E| ∝ sqrt(Δf/f0) (Eq. 4.1-4.2)
    Used to convert bead-pull frequency shifts to field amplitudes; standard microwave engineering, cited to refs 57-58.
  • domain assumption CST Studio Suite simulations provide accurate Q0, frequency, and field distributions for ideal and misaligned cavity geometries
    All comparisons in the paper use CST as the benchmark; no independent analytical derivation of Q0 or C is given. Inaccuracies in the cavity model (e.g., surface roughness, gap radiation) would directly affect the stated agreement.
  • domain assumption The TM010 mode has its electric field parallel to the vertical cut, so opening the gap does not couple significant power into the gap ('loss-less' tuning)
    Physical basis of the tuning concept (Section 2.1); even in simulation Q0 drops by 15.6% at 4 mm gap, so the assumption is only approximately true.
  • ad hoc to paper Misalignment effects can be treated as linear combinations of independent θx, θy, gy perturbations
    Stated in Section 2.2.2 without proof; if cross-terms are significant, the tolerance estimates (Table I) would be inaccurate.
  • domain assumption The RF performance of the final three-port cavity at 44 mK is the same as the two-port cavity measured at ~0.4 K and at 4 K
    The mK claim is supported by thermal/mechanical tests and unspecified 'similar' S-parameter responses, but no Q0-vs-frequency dataset is reported for the final configuration (Table II).
  • ad hoc to paper The electric field extracted at the resonant frequency is unaffected by the excessive perturbation that produced spurious off-resonance lobes
    Section 4.3 states the off-resonance structure is an artifact of the bead being too large, but the resonant-frequency profile is still used as a validation; this is a post-hoc selection of the usable data.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 27217 in / 19693 out tokens · 202969 ms · 2026-08-03T01:25:17.365918+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

One of the major challenges in axion dark matter haloscope searches is a loss-less tuning mechanism that is able to cover a significant frequency range around the haloscope's central frequency. In this article, we report on the implementation and performance of an axion haloscope dubbed Vertical-cut Optimised Resonant Tunable cavity for dark matter EXploration (VORTEX) centred at $8.5$ GHz with a tuning range of around $800$ MHz. The performance of this setup is measured at temperatures in the mK range and compared to simulation. In addition, we test the cavity-mode structure of this cavity type directly via the `bead-pull method' and observe satisfactory agreement with expectations. The arrangement is poised to be used in an upcoming RADES (Relic Axion Detection Exploratory Setup) data-taking campaign employing a $12$ T solenoid magnet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 24 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn,CP conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440

    1977

  2. [2]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn,Constraints imposed by CP conservation in the presence of instantons,Phys. Rev.D16(1977) 1791. – 39 –

    1977

  3. [3]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223

    1978

  4. [4]

    Wilczek,Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279

    1978

  5. [5]

    O’Hare,Cosmology of axion dark matter,PoSCOSMICWISPers(2024) 040 [2403.17697]

    C.A.J. O’Hare,Cosmology of axion dark matter,PoSCOSMICWISPers(2024) 040 [2403.17697]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Preskill, M.B

    J. Preskill, M.B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 127

    1983

  7. [7]

    Abbott and P

    L.F. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 133

    1983

  8. [8]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,The Not So Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 137

    1983

  9. [9]

    Irastorza,An introduction to axions and their detection,SciPost Phys

    I.G. Irastorza,An introduction to axions and their detection,SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes45 (2022) 1 [2109.07376]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Di Luzio, M

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi and L. Visinelli,The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rept.870(2020) 1 [2003.01100]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Sikivie,Axion dark matter,Nucl

    P. Sikivie,Axion dark matter,Nucl. Phys. B1003(2024) 116500

    2024

  12. [12]

    Yu,Primer on Axion Physics,Annalen Phys.536(2024) 2300106 [2308.08612]

    F. Yu,Primer on Axion Physics,Annalen Phys.536(2024) 2300106 [2308.08612]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Irastorza and J

    I.G. Irastorza and J. Redondo,New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.102(2018) 89 [1801.08127]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    Adams et al.,Axion Dark Matter, inSnowmass 2021, p

    C.B. Adams et al.,Axion Dark Matter, inSnowmass 2021, p. all, 3, 2022 [2203.14923]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Baryakhtar, L

    M. Baryakhtar, L. Rosenberg and G. Rybka,Searching for the QCD Dark Matter Axion,to appear(2025) [2504.10607]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Döbrich and I.G

    B. Döbrich and I.G. Irastorza,Experiments to test the hypothesis for solar and dark matter axions,2507.06414

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Sikivie,Experimental tests of the invisible axion,Phys

    P. Sikivie,Experimental tests of the invisible axion,Phys. Rev. Lett.51(1983) 1415. [18]ADMXcollaboration,A Search for Invisible Axion Dark Matter with the Axion Dark Matter Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 151301 [1804.05750]. [19]ADMXcollaboration,Extended Search for the Invisible Axion with the Axion Dark Matter Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020)...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1983

  18. [22]

    J. Kim, O. Kwon, C. Kutlu, W. Chung, A. Matlashov and Y.K. Semertzidis, Near-Quantum-Noise Axion Dark Matter Search at CAPP around 5.3µeV,Phys. Rev. Lett. 130(2023) 091602 [2211.07929]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [23]

    B. Yang, H. Yoon, M. Ahn, Y. Lee and J. Yoo,Extended axion dark matter search using the CAPP18T haloscope,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 081801 [2306.08565]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [24]

    Ahn, J.M

    S. Ahn, J.M. Kim, B.I. Ivanov, O. Kwon, H.S. Byun and Y.K. Semertzidis,Extensive search for axion dark matter over 1 GHz with CAPP’s Main Axion eXperiment (CAPP-MAX), Phys. Rev. X14(2024) 031023 [2402.07941]. – 40 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [25]

    Alesini et al.,Galactic axions search with a superconducting resonant cavity,Phys

    D. Alesini et al.,Galactic axions search with a superconducting resonant cavity,Phys. Rev. D 99(2019) 101101 [1903.06547]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [26]

    Ahyoune et al.,RADES axion search results with a high-temperature superconducting cavity in an 11.7 T magnet,JHEP04(2025) 113 [2403.07790]

    S. Ahyoune et al.,RADES axion search results with a high-temperature superconducting cavity in an 11.7 T magnet,JHEP04(2025) 113 [2403.07790]

    arXiv 2025

  23. [27]

    Boutan et al.,Piezoelectrically tuned multimode cavity search for axion dark matter,Phys

    C. Boutan et al.,Piezoelectrically tuned multimode cavity search for axion dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018)

    2018

  24. [28]

    Álvarez Melcón et al.,Scalable haloscopes for axion dark matter detection in the 30µeV range with RADES,JHEP07(2020) 084 [2002.07639]

    A. Álvarez Melcón et al.,Scalable haloscopes for axion dark matter detection in the 30µeV range with RADES,JHEP07(2020) 084 [2002.07639]. [29]CASTcollaboration,First results of the CAST-RADES haloscope search for axions at 34.67 µeV,JHEP10(2020) 075 [2104.13798]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  25. [30]

    Jeong, S

    J. Jeong, S. Youn, S. Bae, J. Kim, T. Seong, J.E. Kim et al.,Search for Invisible Axion Dark Matter with a Multiple-Cell Haloscope,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 221302 [2008.10141]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  26. [31]

    Melcón et al.,Axion Searches with Microwave Filters: the RADES project,JCAP1805 (2018) 040 [1803.01243]

    A.A. Melcón et al.,Axion Searches with Microwave Filters: the RADES project,JCAP1805 (2018) 040 [1803.01243]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [32]

    Arguedas Cuendis et al.,The 3 Cavity Prototypes of RADES: An Axion Detector Using Microwave Filters at CAST,Springer Proc

    S. Arguedas Cuendis et al.,The 3 Cavity Prototypes of RADES: An Axion Detector Using Microwave Filters at CAST,Springer Proc. Phys.245(2020) 45 [1903.04323]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  28. [33]

    Golm, J.M

    J. Golm, J.M. García-Barceló, S. Arguedas Cuendis, S. Calatroni, W. Wuensch and B. Döbrich,Split-cavity tuning of a rectangular axion haloscope operating around 8.4 GHz, Front. in Phys.12(2024) 1372846 [2312.13109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [34]

    García-Barceló, C

    J.M. García-Barceló, C. Cogollos and B. Döbrich,Towards a tunable mK haloscope in RADES,PoSCOSMICWISPers2024(2025) 044

    2025

  30. [35]

    Braggio, G

    C. Braggio, G. Carugno, R. Di Vora, A. Ortolan, G. Ruoso and D. Seyler,A tunable clamshell cavity for wavelike dark matter searches,Rev. Sci. Instrum.94(2023) 045111

    2023

  31. [36]

    Maiello et al.,Broad frequency tuning of a Nb3Sn superconducting microwave cavity for dark matter searches,2603.08175

    D. Maiello et al.,Broad frequency tuning of a Nb3Sn superconducting microwave cavity for dark matter searches,2603.08175

    arXiv

  32. [37]

    Dyson, C.L

    T.A. Dyson, C.L. Bartram, A. Davidson, J.B. Ezekiel, L.M. Futamura, T. Liu et al., High-volume tunable resonator for axion searches above 7 GHz,Phys. Rev. Applied21(2024) L041002 [2402.01060]. [38]MADMAXcollaboration,Sensitivity of a closed dielectric haloscope to axion dark matter, 2603.05006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [39]

    Egge et al.,Experimental determination of axion signal power of dish antennas and dielectric haloscopes using the reciprocity approach,JCAP04(2024) 005 [2311.13359]

    J. Egge et al.,Experimental determination of axion signal power of dish antennas and dielectric haloscopes using the reciprocity approach,JCAP04(2024) 005 [2311.13359]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [40]

    Di Vora, A

    R. Di Vora, A. Lombardi, A. Ortolan, G. Ruoso, C. Braggio, G. Carugno et al.,Axion haloscope resonators: The polygonal coaxial cavity,Phys. Rev. Appl.23(2025) 034047

    2025

  35. [41]

    Lewis, D.T

    S.M. Lewis, D.T. Goulart, M.C. Barbosa, A.F. Leder, A.M. Sindhwad, I. Urdinaran et al.,A tunable photonic band gap resonator for axion dark matter searches,2408.03861

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [42]

    CST Studio Suite

    Dassault Systèmes, “CST Studio Suite.” https://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/products/cst-studio-suite/, 2025

    2025

  37. [43]

    García-Barceló, A

    J.M. García-Barceló, A. Díaz-Morcillo and B. Gimeno,Enhancing resonant circular-section haloscopes for dark matter axion detection: approaches and limitations in volume expansion, JHEP11(2023) 159 [2309.13199]. – 41 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [44]

    Zhu, M.J

    Y. Zhu, M.J. Jewell, C. Laffan, X. Bai, S. Ghosh, E. Graham et al.,An improved synthetic signal injection routine for the Haloscope At Yale Sensitive To Axion Cold dark matter (HAYSTAC),Rev. Sci. Instrum.94(2023) 054712 [2212.00732]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [45]

    Simon, E.S

    N.J. Simon, E.S. Drexler and R.P. Reed,Properties of copper and copper alloys at cryogenic temperatures, Monograph NIST-MONO-177, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD (February, 1992)

    1992

  40. [46]

    jpe-innovations

    JPE innovations,https: // www. jpe-innovations. com/ cryo-uhv-products/, 2026

    2026

  41. [47]

    D. Kim, J. Jeong, S. Youn, Y. Kim and Y.K. Semertzidis,Revisiting the detection rate for axion haloscopes,JCAP03(2020) 066 [2001.05605]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  42. [48]

    physikinstrumente

    PI (Physik Instrumente),https: // www. physikinstrumente. com/ en/ products, 2026

    2026

  43. [49]

    Phytron GmbH,https: // www. phytron. eu/ products/, 2026

    2026

  44. [50]

    Krkotić, Q

    P. Krkotić, Q. Gallardo, N.D. Tagdulang, M. Pont and J.M. O’Callaghan,Algorithm for resonator parameter extraction from symmetrical and asymmetrical transmission responses, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques69(2021) 3917

    2021

  45. [51]

    Aparicio, J.H

    A.O. Aparicio, J.H. Jiménez, F.D.Q. Pereira and A.A. Melcón,Design of evanescent-mode rectangular waveguide inline bandpass filters with transmission zeros using split ring resonators,IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques72(2024) 4246

    2024

  46. [52]

    qd-europe

    Lakeshore - QuantumDesign, https: // lakeshore. qd-europe. com/ Temperature-Sensors/, 2026

    2026

  47. [53]

    com/, 2026

    Low Noise Factory,https: // lownoisefactory. com/, 2026

    2026

  48. [54]

    J. Shi, A. Grudiev and W. Wuensch,Tuning of x-band traveling-wave accelerating structures, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment704(2013) 14

    2013

  49. [55]

    Di Vora, A

    R. Di Vora, A. Gardikiotis, C. Braggio, G. Carugno, A. Lombardi, A. Ortolan et al.,A tunable dielectric-loaded copper resonator for axion searches at 11 GHz,Review of Scientific Instruments96(2025) 085204

    2025

  50. [56]

    Rapidis,Application of the Bead Perturbation Technique to a Study of a Tunable 5 GHz Annular Cavity, inMicrowave Cavities and Detectors for Axion Research, G

    N.M. Rapidis,Application of the Bead Perturbation Technique to a Study of a Tunable 5 GHz Annular Cavity, inMicrowave Cavities and Detectors for Axion Research, G. Carosi, G. Rybka and K. van Bibber, eds., vol. 211 ofSpringer Proceedings in Physics, (Cham), pp. 45–51, Springer (2018), DOI

    2018

  51. [57]

    Dombrowski,Matrix formulation of Slater’s cavity perturbation theorem,Journal of Applied Physics55(1984) 2648

    G.E. Dombrowski,Matrix formulation of Slater’s cavity perturbation theorem,Journal of Applied Physics55(1984) 2648

    1984

  52. [58]

    Pozar,Microwave Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 4 ed

    D.M. Pozar,Microwave Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 4 ed. (2012)

    2012

  53. [59]

    cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits

    C. O’Hare, “cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits.” https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/, July, 2020. 10.5281/zenodo.3932430

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.3932430 2020

  54. [60]

    Hosking, B.A

    M.W. Hosking, B.A. Tonkin, Y.G. Proykova, A. Hewitt, N.M. Alford and T.W. Button,The dielectric constant of liquid nitrogen over the frequency range 0.5 to 10.4 GHz, Superconductor Science and Technology6(1993) 549

    1993

  55. [61]

    Krainz,Quench protection and powering in a string of superconducting magnets for the large hadron collider, May, 1997

    G. Krainz,Quench protection and powering in a string of superconducting magnets for the large hadron collider, May, 1997. – 42 –

    1997