Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

What makes visual place recognition easy or hard?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.12671 v1 pith:JY2MMCBE submitted 2021-06-23 cs.CV cs.RO

classification cs.CVcs.RO
keywords placerecognitiondifferentpropertiescontextexperimentexperimentsmany
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Visual place recognition is a fundamental capability for the localization of mobile robots. It places image retrieval in the practical context of physical agents operating in a physical world. It is an active field of research and many different approaches have been proposed and evaluated in many different experiments. In the following, we argue that due to variations of this practical context and individual design decisions, place recognition experiments are barely comparable across different papers and that there is a variety of properties that can change from one experiment to another. We provide an extensive list of such properties and give examples how they can be used to setup a place recognition experiment easier or harder. This might be interesting for different involved parties: (1) people who just want to select a place recognition approach that is suitable for the properties of their particular task at hand, (2) researchers that look for open research questions and are interested in particularly difficult instances, (3) authors that want to create reproducible papers on this topic, and (4) also reviewers that have the task to identify potential problems in papers under review.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Breaking D\'ej\`a Vu: Independent Auditing of Visual Place Recognition through Vision-Language Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    VLM-based post-retrieval auditing of visual place recognition raises recall@1 by 13.6% on average while cutting false accepts to 12% and holding precision above 95%.

  2. Quantile Transfer for Reliable Operating Point Selection in Visual Place Recognition

    cs.RO 2026-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A quantile-based threshold transfer method automates operating-point selection for visual place recognition, maximizing recall at a user-specified precision without manual tuning.

Pith tools