REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 77 references
A landscape of 4d N=1 SCFTs with a=c
T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Starting from a single gauged Argyres-Douglas theory with equal central charges, this paper enumerates every relevant superpotential deformation landing on another interacting fixed point with a=c, finding 21 fixed points and many flows…
desk verdict A careful, useful map of a=c-preserving deformations for one gauged Argyres–Douglas seed, but the claim that all sequences are determined overstates what the paper's own unresolved branches allow. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing identity is $a-c=\frac{1}{16}\mathrm{Tr}\,R$ together with the structure $\mathrm{Tr}\,R=\frac{\dim(G)}{h_G^\vee}\mathrm{Tr}\,RGG$, which holds for these gauged Argyres-Douglas seeds whenever $\prod_\alpha \gcd(p_\alpha,h_G^\vee)=1$. Because the anomaly combination determining $a-c$ is not altered by any relevant superpotential deformation, every interacting infrared fixed point reached by the enumerated flows automatically has $a=c$, provided no accidental symmetry appears. The algorithm that carries the argument enumerates the relevant gauge-invariant operators built from the Coulomb branch operators $u_\alpha$, their superpartners $Q^2u_\alpha$, the moment maps $\mu_\alpha$, and the adjoint chiral $X$; shifts the trial R-symmetry by $R+\epsilon F$ with $\epsilon=(2-R[O])/F[O]$; performs a-maximization; and filters candidates through unitarity bounds and the refined superconformal index.
What would settle it
Compute the fully refined superconformal index of the theory reached by the sequence $W = u_3 + \mathrm{Tr}\,Y^2 + (\mathrm{Tr}\,X^2)^2 + \mathrm{Tr}\,X^3$; if an emergent $U(1)$-charged superconformal multiplet appears with a consistent R-symmetry, the paper's claim that this branch has no $a=c$ fixed point would be wrong.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a complete enumeration: for the infrared SCFT of the asymptotically-free N=1 gauge theory obtained by the SU(3) diagonal gauging of three D2(SU(3)) Argyres-Douglas blocks plus an adjoint chiral multiplet, every sequence of relevant superpotential deformations that preserves $a=c$ has been found, yielding 21 interacting fixed points. The preservation of $a=c$ follows from the identity $a-c=\frac{1}{16}\mathrm{Tr}\,R$ together with the structure $\mathrm{Tr}\,R=\frac{\dim(G)}{h_G^\vee}\mathrm{Tr}\,RGG$, which remains valid under any relevant deformation provided no accidental symmetries appear. The paper identifies many fixed points as points on the conformal manifold of N=4 super-Yang-Mills, some as the two-adjoint SU(3) theory, and several flows end in collections of free N=2 vector multiplets. It also exhibits dualities: sequences ending in the same fixed point correspond to exchanging a D2(SU(3)) factor, under certain deformations, with an adjoint chiral multiplet carrying a cubic superpotential. These results are checked with a-maximization, decoupling and flip arguments, and the refined superconformal index.
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that no accidental U(1) symmetries emerge along any of the RG flows, so every infrared R-symmetry is a combination of the ultraviolet Abelian symmetries explicitly listed, and that the Dp(G) deformation dualities and superconformal-index data used in the unitarity checks are exactly correct.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- The 21 fixed points form a connected network, and every path in the network is a valid RG flow whose endpoints and central charges are explicitly computed in Table 3.
- Many of the flows land on the N=1-preserving conformal manifold of N=4 super-Yang-Mills, providing further examples of minimal-to-maximal supersymmetry enhancement.
- Some deformations end on the SU(3) two-adjoint theory or on free N=2 vector multiplets, so the landscape includes both interacting and free endpoints.
- The discovered dualities show that different-looking superpotential deformations of gauged Argyres-Douglas theories can describe the same infrared physics.
Reading between the lines
- If this pattern persists in the broader families of gauged Dp(G) theories classified in the paper, $a=c$ SCFTs may generically be connected to N=4 super-Yang-Mills by finite sequences of relevant deformations, making supersymmetry enhancement a common rather than exceptional phenomenon.
- The branches the paper labels 'No R' could be probed with the mixed-anomaly constraints sketched in Section 6.2: an anomaly-matching argument could decide whether those endpoints are non-SCFT infrared phases rather than simply having no fixed point.
- One could test the unresolved 'dangerously irrelevant' scenario around equation (5.71) by computing higher-order terms in the superconformal index of the two-adjoint theory with the quartic coupling turned on, which the paper leaves explicitly open.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This paper studies the network of 4d N=1 superconformal field theories with equal central charges a=c that can be reached by relevant superpotential deformations of a single 'seed' theory: the asymptotically-free N=1 gauge theory obtained by gauging the SU(3) flavor symmetry of three copies of the D2(SU(3)) Argyres-Douglas theory together with one adjoint chiral multiplet. The authors first review the a=c property for such gaugings (Section 2) and derive the infrared behavior of individual D2(G) building blocks deformed by the lowest Coulomb branch operator u1 or its N=2 descendant Q2u1 (Section 3). They then formulate a nine-step algorithm (Section 4) for enumerating flows to interacting a=c fixed points: enumerate relevant operators, fix the R-symmetry by anomaly cancellation and a-maximization, apply unitarity and superconformal-index checks, remove marginal operators, and iterate. Section 5 applies this algorithm to the chosen seed, cataloguing a large number of deformation sequences and reporting central charges, operator spectra, and several dualities, including flows onto the conformal manifold of N=4 super-Yang-Mills and to collections of free N=2 vector multiplets. The paper claims twenty-one interacting a=c fixed points, summarized in Table 3 and Figure 1.2.
Significance. If the enumeration is correct, this is the first complete a=c landscape for a nontrivial seed theory, and it is a useful proof-of-concept for the algorithmic approach the authors propose for a broader program. The paper's strengths are concrete: central charges are computed from anomaly data and a-maximization with explicit mixing parameters; operator spectra and unitarity are cross-checked by superconformal index computations (e.g., eqs. (5.11), (5.45), (5.73)); the results are organized accessibly in Table 3 and Figure 1.2; and the many concrete claims about flows to N=4 SYM and to free N=2 vector multiplets are falsifiable predictions. The main risk concerns the exhaustiveness claim, which rests on the assumption that no accidental U(1) symmetries emerge along the flows and on two branches whose infrared endpoint the text explicitly leaves unresolved; this risk is the subject of the major comments below.
major comments (3)
- [§5 'Emergent R' branch, eqs. (5.35)–(5.38), and Table 3] Table 3 lists the branch W = u3 + TrY^2 + (TrX^2)^2 + u2 with a=c = 75/256 dim(G), but the corresponding Section 5 passage presents two scenarios with different central charges — eq. (5.36), a=c = 75/256 dim(G), and eq. (5.38), a=c = (442+79√79)/3888 dim(G) — and states verbatim: 'We do not have a definitive argument to prefer one scenario over the other.' Similarly, for the branch W = Trµ3X + u3TrX^2 + Q2u2, the text's primary conclusion is that the deformation 'does not lead to an infrared containing an a=c SCFT sector,' while the alternative yielding a=c = 81/343 dim(G) is introduced with 'if we assume that there is a fixed point when turning both couplings (because it might be dangerously irrelevant)' and 'we do not have sufficient information to determine which is the correct scenario'; Table 3 nevertheless lists this branch with the speculative value. Since the Section 6 claim of 'twenty-one different interacting a=c fixed points' and the abstract's presentation of a determined landscape depend on these entries, the count and the table are not settled by the analysis as written. The authors should either resolve these branches or explicitly present them as two-valued (or candidate) entries, and adjust the headline count accordingly.
- [§4 step 3; §5 branches 'Emergent R' and 'No R'] The no-emergent-U(1) assumption is applied asymmetrically across the catalogue. In the counted branch W = u3 + TrY^2 + (TrX^2)^2 + u2, the paper invokes an emergent IR R-symmetry ('It seems there is no R-symmetry preserved upon this deformation, but we find there is an emergent symmetry in the IR'), while in neighboring branches such as W = u3 + TrY^2 + (TrX^2)^2 + TrX^3 the same lack of a preserved R-symmetry is taken as evidence that no SCFT exists ('unless there exists some emergent U(1) symmetry along the flow ... and we expect this deformation does not lead to an SCFT'). The step-3 caveat in Section 4 ('we cannot rule out the possibility that there may be a non-trivial fixed point we are missing') therefore applies unevenly: emergent symmetries are admitted when they produce a table entry and excluded when they would enlarge the landscape. A uniform criterion for when emergent R-symmetries are taken into account is needed; absent that, the enumeration should be presented as conditional on that assumption throughout, which also removes the tension with the Section 6 exhaustiveness claim.
- [§6 and §4 step 9] Section 6 states that 'we have determined all sequences of relevant deformations of the infrared SCFT which give rise to SCFTs with identical central charges,' but Section 4 (step 9, and the caveat in step 3) closes with the statement that the procedure 'cannot rule out the possibility that there may be a non-trivial fixed point we are missing.' In light of the unresolved branches flagged in my first comment, the unqualified 'all sequences' wording overstates what the paper's own procedure establishes. The abstract, introduction, and Section 6 should carry the qualifier 'under the stated assumptions,' and the count of 21 should be presented with the unresolved entries explicitly marked.
minor comments (4)
- [Figure 1.2 caption] The caption of Figure 1.2 refers to 'the gauged Argyres–Douglas theory depicted in Figure 1.2'; this should refer to Figure 1.1.
- [§5, heading after eq. (5.76)] The heading 'W = u3 + Q2u2 + TrY 3 + TrX 2Y deformation: N = 4 SYN' contains a typo: 'SYN' should be 'SYM'.
- [§5, around eq. (5.59)] The paragraph after eq. (5.58) states 'There exist eight relevant operators' but then lists only six, and the first listed entry 'TrX^2Y^{n−2}' contains an undefined index n; the list should be corrected and the count rechecked.
- [Table 3] The Table 3 footnote alerts the reader that only one value is written for branches where the endpoint is unclear; this information should also appear at the first mention of the 'twenty-one fixed points' count in the abstract and Section 6, rather than only in the table footnote.
Circularity Check
No circular reduction: the landscape is assembled from anomaly/R-charge constraints and cross-checked against known indices; explicit completeness caveats are assumptions, not built-in outputs.
full rationale
The central derivation is self-contained in the sense required by the circularity test. Starting from the seed theory, each flow has its mixing parameters fixed by anomaly cancellation, the superpotential condition R[W]=2, and a-maximization; central charges are then computed from the trace formula, and endpoint identifications (e.g., N=4 SYM, the two-adjoint theory, free vector multiplets) are cross-checked against known indices and operator spectra. No parameter is fitted to a target central charge and then renamed a prediction. The Dp(G) deformation dualities in Section 3 are derived in-paper from central-charge and index matching, and the seed/index inputs [50,54,4,51] are independent published results, so the heavy self-citation does not reduce the argument to a self-citation chain. The explicit caveats—“we cannot rule out the possibility that there may be a non-trivial fixed point we are missing” (Section 4) and “We do not have a definitive argument to prefer one scenario over the other” (Section 5, around eqs. (5.36)/(5.38)), with a third branch left between a=c=81/343 dim(G) and an unresolved alternative—are genuine limitations on exhaustiveness and determinacy, but they are assumptions about emergent symmetries and dangerously irrelevant operators, not cases where the output equals the input by construction. The no-emergent-U(1) rule is applied asymmetrically to admit one emergent-R branch while excluding analogous branches, but this is an internal-consistency/completeness concern, not a circular derivation.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (5)
- domain assumption Dp(G) Argyres-Douglas theories have the anomaly coefficients, Coulomb branch spectrum, and chiral ring relations used in Sections 2 and 3 (Eqs. 2.6, 3.1, 3.12, 4.1).
- standard math a-maximization [44] selects the superconformal R-symmetry, and unitarity-violating operators decouple via the Kutasov-Parnachev-Sahakyan procedure [56].
- ad hoc to paper No accidental or emergent U(1) symmetries appear in the infrared unless explicitly noted.
- domain assumption The Dp(G) deformation dualities of Section 3 (W=u1 maps to adjoint chiral with W=Tr phi^{p+1} when G is gauged; W=Q2ui maps to free N=2 vectors) are valid endpoints.
- domain assumption The refined superconformal index of D2(SU(3)) is known and can be used for unitarity checks beyond the chiral ring.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of A landscape of 4d N=1 SCFTs with a=c." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JY7TLYIX
@misc{pith2026241217895,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: A landscape of 4d N=1 SCFTs with a=c},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JY7TLYIX}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17895}
}
abstract
We study a landscape of four-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=1$ superconformal field theories (SCFTs) with identical central charges. These theories are obtained by renormalization group flows triggered by supersymmetry-preserving superpotential deformations of the $\mathcal{N}=1$ gauging of the flavor symmetry of a collection of $\mathcal{N}=2$ $\mathcal{D}_p(G)$ Argyres--Douglas SCFTs. In this work, we focus on the fixed points in the landscape of the $SU(3)$ gauging of three copies of the $\mathcal{D}_2(SU(3)) = H_2$ theory together with an adjoint-valued chiral multiplet. We catalogue the network of $a = c$ fixed points, and, along the way, we find a variety of dualities and instances of supersymmetry enhancement.
Figures
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Quiver Tails and N=1 SCFTs from M5-branes
P. Agarwal, I. Bah, K. Maruyoshi, and J. Song, “Quiver tails and N = 1 SCFTs from M5-branes,” JHEP 03 (2015) 049, arXiv:1409.1908 [hep-th]
work page Pith review arXiv 2015
-
[2]
Classification of large N superconformal gauge theories with a dense spectrum
P. Agarwal, K.-H. Lee, and J. Song, “Classification of large N superconformal gauge theories with a dense spectrum,” JHEP 10 (2021) 049, arXiv:2007.16165 [hep-th]
work page Pith review arXiv 2021
-
[3]
Vanishing OPE Coefficients in 4d N = 2 SCFTs,
P. Agarwal, S. Lee, and J. Song, “Vanishing OPE Coefficients in 4d N = 2 SCFTs,” JHEP 06 (2019) 102, arXiv:1812.04743 [hep-th]
arXiv 2019
-
[4]
N = 1 Deformations and RG flows of N = 2 SCFTs, part II: non-principal deformations,
P. Agarwal, K. Maruyoshi, and J. Song, “ N = 1 Deformations and RG flows of N = 2 SCFTs, part II: non-principal deformations,” JHEP 12 (2016) 103, arXiv:1610.05311 [hep-th]. [Addendum: JHEP04,113(2017)]. 54
arXiv 2016
-
[5]
Large N Gauge Theories with a Dense Spectrum and the Weak Gravity Conjecture
P. Agarwal and J. Song, “Large N Gauge Theories with a Dense Spectrum and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,” JHEP 05 (2021) 124, arXiv:1912.12881 [hep-th]
work page Pith review arXiv 2021
-
[6]
Nonperturbative formulas for central functions of supersymmetric gauge theories,
D. Anselmi, D. Z. Freedman, M. T. Grisaru, and A. A. Johansen, “Nonperturbative formulas for central functions of supersymmetric gauge theories,” Nucl. Phys. B526 (1998) 543–571, arXiv:hep-th/9708042
arXiv 1998
-
[7]
Hilbert Schemes of Points in the Plane and Quasi-Lisse Vertex Algebras with N = 4 Symmetry,
T. Arakawa, T. Kuwabara, and S. M¨ oller, “Hilbert Schemes of Points in the Plane and Quasi-Lisse Vertex Algebras with N = 4 Symmetry,” arXiv:2309.17308 [math.RT]
-
[8]
S-confining gauge theories and supersymmetry enhancements
S. Bajeot, S. Benvenuti, and M. Sacchi, “S-confining gauge theories and supersymmetry enhancements,” JHEP 08 (2023) 042, arXiv:2305.10274 [hep-th]
work page Pith review arXiv 2023
Show all 77 references
-
[9]
Evidence for the strongest version of the 4d a-theorem, via a-maximization along RG flows,
E. Barnes, K. A. Intriligator, B. Wecht, and J. Wright, “Evidence for the strongest version of the 4d a-theorem, via a-maximization along RG flows,” Nucl. Phys. B702 (2004) 131–162, arXiv:hep-th/0408156
2004 arXiv
-
[10]
Giant graviton expansion of Schur index and quasimodular forms,
M. Beccaria and A. Cabo-Bizet, “Giant graviton expansion of Schur index and quasimodular forms,” JHEP 05 (2024) 282, arXiv:2403.06509 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[11]
The N = 1 superconformal index for class S fixed points,
C. Beem and A. Gadde, “The N = 1 superconformal index for class S fixed points,” JHEP 04 (2014) 036, arXiv:1212.1467 [hep-th]
2014 arXiv
-
[12]
Argyres-Douglas Theories in Class S Without Irregularity,
C. Beem and W. Peelaers, “Argyres-Douglas Theories in Class S Without Irregularity,” arXiv:2005.12282 [hep-th]
2005 arXiv
-
[13]
Deconfinements, Kutasov-Schwimmer dualities and Dp[SU (N )] theories,
S. Benvenuti, R. Comi, S. Pasquetti, and M. Sacchi, “Deconfinements, Kutasov-Schwimmer dualities and Dp[SU (N )] theories,” arXiv:2407.11134 [hep-th]
-
[14]
N = 2 Argyres-Douglas theories, N = 1 SQCD and Seiberg duality,
S. Bolognesi, S. Giacomelli, and K. Konishi, “ N = 2 Argyres-Douglas theories, N = 1 SQCD and Seiberg duality,” JHEP 08 (2015) 131, arXiv:1505.05801 [hep-th]
2015 arXiv
-
[15]
Argyres–Douglas Theories, the Macdonald Index, and an RG Inequality,
M. Buican and T. Nishinaka, “Argyres–Douglas Theories, the Macdonald Index, and an RG Inequality,” JHEP 02 (2016) 159, arXiv:1509.05402 [hep-th]
2016 arXiv
-
[16]
On the superconformal index of Argyres–Douglas theories,
M. Buican and T. Nishinaka, “On the superconformal index of Argyres–Douglas theories,” J. Phys. A49 no. 1, (2016) 015401, arXiv:1505.05884 [hep-th]
2016 arXiv
-
[17]
Small deformation of a simple N = 2 superconformal theory,
M. Buican and T. Nishinaka, “Small deformation of a simple N = 2 superconformal theory,” Phys. Rev. D94 no. 12, (2016) 125002, arXiv:1602.05545 [hep-th]
2016 arXiv
-
[18]
On Irregular Singularity Wave Functions and Superconformal Indices,
M. Buican and T. Nishinaka, “On Irregular Singularity Wave Functions and Superconformal Indices,” JHEP 09 (2017) 066, arXiv:1705.07173 [hep-th]
2017 arXiv
-
[19]
N = 4 SYM, Argyres–Douglas Theories, and an Exact Graded Vector Space Isomorphism,
M. Buican and T. Nishinaka, “ N = 4 SYM, Argyres–Douglas Theories, and an Exact Graded Vector Space Isomorphism,” arXiv:2012.13209 [hep-th]. 55
2012 arXiv
-
[20]
Comments on Non-invertible Symmetries in Argyres–Douglas Theories,
F. Carta, S. Giacomelli, N. Mekareeya, and A. Mininno, “Comments on Non-invertible Symmetries in Argyres–Douglas Theories,” JHEP 07 (2023) 135, arXiv:2303.16216 [hep-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[21]
Infinitely many N = 2 SCFT with ADE flavor symmetry,
S. Cecotti and M. Del Zotto, “Infinitely many N = 2 SCFT with ADE flavor symmetry,” JHEP 01 (2013) 191, arXiv:1210.2886 [hep-th]
2013 arXiv
-
[22]
More on the N=2 superconformal systems of type Dp(G),
S. Cecotti, M. Del Zotto, and S. Giacomelli, “More on the N=2 superconformal systems of type Dp(G),” JHEP 04 (2013) 153, arXiv:1303.3149 [hep-th]
2013 arXiv
-
[23]
Large Landscape of 4d Superconformal Field Theories from Small Gauge Theories,
M. Cho, K. Maruyoshi, E. Nardoni, and J. Song, “Large Landscape of 4d Superconformal Field Theories from Small Gauge Theories,” JHEP 11 (2024) 010, arXiv:2408.02953 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[24]
Coulomb and Higgs branches from canonical singularities. Part I. Hypersurfaces with smooth Calabi-Yau resolutions,
C. Closset, S. Sch¨ afer-Nameki, and Y.-N. Wang, “Coulomb and Higgs branches from canonical singularities. Part I. Hypersurfaces with smooth Calabi-Yau resolutions,” JHEP 04 (2022) 061, arXiv:2111.13564 [hep-th]
2022 arXiv
-
[25]
R. Comi, C. Lawrie, and A. Mininno, in preparation
-
[26]
Schur Indices, BPS Particles, and Argyres-Douglas Theories,
C. Cordova and S.-H. Shao, “Schur Indices, BPS Particles, and Argyres-Douglas Theories,” JHEP 01 (2016) 040, arXiv:1506.00265 [hep-th]
2016 arXiv
-
[27]
Holographic duals of Higgsed Db p(BCD ),
C. Couzens, M. J. Kang, C. Lawrie, and Y. Lee, “Holographic duals of Higgsed Db p(BCD ),” arXiv:2312.12503 [hep-th]
-
[28]
Schur indices for N = 4 super-Yang–Mills with more general gauge groups,
B.-n. Du, M.-x. Huang, and X. Wang, “Schur indices for N = 4 super-Yang–Mills with more general gauge groups,” JHEP 03 (2024) 009, arXiv:2311.08714 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[29]
Studying superconformal symmetry enhancement through indices,
M. Evtikhiev, “Studying superconformal symmetry enhancement through indices,” JHEP 04 (2018) 120, arXiv:1708.08307 [hep-th]
2018 arXiv
-
[30]
Closed form fermionic expressions for the Macdonald index,
O. Foda and R.-D. Zhu, “Closed form fermionic expressions for the Macdonald index,” JHEP 06 (2020) 157, arXiv:1912.01896 [hep-th]
2020 arXiv
-
[31]
New N=1 Dualities,
A. Gadde, K. Maruyoshi, Y. Tachikawa, and W. Yan, “New N=1 Dualities,” JHEP 06 (2013) 056, arXiv:1303.0836 [hep-th]
2013 arXiv
-
[32]
The 4d Superconformal Index from q-deformed 2d Yang-Mills,
A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S. S. Razamat, and W. Yan, “The 4d Superconformal Index from q-deformed 2d Yang-Mills,” Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 241602, arXiv:1104.3850 [hep-th]
2011 arXiv
-
[33]
N = 2 dualities,
D. Gaiotto, “ N = 2 dualities,” JHEP 08 (2012) 034, arXiv:0904.2715 [hep-th]
2012 arXiv
-
[34]
Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature,
D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, Z. Komargodski, and N. Seiberg, “Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature,” JHEP 05 (2017) 091, arXiv:1703.00501 [hep-th]. 56
2017 arXiv
-
[35]
Generalized Global Symmetries,
D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized Global Symmetries,” JHEP 02 (2015) 172, arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]
2015 arXiv
-
[36]
Wall-crossing, Hitchin Systems, and the WKB Approximation,
D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, “Wall-crossing, Hitchin Systems, and the WKB Approximation,” arXiv:0907.3987 [hep-th]
-
[37]
All Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Four-Folds,
J. Gray, A. S. Haupt, and A. Lukas, “All Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Four-Folds,” JHEP 07 (2013) 070, arXiv:1303.1832 [hep-th]
2013 arXiv
-
[38]
Generalized global symmetries of T [M ] theories. Part I,
S. Gukov, P.-S. Hsin, and D. Pei, “Generalized global symmetries of T [M ] theories. Part I,” JHEP 04 (2021) 232, arXiv:2010.15890 [hep-th]
2021 arXiv
-
[39]
N=2 Schur index and line operators,
Z. Guo, Y. Li, Y. Pan, and Y. Wang, “N=2 Schur index and line operators,” Phys. Rev. D108 no. 10, (2023) 106002, arXiv:2307.15650 [hep-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[40]
N = 2∗ Schur indices,
Y. Hatsuda and T. Okazaki, “ N = 2∗ Schur indices,” JHEP 01 (2023) 029, arXiv:2208.01426 [hep-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[41]
String theory, N = 4 SYM and Riemann hypothesis,
M. Honda and T. Yoda, “String theory, N = 4 SYM and Riemann hypothesis,” arXiv:2203.17091 [hep-th]
-
[42]
Modular anomaly equation for Schur index of N = 4 super-Yang–Mills,
M.-x. Huang, “Modular anomaly equation for Schur index of N = 4 super-Yang–Mills,” JHEP 08 (2022) 049, arXiv:2205.00818 [hep-th]
2022 arXiv
-
[43]
S-confinement of 3d Argyres-Douglas theories and the Seiberg-like duality with an adjoint matter,
C. Hwang and S. Kim, “S-confinement of 3d Argyres-Douglas theories and the Seiberg-like duality with an adjoint matter,” arXiv:2407.11129 [hep-th]
-
[44]
The Exact superconformal R symmetry maximizes a,
K. A. Intriligator and B. Wecht, “The Exact superconformal R symmetry maximizes a,” Nucl. Phys. B667 (2003) 183–200, arXiv:hep-th/0304128
2003 arXiv
-
[45]
RG fixed points and flows in SQCD with adjoints,
K. A. Intriligator and B. Wecht, “RG fixed points and flows in SQCD with adjoints,” Nucl. Phys. B677 (2004) 223–272, arXiv:hep-th/0309201
2004 arXiv
-
[46]
Modularity in Argyres–Douglas theories with a = c,
H. Jiang, “Modularity in Argyres–Douglas theories with a = c,” JHEP 06 (2024) 131, arXiv:2403.05323 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[47]
Higgs branch, Coulomb branch, and Hall-Littlewood index,
M. J. Kang, C. Lawrie, K.-H. Lee, M. Sacchi, and J. Song, “Higgs branch, Coulomb branch, and Hall-Littlewood index,” Phys. Rev. D106 no. 10, (2022) 106021, arXiv:2207.05764 [hep-th]
2022 arXiv
-
[49]
M. J. Kang, C. Lawrie, K.-H. Lee, and J. Song, in preparation
-
[50]
Infinitely many 4D N=1 SCFTs with a=c,
M. J. Kang, C. Lawrie, K.-H. Lee, and J. Song, “Infinitely many 4D N=1 SCFTs with a=c,” Phys. Rev. D105 no. 12, (2022) 126006, arXiv:2111.12092 [hep-th]. 57
2022 arXiv
-
[51]
Emergent N=4 Supersymmetry from N=1,
M. J. Kang, C. Lawrie, K.-H. Lee, and J. Song, “Emergent N=4 Supersymmetry from N=1,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130 no. 23, (2023) 231601, arXiv:2302.06622 [hep-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[52]
Operator spectroscopy for 4D SCFTs with a=c,
M. J. Kang, C. Lawrie, K.-H. Lee, and J. Song, “Operator spectroscopy for 4D SCFTs with a=c,” Phys. Rev. D107 no. 6, (2023) 066018, arXiv:2210.06497 [hep-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[53]
Generalized symmetry constraints on deformed 4d (S)CFTs,
M. J. Kang, C. Lawrie, K.-H. Lee, and J. Song, “Generalized symmetry constraints on deformed 4d (S)CFTs,” arXiv:2408.14532 [hep-th]
-
[54]
Infinitely many 4d N = 2 SCFTs with a = c and beyond,
M. J. Kang, C. Lawrie, and J. Song, “Infinitely many 4d N = 2 SCFTs with a = c and beyond,” Phys. Rev. D104 no. 10, (2021) 105005, arXiv:2106.12579 [hep-th]
2021 arXiv
-
[55]
On the Nekrasov partition function of gauged Argyres–Douglas theories,
T. Kimura and T. Nishinaka, “On the Nekrasov partition function of gauged Argyres–Douglas theories,” JHEP 01 (2023) 030, arXiv:2206.10937 [hep-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[56]
Central charges and U(1)(R) symmetries in N = 1 superYang-Mills,
D. Kutasov, A. Parnachev, and D. A. Sahakyan, “Central charges and U(1)(R) symmetries in N = 1 superYang-Mills,” JHEP 11 (2003) 013, arXiv:hep-th/0308071
2003 arXiv
-
[57]
Correlation functions of conserved currents in N=2 superconformal theory,
S. M. Kuzenko and S. Theisen, “Correlation functions of conserved currents in N=2 superconformal theory,” Class. Quant. Grav.17 (2000) 665–696, arXiv:hep-th/9907107
2000 arXiv
-
[58]
Intermediate defect groups, polarization pairs, and noninvertible duality defects,
C. Lawrie, X. Yu, and H. Y. Zhang, “Intermediate defect groups, polarization pairs, and noninvertible duality defects,” Phys. Rev. D109 no. 2, (2024) 026005, arXiv:2306.11783 [hep-th]
2024 arXiv
-
[59]
Exactly marginal operators and duality in four-dimensional N = 1 supersymmetric gauge theory,
R. G. Leigh and M. J. Strassler, “Exactly marginal operators and duality in four-dimensional N = 1 supersymmetric gauge theory,” Nucl. Phys. B447 (1995) 95–136, arXiv:hep-th/9503121
1995 arXiv
-
[60]
Landscape of Simple Superconformal Field Theories in 4d,
K. Maruyoshi, E. Nardoni, and J. Song, “Landscape of Simple Superconformal Field Theories in 4d,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122 no. 12, (2019) 121601, arXiv:1806.08353 [hep-th]
2019 arXiv
-
[61]
Dualities of adjoint SQCD and supersymmetry enhancement,
K. Maruyoshi, E. Nardoni, and J. Song, “Dualities of adjoint SQCD and supersymmetry enhancement,” JHEP 09 (2023) 082, arXiv:2306.08867 [hep-th]
2023 arXiv
-
[62]
N = 1 deformations and RG flows of N = 2 SCFTs,
K. Maruyoshi and J. Song, “ N = 1 deformations and RG flows of N = 2 SCFTs,” JHEP 02 (2017) 075, arXiv:1607.04281 [hep-th]
2017 arXiv
-
[63]
Exact Schur index in closed form,
Y. Pan and W. Peelaers, “Exact Schur index in closed form,” Phys. Rev. D106 no. 4, (2022) 045017, arXiv:2112.09705 [hep-th]
2022 arXiv
-
[64]
Superconformal indices of generalized Argyres–Douglas theories from 2d TQFT,
J. Song, “Superconformal indices of generalized Argyres–Douglas theories from 2d TQFT,” JHEP 02 (2016) 045, arXiv:1509.06730 [hep-th]. 58
2016 arXiv
-
[65]
Macdonald Index and Chiral Algebra,
J. Song, “Macdonald Index and Chiral Algebra,” JHEP 08 (2017) 044, arXiv:1612.08956 [hep-th]
2017 arXiv
-
[66]
Vertex operator algebras of Argyres–Douglas theories from M5-branes,
J. Song, D. Xie, and W. Yan, “Vertex operator algebras of Argyres–Douglas theories from M5-branes,” JHEP 12 (2017) 123, arXiv:1706.01607 [hep-th]
2017 arXiv
-
[67]
An Unorthodox introduction to supersymmetric gauge theory,
M. J. Strassler, “An Unorthodox introduction to supersymmetric gauge theory,” in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 2001): Strings, Branes and EXTRA Dimensions, pp. 561–638. 9, 2003. arXiv:hep-th/0309149
2001 arXiv
-
[68]
Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,
G. ’t Hooft, “Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,” NATO Sci. Ser. B59 (1980) 135–157
1980
-
[69]
Explanation of the Central Charge Ratio 27 /32 in Four-Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows between Superconformal Theories,
Y. Tachikawa and B. Wecht, “Explanation of the Central Charge Ratio 27 /32 in Four-Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows between Superconformal Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett.103 (2009) 061601, arXiv:0906.0965 [hep-th]
2009 arXiv
-
[70]
An Effective Lagrangian for the Pure N=1 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,
G. Veneziano and S. Yankielowicz, “An Effective Lagrangian for the Pure N=1 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,” Phys. Lett. B113 (1982) 231
1982
-
[71]
Classification of Argyres–Douglas theories from M5 branes,
Y. Wang and D. Xie, “Classification of Argyres–Douglas theories from M5 branes,” Phys. Rev. D94 no. 6, (2016) 065012, arXiv:1509.00847 [hep-th]
2016 arXiv
-
[72]
Testing Macdonald Index as a Refined Character of Chiral Algebra,
A. Watanabe and R.-D. Zhu, “Testing Macdonald Index as a Refined Character of Chiral Algebra,” JHEP 02 (2020) 004, arXiv:1909.04074 [hep-th]
2020 arXiv
-
[73]
Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking,
E. Witten, “Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking,” Nucl. Phys. B202 (1982) 253
1982
-
[74]
Schur sector of Argyres–Douglas theory and W -algebra,
D. Xie and W. Yan, “Schur sector of Argyres–Douglas theory and W -algebra,” SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 080, arXiv:1904.09094 [hep-th]
2021 arXiv
-
[75]
General Argyres–Douglas Theory,
D. Xie, “General Argyres–Douglas Theory,” JHEP 01 (2013) 100, arXiv:1204.2270 [hep-th]
2013 arXiv
-
[76]
Soft supersymmetry breaking of 4d N = 2 SCFT,
D. Xie, “Soft supersymmetry breaking of 4d N = 2 SCFT,” arXiv:1905.00345 [hep-th]
1905 arXiv
-
[77]
A study of N = 1 SCFT derived from N = 2 SCFT: index and chiral ring,
D. Xie and W. Yan, “A study of N = 1 SCFT derived from N = 2 SCFT: index and chiral ring,” arXiv:2109.04090 [hep-th]
-
[78]
Search for a Minimal N=1 Superconformal Field Theory in 4D,
D. Xie and K. Yonekura, “Search for a Minimal N=1 Superconformal Field Theory in 4D,” Phys. Rev. Lett.117 no. 1, (2016) 011604, arXiv:1602.04817 [hep-th]. 59
2016 arXiv
Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.