Dissociative recombination of NeH+ with low-energy electrons: Multichannel quantum defect theory including non-adiabatic couplings

Dahbia Talbi; Ioan F. Schneider; Janos Zsolt Mezei; Jonathan Tennyson; Riyad Hassaine

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 40 references

Dissociative recombination of NeH+ with low-energy electrons: Multichannel quantum defect theory including non-adiabatic couplings

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives NeH+ dissociative-recombination rates up to 5.2×10⁻⁸ cm³ s⁻¹, far above the 10⁻¹¹ value used in remnant models, and argues this explains the ion's non-detection.

desk verdict Solid MQDT application that fills the NeH+ DR gap below 4.5 eV, but the absolute rates rest on a single n=3 quantum defect and a relative experimental normalization, so the astrophysical magnitude should be viewed as provisional. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.05859 v1 pith:JYOK2JZJ submitted 2025-09-06 physics.atm-clus astro-ph.IMphysics.plasm-ph

Riyad Hassaine , Janos Zsolt Mezei , Dahbia Talbi , Jonathan Tennyson , Ioan F. Schneider This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.atm-clusastro-ph.IMphysics.plasm-ph

keywords dissociativerecombinationNeH+multichannelquantumdefecttheorynon-adiabaticcouplingsRydbergstatesthermalratecoefficientssupernovaremnantsfusionedgeplasma

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper computes how fast the molecular ion NeH+ is destroyed when it captures a low-energy electron, the process called dissociative recombination. Using multichannel quantum defect theory extended with first- and second-order non-adiabatic couplings plus a Rydberg density-of-states factor, it produces cross sections below 4.5 eV where no detailed theory previously existed. For the ground vibrational level the isotropic thermal rate runs from $5.2\times10^{-8}$ cm$^{3}$ s$^{-1}$ at 10 K to $6.1\times10^{-9}$ cm$^{3}$ s$^{-1}$ at 4000 K, two to three orders of magnitude above the constant $10^{-11}$ cm$^{3}$ s$^{-1}$ that remnant-chemistry models have assumed for NeH+. A rate this high means the ion is efficiently destroyed wherever electrons are present, which offers an explanation for why NeH+ has never been detected and would also stop NeH+ from accumulating in fusion-divertor plasmas.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the non-adiabatic coupling matrix element of Eq. (25), $\tilde{V}_{d,\nu v^+} = -(1/2M_r)\langle \chi_d | \beta_\nu(R)\,[B_{d\nu}(R)+2A_{d\nu}(R)\,\partial/\partial R]|\chi_{v^+}\rangle$, which couples the ionization continuum to the dissociative states. It packages the first-order radial couplings $A(R)$, the second-order couplings $B_{d\nu}(R)=\partial A_{d\nu}(R)/\partial R - A_{d\nu}^2(R)$, and the square-root Rydberg density of states $\beta_\nu(R)=(n^*)^{3/2}$; this matrix element feeds the short-range reaction matrix, and after frame transformation and closed-channel elimination it yields the DR cross section. The quantum defects $\mu_\ell^\Lambda(R)$ setting the Rydberg ladder are extracted from the highest Rydberg states of each symmetry, the $4\,{}^2\Sigma^+$ (3s) and $2\,{}^2\Pi$ (3p) states.

What would settle it

Measure the $v_i^+=0$ DR rate of NeH+ in a cryogenic storage ring between 10 and 100 K; a rate near the old $10^{-11}$ cm$^{3}$ s$^{-1}$ rather than the predicted $5.2\times10^{-8}$ cm$^{3}$ s$^{-1}$ at 10 K would falsify the single-state quantum-defect model. A complementary check is to spectroscopically map several Rydberg series of NeH and compare their quantum defects with the 3s value used here.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For $v_i^+=0$, dissociative recombination of NeH+ at electron energies up to 2.26 eV proceeds without any direct potential-curve crossing: the electron is captured into Rydberg states and the molecule is predissociated by non-adiabatic couplings. The paper's central result is a set of cross sections, $10^{-21}$ to $10^{-15}$ cm$^2$, that reproduce the magnitude and energy dependence of the storage-ring measurements when both are averaged over an anisotropic electron velocity distribution. The thermal rate coefficients fall as temperature rises, from $5.2\times10^{-8}$ cm$^{3}$ s$^{-1}$ at 10 K to $6.1\times10^{-9}$ cm$^{3}$ s$^{-1}$ at 4000 K for $v_i^+=0$, with $v_i^+=1$ and $v_i^+=2$ giving larger values. The paper concludes that these rates, two to three orders of magnitude above the constant $10^{-11}$ cm$^{3}$ s$^{-1}$ used in nova and supernova remnant models, make DR the dominant destruction path for NeH+ and plausibly account for its non-detection.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the accuracy of the previously computed potential curves and non-adiabatic couplings, and specifically on the assumption that the quantum defect extracted from the single 3s Rydberg state represents the whole Rydberg series and continuum; wrong input there shifts all reported rates.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Ground-state NeH+ is destroyed by DR at $5.2\times10^{-8}$ cm$^{3}$ s$^{-1}$ at 10 K, so in cold remnant gas the ion's lifetime is short unless the electron fraction is extremely low.
The vibrationally excited levels $v_i^+=1,2$ recombine even faster, up to nearly $10^{-6}$ cm$^{3}$ s$^{-1}$ at low temperature, so the formation route through vibrationally excited H$_2^+$ is rapidly counteracted by DR.
Adopting these rates in remnant chemistry should reduce predicted NeH+ abundances by orders of magnitude compared with the old constant $10^{-11}$ cm$^{3}$ s$^{-1}$, matching the fact that NeH+ has not been observed.
The $^2\Pi$ symmetry contributes negligibly; essentially all low-energy DR below 2.26 eV is carried by $^2\Sigma^+$ states.
In fusion edge plasmas, the anisotropic rates of $10^{-9}$ to $10^{-8}$ cm$^{3}$ s$^{-1}$ mean NeH+ formed from vibrationally excited H$_2^+$ is efficiently converted back to neutral neon and hydrogen, preventing accumulation in the divertor.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the single-state quantum defect is the main error source, then recalculating $\mu(R)$ from several Rydberg states and re-running the MQDT would quantify the uncertainty; a robust check would compare the predicted 10 K rate against a cryogenic merged-beam measurement.
The same second-order-coupling extension could be applied to HeH+ and ArH+, whose low-energy DR also proceeds without curve crossings; systematic increases there would revise current explanations of their observed abundances.
The strong temperature fall-off of the rate suggests NeH+ may act as a natural probe of ionization: in a neon-rich remnant, detectable NeH+ would only survive in regions with very low electron density, while non-detection in a neon-enriched object would demand efficient DR.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick read of 2509.05859. It is the first MQDT treatment of NeH+ DR below 4.5 eV, using ab initio PECs and NACs from their earlier J. Chem. Phys. paper. What's actually new: extending the MQDT coupling to second-order B(R) and adding the density-of-states factor beta_nu(R) to reach the continuum. That is an incremental but real upgrade over the HeH+/ArH+ treatments, and it lets them fill a gap that has been empty since Mitchell et al.'s 2005 storage-ring data. The v_i=0 thermal rates—5e-8 at 10 K to 6e-9 at 4000 K—are two to three orders above the constant 1e-11 assumed in remnant models. If right, that is enough to explain NeH+ non-detection, which is the paper's main astrophysical sell.

What I trust: the method is standard MQDT, the machinery is internally consistent, and the 2Pi symmetry is correctly shown to be negligible. They are also honest in the conclusion that accuracy is limited by the ab initio inputs and that a quantitative uncertainty estimate is difficult.

Where I wince: the absolute scale is less pinned down than the paper's tone suggests. The experimental comparison uses relative ASTRID data normalized to theory at 0.4 eV, so it constrains the energy dependence but not the magnitude; the shape agreement is good, but it cannot confirm the factor-of-100 gap by itself. The stress-test concern is fair: mu(R) is extracted from the 4 2Sigma+ state, n=3, then used as if it holds for the whole Rydberg series and, through beta_nu(R), for the continuum density of states. n=3 is the least asymptotic member of the series. No convergence check against n=4 or 5 is shown, and no uncertainty is propagated. The authors flag this in a general way but do not address it. That single extrapolation is load-bearing for the absolute cross section.

Also, the data availability line—'available from the corresponding author'—is a weak choice for a paper whose value is a number other modelers will use. Ship a table of rate coefficients.

Bottom line: deserves a serious referee. I would send it out, asking for (a) a check of the n-scaling using at least one higher Rydberg state, (b) an explicit statement of what the 0.4 eV normalization does and does not validate, and (c) a data file with cross sections and rate coefficients. The central result is plausible and important; it just needs more humility about its absolute calibration.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents multichannel quantum defect theory (MQDT) calculations of dissociative recombination (DR) of NeH+ with low-energy electrons, using ab initio potential energy curves and non-adiabatic couplings from a companion paper [20]. The formalism includes first-order radial couplings A(R), second-order terms B(R), and a radial density of states beta_nu(R) to model the transition into the ionization continuum. Cross sections and anisotropic and isotropic thermal rate coefficients are computed for the first three vibrational levels of the ion. For v_i+=0, the isotropic rate spans 5.2e-8 cm^3/s at 10 K to 6.1e-9 cm^3/s at 4000 K, two to three orders of magnitude larger than the constant 1e-11 cm^3/s previously used in astrophysical remnant models. The authors compare their v_i+=0 cross section with relative ASTRID storage-ring data normalized to theory at 0.4 eV and report good agreement, and they argue that the high rates explain the non-detection of NeH+ in nova and supernova remnants.

Significance. If the computed absolute rates are correct, the result is significant: it provides the first theoretical DR data for NeH+ below 4.5 eV, updates rate coefficients used in astrochemical models of remnants, and gives a quantitative explanation for the non-detection of NeH+. The method also extends the non-adiabatic MQDT treatment by explicitly including B(R) and the density of states, which could be useful for other rare-gas hydride cations. A clear strength is that no parameters are fitted to the DR data; the molecular inputs derive from prior ab initio calculations, so the claim is not circular. However, the central quantitative claim rests on an untested extrapolation from a single n=3 Rydberg state and on an experimental comparison with relative data normalized at one energy, so the significance is conditional on those issues being resolved.

major comments (3)

[II, Eqs. (6), (20), (25)] The coupling matrix element in Eq. (25) is constructed from beta_nu(R) = (n*)^(3/2) and from A(R) and B(R) extracted from a single Rydberg state, 4 2Sigma+ (3s), via the quantum defect formula in Eq. (6). This assumes that the quantum defect and the n^(-3/2) scaling of the couplings are already converged at n=3, which is the least asymptotic member of the series. The manuscript offers no check against the n=4 or n=5 members (the 5 2Sigma+ state is discarded because its couplings are found to be negligible), and the conclusion explicitly concedes that a quantitative assessment of the uncertainty is difficult. Because this single-state extrapolation controls the absolute magnitude of V and hence the factor-of-100-1000 gap relative to the previously adopted rate, it is load-bearing and needs either a convergence test, an uncertainty estimate, or a sensitivity analysis before the absolute rates can be considered reliable.
[III, Fig. 3] The comparison with experiment uses relative ASTRID data that were normalized to coincide with the theoretical cross section at 0.4 eV. Consequently, the magnitude agreement is partly enforced by construction and cannot validate the absolute scale of the cross sections. The comparison can support the energy dependence and slope of the cross section, but the absolute thermal rates that drive the astrophysical conclusion require an independent test, such as an absolute measurement or a renormalization to a known absolute quantity; in the absence of such a test, the statement that the experimental agreement confirms the absolute rates should be softened.
[II, Eqs. (23)-(25)] The neglect of the derivatives of beta_nu(R) in Eqs. (23) and (24) is justified only by the assertion that the quantum defect varies weakly with R, but no numerical bound is provided. If d mu/dR is not small in the region where A(R) and B(R) peak, the neglected terms could modify the coupling matrix element V in Eq. (25) and hence the cross sections. Please quantify the size of these terms, for example by computing the ratios of the neglected contributions to beta_nu A_dnu and beta_nu B_dnu over the relevant range of R.

minor comments (5)

[III, Fig. 3] The description of the 'average total MQDT cross section' as obtained by dividing the anisotropic rate coefficient by the relative electron-ion velocity is confusing; since this is just a conversion between a rate and a cross section, the text should state explicitly which velocity is used and why this curve is presented as a cross section.
[Abstract and Eq. (20)] The notation for the density-of-states factor is inconsistent: the abstract uses \b{eta}{\nu} while the text uses beta_nu; please unify the notation throughout.
[Fig. 2] The labels 'Rs' and 'Rp' in the top row of Fig. 2 are not defined in the caption; specify the Rydberg orbital character of the states used to extract the quantum defects.
[References] Reference [26] appears unrelated to the rotational operator discussion in the text; please verify that this citation is correct and appropriate.
[Data availability] The data availability statement says that data are available from the corresponding author; depositing the cross sections and rate coefficients in a public repository would make them directly usable in modeling codes such as Cloudy and would increase the impact of the paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DR cross sections and rate coefficients are predicted from ab initio inputs; experimental data are used only for a normalized display comparison, not fitted.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain. The DR cross sections and rates are obtained from MQDT with the interaction matrix V (Eq. 25) built from ab initio potential energy curves, non-adiabatic couplings A(R) and B(R), and quantum defects extracted via the Rydberg formula Eq. (6). No parameter is fitted to the experimental DR data. The only use of the Mitchell et al. [3] data is to normalize the relative experimental curve for visual comparison at 0.4 eV; the absolute theoretical normalization is not adjusted, and the comparison therefore tests the shape or energy dependence rather than importing the measured magnitude into the model. The molecular data come from the authors' previous study [20], but that is an independent quantum-chemistry calculation (MCSCF/MRCI with MOLPRO) whose inputs are basis sets, active spaces, and electronic structure methods, not the DR rate coefficients it is used to predict. Citing [20] is thus a normal chain of computation, not a circular reduction. The extrapolation from a single n=3 Rydberg state (4 2Sigma+ and 2 2Pi) to the entire Rydberg series and the continuum, via Eqs. (6), (20), and (25), is a legitimate convergence and accuracy concern and is acknowledged in the conclusions as making a quantitative uncertainty assessment difficult; however, this is not a circularity because the predicted rates are not equivalent to the input by construction — the model would fail visibly if the extrapolation were invalid. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, and no ansatz is smuggled solely via citation: the B(R) = dA/dR - A^2 relation is justified by standard differentiation and cited literature [24], and the density-of-states weighting beta_nu(R) = (n*)^(3/2) is explicitly derived in Eqs. (17)-(20) from the Rydberg formula. The central claim is therefore self-contained relative to its stated ab initio inputs rather than being a renamed fit or a definitional identity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation introduces no new free parameters fitted to recombination data. It relies on standard MQDT and on ab initio molecular data from the authors' prior study [20]; the main assumptions are the radial-coupling approximations, the neglect of rotational and 2Pi channels, and the accuracy of the underlying potentials.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer separation; rotational couplings neglected (radial kinetic operator only)
Section II: 'We restrict our attention to the radial kinetic operator' and 'The current MQDT calculations neglect rotational effects, since NACs among the states having different molecular symmetry were not included.' Rotational effects are stated to be small.
domain assumption The cross-term in Eq. (14) is approximated as A_{d nu}^2(R), giving B(R) = dA/dR - A^2
Section II, after Eq. (14): 'Assuming that the cross-term can be approximated as A^2_{d nu}(R) [24]'. This is essential for the second-order coupling in Eq. (25).
domain assumption Derivatives of the density-of-states factor beta_nu(R) are neglected
Section II, after Eq. (24): 'Since the quantum defect mu(R) varies only weakly with R, the terms involving the derivatives of beta_nu(R) can be neglected.' This simplifies Eq. (25).
domain assumption The 2Pi symmetry contribution to DR is negligible compared to 2Sigma+
Section III: non-adiabatic couplings for 2Pi are 'at least one order of magnitude smaller' than for 2Sigma+ (Fig. 2). Only 2Sigma+ channels are used in the final cross sections.
domain assumption The ab initio PECs, NACs, and quantum defects from [20] are sufficiently accurate for quantitative DR cross sections
All input molecular data (Figs. 1-2) come from the authors' previous MRCI/MCSCF calculations [20]. The paper's own conclusion states accuracy is limited by the quality of these inputs.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dissociative recombination of NeH+ with low-energy electrons: Multichannel quantum defect theory including non-adiabatic couplings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JYOK2JZJ

@misc{pith2026250905859,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dissociative recombination of NeH+ with low-energy electrons: Multichannel quantum defect theory including non-adiabatic couplings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JYOK2JZJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.05859}
}

read the original abstract

Theoretical investigation of the dissociative recombination (DR) of NeH+ with low-energy electrons in the regime where the process occurs without direct potential energy curve crossings is presented. The calculations are performed using multichannel quantum defect theory, incorporating non-adiabatic couplings between electronic states. Unlike the previous treatment of the DR of HeH+, where only first-order radial couplings A(R) were considered, our formulation also incorporates the second-order terms B(R), together with a radial density of states \b{eta}{\nu} (R) to describe the transition into the ionization continuum. This development uses a large number of potential energy curves and non-adiabatic couplings of NeH characterized by us previously, enabling a consistent modeling of the DR process. The resulting cross sections show good agreement with the available experimental data and fill a gap in theoretical data below 4.5 eV, where no detailed quantum calculations are currently available.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.05859 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Relevant molecular data used in the nuclear dynamics [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Dissociative recombination cross section of NeH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Anisotropic dissociative recombination rate coeffi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Isotropic dissociative recombination thermal rate co [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

[20]

Hassaine, D

R. Hassaine, D. Talbi, R. P. Brady, J. Z. Mezei, J. Ten- nyson, and I. F. Schneider, Theoretical study of the ex- cited states of neh and of their non-adiabiatic couplings: A preliminary for the modeling of the dissociative recom- bination of NeH +, J. Chem. Phys.162, 134302 (2025)

work page 2025
[1]

Zajfman, B

D. Zajfman, B. A. Mitchell, James, B. R. Rowe, and D. Schwalm,Dissociative Recombination, Theory, Exper- iment And Applications III(World Scientific, 1996)

work page 1996
[2]

J. B. A. Mitchell, Atomic and Plasma-Material Interac- tion for Fusion, Vienna: IAEA , 97 (2001)

work page 2001
[3]

J. B. A. Mitchell, O. Novotny, G. Angelova, J. L. LeGar- rec, C. Rebrion-Rowe, A. Svendsen, L. H. Andersen, A. I. Florescu-Mitchell, and A. E. Orel, Dissociative recombi- nation of rare gas hydride ions: I. NeH +, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys.38, 693 (2005)

work page 2005
[4]

Ngassam, A

V. Ngassam, A. I. Florescu-Mitchell, and A. E. Orel, Electron-induced resonant dissociation and excitation of NeH+ and NeD+, Phys. Rev. A77, 042706 (2008)

work page 2008
[5]

G¨ usten, H

R. G¨ usten, H. Wiesemeyer, D. Neufeld, K. M. Menten, U. U. Graf, K. Jacobs, B. Klein, O. Ricken, C. Risacher, and J. Stutzki, Astrophysical detection of the helium hy- dride ion HeH +, Nature568, 357 (2019)

work page 2019
[6]

B. K. Sarpal, J. Tennyson, and L. A. Morgan, Disso- ciative recombination without curve crossing: study of HeH+, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys27, 5943 (1994)

work page 1994
[7]

S. L. Guberman, Dissociative recombination without a curve crossing, Phys. Rev. A49, R4277 (1994)

work page 1994

Show all 40 references

[8]

Novotn` y, P

O. Novotn` y, P. Wilhelm, D. Paul, A. Kalosi, S. Saurabh, A. Becker, K. Blaum, S. George, J. G¨ ock, M. Grieser, et al., Quantum-state–selective electron recombination studies suggest enhanced abundance of primordial HeH+, Science365, 676 (2019)

2019
[9]

ˇCur´ ık, D

R. ˇCur´ ık, D. Hvizdoˇ s, and C. H. Greene, Dissociative recombination of cold HeH + ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 043401 (2020)

2020
[10]

Hvizdoˇ s, C

D. Hvizdoˇ s, C. H. Greene, and R. ˇCur´ ık, Backprop- agated frame transformation theory: A reformulation, Phys. Rev. A101, 012709 (2020)

2020
[11]

M. J. Barlow, B. M. Swinyard, P. J. Owen, J. Cernicharo, H. L. Gomez, R. J. Ivison, O. Krause, T. L. Lim, M. Mat- suura, S. Miller,et al., Detection of a noble gas molec- ular ion, 36ArH+, in the crab nebula, Science342, 1343 (2013)

2013
[12]

J. B. A. Mitchell, O. Novotny, J. L. LeGarrec, A. Florescu-Mitchell, C. Rebrion-Rowe, A. V. Stolyarov, M. S. Child, A. Svendsen, M. A. El Ghazaly, and L. H. Andersen, Dissociative recombination of rare gas hydride ions: II. ArH +, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys.38, L175 (2005)

2005
[13]

Abdoulanziz, F

A. Abdoulanziz, F. Colboc, D. A. Little, Y. Moulane, J. Z. Mezei, E. Roueff, J. Tennyson, I. F. Schneider, and V. Laporta, Theoretical study of ArH + dissociative re- combination and electron-impact vibrational excitation, MNRAS479, 2415 (2018)

2018
[14]

Djuissi, A

E. Djuissi, A. Bultel, J. Tennyson, I. F. Schneider, and V. Laporta, Electron collisions with ArH + molecular ions: highly excited vibrational states and dissociative excitation, PSST31, 114012 (2022)

2022
[15]

K´ alosi, M

´A. K´ alosi, M. Grieser, L. W. Isberner, H. Kreckel,˚A. Lar- son, D. A. Neufeld, A. E. Orel, D. Paul, D. W. Savin, S. Schippers,et al., Dissociative recombination of rota- tionally cold ArH +, Phys. Rev. A110, 022816 (2024)

2024
[16]

M. Sil, A. Das, R. Das, R. Pandey, A. Faure, H. Wiese- meyer, P. Hily-Blant, F. Lique, and P. Caselli, Fate and detectability of rare gas hydride ions in nova ejecta, As- tron. Astrophys.692, A264 (2024)

2024
[17]

R. A. Theis, W. J. Morgan, and R. C. Fortenberry, ArH+ 2 and NeH + 2 as global minima in the ArH +/Ne+ + H 2 reactions: energetic, spectroscopic, and structural data, MNRAS446, 195 (2015)

2015
[18]

G. J. Schwarz, A new abundance analysis of the onemg nova qu vulpeculae, ApJ577, 940 (2002)

2002
[19]

A. Das, M. Sil, B. Bhat, P. Gorai, S. K. Chakrabarti, and P. Caselli, Exploring the possibility of identifying hydride and hydroxyl cations of noble gas species in the crab nebula filament, ApJ902, 131 (2020)

2020
[21]

Theodorakopoulos, R

G. Theodorakopoulos, R. J. Buenker, and I. D. Pet- salakis, Theoretical investigation of the excited states of neh: calculations of dipole transition moments and radial coupling matrix elements, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys20, 5335 (1987)

1987
[22]

H. J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, G. Knizia, F. R. Manby, M. Sch¨ utz, P. Celani, W. Gy¨ orffy, D. Kats, T. Korona, R. Lindh,et al., Molpro, version 2022.1, a package of ab initio programs (2022)

2022
[23]

S. Baer, D. G. Fleming, J. J. Sloan, D. J. Arse- neau, M. Kolbuszewski, J. Wright, M. Senba, J. J. Pan, and R. Snooks, First spectroscopic evidence for a muonium-containing molecule: NeMu ∗ chemilumines- cence, J. Chem. Phys.101, 1202 (1994)

1994
[24]

R. P. Brady, C. Drury, S. N. Yurchenko, and J. Ten- nyson, Numerical equivalence of diabatic and adiabatic representations in diatomic molecules, J. Chem. Theory Comput.20, 2127 (2024)

2024
[25]

Lefebvre-Brion,Perturbations in the spectra of di- atomic molecules, p

H. Lefebvre-Brion,Perturbations in the spectra of di- atomic molecules, p. 77-78(2012)

2012
[26]

Leoni, Noncollinearity effect in the neutron-scattering structure factor: FeF 2 case, Phys

F. Leoni, Noncollinearity effect in the neutron-scattering structure factor: FeF 2 case, Phys. Rev. B6, 178 (1972)

1972
[27]

Jungen, Elements of quantum defect theory, Hand- book of High-resolution Spectroscopy (2011)

C. Jungen, Elements of quantum defect theory, Hand- book of High-resolution Spectroscopy (2011)

2011
[28]

Motapon, F

O. Motapon, F. O. Waffeu Tamo, X. Urbain, and I. F. Schneider, Decisive role of rotational couplings in the dissociative recombination and superelastic collisions of H2 + with low-energy electrons, Phys. Rev. A77, 052711 9 (2008)

2008
[29]

F. O. Waffeu Tamo, H. Buhr, O. Motapon, S. Al- tevogt, V. M. Andrianarijaona, M. Grieser, L. Lammich, M. Lestinsky, M. Motsch, I. Nevo, S. Novotny, D. A. Orlov, H. B. Pedersen, D. Schwalm, F. Sprenger, X. Ur- bain, U. Weigel, A. Wolf, and I. F. Schneider, Assignment of resonan...

2011
[30]

Chakrabarti, D

K. Chakrabarti, D. R. Backodissa-Kiminou, N. Pop, J. Z. Mezei, O. Motapon, F. Lique, O. Dulieu, A. Wolf, and I. F. Schneider, Dissociative recombination of elec- trons with diatomic molecular cations above dissociation threshold: Application to H 2 + and HD+, Phys. Rev. A 87, ...

2013
[31]

Motapon, N

O. Motapon, N. Pop, F. Argoubi, J. Z. Mezei, M. D. Ep´ ee Ep´ ee, A. Faure, M. Telmini, J. Tennyson, and I. F. Schneider, Rotational transitions induced by collisions of HD+ ions with low-energy electrons, Phys. Rev. A90, 012706 (2014)

2014
[32]

M. D. Ep´ ee Ep´ ee, J. Z. Mezei, O. Motapon, N. Pop, and I. F. Schneider, Reactive collisions of very low-energy electrons with H 2 +: rotational transitions and dissocia- tive recombination, MNRAS455, 276 (2016)

2016
[33]

J. Z. Mezei, K. Chakrabarti, M. D. Ep´ ee Ep´ ee, O. Mo- tapon, C. H. Yuen, M. A. Ayouz, N. Douguet, S. Fonseca dos Santos, V. Kokoouline, and I. F. Schneider, Electron- induced excitation, recombination, and dissociation of molecular ions initiating the formation of complex o...

2019
[34]

D. O. Kashinski, D. Talbi, A. P. Hickman, O. E. Di Nallo, F. Colboc, K. Chakrabarti, I. F. Schneider, and J. Z. Mezei, A theoretical study of the dissociative recombina- tion of SH + with electrons through the 2Π states of sh, J. Chem. Phys.146, 204109 (2017)

2017
[35]

Boffelli, F

J. Boffelli, F. Gauchet, D. O. Kashinski, D. Talbi, A. P. Hickman, K. Chakrabarti, E. Bron, A. Orb´ an, J. Z. Mezei, and I. F. Schneider, Population of ground and lowest excited states of sulfur via the dissociative recom- bination of SH + in the diffuse interstellar medium, M...

2023
[36]

D. A. Little, K. Chakrabarti, J. Z. Mezei, I. F. Schneider, and J. Tennyson, Dissociative recombination of N2 +: An ab initio study, Phys. Rev. A90, 052705 (2014)

2014
[37]

Abdoulanziz, C

A. Abdoulanziz, C. Argentin, V. Laporta, K. Chakrabarti, A. Bultel, J. Tennyson, I. F. Schneider, and J. Z. Mezei, Low-energy electron impact dissociative recombination and vibrational transitions of N 2 +, J. Appl. Phys.129(2021)

2021
[38]

Cayley,The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Vol

A. Cayley,The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Vol. 7 (University of Michigan Library, 1894)
[39]

M. J. Seaton, Quantum defect theory, Rep. Prog. Phys 46(1983)

1983
[40]

G. J. Ferland, K. T. Korista, D. A. Verner, J. W. Fer- guson, J. B. Kingdon, and E. M. Verner, Cloudy 90: nu- merical simulation of plasmas and their spectra, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.110, 761 (1998)

1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [20]

Hassaine, D

R. Hassaine, D. Talbi, R. P. Brady, J. Z. Mezei, J. Ten- nyson, and I. F. Schneider, Theoretical study of the ex- cited states of neh and of their non-adiabiatic couplings: A preliminary for the modeling of the dissociative recom- bination of NeH +, J. Chem. Phys.162, 134302 (2025)

work page 2025

[2] [1]

Zajfman, B

D. Zajfman, B. A. Mitchell, James, B. R. Rowe, and D. Schwalm,Dissociative Recombination, Theory, Exper- iment And Applications III(World Scientific, 1996)

work page 1996

[3] [2]

J. B. A. Mitchell, Atomic and Plasma-Material Interac- tion for Fusion, Vienna: IAEA , 97 (2001)

work page 2001

[4] [3]

J. B. A. Mitchell, O. Novotny, G. Angelova, J. L. LeGar- rec, C. Rebrion-Rowe, A. Svendsen, L. H. Andersen, A. I. Florescu-Mitchell, and A. E. Orel, Dissociative recombi- nation of rare gas hydride ions: I. NeH +, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys.38, 693 (2005)

work page 2005

[5] [4]

Ngassam, A

V. Ngassam, A. I. Florescu-Mitchell, and A. E. Orel, Electron-induced resonant dissociation and excitation of NeH+ and NeD+, Phys. Rev. A77, 042706 (2008)

work page 2008

[6] [5]

G¨ usten, H

R. G¨ usten, H. Wiesemeyer, D. Neufeld, K. M. Menten, U. U. Graf, K. Jacobs, B. Klein, O. Ricken, C. Risacher, and J. Stutzki, Astrophysical detection of the helium hy- dride ion HeH +, Nature568, 357 (2019)

work page 2019

[7] [6]

B. K. Sarpal, J. Tennyson, and L. A. Morgan, Disso- ciative recombination without curve crossing: study of HeH+, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys27, 5943 (1994)

work page 1994

[8] [7]

S. L. Guberman, Dissociative recombination without a curve crossing, Phys. Rev. A49, R4277 (1994)

work page 1994