Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Implications of an extended dark energy model with massive neutrinos

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.01749 v4 pith:JYZSD7KK submitted 2022-02-03 astro-ph.CO

Implications of an extended dark energy model with massive neutrinos

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords sigmadarkenergyequationparameterstatelevelmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently there has been reports of finding a lower bound on the neutrino mass parameter ($\Sigma m_\nu$) when using ACT and SPTpol data however these bounds on the $\Sigma m_\nu$ are still weaker for most case around at 1 $\sigma$ level. In this context, here in this work, we study the consequences of using an enlarged four parameter dynamical dark energy equation of state on neutrino mass parameter as well as on the Hubble and S8 tensions. The four parameter dark energy equation of state incorporates a generic non-linear monotonic evolution of the dark energy equation of state, where the four parameters are the early and the present value of the equation of state, the transition scale factor and the sharpness of the transition. We report that with lensing-marginalized Planck + BAO + Pantheon and prior on absolute magnitude $M_B$ and KIDS/Viking $S_8$ prior, the model favours a non-zero value for the neutrino mass parameter at the most at $\sim 1 \sigma$ level ($\Sigma m_\nu = 0.1847_{-0.165}^{+0.0698}$ eV). In this case this model also brings down the Hubble tension to $\sim 2.5 \sigma$ level and the S8 tension to $\sim$ 1.5 $\sigma$ level. This model also provide a tighter constraints on the value of the dark energy equation of state at present epoch $w_0$ ($w_0 = -0.9901_{-0.0766}^{+0.0561}$) in comparison to the CPL like parameterization.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dissipative Dark Energy can explain the DESI phantom crossing

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Weakly dissipative quintessence explains DESI phantom crossing in dark energy without pathological dynamics.

  2. Constraints on Neutrino Physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 Full Shape

    astro-ph.CO 2025-03 conditional novelty 5.0

    DESI DR2 BAO and full-shape data plus CMB yield ∑m_ν < 0.0642 eV (95% CL) under ΛCDM, in 3σ tension with oscillation lower limits, relaxed to <0.163 eV in w0waCDM.

  3. Neutrino mass constraints in the Schwarzschild-de Sitter black-hole dark energy model with ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.5

    SdSDE dark energy yields a ~0.16–0.21 eV positive neutrino-mass preference with DESI+ACT data, but χ² strongly favors extended ΛCDM and the shift is likely compensation.