Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Rethinking the Stability-Plasticity Trade-off in Continual Learning from an Architectural Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.03951 v2 pith:K3HJZOWD submitted 2025-06-04 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords networksplasticitystabilitydual-archtrade-offwhilearchitecturalarchitecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The quest for Continual Learning (CL) seeks to empower neural networks with the ability to learn and adapt incrementally. Central to this pursuit is addressing the stability-plasticity dilemma, which involves striking a balance between two conflicting objectives: preserving previously learned knowledge and acquiring new knowledge. While numerous CL methods aim to achieve this trade-off, they often overlook the impact of network architecture on stability and plasticity, restricting the trade-off to the parameter level. In this paper, we delve into the conflict between stability and plasticity at the architectural level. We reveal that under an equal parameter constraint, deeper networks exhibit better plasticity, while wider networks are characterized by superior stability. To address this architectural-level dilemma, we introduce a novel framework denoted Dual-Arch, which serves as a plug-in component for CL. This framework leverages the complementary strengths of two distinct and independent networks: one dedicated to plasticity and the other to stability. Each network is designed with a specialized and lightweight architecture, tailored to its respective objective. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Dual-Arch enhances the performance of existing CL methods while being up to 87% more compact in terms of parameters. Code: https://github.com/byyx666/Dual-Arch.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Continual Learning of Domain-Invariant Representations

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Introduces replay-based continual learning with sequential invariance alignment to learn domain-invariant representations, outperforming baselines on generalization to unseen domains across six datasets in vision, med...

  2. FOREVER: Forgetting Curve-Inspired Memory Replay for Language Model Continual Learning

    cs.LG 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    FOREVER aligns replay intervals in LLM continual learning with a model-centric time based on optimizer update magnitudes and an Ebbinghaus-inspired forgetting curve to reduce catastrophic forgetting.

  3. Rotation-Preserving Supervised Fine-Tuning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    RPSFT improves the in-domain versus out-of-domain performance trade-off during LLM supervised fine-tuning by penalizing rotations in pretrained singular subspaces as a proxy for loss-sensitive directions.

  4. Dimensionality Controls When Modularity Helps in Continual Learning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Modularity aids compositional continual learning in sequential A-B-A tasks only in low-dimensional rich regimes induced by initialization scale, where it produces graded task-specific subspaces.

  5. C-Flat++: Towards a More Efficient and Powerful Framework for Continual Learning

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Adding zeroth- and first-order flatness penalties to continual learning losses yields small consistent accuracy gains across seven methods, with the gated C-Flat++ variant at roughly 30% of the update cost.

Pith tools