Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Terahertz Magnon Excitations and Switching in Non-Collinear Antiferromagnets

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A femtosecond spin-current pulse generates thickness-tunable terahertz standing spin waves in the non-collinear antiferromagnet Mn3Ge, and can reverse its Neel vector within picoseconds.

desk verdict A legitimate Mn3Ge LLG study with a credible thickness-dependent standing-wave spectrum, but the switching phase diagram rests on an inconsistent STT normalization and the 10 THz claim is unshown. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01150 v1 pith:K3VWL5AZ submitted 2025-01-02 cond-mat.mes-hall

Durga Prasad Goli , Se Kwon Kim This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall MSC 82D40
keywords terahertzmagnonicsnon-collinearantiferromagnetMn3GespintransfertorquestandingwavesNeelvectorswitchingfemtosecondcurrentatomisticsimulations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a femtosecond-laser-generated spin current pulse can excite terahertz standing spin waves in the non-collinear antiferromagnet Mn3Ge, with a magnon spectrum whose mode count and frequencies are controlled by the film thickness. In the same heterostructure (Fe|Au|Mn3Ge), the spin transfer torque can also reverse the Neel vector and the associated magnetic octupole moment within a few picoseconds, provided the current amplitude and pulse duration lie in the appropriate region of a switching phase diagram. If true, this makes non-collinear antiferromagnets a practical platform for terahertz magnonics and ultrafast memory, and gives thickness as a tuning knob for terahertz magnon frequencies.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spin Hamiltonian of Mn3Ge (intralayer antiferromagnetic exchange, interlayer ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic exchange, intralayer Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, and easy-axis in-plane anisotropy) combined with the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation augmented by an anti-damping spin transfer torque. The torque is driven by the assumed spin-current pulse $j_s = j_0 e^{-z/\lambda_{\mathrm{STT}}} e^{-t/\tau_2}/(1+e^{-(t-t_0)/\tau_1})$, whose finite penetration depth and femtosecond time profile create a spatially and temporally localized excitation. Reflections of the excited spin waves at the open film surfaces produce standing modes at wave vectors quantized by the thickness, which is the mechanism that ties the magnon spectrum to $d$.

What would settle it

A thickness-series experiment on Mn3Ge thin films (e.g., 4, 6, 8, 10 nm) under femtosecond laser excitation should resolve standing spin-wave peaks whose number increases and whose frequencies decrease with thickness; its absence, or a spectrum fixed by the bulk magnon dispersion rather than by $k_n = n\pi/d$, would falsify the standing-wave claim. The switching claim is testable by measuring the Neel vector (via X-ray magnetic linear dichroism or the anomalous Hall signal) after single femtosecond pulses and checking that switching occurs only in the predicted $(j_0, \tau_2)$ regions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes, through numerical solution of the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation with spin transfer torque, that a spatiotemporal spin current pulse in Mn3Ge generates standing spin waves at quantized wave vectors $k_n = n\pi/d$ imposed by the finite film thickness. The fundamental antiferromagnetic resonance sits at 0.13 THz regardless of thickness, while the higher modes shift downward and become more numerous as the film thickens; for $d = 10.78$ nm the spectrum shows $n = 0$ through $n = 10$ modes. The same torque, with $j_0$ and $\tau_2$ in the switching phase-diagram regions labeled II and IV, rotates every sublattice spin by $180^\circ$, reversing both Neel vectors and the octupole moment. Too weak or too strong a pulse leaves the ground state unchanged, and an intermediate case returns via a full $360^\circ$ rotation. The claim is that thickness acts as a control parameter for terahertz magnon modes and that spin-current pulses provide deterministic picosecond switching in a non-collinear antiferromagnet.

Load-bearing premise

The results rest on the assumed spatiotemporal shape of the spin-current pulse that hits Mn3Ge: a superdiffusive profile with 1 nm penetration depth, full spin polarization (spin Hall angle 1), the stated femtosecond rise and decay times, and a Fe|Au|Mn3Ge stack at zero temperature.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Thickness becomes a practical control knob for terahertz magnon frequencies in Mn3Ge, with mode spacing set by the confinement condition $k_n = n\pi/d$ shrinking as the film grows.
  • A single spin-current pulse can reverse the Mn3Ge ground state (Neel vector and octupole moment) in picoseconds without an applied field.
  • Switching is non-monotonic in pulse strength: a 360-degree rotation returns the system to its initial state at high $j_0$, defining non-switching islands in the phase diagram.
  • Two pulses separated by a few picoseconds can double-switch the system back to its original configuration, suggesting a way to write and erase with the same device.
  • Standing spin waves at several terahertz raise the accessible magnon frequencies beyond those reported for Fe and collinear Mn2Au.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the standing-wave condition holds, the same quantization argument should apply to other non-collinear antiferromagnets with kagome order, making the mode spectrum a fingerprint of thickness rather than of material-specific dispersion.
  • A natural extension is to test whether the 360-degree return rotation leaves any transient topological or handedness signature that could be read out electrically even when no net switching occurs.
  • The phase diagram suggests that modest heating or strain, which alters the anisotropy parameter $K$, will shift the switching boundaries; those boundaries are therefore a sensitive probe of the energy barrier between degenerate ground states.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a Fe|Au|Mn3Ge spin valve driven by a femtosecond-laser-generated spin current. The authors solve an atomistic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation with a spin-transfer torque term and report two main results: (i) FFT magnon spectra showing standing spin-wave modes whose number increases with Mn3Ge thickness, with a thickness-independent fundamental antiferromagnetic resonance around 0.13 THz, and (ii) a switching phase diagram in the (j0, tau2) plane for the Neel vector and octupole moment, containing switching and non-switching regions. They conclude that non-collinear antiferromagnets can support thickness-tunable THz magnon modes and picosecond-scale switching.

Significance. If the results are correct, this is a useful numerical demonstration for the emerging fields of THz magnonics and ultrafast antiferromagnetic spintronics. The simulation approach is standard atomistic LLG dynamics with parameters taken from the literature, and no parameter is fitted to the target spectra or phase boundaries, so the qualitative observations (thickness-dependent mode counting, existence of switching and non-switching regions) are transparent and reproducible in principle. The main value is the proposal that Mn3Ge in particular combines standing-wave THz magnon modes with current-controlled switching. The paper does not provide an analytical theory or experimental validation, but for a simulation study that is acceptable if the numerical implementation is clean and the reported claims are supported by the data.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II, Eqs. (2)-(3)] The spin-transfer torque normalization is internally inconsistent. Equation (2) uses the prefactor gamma hbar theta/(2 e d M_s) with d the total film thickness, while Eq. (3) makes j_s decay spatially as j0 e^{-z/lambda_STT}. For a spin current that is absorbed as it propagates, the local torque density should be proportional to -partial j_s/partial z = j_s/lambda_STT, so the prefactor should be gamma hbar theta/(2 e lambda_STT M_s), not gamma hbar theta/(2 e d M_s). With the present form, the integrated torque is proportional to integral_0^d (j0 e^{-z/lambda}/d) dz = j0 (lambda/d)(1-e^{-d/lambda}), which is about 24% of the injected spin angular momentum for d=4.18 nm and about 9% for d=10.78 nm. Because the prefactor contains the total thickness d, the statement in Sec. III that larger j_s is needed for larger d is partly an artifact of this normalization, and the quantitative switching phase diagram in Fig. 4, including the critical j0 and tau2 boundaries, is not reliable as stated. The magnon eigenfrequencies in Figs. 2 and 3 are less affected because the torque scale multiplies all driving terms, but the mode amplitudes and any thickness trend of the switching threshold should be recomputed with a conserved normalization.
  2. [Sec. IV, Discussion] The Discussion claims that the use of non-collinear antiferromagnets can boost resonant frequencies 'higher than 10 THz', but no computed spectrum with a numerical frequency axis is reported and the maximum frequency reached in the simulations is never stated in the text. The only quantitative frequency given is the fundamental mode at 0.13 THz, and the text mentions up to n=10 visible modes for d=10.78 nm without stating their frequencies. This unsupported quantitative claim should either be removed or substantiated by reporting the actual maximum peak frequency and the frequency range shown in Figs. 2 and 3. Without this, the quantitative reach of the central THz claim cannot be assessed.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. II, Eq. (4)] The FFT amplitude in Eq. (4) is written without an absolute value or a normalization by Nsteps; please state that the plotted quantity is |A(z,f)| and specify the normalization used, so that the amplitude comparisons in Figs. 2 and 3 are well-defined.
  2. [Sec. III, Figs. 2-3] The frequency axes of Figs. 2 and 3 are not discussed in the text and no numerical frequency values are quoted beyond the 0.13 THz fundamental mode; please add explicit frequency axes and units and state the maximum frequency shown.
  3. [Sec. II] The boundary conditions along the z direction are not stated; since the standing-wave picture relies on reflection at the two ends of the Mn3Ge layer, please specify whether the top and bottom surfaces are open, absorbing, or periodic.
  4. [Sec. III, Fig. 4] The phase diagram would be easier to assess if the authors stated the grid of (j0, tau2) points used and the criterion used to classify a point as switching (for example, the sign of l1 after a fixed integration time).
  5. [Sec. II] The choices theta=1 and lambda_STT=1 nm are taken from ferromagnetic-material literature; because these are strong assumptions for Fe|Au|Mn3Ge, a brief sensitivity check varying lambda_STT and theta would strengthen the switching conclusions.
  6. [Secs. II-III] There are several grammatical slips that should be corrected, including 'absorbtion' in Sec. II, 'switching process occurs place for all' after Fig. 4, and 'Similar to region-III, spins return to their initial states in region V indicates' in Sec. III.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claims are outputs of a forward LLG simulation with literature-fixed Hamiltonian and pulse parameters, with no fitted target quantities.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—THz standing spin-wave modes as a function of Mn3Ge thickness and a spin-current switching phase diagram—are obtained by numerically integrating the LLG equation Eq. (2) with the Hamiltonian Eq. (1) whose parameters are taken from external literature (Refs. [37,38]) and the spatiotemporal current profile Eq. (3) whose parameters are likewise adopted from external sources. No parameter is fitted to the computed spectra or phase boundaries, so the 'predictions' are not equivalent by construction to the inputs. The only self-citation is Ref. [42] for the standard definition of the two Néel vectors of a three-sublattice antiferromagnet; this definition is not load-bearing for any of the paper's conclusions. The reviewer-flagged normalization issue between Eq. (2)'s 1/d prefactor and Eq. (3)'s exponential decay is a quantitative modeling concern that may affect torque magnitudes and switching thresholds, but it is not circularity because it does not make any output equal to an input by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on the assumed LLG+STT model, the assumed superdiffusive spin-current pulse, and literature Hamiltonian parameters. No parameter is fit to the target spectra or switching boundaries, so circularity burden is low, but the number of hand-set inputs (λSTT, θ, τ2, j0, α, K) means the quantitative predictions are model-dependent.

free parameters (5)
  • λSTT (spin current penetration depth) = 1 nm
    Chosen to mimic experimental conditions [40]; controls how deeply the pulse excites spins and thus which modes appear.
  • θ (spin Hall angle) = 1
    Adopted from Refs. [14,39]; the STT efficiency. Setting it to unity maximizes torque, and results are not tested at smaller realistic values.
  • τ2 (pulse decay time) = 150 fs for spectra; 100-500 fs scanned in phase diagram
    Sets how long the current pulse acts; the switching phase diagram is defined as a function of τ2, so the switching regions are not robust across arbitrary pulse shapes.
  • j0 (spin current amplitude) = 1e12 A/m^2 for spectra; 1-3e12 A/m^2 for phase diagram
    Peak current amplitude at interface; not derived from transport theory, chosen in the range used in prior spin-valve studies [13].
  • t0 and τ1 (pulse rise parameters) = t0 = 300 fs, τ1 = 10 fs
    Hand-chosen temporal profile parameters; they affect the torque onset and higher-frequency content of the pulse.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption LLG equation with the STT term in Eq. (2) is the correct equation of motion for Mn spins at T=0.
    The entire dynamics, standing modes, and switching are outputs of this equation; no comparison to quantum or multi-sublattice alternatives is made.
  • domain assumption Superdiffusive spin transport produces the pulse profile of Eq. (3), with polarization along z.
    The paper assumes the ultrafast current from Fe arrives as a decaying pulse; this is the excitation whose properties are being tested, not a measured quantity in Mn3Ge.
  • domain assumption Hamiltonian parameters in Eq. (1) (from Refs. [37,38]) describe Mn3Ge.
    The mode frequencies and energy barrier depend on Jintra, Jinter, D and K values taken from literature.
  • domain assumption Open boundaries at the film surfaces cause reflections that form standing waves.
    Standing spin wave interpretation assumes reflective boundaries; no explicit boundary treatment is discussed beyond PBC in xy.
  • domain assumption T=0 K with no thermal fluctuations.
    All simulations at zero temperature; the switching and spectra ignore thermal activation and finite-temperature damping.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Terahertz Magnon Excitations and Switching in Non-Collinear Antiferromagnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K3VWL5AZ

@misc{pith2026250101150,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Terahertz Magnon Excitations and Switching in Non-Collinear Antiferromagnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K3VWL5AZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01150}
}
abstract

We investigate how spatiotemporal spin polarized current can lead to terahertz frequency excitations in non-collinear antiferromagnets. By solving the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation numerically for non-collinear antiferromagnet, we show that the magnon frequency spectrum exhibits standing spin wave modes and depends on the thickness of Mn$_3$Ge in heterostructure Fe|Au|Mn$_3$Ge. Also, we analyze the switching process of ground state as a function of a spin current. We show a switching phase diagram, which contains switching and non-switching regions. Our work suggests non-collinear antiferromagnets as an efficient platform for terahertz magnonics and ultrafast memory devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.01150 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic illustration of Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Excited magnon spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5. The dynamics of the N´eel vector, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Investigation of Sub-configurations Reveals Stable Spin-Orbit Torque Switching Polarity in Polycrystalline Mn3Sn

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Atomistic LLGS simulations of all in-plane grain rotations show configuration II switches Mn3Sn to a single +z octupole state, while configuration I sub-configurations switch in opposite directions and cancel.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Beaurepaire, J.-C

    E. Beaurepaire, J.-C. Merle, A. Daunois, and J.-Y. Bigot, Ultrafast spin dynamics in ferromagnetic nickel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4250 (1996)

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    The corresponding spin texture is characterized by a ferroic order of cluster magnetic octupole [35, 36]. The spin Hamiltonian describing Mn 3Ge is given by H = J intra AFM 2 X ⟨i,j⟩ ⃗Si · ⃗Sj + J inter FM 2 X ⟨i,j′⟩ ⃗Si · ⃗Sj′ + J inter AFM 2 X ⟨i,j′⟩ ⃗Si · ⃗Sj′ + Dintra 2 X ⟨i,j⟩ ˆz · (⃗Si × ⃗Sj) − K X i (⃗Si · ˆni)2, (1) where the local magnetic moment...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Kirilyuk, A

    A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, and T. Rasing, Laser-induced magnetization dynamics and reversal in ferrimagnetic al- loys, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 026501 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Kampfrath, M

    T. Kampfrath, M. Battiato, P. Maldonado, G. Eil- ers, J. N¨ otzold, S. M¨ ahrlein, V. Zbarsky, F. Freimuth, Y. Mokrousov, S. Bl¨ ugel, M. Wolf, I. Radu, P. M. Oppe- neer, and M. M¨ unzenberg, Terahertz spin current pulses controlled by magnetic heterostructures, Nat. Nanotech- nol. 8, 256 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Seifert, S

    T. Seifert, S. Jaiswal, U. Martens, J. Hannegan, L. Braun, P. Maldonado, F. Freimuth, A. Kronenberg, J. Henrizi, I. Radu, E. Beaurepaire, Y. Mokrousov, P. M. Oppeneer, M. Jourdan, G. Jakob, D. Turchinovich, L. M. Hayden, M. Wolf, M. M¨ unzenberg, M. Kl¨ aui, and T. Kampfrath, Efficient metallic spintronic emitters of ultrabroadband terahertz radiation, Na...

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    C. D. Stanciu, F. Hansteen, A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, and T. Rasing, All-optical mag- netic recording with circularly polarized light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 047601 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Walowski and M

    J. Walowski and M. M¨ unzenberg, Perspective: Ultra- fast magnetism and THz spintronics, J. Appl. Phys. 120, 140901 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Malinowski, N

    G. Malinowski, N. Bergeard, M. Hehn, and S. Mangin, Hot-electron transport and ultrafast magnetization dy- namics in magnetic multilayers and nanostructures fol- lowing femtosecond laser pulse excitation, Eur. Phys. J. B 91, 98 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Eschenlohr, M

    A. Eschenlohr, M. Battiato, P. Maldonado, N. Pontius, T. Kachel, K. Holldack, R. Mitzner, A. F¨ ohlisch, P. M. Oppeneer, and C. Stamm, Ultrafast spin transport as key to femtosecond demagnetization, Nat. Mater.12, 332 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Bergeard, M

    N. Bergeard, M. Hehn, S. Mangin, G. Lengaigne, F. Mon- taigne, M. L. M. Lalieu, B. Koopmans, and G. Mali- nowski, Hot-electron-induced ultrafast demagnetization in Co /Pt multilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 147203 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    Battiato, K

    M. Battiato, K. Carva, and P. M. Oppeneer, Superdiffu- sive spin transport as a mechanism of ultrafast demag- netization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 027203 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    Battiato, K

    M. Battiato, K. Carva, and P. M. Oppeneer, Theory of laser-induced ultrafast superdiffusive spin transport in layered heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B86, 024404 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    Bal´ aˇ z, M.ˇZonda, K

    P. Bal´ aˇ z, M.ˇZonda, K. Carva, P. Maldonado, and P. M. Oppeneer, Transport theory for femtosecond laser- induced spin-transfer torques, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30, 115801 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Razdolski, A

    I. Razdolski, A. Alekhin, N. Ilin, J. P. Meyburg, V. Rod- datis, D. Diesing, U. Bovensiepen, and A. Melnikov, Nanoscale interface confinement of ultrafast spin trans- fer torque driving non-uniform spin dynamics, Nat. Com- mun. 8, 15007 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Ulrichs and I

    H. Ulrichs and I. Razdolski, Micromagnetic view on ul- trafast magnon generation by femtosecond spin current pulses, Phys. Rev. B 98, 054429 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    Ritzmann, P

    U. Ritzmann, P. Bal´ aˇ z, P. Maldonado, K. Carva, and P. M. Oppeneer, High-frequency magnon excitation due 6 to femtosecond spin-transfer torques, Phys. Rev. B 101, 174427 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol.11, 231 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    Cheng and Q

    R. Cheng and Q. Niu, Dynamics of antiferromagnets driven by spin current, Phys. Rev. B 89, 081105 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    A. V. Kimel, B. A. Ivanov, R. V. Pisarev, P. A. Usachev, A. Kirilyuk, and T. Rasing, Inertia-driven spin switching in antiferromagnets, Nat. Phys. 5, 727 (2009)

    2009

  13. [21]

    Kampfrath, A

    T. Kampfrath, A. Sell, G. Klatt, A. Pashkin, S. M¨ ahrlein, T. Dekorsy, M. Wolf, M. Fiebig, A. Leitenstorfer, and R. Huber, Coherent terahertz control of antiferromag- netic spin waves, Nat. Photonics 5, 31 (2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    J. R. Hortensius, D. Afanasiev, M. Matthiesen, R. Leen- ders, R. Citro, A. V. Kimel, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, B. A. Ivanov, and A. D. Caviglia, Coherent spin-wave transport in an antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys. 17, 1001 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    J. L. Ross, P.-I. Gavriloaea, F. Freimuth, T. Adaman- topoulos, Y. Mokrousov, R. F. L. Evans, R. Chantrell, R. M. Otxoa, and O. Chubykalo-Fesenko, Ultrafast an- tiferromagnetic switching of Mn 2Au with laser-induced optical torques, npj Comput. Mater. 10, 234 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Chirac, J.-Y

    T. Chirac, J.-Y. Chauleau, P. Thibaudeau, O. Gomonay, and M. Viret, Ultrafast antiferromagnetic switching in nio induced by spin transfer torques, Phys. Rev. B 102, 134415 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Weißenhofer, F

    M. Weißenhofer, F. Foggetti, U. Nowak, and P. M. Op- peneer, N´ eel vector switching and terahertz spin-wave excitation in Mn 2Au due to femtosecond spin-transfer torques, Phys. Rev. B 107, 174424 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    H. Chen, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Anomalous Hall effect arising from noncollinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 017205 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    K¨ ubler and C

    J. K¨ ubler and C. Felser, Non-collinear antiferromagnets and the anomalous Hall effect, Europhys. Lett. 108, 67001 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Nakatsuji, N

    S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, and T. Higo, Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature, Nature (London) 527, 212 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    A. K. Nayak, J. E. Fischer, Y. Sun, B. Yan, J. Karel, A. C. Komarek, C. Shekhar, N. Kumar, W. Schnelle, J. K¨ ubler, C. Felser, and S. S. P. Parkin, Large anoma- lous Hall effect driven by a nonvanishing Berry curvature in the noncolinear antiferromagnet Mn 3Ge, Sci. Adv. 2, e...

    2016

  22. [30]

    Ikhlas, T

    M. Ikhlas, T. Tomita, T. Koretsune, M.-T. Suzuki, D. Nishio-Hamane, R. Arita, Y. Otani, and S. Nakat- suji, Large anomalous Nernst effect at room temperature in a chiral antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys. 13, 1085 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Reichlova, T

    H. Reichlova, T. Janda, J. Godinho, A. Markou, D. Kriegner, R. Schlitz, J. Zelezny, Z. Soban, M. Be- jarano, H. Schultheiss, P. Nemec, T. Jungwirth, C. Felser, J. Wunderlich, and S. T. B. Goennenwein, Imaging and writing magnetic domains in the non-collinear antiferro- magnet ...

    2019

  24. [32]

    T. Higo, H. Man, D. B. Gopman, L. Wu, T. Koret- sune, O. M. J. van ’t Erve, Y. P. Kabanov, D. Rees, Y. Li, M.-T. Suzuki, S. Patankar, M. Ikhlas, C. L. Chien, R. Arita, R. D. Shull, J. Orenstein, and S. Nakatsuji, Large magneto-optical Kerr effect and imaging of mag- netic octu...

    2018

  25. [33]

    Shukla and S

    A. Shukla and S. Rakheja, Spin-torque-driven terahertz auto-oscillations in noncollinear coplanar antiferromag- nets, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 034037 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    H. Tsai, T. Higo, K. Kondou, T. Nomoto, A. Sakai, A. Kobayashi, T. Nakano, K. Yakushiji, R. Arita, S. Miwa, Y. Otani, and S. Nakatsuji, Electrical manip- ulation of a topological antiferromagnetic state, Nature (London) 580, 608 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Kiyohara, T

    N. Kiyohara, T. Tomita, and S. Nakatsuji, Giant anoma- lous Hall effect in the chiral antiferromagnet Mn 3Ge, Phys. Rev. Appl. 5, 064009 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Nomoto and R

    T. Nomoto and R. Arita, Cluster multipole dynamics in noncollinear antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 012045 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Dasgupta, Tuning the transport properties of Mn 3Ge through the effect of strain on its magnetism, Phys

    S. Dasgupta, Tuning the transport properties of Mn 3Ge through the effect of strain on its magnetism, Phys. Rev. B 106, 064431 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Y. Chen, J. Gaudet, S. Dasgupta, G. G. Marcus, J. Lin, T. Chen, T. Tomita, M. Ikhlas, Y. Zhao, W. C. Chen, M. B. Stone, O. Tchernyshyov, S. Nakatsuji, and C. Bro- holm, Antichiral spin order, its soft modes, and their hy- bridization with phonons in the topological semimetal M...

    2020

  31. [39]

    Chaudhary, A

    G. Chaudhary, A. A. Burkov, and O. G. Heinonen, Mag- netism and magnetotransport in the kagome antiferro- magnet Mn3Ge, Phys. Rev. B 105, 085108 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Alekhin, I

    A. Alekhin, I. Razdolski, N. Ilin, J. P. Meyburg, D. Diesing, V. Roddatis, I. Rungger, M. Stamenova, S. Sanvito, U. Bovensiepen, and A. Melnikov, Femtosec- ond spin current pulses generated by the nonthermal spin-dependent Seebeck effect and interacting with fer- romagnets in ...

    2017

  33. [41]

    Ghosh, S

    A. Ghosh, S. Auffret, U. Ebels, and W. E. Bailey, Pene- tration depth of transverse spin current in ultrathin fer- romagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 127202 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    O. V. Gomonay and V. M. Loktev, Using general- ized Landau-Lifshitz equations to describe the dynam- ics of multi-sublattice antiferromagnets induced by spin- polarized current, Low Temp. Phys. 41, 698 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    V. M. L. D. P. Goli and A. Manchon, Crossover from diffusive to superfluid transport in frustrated magnets, Phys. Rev. B 103, 104425 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    He and L

    Z. He and L. Liu, Magnetic dynamics of strained non- collinear antiferromagnet, J. Appl. Phys. 135, 093902 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    J.-Y. Yoon, P. Zhang, C.-T. Chou, Y. Takeuchi, T. Uchimura, J. T. Hou, J. Han, S. Kanai, H. Ohno, S. Fukami, and L. Liu, Handedness anomaly in a non- collinear antiferromagnet under spin–orbit torque, Nat. Mater. 22, 1106 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Z. Xu, X. Zhang, Y. Qiao, G. Liang, S. Shi, and Z. Zhu, Deterministic spin-orbit torque switching including the interplay between spin polarization and kagome plane in Mn3Sn, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134433 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.