REVIEW 1 cited by
On the Generalization of PINNs outside the training domain and the Hyperparameters influencing it
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
On the Generalization of PINNs outside the training domain and the Hyperparameters influencing it
read the original abstract
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are Neural Network architectures trained to emulate solutions of differential equations without the necessity of solution data. They are currently ubiquitous in the scientific literature due to their flexible and promising settings. However, very little of the available research provides practical studies that aim for a better quantitative understanding of such architecture and its functioning. In this paper, we perform an empirical analysis of the behavior of PINN predictions outside their training domain. The primary goal is to investigate the scenarios in which a PINN can provide consistent predictions outside the training area. Thereinafter, we assess whether the algorithmic setup of PINNs can influence their potential for generalization and showcase the respective effect on the prediction. The results obtained in this study returns insightful and at times counterintuitive perspectives which can be highly relevant for architectures which combines PINNs with domain decomposition and/or adaptive training strategies.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Clean Combustion: A Pathway to Sustainable Aerospace Propulsion
A review article argues physics-informed neural networks are a faster, more data-efficient route to clean combustion modeling, but its 'transformative' thesis is undercut by its own scaling caveats and duplicated sections.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.