REVIEW 1 cited by
Magnetostatics and micromagnetics with physics informed neural networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Partial differential equations and variational problems can be solved with physics informed neural networks (PINNs). The unknown field is approximated with neural networks. Minimizing the residuals of the static Maxwell equation at collocation points or the magnetostatic energy, the weights of the neural network are adjusted so that the neural network solution approximates the magnetic vector potential. This way, the magnetic flux density for a given magnetization distribution can be estimated. With the magnetization as an additional unknown, inverse magnetostatic problems can be solved. Augmenting the magnetostatic energy with additional energy terms, micromagnetic problems can be solved. We demonstrate the use of physics informed neural networks for solving magnetostatic problems, computing the magnetization for inverse problems, and calculating the demagnetization curves for two-dimensional geometries.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
PINNs for Solving Unsteady Maxwell's Equations: Convergence Issues and Comparative Assessment with Compact Schemes
Configured PINNs with Fourier features, periodic mappings, and causal training match or exceed traditional finite-difference solvers on 1D and 2D unsteady Maxwell test cases, though NTK analysis shows convergence effo...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.