Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 117 references

Probing small neutron skin variations in isotope pairs by hyperon-antihyperon production in antiproton--nucleus interactions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A double ratio of near-threshold $\Sigma^-\overline{\Lambda}$ and $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ production in antiproton–nucleus collisions is proposed and shown to be a direct measure of the change in neutron skin thickness between two…

desk verdict A clever new double-ratio observable for neutron skin studies, with a clean analytic formula and strong transport-based evidence, though the verification is partly tied to the shared input densities. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13622 v2 pith:K7K3MAHJ submitted 2024-11-20 nucl-th nucl-ex

Falk Schupp , Josef Pochodzalla , Michael Bölting , Martin Christiansen , Theodoros Gaitanos , Horst Lenske , Marcell Steinen This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thnucl-ex MSC 81V3581V05 PACS 25.43.+t21.10.Gv
keywords neutronskinthicknessisotopechainsantiproton-nucleuscollisionshyperon-antihyperonpairproductiondoubleratioobservableBoltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbecktransportrelativisticmean-fielddensitiesnuclearperiphery
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that the evolution of the neutron periphery between two isotopes can be read from a single dimensionless double ratio: the production of $\Sigma^-\overline{\Lambda}$ pairs (which require antiproton–neutron collisions) divided by $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ pairs (which require antiproton–proton collisions), measured for both isotopes. Because antiprotons are strongly absorbed in the nuclear periphery, the extra neutrons of the heavier isotope act as an absorber for the $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ channel and as an extra source for the $\Sigma^-\overline{\Lambda}$ channel, and the paper derives the approximate linear relation $\mathrm{DR}\approx 1+(1+Z/N)\,p_{\mathrm{abs}}$ linking the double ratio to the absorption probability in the added neutron layer. Full transport simulations for neon, calcium, nickel, and xenon isotope pairs confirm that this schematic double ratio tracks the transport double ratio with a Pearson correlation of $0.999$ over a wide mass range. If the relation holds, the method offers a precision tool for tiny neutron-skin variations along isotope chains that is complementary to parity-violating electron scattering and could help settle the current tension between the results for $^{208}$Pb and $^{48}$Ca.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the double ratio $\mathrm{DR}=(\Sigma^-\overline{\Lambda}/\Lambda\overline{\Lambda})_{\mathrm{II}}/(\Sigma^-\overline{\Lambda}/\Lambda\overline{\Lambda})_{\mathrm{I}}$ for a heavier isotope II relative to a reference isotope I. In the schematic picture, the extra neutron layer of II suppresses $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ production through absorption of the incoming antiproton with probability $p_{\mathrm{abs}}=1-\exp(-\sigma_{pn}\int_{\Delta n}\rho_n\,d^3r)$, while adding a new neutron-only production region for $\Sigma^-\overline{\Lambda}$; expanding in small $p_{\mathrm{abs}}$ yields $\mathrm{DR}\approx 1+(1+Z/N)p_{\mathrm{abs}}$. The finite-impact-parameter version replaces the analytic formula by the ratio of the neutron and proton areal densities within one interaction length, integrated over all impact parameters, and this schematic quantity is what correlates with the transport result.

What would settle it

Measure $\mathrm{DR}$ for $^{40}$Ca/$^{48}$Ca and for several xenon isotope pairs at a $2.4$ GeV/$c$ antiproton beam, using the measured $\overline{p}n$ cross section to compute $p_{\mathrm{abs}}$ from the integrated skin density; if the data fall off the common linear relation $\mathrm{DR}=1+(1+Z/N)\,p_{\mathrm{abs}}$ across pairs, or if the transport model with artificially unequal $\Lambda$ and $\Sigma^-$ absorption inside the skin changes the double ratio substantially, the central claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Close to the production threshold, $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ pairs are produced only in $\overline{p}p$ sub-collisions and $\Sigma^-\overline{\Lambda}$ pairs only in $\overline{p}n$ sub-collisions, so the proton and neutron content of the nuclear periphery are imprinted differently on the two channels. The paper's central claim is that the double ratio $\mathrm{DR}$ between two isotopes, defined by Eq. (1), is a direct measure of the increment of the integrated neutron skin thickness: in the small-absorption limit $\mathrm{DR}\approx 1+(1+Z/N)\,p_{\mathrm{abs}}$, where $p_{\mathrm{abs}}$ is the probability that the antiproton is absorbed in the additional outer neutron layer of the heavier isotope. The claim is supported by a Boltzmann–Uehling–Uhlenbeck transport study of $\overline{p}+A$ reactions at $2.4$ GeV/$c$: the double ratio computed from the neutron-to-proton content of the periphery within one interaction length, integrated over all impact parameters, is linearly correlated with the full transport double ratio with Pearson coefficient $0.999$, and the authors show that a $1\%$ uncertainty on $\mathrm{DR}$ for the $^{40}$Ca/$^{48}$Ca pair translates into roughly $10\%$ uncertainty on the neutron-skin variation.

Load-bearing premise

The method requires that inside the added outer neutron layer the produced $\Lambda$ and $\Sigma^-$ hyperons are absorbed with the same probability, and that this extra-layer absorption factorizes as a simple multiplier on the core absorption; if the two hyperon species are absorbed differently in the skin, $\mathrm{DR}$ is no longer a clean function of the absorption probability.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A measurement of $\mathrm{DR}$ for $^{40}$Ca and $^{48}$Ca at the percent level would constrain the neutron-skin variation between the two isotopes to about $10\%$, roughly a factor of three better than the CREX uncertainty.
  • Absolute cross sections are not needed, and the different energy dependences of the $\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ and $\Sigma^-\overline{\Lambda}$ channels cancel in the double ratio, reducing many experimental systematics.
  • For the xenon chain $^{129}$Xe to $^{136}$Xe, where the neutron-skin variation is only about $0.07$ fm, the predicted double ratio rises from about $1.02$ to $1.17$, so small skin increments are experimentally visible.
  • The incident antiproton momentum has only a small effect on the double ratio, so the method is robust around the $2.4$ GeV/$c$ operating point.
  • An analogous construction applied to isotone chains could probe the evolution of proton skins rather than neutron skins.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the isolines of $\mathrm{DR}$ and of the rms neutron-skin thickness in the $(R_n,a_n)$ plane are not parallel, a joint analysis of $\mathrm{DR}$ with an independent peripheral probe such as antiprotonic-atom x-rays could separate changes in the half-density radius from changes in the surface diffuseness; the paper notes the combination would be valuable but does not construct such a fit.
  • If precise $\mathrm{DR}$ values were obtained across a long isotope chain, the chain itself would provide a differential map of how the neutron periphery grows with neutron number, indirectly constraining the density dependence of the symmetry energy that enters neutron-star equations of state; the paper only invokes the known general correlation.
  • The factorisation assumption $\kappa_{\mathrm{II}}=\kappa_{\mathrm{I}}\kappa_n$ could be tested directly in the transport model by artificially setting the $\Lambda$ and $\Sigma^-$ absorption cross sections equal and then unequal inside the added skin layer; the change in the resulting $\mathrm{DR}$ would quantify the leading systematic of the method, a test the paper does not perform.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a new method to probe variations of the neutron skin thickness between isotopes using the double ratio of Σ−Λ and ΛΛ pair production in antiproton–nucleus interactions. Building on a simple geometrical model, the authors derive an approximate linear relation, DR ≈ 1 + (1 + Z/N) p_abs (Eq. 10), and verify it via high-statistics GiBUU transport simulations for several isotope pairs (Ne, Ca, Ni, Xe), finding a Pearson correlation of 0.999 between the schematic and transport double ratios (Fig. 8). The paper also discusses sensitivity to density parameters, estimates an uncertainty of about ±10% on the neutron-skin variation for a ±1% double-ratio measurement, and outlines experimental prospects for PANDA.

Significance. If the proposed method is validated, it would provide a new, potentially high-precision observable for neutron-skin studies that is complementary to existing probes and is particularly sensitive to small variations along isotope chains. The analytical derivation is transparent and parameter-free, and the GiBUU calculations are extensive and reproducible in principle. The paper also offers a useful discussion of systematic uncertainties and experimental feasibility. The credibility of the quantitative uncertainty claim, however, depends on the degree to which the GiBUU comparison constitutes an independent verification, which is the main concern of this report.

major comments (3)
  1. [§IV, Fig. 8] The verification of the central relation (Eq. 10) is partly circular with respect to the input densities. The schematic model of §III integrates the same RMF-generated proton and neutron areal densities that are used to initialize the GiBUU phase-space distributions. Therefore the Pearson correlation of 0.999 may largely reflect that both calculations respond to the same density input in a similar way, rather than that the simplified absorption formula captures the dynamics of hyperon production and absorption. The paper does not compare against an independent transport code or against synthetic data generated with different density parametrizations. This weakness directly affects the precision claim in §V B (Figure 9), where the ±10% mapping from double-ratio uncertainty to neutron-skin variation is derived from a comparison that shares the same density input and similar reaction assumptions. I recommend that the authors either provide such an independent test or explicitly qualify the correlation as a consistency check rather than a validation.
  2. [§II, after Eq. (7)] The factorization ansatz κ_II = κ_I · κ_n and the equality κ_ΛΛ ≈ κ_Σ−Λ are load-bearing assumptions in the derivation of Eq. (10). Neither is derived from first principles, and the GiBUU comparison does not isolate their validity because GiBUU includes full dynamics. The authors should provide a quantitative assessment of how strongly the double ratio depends on these assumptions, for example by running GiBUU with artificially modified absorption cross sections for Λ and Σ−, or by comparing the schematic result with a version of the schematic model where these equalities are relaxed.
  3. [§V, Figures 9 and 10] The sensitivity study in Figure 9 varies only the neutron distribution of 48Ca while keeping the proton distribution fixed. In reality, as the paper itself notes (e.g., §III list of deficiencies and §IV C), proton distributions also differ between isotopes and may be correlated with neutron changes. The two-parameter scan in Figure 10 does include variations of Rn and an for the neutron distribution, but it does not address correlated variations between protons and neutrons. The claimed precision of ±10% on neutron-skin variation should be justified under a broader set of density variations that includes correlated proton and neutron changes.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 3 caption] The caption states 'for 40Ca (blue lines) and 48Ca (red lines)', but the text in §III describes protons as red and neutrons as blue. Please correct the inconsistency.
  2. [Figures 5 and 6 captions] The captions refer to lines marking half-density radii, while the text in §IV A refers to vertical dashed lines indicating rms radii. Please align the description of the graphical elements.
  3. [Throughout] Several instances of 'double ration' should read 'double ratio' (e.g., §IV C, §V A).
  4. [Eq. (8)] The derivation from Eq. (7) to the double ratio is compact; a short intermediate step showing the cancellation of the common factors would improve readability.
  5. [§VI] The statement that 'the statistical precision shown in Table II e.g. for calcium can be reached in about half a day running for each isotope' would benefit from a brief justification based on the production yields and the assumed detection efficiencies, as the reader otherwise cannot judge the feasibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. 10 is derived analytically and the GiBUU comparison is a non-trivial consistency check; shared density input limits independence but does not make the derivation circular.

full rationale

The central relation, Eq. 10, is derived analytically from the defined yields (Eqs. 2-7) and the absorption probability p_abs (Eq. 5); it is not obtained by fitting DR to neutron-skin data, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction step. The GiBUU comparison in Figure 8 is a consistency check: the schematic model of Sec. III uses the same RMF-generated densities that initialize GiBUU, so the correlation partly reflects a shared input, but the transport calculation includes absorption, rescattering and impact-parameter dependence absent from the schematic model, making the agreement non-trivial. The paper explicitly acknowledges the oversimplifications (factorization ansatz, neglected absorption differences) and calls the quantitative agreement possibly fortuitous. Self-citations, notably the GiBUU code [56] and preliminary neon results [73], are not load-bearing because GiBUU is a public, externally benchmarked transport code and the central derivation does not depend on the contested data. No equation or fitted parameter reduces by construction to the claimed observable; the sensitivity estimates in Sec. V are model-dependent but not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper fits no parameters to data. All inputs (σ_pn from PDG, RMF parameter sets NL1/NL3/NL3*) are taken from prior literature, and the sensitivity study varies density parameters as a scan rather than a fit. The method introduces no new entities.

assumptions (6)
  • ad hoc to paper The absorption probabilities for Λ and Σ− antihyperons are equal: κ_ΛΛ ≈ κ_Σ−Λ.
    Stated in Section II after Eq. 3, justified only by the dominance of Λ absorption.
  • ad hoc to paper Absorption in the additional neutron skin factorizes from core absorption: κ_II = κ_I · κ_n.
    Introduced in Section II after Eq. 5 without derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper The peripheral proton-to-neutron density ratio equals the bulk ratio: ρ_p = (Z/N) ρ_n.
    Simplifying assumption used to obtain Eq. 9.
  • domain assumption Incident antiprotons follow straight-line trajectories through the nucleus.
    Used in Section III to compute areal densities along the path.
  • domain assumption Nuclear densities are spherically symmetric and well described by two-parameter Fermi functions.
    Adopted in Section V for the sensitivity parameter scan.
  • domain assumption The RMF density distributions from Ref. [58] are realistic ground-state densities.
    Used as initial conditions for both GiBUU and the schematic model; the paper argues they are typical, but this is a model assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing small neutron skin variations in isotope pairs by hyperon-antihyperon production in antiproton--nucleus interactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K7K3MAHJ

@misc{pith2026241113622,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing small neutron skin variations in isotope pairs by hyperon-antihyperon production in antiproton--nucleus interactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K7K3MAHJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13622}
}
abstract

We propose a new method to study the evolution of the neutron periphery between different isotopes by considering antiproton--nucleus interactions close to the production threshold of $\Lambda \overline{\Lambda }$ and $\Sigma^-\overline{\Lambda }$ pairs. At low energies, $\Lambda \overline{\Lambda }$ pairs are produced in $\overline{\text{p}} +\text{p}$ collisions, while $\Sigma^-\overline{\Lambda }$ pairs can only be produced in $\overline{\text{p}} +\text{n}$ interactions. Within a simple geometrical picture we show that the double ratio for the production of $\Sigma^-\overline{\Lambda }$ and $\Lambda \overline{\Lambda }$ pairs for two different isotopes are related to the variation of the neutron skin thickness between the two nuclei. Performing high statistics calculations with the Gie\ss en Boltzmann--Uehling--Uhlenbeck (GiBUU) transport model for several isotope pairs covering a wide range of elements we verify a strong correlation between the double ratio from the full transport simulations and the schematic model. This correlation enables us to quantify the potential of the proposed method for precise studies of neutron skin variations in isotope chains.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13622 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Experimental values for the neutron skin thickness of the doubly magic nuclei [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Illustration of the production of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Proton (filled red squares) and neutron (blue points) rms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Double ratio predicted from the two simplified scenarios [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Production probability of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows the ratio of exclusive ΛΛ (red symbols) and Σ −Λ pair (blue symbols) production in 136Xe vs. 129Xe nu￾clei as a function of the impact parameter. At impact param￾eters around the nuclear radius, the ΛΛ production in p + p interactions is reduced for the more neut…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Double ratio deduced from the neutron-proton content of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Double ratio deduced from the neutron-proton content of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Probing the dependence of the Double Ratio DR and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: theory, Phys. Rev. C 61, 044326 (2000). [20] C. Horowitz, K. Kumar, and R. Michaels, Electroweak mea￾surements of neutron densities in CREX and PREX at JLab, USA, The European Physical Journal A 50, 48 (2014). [21] S. Tagami, T. Wakasa, M. Takechi, J. Matsui, and M. Ya…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. B. Tsang, J. R. Stone, F. Camera, P. Danielewicz, S. Gan- dolfi, K. Hebeler, C. J. Horowitz, J. Lee, W. G. Lynch, Z. Koh- ley, R. Lemmon, P. M¨oller, T. Murakami, S. Riordan, X. Roca- Maza, F. Sammarruca, A. W. Steiner, I. Vida˜na, and S. J. Yen- nello, Constraints on the symmetry energy and neutron skins from experiments and theory, Phys. Rev. C86, 01...

    2012

  2. [2]

    Baldo and G

    M. Baldo and G. Burgio, The nuclear symmetry energy, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 91, 203 (2016). 12 Method Ref. R p [fm] R n [fm] ∆Rpn [fm] 10.8-16.3 MeV p elastic scattering [90] 3.38 3.78 ±0.09 0.39 ± 0.10 1044 MeV p elastic scattering [13] 3.48 3.66 0.16 ± 0.023 1040 MeV p elastic scattering [91] 3.38 3.54 0.16 ± 0.05 1040 MeV p scattering...

    2016

  3. [3]

    Piekarewicz and F

    J. Piekarewicz and F. J. Fattoyev, Neutron-rich matter in heaven and on earth, Physics Today 72, 30 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.4247

    work page doi:10.1063/pt.3.4247 2019

  4. [4]

    Alex Brown, Neutron radii in nuclei and the neutron equa- tion of state, Phys

    B. Alex Brown, Neutron radii in nuclei and the neutron equa- tion of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5296 (2000)

    2000

  5. [5]

    C. J. Horowitz and J. Piekarewicz, Neutron Star Structure and the Neutron Radius of 208P b, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5647 (2001)

    2001

  6. [6]

    Typel and B

    S. Typel and B. A. Brown, Neutron radii and the neutron equa- tion of state in relativistic models, Phys. Rev. C 64, 027302 (2001)

    2001

  7. [7]

    C. J. Horowitz and J. Piekarewicz, Neutron radii of 208Pb and neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C 64, 062802 (2001)

    2001

  8. [8]

    Sammarruca and P

    F. Sammarruca and P. Liu, Neutron skin of 208Pb and density dependence of the symmetry energy, Phys. Rev. C79, 057301 (2009)

    2009

Show all 117 references
  1. [9]

    Roca-Maza, M

    X. Roca-Maza, M. Brenna, B. K. Agrawal, P. F. Bor- tignon, G. Colo, L.-G. Cao, N. Paar, and D. Vretenar, Giant quadrupole resonances in 208Pb, the nuclear symmetry en- ergy, and the neutron skin thickness, Phys. Rev. C 87, 034301 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Reinhard and W

    P.-G. Reinhard and W. Nazarewicz, Nuclear charge and neu- tron radii and nuclear matter: Trend analysis in skyrme density-functional-theory approach, Phys. Rev. C 93, 051303 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    Centelles, X

    M. Centelles, X. Roca-Maza, X. Vi ˜nas, and M. Warda, Nu- clear symmetry energy probed by neutron skin thickness of nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 122502 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    Suzuki, H

    T. Suzuki, H. Geissel, O. Bochkarev, L. Chulkov, M. Golovkov, D. Hirata, H. Irnich, Z. Janas, H. Keller, T. Kobayashi, G. Kraus, G. M ¨unzenberg, S. Neumaier, F. Nickel, A. Ozawa, A. Piechaczeck, E. Roeckl, W. Schwab, K. S ¨ummerer, K. Yoshida, and I. Tanihata, Neutron skin of...

    1995

  5. [13]

    Alkhazov, T

    G. Alkhazov, T. Bauer, R. Beurtey, A. Boudard, G. Bruge, A. Chaumeaux, P. Couvert, G. Cvijanovich, H. Duhm, J. Fontaine, D. Garreta, A. Kulikov, D. Legrand, J. Lugol, J. Saudinos, J. Thirion, and A. V orobyov, Elastic and inelastic scattering of 1.044 GeV protons by 40Ca, 42Ca...

    1976

  6. [14]

    K. G. Boyer, W. J. Braithwaite, W. B. Cottingame, S. J. Greene, L. E. Smith, C. F. Moore, C. L. Morris, H. A. Thiessen, G. S. Blanpied, G. R. Burleson, J. F. Davis, J. S. Mc- Carthy, R. C. Minehart, and C. A. Goulding, Pion elastic and inelastic scattering from 40,42,44,48Ca a...

    1984

  7. [15]

    W. R. Gibbs and J.-P. Dedonder, Neutron radii of the calcium isotopes, Phys. Rev. C 46, 1825 (1992)

    1992

  8. [16]

    F. J. Hartmann, R. Schmidt, B. Ketzer, T. von Egidy, S. Wycech, R. Smola ´nczuk, T. Czosnyka, J. Jastrze ¸bski, M. Kisieli ´nski, P. Lubi´nski, P. Napiorkowski, L. Pie ´nkowski, A. Trzci´nska, B. Kłos, K. Gulda, W. Kurcewicz, and E. Wid- mann, Nucleon density in the nuclear pe...

    2001

  9. [17]

    Yamaguchi, T

    T. Yamaguchi, T. Suzuki, T. Ohnishi, F. Becker, M. Fukuda, H. Geissel, M. Hosoi, R. Janik, K. Kimura, T. Kuboki, S. Man- del, M. Matsuo, G. M ¨unzenberg, S. Nakajima, T. Ohtsubo, A. Ozawa, A. Prochazka, M. Shindo, B. Sit ´ar, P. Strme ˇn, T. Suda, K. S ¨ummerer, K. Sugawara, I...

    2008

  10. [18]

    Zenihiro, H

    J. Zenihiro, H. Sakaguchi, T. Murakami, M. Yosoi, Y . Yasuda, S. Terashima, Y . Iwao, H. Takeda, M. Itoh, H. P. Yoshida, and M. Uchida, Neutron density distributions of 204,206,208Pb de- duced via proton elastic scattering at Ep = 295 MeV, Phys. Rev. C 82, 044611 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    Mizutori, J

    S. Mizutori, J. Dobaczewski, G. A. Lalazissis, W. Nazarewicz, and P.-G. Reinhard, Nuclear skins and halos in the mean-field 13 Method Ref. ∆Rpn [fm] remark elastic p and n scattering at 40, 65, 200 MeV [27] 0.17 elastic p scattering at 295 MeV [18] 0.211 +0.054 −0.063 elastic ...

  12. [20]

    Horowitz, K

    C. Horowitz, K. Kumar, and R. Michaels, Electroweak mea- surements of neutron densities in CREX and PREX at JLab, USA, The European Physical Journal A 50, 48 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    Tagami, T

    S. Tagami, T. Wakasa, M. Takechi, J. Matsui, and M. Yahiro, Neutron skin in 48Ca determined from p+48Ca and 48Ca+12C scattering, Results in Physics 33, 105155 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    C. H. Hyun, Neutron Skin Thickness of 48Ca, 132Sn, and 208Pb with KIDS Density Functional, The origin of New Physics: Sae Mulli 72, 371 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    0.14 ±0.10 π+ reaction cross section [98] 0.11 ±0.06 natPb target strength of pigmy dipole resonance [104] 0.18 ± 0.035

  16. [24]

    Adhikari, H

    D. Adhikari, H. Albataineh, D. Androic, K. Aniol, D. S. Arm- strong, T. Averett, C. Ayerbe Gayoso, S. Barcus, V . Bellini, R. S. Beminiwattha, J. F. Benesch, H. Bhatt, D. Bhatta Pathak, D. Bhetuwal, B. Blaikie, Q. Campagna, A. Camsonne, G. D. Cates, Y . Chen, C. Clarke, J. C. ...

    2021

  17. [25]

    Adhikari, H

    D. Adhikari, H. Albataineh, D. Androic, K. A. Aniol, D. S. Armstrong, T. Averett, C. Ayerbe Gayoso, S. K. Barcus, V . Bellini, R. S. Beminiwattha, J. F. Benesch, H. Bhatt, D. Bhatta Pathak, D. Bhetuwal, B. Blaikie, J. Boyd, Q. Cam- pagna, A. Camsonne, G. D. Cates, Y . Chen, C....

    2022

  18. [26]

    Brissaud and X

    I. Brissaud and X. Campi, Determination of matter densities of Ca isotopes by 600 MeV and 1 GeV proton elastic scattering, Physics Letters B 86, 141 (1979)

    1979

  19. [27]

    Karataglidis, K

    S. Karataglidis, K. Amos, B. Brown, and P. Deb, Discerning the neutron density distribution of 208Pb from nucleon elastic scattering, Phys. Rev. C 65, 044306 (2002)

    2002

  20. [28]

    The neutron distribution of 40Ca and the proton distributions of both isotopes remained unchanged

    As stressed before, the diffuseness of the neutron skin is scaled correspondingly. The neutron distribution of 40Ca and the proton distributions of both isotopes remained unchanged. Figure 9 shows the double ratio calculated as described in section III versus the difference ∆n...

  21. [29]

    Abrahamyan, Z

    S. Abrahamyan, Z. Ahmed, H. Albataineh, K. Aniol, D. S. Armstrong, W. Armstrong, T. Averett, B. Babineau, A. Barbi- eri, V . Bellini, R. Beminiwattha, J. Benesch, F. Benmokhtar, T. Bielarski, W. Boeglin, A. Camsonne, M. Canan, P. Carter, G. D. Cates, C. Chen, J.-P. Chen, O. He...

    2012

  22. [30]

    I. A. M. Abdul-Magead, E. Hamza, and B. Abu-Ibrahim, Neu- tron radii and neutron skin of neutron-rich nuclei deduced from proton-nucleus total reaction cross sections, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 47, 055103 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Tagami, T

    S. Tagami, T. Wakasa, J. Matsui, M. Yahiro, and M. Takechi, Neutron skin thickness of 208Pb determined from the reaction cross section for proton scattering, Phys. Rev. C 104, 024606 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Tanaka, M

    M. Tanaka, M. Takechi, A. Homma, M. Fukuda, D. Nishimura, T. Suzuki, Y . Tanaka, T. Moriguchi, D. S. Ahn, A. Aimaganbetov, M. Amano, H. Arakawa, S. Bagchi, K.-H. Behr, N. Burtebayev, K. Chikaato, H. Du, S. Ebata, T. Fujii, N. Fukuda, H. Geissel, T. Hori, W. Horiuchi, S. Hoshin...

    2020

  25. [33]

    B. C. Clark, L. J. Kerr, and S. Hama, Neutron densities from a global analysis of medium-energy proton-nucleus elastic scat- tering, Phys. Rev. C 67, 054605 (2003)

    2003

  26. [34]

    Sakaguchi and J

    H. Sakaguchi and J. Zenihiro, Proton elastic scattering from stable and unstable nuclei - extraction of nuclear densities, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 97, 1 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    Lenske and P

    H. Lenske and P. Kienle, Probing matter radii of neutron- rich nuclei by antiproton scattering, Physics Letters B 647, 82 (2007)

    2007

  28. [36]

    Krasznahorkay, J

    A. Krasznahorkay, J. Bacelar, J. A. Bordewijk, S. Branden- burg, A. Buda, G. van ’t Hof, M. A. Hofstee, S. Kato, T. D. Poelhekken, S. Y . van der Werf, A. van der Woude, M. N. Harakeh, and N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki, Excitation of the isovector giant dipole resonance by inelastic...

    1991

  29. [37]

    Krasznahorkay, H

    A. Krasznahorkay, H. Akimune, A. van den Berg, N. Blasi, S. Brandenburg, M. Csatl ´os, M. Fujiwara, J. Guly ´as, M. Harakeh, M. Hunyadi, M. de Huu, Z. Mate, D. Sohler, S. van der Werf, H. W ¨ortche, and L. Zolnai, Neutron-skin thickness in neutron-rich isotopes, Nuclear Physic...

    2004

  30. [38]

    The neutron skin thickness ∆Rnp = R rms(n)-Rrms(p) of 208Pb deduced by different experiments and analyses as shown in Figure 1

    0.194 ± 0.024 electric dipole polarizability [40] 0.156 +0.025 −0.021 by ⃗ p-scattering at 295 MeV [105] 0.165 ±(0.009)exp±(0.013)theo±(0.021)est [40, 106] 0.168 ± 0.022 reanalsis of [40] giant dipole resonance; 120 MeV α-scattering [36] 0.19 ± 0.09 see [37] giant dipole reson...

    2000

  31. [39]

    I. A. M. Abdul-Magead and B. Abu-Ibrahim, Neutron skin of neutron-rich nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 105, 014626 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Giacalone, G

    G. Giacalone, G. Nijs, and W. van der Schee, Determination of the neutron skin of 208Pb from ultrarelativistic nuclear col- lisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 202302 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Birkhan, M

    J. Birkhan, M. Miorelli, S. Bacca, S. Bassauer, C. A. Bertulani, G. Hagen, H. Matsubara, P. von Neumann-Cosel, T. Papen- brock, N. Pietralla, V . Y . Ponomarev, A. Richter, A. Schwenk, and A. Tamii, Electric dipole polarizability of 48Ca and im- plications for the neutron skin...

    2017

  34. [42]

    C. M. Tarbert, D. P. Watts, D. I. Glazier, P. Aguar, J. Ahrens, J. R. M. Annand, H. J. Arends, R. Beck, V . Bekrenev, B. Boil- lat, A. Braghieri, D. Branford, W. J. Briscoe, J. Brudvik, S. Cherepnya, R. Codling, E. J. Downie, K. Foehl, P. Grab- mayr, R. Gregor, E. Heid, D. Hor...

    2014

  35. [43]

    Carbone, G

    A. Carbone, G. Col `o, A. Bracco, L.-G. Cao, P. F. Bortignon, F. Camera, and O. Wieland, Constraints on the symmetry en- ergy and neutron skins from pygmy resonances in 68Ni and 132Sn, Phys. Rev. C 81, 041301 (2010)

    2010

  36. [44]

    Krasznahorkay, M

    A. Krasznahorkay, M. Fujiwara, P. van Aarle, H. Akimune, I. Daito, H. Fujimura, Y . Fujita, M. N. Harakeh, T. Inomata, J. J¨anecke, S. Nakayama, A. Tamii, M. Tanaka, H. Toyokawa, W. Uijen, and M. Yosoi, Excitation of isovector spin-dipole resonances and neutron skin of nuclei,...

    1999

  37. [45]

    Tamii, I

    A. Tamii, I. Poltoratska, P. von Neumann-Cosel, Y . Fujita, T. Adachi, C. A. Bertulani, J. Carter, M. Dozono, H. Fujita, K. Fujita, K. Hatanaka, D. Ishikawa, M. Itoh, T. Kawabata, Y . Kalmykov, A. M. Krumbholz, E. Litvinova, H. Matsubara, K. Nakanishi, R. Neveling, H. Okamura,...

    2011

  38. [46]

    B. T. Reed, F. J. Fattoyev, C. J. Horowitz, and J. Piekarewicz, Implications of prex-2 on the equation of state of neutron-rich matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 172503 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    G. A. Miller, Coherent-nuclear pion photoproduction and neu- tron radii, Phys. Rev. C 100, 044608 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    Trzci ´nska, J

    A. Trzci ´nska, J. Jastrze ¸bski, P. Lubi ´nski, F. Hartmann, R. Schmidt, T. von Egidy, and B. Kłos, Neutron density distri- butions deduced from antiprotonic atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 082501 (2001)

    2001

  41. [49]

    F. J. Fattoyev, J. Piekarewicz, and C. J. Horowitz, Neutron skins and neutron stars in the multimessenger era, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 172702 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Abbott, R

    B. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V . B. Adya, C. Affeldt, M. Afrough, B. Agarwal, M. Agathos, K. Agat- suma, et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collab- oration), Gw170817: Observation of gr...

    2017

  43. [51]

    McIlroy, C

    C. McIlroy, C. Barbieri, T. Inoue, T. Doi, and T. Hatsuda, Doubly magic nuclei from lattice qcd forces at Mps = 469 MeV/c2, Phys. Rev. C 97, 021303 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    Miyagi, T

    T. Miyagi, T. Abe, M. Kohno, P. Navr´atil, R. Okamoto, T. Ot- suka, N. Shimizu, and S. R. Stroberg, Ground-state properties of doubly magic nuclei from the unitary-model-operator ap- proach with chiral two- and three-nucleon forces, Phys. Rev. C 100, 034310 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    Ekstr ¨om, G

    A. Ekstr ¨om, G. R. Jansen, K. A. Wendt, G. Hagen, T. Pa- penbrock, B. D. Carlsson, C. Forss ´en, M. Hjorth-Jensen, P. Navr´atil, and W. Nazarewicz, Accurate nuclear radii and binding energies from a chiral interaction, Phys. Rev. C 91, 051301 (2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    J. E. Sobczyk, B. Acharya, S. Bacca, and G. Hagen, Ab ini- tio computation of the longitudinal response function in40Ca, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 072501 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    K. Hebeler, Three-nucleon forces: Implementation and appli- cations to atomic nuclei and dense matter, Physics Reports 890, 1 (2021), three-nucleon forces: Implementation and ap- plications to atomic nuclei and dense matter

    2021

  48. [56]

    O. Buss, T. Gaitanos, K. Gallmeister, H. van Hees, M. Kaskulov, O. Lalakulich, A. Larionov, T. Leitner, J. Weil, and U. Mosel, Transport-theoretical description of nuclear re- actions, Physics Reports 512, 1 (2012)

    2012

  49. [57]

    H. D. Vries, C. D. Jager, and C. D. Vries, Nuclear charge- density-distribution parameters from elastic electron scatter- ing, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 36, 495 (1987)

    1987

  50. [58]

    M. C. Atkinson, M. H. Mahzoon, M. A. Keim, B. A. Bordelon, C. D. Pruitt, R. J. Charity, and W. H. Dickhoff, Dispersive opti- cal model analysis of 208Pb generating a neutron-skin predic- tion beyond the mean field, Phys. Rev. C 101, 044303 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    C. D. Pruitt, R. J. Charity, L. G. Sobotka, M. C. Atkinson, and W. H. Dickhoff, Systematic matter and binding-energy distri- butions from a dispersive optical model analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 102501 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    Reinhard, X

    P.-G. Reinhard, X. Roca-Maza, and W. Nazarewicz, Com- bined theoretical analysis of the parity-violating asymmetry for 48Ca and 208Pb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 232501 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    Lalazissis, S

    G. Lalazissis, S. Karatzikos, R. Fossion, D. P. Arteaga, A. Afanasjev, and P. Ring, The effective force nl3 revisited, Physics Letters B 671, 36 (2009)

    2009

  54. [62]

    Malbrunot-Ettenauer, S

    S. Malbrunot-Ettenauer, S. Kaufmann, S. Bacca, C. Barbieri, J. Billowes, M. L. Bissell, K. Blaum, B. Cheal, T. Duguet, R. F. G. Ruiz, W. Gins, C. Gorges, G. Hagen, H. Heylen, J. D. Holt, G. R. Jansen, A. Kanellakopoulos, M. Kortelainen, T. Miyagi, P. Navr´atil, W. Nazarewicz, ...

    2022

  55. [63]

    G. A. Lalazissis, J. K ¨onig, and P. Ring, New parametriza- tion for the lagrangian density of relativistic mean field theory, Phys. Rev. C 55, 540 (1997)

    1997

  56. [64]

    Angeli and K

    I. Angeli and K. Marinova, Table of experimental nuclear ground state charge radii: An update, Atomic Data and Nu- clear Data Tables 99, 69 (2013)

    2013

  57. [65]

    R. F. Garcia Ruiz, M. L. Bissell, K. Blaum, A. Ekstr ¨om, N. Fr ¨ommgen, G. Hagen, M. Hammen, K. Hebeler, J. D. Holt, G. R. Jansen, M. Kowalska, K. Kreim, W. Nazarewicz, R. Neugart, G. Neyens, W. N ¨ortersh¨auser, T. Papenbrock, J. Papuga, A. Schwenk, J. Simonis, K. Wendt, and...

    2016

  58. [66]

    A. B. Larionov, T. Gaitanos, and U. Mosel, Kaon and hyperon production in antiproton-induced reactions on nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 85, 024614 (2012)

    2012

  59. [67]

    Gr ¨ummer, B

    F. Gr ¨ummer, B. Chen, Z. Ma, and S. Krewald, Bulk prop- erties of light deformed nuclei derived from a medium- modified meson-exchange interaction, Physics Letters B 387, 673 (1996)

    1996

  60. [68]

    R. L. Workman and Others (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022)

    2022

  61. [69]

    Atanasov, D

    D. Atanasov, D. Beck, K. Blaum, C. Borgmann, R. Cakirli, T. Eronen, S. George, F. Herfurth, A. Herlert, M. Kowal- ska, S. Kreim, Y . Litvinov, D. Lunney, V . Manea, D. Neid- herr, M. Rosenbusch, L. Schweikhard, F. Wienholtz, R. Wolf, and K. Zuber, Precision mass measurements o...

    2017

  62. [70]

    A. B. Larionov, I. A. Pshenichnov, I. N. Mishustin, and W. Greiner, Antiproton-nucleus collisions simulation within a kinetic approach with relativistic mean fields, Phys. Rev. C 80, 021601 (2009)

    2009

  63. [71]

    P. E. Hodgson, Nuclear matter distributions, Hyperfine Inter- actions 74, 75 (1992)

    1992

  64. [72]

    W. Horiuchi, Single-particle decomposition of nuclear surface diffuseness, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics 2021, 123D01 (2021), https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article- pdf/2021/12/123D01/42899146/ptab136.pdf

    2021

  65. [73]

    Panda, M

    R. Panda, M. Sharma, and S. Patra, Nuclear structure and re- action properties of ne, mg and si isotopes with rmf densities, Modern Physics Letters A 29, 1450013 (2014)

    2014

  66. [74]

    A. J. Miller, K. Minamisono, A. Klose, D. Garand, C. Kujawa, J. D. Lantis, Y . Liu, B. Maaß, P. F. Mantica, W. Nazarewicz, W. N ¨ortersh¨auser, S. V . Pineda, P.-G. Reinhard, D. M. Rossi, F. Sommer, C. Sumithrarachchi, A. Teigelh ¨ofer, and J. Watkins, Proton superfluidity and...

    2019

  67. [75]

    Emrich, G

    H. Emrich, G. Fricke, G. Mallot, H. Miska, H.-G. Sieberling, J. Cavedon, B. Frois, and D. Goutte, Radial distribution of nu- cleons in the isotopes 48,40ca, Nuclear Physics A 396, 401 (1983)

    1983

  68. [76]

    Yong, A direct probe of Λ potential in nuclear medium, Physics Letters B 853, 138662 (2024)

    G.-C. Yong, A direct probe of Λ potential in nuclear medium, Physics Letters B 853, 138662 (2024)

    2024

  69. [77]

    Ehehalt and W

    W. Ehehalt and W. Cassing, Relativistic transport approach for nucleus-nucleus collisions from sis to sps energies, Nuclear Physics A 602, 449 (1996)

    1996

  70. [78]

    Pochodzalla, S

    J. Pochodzalla, S. Bleser, A. S. Lorente, M. M. Rojo, M. Steinen, for the PANDA Collaboration, J. Gerl, J. Ko- jouharova, and I. Kojouharov, Many facets of strangeness nu- clear physics with stored antiprotons, in Proceedings of the 16 12th International Conference on Hypernuc...

    2017 doi

  71. [79]

    Hirtz, J.-C

    J. Hirtz, J.-C. David, A. Boudard, J. Cugnon, S. Leray, I. Leya, J. L. Rodr ´ıguez-S´anchez, and G. Schnabel, Strangeness pro- duction in the new version of the li `ege intranuclear cascade model, Phys. Rev. C 101, 014608 (2020)

    2020

  72. [80]

    J. L. Rodr ´ıguez-S´anchez, J. Cugnon, J.-C. David, J. Hirtz, A. Keli ´c Heil, and S. Leray, Hypernuclei formation in spal- lation reactions by coupling the li `ege intranuclear cascade model to the deexcitation code abla, Phys. Rev. C105, 014623 (2022)

    2022

  73. [81]

    Schupp, Study of antihyperon pairs in nuclei at PANDA , Ph.D

    F. Schupp, Study of antihyperon pairs in nuclei at PANDA , Ph.D. thesis, Johannes Gutenberg-Universit¨at Mainz ((unpub- lished))

  74. [82]

    M. Steinen, Feasibility studies for the high precision X-ray spectroscopy of heavy Ξ− hyperatoms at PANDA using the PANda GErmanium Array PANGEA , Phd thesis, Johannes Gutenberg-Universit¨at Mainz ((2020))

    2020

  75. [83]

    Geiss, W

    J. Geiss, W. Cassing, and C. Greiner, Strangeness production in the hsd transport approach from sis to sps energies, Nuclear Physics A 644, 107 (1998)

    1998

  76. [84]

    Hartnack, H

    C. Hartnack, H. Oeschler, Y . Leifels, E. L. Bratkovskaya, and J. Aichelin, Strangeness production close to the threshold in proton–nucleus and heavy-ion collisions, Physics Reports 510, 119 (2012), strangeness production close to the threshold in proton–nucleus and heavy-ion ...

    2012

  77. [85]

    Aichelin, E

    J. Aichelin, E. Bratkovskaya, A. Le F `evre, V . Kireyeu, V . Kolesnikov, Y . Leifels, V . V oronyuk, and G. Coci, Parton- hadron-quantum-molecular dynamics: A novel microscopic n-body transport approach for heavy-ion collisions, dynami- cal cluster formation, and hypernuclei ...

    2020

  78. [86]

    K. Suzuki, The p physics opportunities at the j-parc hadron facility, https://kds.kek.jp/event/46965/contributions/ (2024), fourth International Workshop on the Extension Project for the J-PARC Hadron Experimental Facility (HEF-ex 2024)

    2024

  79. [87]

    271, 02011 (2022)

    Christiansen, Martin, Schupp, Falk, Achenbach, Patrick, B¨olting, Michael, Pochodzalla, Josef, and Steinen, Marcell, Exploring the neutron skin by hyperon-antihyperon produc- tion in antiproton-nucleus interactions, EPJ Web Conf. 271, 02011 (2022)

    2022

  80. [88]

    Schupp, M

    F. Schupp, M. B ¨olting, P. Achenbach, S. Bleser, J. Pochodza- lla, and M. Steinen, An infrared light-guide based target po- sitioning system for operation in a harsh environment, Nu- clear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Det...

    2023

  81. [89]

    J. T. Zhang, X. L. Tu, P. Sarriguren, K. Yue, Q. Zeng, Z. Y . Sun, M. Wang, Y . H. Zhang, X. H. Zhou, and Y . A. Litvi- nov, Systematic trends of neutron skin thickness versus rela- tive neutron excess, Phys. Rev. C104, 034303 (2021)

    2021

  82. [90]

    de/unser-service-2/metall-preise/ preise-fuer-stabile-isotope/ (2023), accessed: 2023-04-30

    Institut f ¨ur Seltene Erden und Metalle AG, Price list of electromagnetically separated iso- topes, https://institut-seltene-erden. de/unser-service-2/metall-preise/ preise-fuer-stabile-isotope/ (2023), accessed: 2023-04-30

    2023

  83. [91]

    Chaumeaux, V

    A. Chaumeaux, V . Layly, and R. Schaeffer, Neutron densities from 1 GeV proton scattering, Physics Letters B72, 33 (1977)

    1977

  84. [92]

    G. Igo, G. Adams, T. Bauer, G. Pauletta, C. Whitten, A. Wreikat, G. Hoffmann, G. Blanpied, W. Coker, C. Harvey, R. Liljestrand, L. Ray, J. Spencer, H. Thiessen, C. Glashausser, N. Hintz, M. Oothoudt, H. Nann, K. Seth, B. Wood, D. Mc- Daniels, and M. Gazzaly, Elastic differenti...

    1979

  85. [93]

    M. Christiansen, Einfluss der Neutronenhaut auf die Produk- tion von Hyperon-Anthyperon-Paaren bei Antiproton-Kern- St¨oßen , Bachelor’s thesis, Johannes Gutenberg-Universit ¨at Mainz (2022)

    2022

  86. [94]

    uni-mainz.de/, accessed: 2024-11-18

    MOGON II High Performance Computing, https://hpc. uni-mainz.de/, accessed: 2024-11-18

    2024

  87. [95]

    Lombardi, R

    J. Lombardi, R. Boyd, R. Arking, and A. Robbins, Nuclear sizes in 40,44,48ca, Nuclear Physics A 188, 103 (1972)

    1972

  88. [96]

    Friedman, H

    E. Friedman, H. J. Gils, H. Rebel, and Z. Majka, 48Ca-40Ca Radius Difference from Elastic Scattering of 104-MeV α Par- ticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1220 (1978)

    1978

  89. [97]

    M. J. Jakobson, G. R. Burleson, J. R. Calarco, M. D. Cooper, D. C. Hagerman, I. Halpern, R. H. Jeppeson, K. F. Johnson, L. D. Knutson, R. E. Marrs, H. O. Meyer, and R. P. Redwine, Neutron radii of calcium isotopes from pion total cross section measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38...

    1977

  90. [98]

    TABLE III

    0.16 ±0.07 electric dipole polarizability [41] 0.17 ± 0.03 CREX [25] 0.121 ±0.026(exp)±0.024(mod) 1assuming Rp=Rn for 40Ca. TABLE III. Published radii of protons and neutrons in 48Ca which are shown in Figure 1

  91. [99]

    M. H. Mahzoon, M. C. Atkinson, R. J. Charity, and W. H. Dickhoff, Neutron skin thickness of48Ca from a nonlocal dis- persive optical-model analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 222503 (2017)

    2017

  92. [100]

    Brissaud, Y

    I. Brissaud, Y . Le Bornec, B. Tatischeff, L. Bimbot, M. Brus- sel, and G. Duhamel, D ´etermination du rayon de la distribu- tion de neutrons de certains noyaux par l’´etude de la diffusion ´elastique de particules alpha de 166 mev, Nuclear Physics A 191, 145 (1972)

    1972

  93. [101]

    Alkhazov, T

    G. Alkhazov, T. Bauer, R. Bertini, L. Bimbot, O. Bing, A. Boudard, G. Bruge, H. Catz, A. Chaumeaux, P. Cou- vert, J. Fontaine, F. Hibou, G. Igo, J. Lugol, and M. Matoba, Elastic and inelastic scattering of 1.37 GeV α-particles from 40,42,44,48Ca, Nuclear Physics A 280, 365 (1977)

    1977

  94. [102]

    and Hartmann, F

    Wycech, S. and Hartmann, F. J. and Jastrz´ebski, J. and Kłos, B. and Trzci´nska, A. and Egidy, T. von, Nuclear surface studies with antiprotonic atom x rays, Phys. Rev. C76, 034316 (2007)

    2007

  95. [103]

    0.20 ±(0.04)exp±(0.04)theo reanalysis of [101] pionic atoms [98] 0.15 ±0.08

  96. [104]

    Friedman, Neutron skins of 208pb and 48ca from pionic probes, Nuclear Physics A 896, 46 (2012)

    E. Friedman, Neutron skins of 208pb and 48ca from pionic probes, Nuclear Physics A 896, 46 (2012)

    2012

  97. [105]

    V . E. Starodubsky and N. M. Hintz, Extraction of neutron den- sities from elastic proton scattering by 206,207,208Pb at 650 MeV, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2118 (1994)

    1994

  98. [106]

    A. M. Mack, N. M. Hintz, D. Cook, M. A. Franey, J. Amann, M. Barlett, G. W. Hoffmann, G. Pauletta, D. Ciskowski, and M. Purcell, Proton scattering by 206,207,208Pb at 650 MeV: Phenomenological analysis, Phys. Rev. C 52, 291 (1995)

    1995

  99. [107]

    Kłos and A

    B. Kłos and A. Trzci ´nska and J. Jastrze ¸bski and T. Czosnyka and M. Kisieli ´nski and P. Lubi ´nski and P. Napiorkowski and L. Pie ´nkowski and F. J. Hartmann and B. Ketzer and P. Ring and R. Schmidt and T. von Egidy and R. Smola ´nczuk and S. Wycech and K. Gulda and W. Kur...

    2007

  100. [108]

    B. A. Brown, G. Shen, G. C. Hillhouse, J. Meng, and A. Trzci ´nska, Neutron skin deduced from antiprotonic atom data, Phys. Rev. C 76, 034305 (2007)

    2007

  101. [109]

    and Paar, N

    Klimkiewicz, A. and Paar, N. and Adrich, P. and Fallot, M. and Boretzky, K. and Aumann, T. and Cortina-Gil, D. and Pra- manik, U. Datta and Elze, Th. W. and Emling, H. and Geissel, 17 H. and Hellstr ¨om, M. and Jones, K. L. and Kratz, J. V . and Kulessa, R. and Nociforo, C. an...

    2007

  102. [110]

    Tamii, P

    A. Tamii, P. von Neumann-Cosel, and I. Poltoratska, Elec- tric dipole response of 208Pb from proton inelastic scattering: Constraints on neutron skin thickness and symmetry energy, The European Physical Journal A 50, 28 (2014)

    2014

  103. [111]

    Piekarewicz, B

    J. Piekarewicz, B. K. Agrawal, G. Col `o, W. Nazarewicz, N. Paar, P.-G. Reinhard, X. Roca-Maza, and D. Vretenar, Elec- tric dipole polarizability and the neutron skin, Phys. Rev. C85, 041302 (2012)

    2012

  104. [112]

    Csatl ´os and A

    M. Csatl ´os and A. Krasznahorkay and D. Sohler and A.M. van den Berg and N. Blasi and J. Guly´as and M.N. Harakeh and M. Hunyadi and M.A. de Huu and Z. M´at´e and S.Y . van der Werf and H.J. W¨ortche and L. Zolnai, Measurement of neutron-skin thickness in 208Pb by excitation ...

    2003

  105. [113]

    Krasznahorkay, N

    A. Krasznahorkay, N. Paar, D. Vretenar, and M. Harakeh, Neutron-skin thickness of 208Pb from the energy of the anti-analogue giant dipole resonance, Physica Scripta T154, 014018 (2013)

    2013

  106. [114]

    Yasuda, T

    J. Yasuda, T. Wakasa, M. Okamoto, M. Dozono, K. Hatanaka, M. Ichimura, S. Kuroita, Y . Maeda, T. Noro, Y . Sakemi, M. Sasano, and K. Yako, Extrac- tion of anti-analog giant dipole resonance and neu- tron skin thickness for 208Pb, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physic...

    2013 doi

  107. [115]

    Wakasa, M

    T. Wakasa, M. Okamoto, M. Dozono, K. Hatanaka, M. Ichimura, S. Kuroita, Y . Maeda, H. Miyasako, T. Noro, T. Saito, Y . Sakemi, T. Yabe, and K. Yako, Complete sets of polarization transfer observables for the 208Pb(⃗ p,⃗ n) reaction at 296 MeV and Gamow-Teller and spin-dipole s...

    2012

  108. [116]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, S. Bogdanov, P. S. Ray, R. M. Lud- lam, S. Guillot, Z. Arzoumanian, C. L. Baker, A. V . Bilous, D. Chakrabarty, K. C. Gendreau, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, S. M. Morsink, and T. E. Strohmayer, A NICER view of PSR j0030+0451: Millisecon...

    2019

  109. [117]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, R. M. Ludlam, S. Mahmoodi- far, S. M. Morsink, P. S. Ray, T. E. Strohmayer, K. S. Wood, T. Enoto, R. Foster, T. Okajima, G. Prigozhin,...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.