Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Unbiased Supervised Contrastive Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.05568 v4 pith:K7W3KQBL submitted 2022-11-10 cs.LG cs.CVstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CVstat.ML
keywords biaseddatacontrastivedatasetslearningbiasesdebiasingepsilon-supinfonce
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many datasets are biased, namely they contain easy-to-learn features that are highly correlated with the target class only in the dataset but not in the true underlying distribution of the data. For this reason, learning unbiased models from biased data has become a very relevant research topic in the last years. In this work, we tackle the problem of learning representations that are robust to biases. We first present a margin-based theoretical framework that allows us to clarify why recent contrastive losses (InfoNCE, SupCon, etc.) can fail when dealing with biased data. Based on that, we derive a novel formulation of the supervised contrastive loss (epsilon-SupInfoNCE), providing more accurate control of the minimal distance between positive and negative samples. Furthermore, thanks to our theoretical framework, we also propose FairKL, a new debiasing regularization loss, that works well even with extremely biased data. We validate the proposed losses on standard vision datasets including CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and ImageNet, and we assess the debiasing capability of FairKL with epsilon-SupInfoNCE, reaching state-of-the-art performance on a number of biased datasets, including real instances of biases in the wild.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Attention-based Framework for Fair Contrastive Learning

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Attention-weighted negative sampling with LSH sparsification improves bias removal in contrastive representation learning while approximately preserving accuracy.

  2. VB-Mitigator: An Open-source Framework for Evaluating and Advancing Visual Bias Mitigation

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    VB-Mitigator is a unified PyTorch framework and benchmark for visual bias mitigation, covering 12 methods and 7 datasets with standardized metrics.

  3. Self-Supervised Learning at the Edge: The Cost of Labeling

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A benchmark of supervised, self-supervised, and semi-supervised contrastive learning on CIFAR-10 and EuroSAT shows labeling energy can dominate training energy, with semi-supervised CCSSL providing a favorable accurac...

Pith tools