Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Large single transverse spin asymmetry for forward neutrons in ultraperipheral polarized proton-nucleus collisions in explanation of measurements at RHIC-PHENIX

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1702.03834 v2 pith:KCEVNY6Q submitted 2017-02-10 nucl-th nucl-ex

classification nucl-thnucl-ex
keywords collisionsforwardmodelpolarizedproton-nucleussimulationultraperipheralneutrons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The PHENIX experiment at BNL-RHIC recently reported the single transverse spin asymmetry $A_N$ for forward neutrons measured in polarized proton-nucleus collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200\,$GeV; $A_N$ in proton-aluminum and proton-gold collisions are -0.015 and 0.18, respectively, which are clearly different from $A_N=-0.08$ in proton-proton collisions. In this paper, we propose large $A_N$ for forward neutrons in ultraperipheral polarized proton-nucleus collisions as an explanation of the PHENIX measurements. The proposed model is demonstrated using two Monte Carlo simulations organized as follows. In the ultraperipheral collision simulation, we use the STARlight event generator for the simulation of the virtual photon flux and then use the MAID2007 unitary isobar model for the simulation of the neutron production in the interactions of a virtual photon with a polarized proton. In the proton-nucleus hadronic interaction simulation, the differential cross sections of forward neutron production are predicted by a simple one-pion exchange model and the Glauber model. The simulated $A_N$ values accumulating the both contribution of ultraperipheral collisions and hadronic interactions are in good agreement with the PHENIX results.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools