Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 38 references

From the one-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung waveform, the paper extracts the spectral radiance, energy spectrum, angular distribution to G^{4} and the nonlinear-memory multipoles to G^{5} at fractional 7.5PN accuracy in the center-of-mas

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 23:16 UTC pith:KCGDRX2A

load-bearing objection Solid high-order post-processing of the known one-loop bremsstrahlung waveform: new CM-frame multipoles for spectrum, angular distribution and nonlinear memory at 7.5PN, with clean checks against known totals. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.03879 v1 pith:KCGDRX2A submitted 2026-07-04 gr-qc

Radiated Energy Spectrum, Radiated Angular Distribution and Non-linear Memory from the One-loop Gravitational Bremsstrahlung Waveform

Donato Bini , Thibault Damour , Stefano De Angelis , Andrea Geralico This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords gravitational bremsstrahlungone-loop waveformnonlinear memoryradiated energy spectrumangular distributionpost-Minkowskianpost-Newtonian expansioncenter-of-mass frame
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper starts from the recently obtained one-loop frequency-domain waveform for the scattering of two non-spinning masses and converts that waveform into the quantities that describe how gravitational waves carry energy. It first builds the spectral radiance (energy per unit frequency and solid angle), then integrates to obtain both the frequency spectrum and the angular distribution of radiated energy up to order G^{4}. From the angular distribution it extracts the multipole coefficients of the nonlinear memory contribution to the asymptotic waveform, reaching order G^{5}. All results are given as high-order post-Newtonian series in the center-of-mass frame, reaching fractional 7.5PN accuracy, and are supplied both in tables for the lowest multipoles and in ancillary files for higher multipoles. A sympathetic reader cares because the nonlinear memory is a pure signature of the nonlinearity of general relativity and because the high-order spectrum and multipoles furnish concrete benchmarks for waveform modeling, analytic continuation between unbound and bound orbits, and future higher-loop calculations.

Core claim

Given the one-loop-accurate frequency-domain gravitational waveform for two-body scattering, the spectral GW radiance, the radiated energy spectrum dE^{+}_gw/dω and the radiated angular distribution dE_gw/dΩ can be obtained to order G^{4}, and the multipole coefficients of the nonlinear memory can be obtained to order G^{5}, all at fractional 7.5PN accuracy in the center-of-mass frame.

What carries the argument

The spectral radiance constructed from the squared one-loop frequency-domain waveform, which is then integrated over angles or frequencies and decomposed into spherical harmonics; the resulting E_lm multipoles convert directly into the spin-weighted multipoles of the nonlinear memory via a fixed numerical factor 16π G N_l.

Load-bearing premise

The entire calculation treats the input one-loop frequency-domain waveform (and its tree-level counterpart) as complete and correct once expanded to 7.5PN order in the center-of-mass frame; any missing or erroneous term in that waveform would appear unchanged in every radiated quantity derived here.

What would settle it

Recompute any low multipole (for example the l=2 or l=0 coefficients) of the radiated energy or of the nonlinear memory from an independent post-Newtonian or multipolar-post-Minkowskian calculation at the same fractional order and check whether the series coefficients agree term by term with the tables given in the paper.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript takes the known one-loop frequency-domain gravitational bremsstrahlung waveform for two non-spinning masses (h ∼ G² + G³) and, working in the center-of-mass frame, extracts the spectral GW radiance dE⁺_gw/(dω dΩ), the angle-integrated energy spectrum dE⁺_gw/dω, and the radiated angular distribution dE_gw/dΩ through O(G⁴). From the multipoles of the angular distribution it obtains the multipole expansion of the nonlinear memory through O(G⁵), at fractional 7.5PN accuracy. Tree-level results in the CM frame are included for completeness. Explicit high-order series for the memory multipoles (l ≤ 5 in the text, l ≤ 17 in ancillaries) and for the energy spectrum (expressed via products of modified Bessel K functions and e^{-u} terms) are given in tables and ancillary files. Standard checks recover the known O(G³) and O(G⁴) total energy and linear-momentum losses and the ν → 0 rest-frame memory of Ref. [31].

Significance. If the results hold, the paper supplies the first CM-frame, 1-loop, 7.5PN multipolar nonlinear memory and the corresponding high-order radiated spectrum and angular distribution for non-spinning gravitational bremsstrahlung. These quantities are directly useful as benchmarks for PN and PM waveform pipelines, for analytic continuation between unbound and bound systems, and for studies of radiation-reaction and high-order tail structure. Strengths include: (i) parameter-free, algebraic extraction from a published waveform; (ii) explicit cross-checks against independent total-loss and rest-frame memory results; (iii) machine-readable ancillary files (spectrum_l_m.m, memory_l_m.m) that make the high-order coefficients usable by others; (iv) a clear extension of the 1-loop waveform PN content from the previous 5PN level to 7.5PN. The work is incremental but high-value post-processing of state-of-the-art PM waveforms.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim rests on a new 7.5PN expansion of the one-loop CM-frame waveform (Introduction; cf. prior 5PN result of Ref. [10]). The manuscript does not describe the procedure used to extract this high-order PN series from the closed PM expressions (choice of variables, handling of half-integer Bessel contributions, regularization of soft/hard regions, or validation against intermediate orders). Without at least a short methodological appendix or a clear pointer to a reproducible pipeline, independent verification of the load-bearing input series is difficult, even though the subsequent algebraic steps (radiance → spectrum → angular multipoles → memory) are standard.
  2. Eq. (3.6), second line: the imaginary 1-loop piece for (l,m)=(3,3) is written as iπ E^{1loop π}_{22} rather than E^{1loop π}_{33}. The same pattern of index slip does not appear in the (3,1) or l=2,4,5 blocks, so this is likely a local typesetting error, but it sits in a defining equation for a multipole that is then tabulated; it should be corrected and the corresponding table entry re-checked against the ancillary file.
minor comments (6)
  1. Notation: the dimensionless frequency u = ωb/p_∞ is introduced in Sec. II and reused for the spectrum in Sec. IV; a brief reminder that u is not retarded time would help readers skimming only Sec. IV.
  2. Tables I–X are extremely dense. Consider moving the highest-order coefficients (e.g. p^{11}–p^{14}) fully into the ancillaries and keeping only leading terms plus a statement of the truncation order in the main text, to improve readability.
  3. In Sec. I, the linear-momentum components P^{rad}_x and P^{rad}_y are given through high orders as checks; it would help to state explicitly which of these coefficients are new versus reproduced from Refs. [15–17].
  4. Eq. (2.13)–(2.20): the θ′=θ+π, ϕ′=ϕ+π map that relates the two helicity contributions is useful; a one-sentence remark that it preserves ω and is therefore valid for the positive-frequency radiance would make the logic self-contained.
  5. Reference list: Ref. [11] is cited as arXiv:2604.21522 and Ref. [9] as arXiv:2511.05412; ensure final bibliographic data are updated at proof stage if those works have appeared.
  6. Abstract and Sec. V: the phrase “fractional 7.5PN accuracy” is clear to specialists but could be glossed once as “O(p_∞^{15}) beyond LO” for broader readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct algebraic extraction of radiance, spectrum, angular multipoles and memory from a previously published one-loop waveform via standard polarization and spherical-harmonic projections.

full rationale

The paper takes as given the one-loop frequency-domain waveform ˆf ∼ G² + G³ (Refs. [6–10]) and the tree-level waveform, expands them to fractional 7.5PN in the CM frame, and applies the textbook relations (1.2)–(1.3) for spectral radiance, (1.5)–(1.6) for the angle-integrated spectrum and angular distribution, and (1.15) for the nonlinear-memory multipoles. These steps are parameter-free algebraic operations (polarization contractions, frequency folding, spherical-harmonic projections, frequency integration). Cross-checks against independent literature results for total Erad and Prad at O(G³) and O(G⁴) and against the ν → 0 rest-frame memory of Ref. [31] confirm consistency but do not feed back into the derivation. Self-citations to the authors’ earlier waveform and spectrum papers supply only the input data and frame conventions; they do not redefine the target observables or force the high-order coefficients by construction. No fitted parameters, uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling appear. The central claims are therefore independent computations, not tautological rearrangements of the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a pure analytic derivation within classical general relativity. It inherits the Einstein equations, the post-Minkowskian expansion, and the already-published one-loop waveform; no free parameters are fitted and no new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Einstein’s equations in the weak-field post-Minkowskian expansion govern the classical two-body scattering and the emitted gravitational radiation.
    Invoked throughout as the underlying dynamical framework (Introduction and Sec. I).
  • domain assumption The frequency-domain one-loop waveform h(ω,θ,ϕ)∼G^{2}+G^{3} of Refs. [6–10] is correct and complete when expanded to the required PN order in the CM frame.
    Taken as the starting point for all subsequent integrations (Abstract, Introduction, Sec. II).
  • standard math Standard spherical-harmonic and spin-weighted spherical-harmonic decompositions, together with the relation between angular energy distribution and nonlinear memory (Eq. 1.15), hold.
    Used to convert the radiance into multipoles and memory coefficients (Secs. I–III).

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 46903 in / 2300 out tokens · 21436 ms · 2026-07-11T23:16:51.281485+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The frequency-domain gravitational waveform emitted by the scattering of two non-spinning massive particles has recently been derived at next-to-leading, \textit{i.e.} one-loop, post-Minkowskian order, $h(\omega, \theta,\phi) \sim G^2 + G^3$. Building on this one-loop-accurate frequency-domain gravitational waveform, we successively derive the spectral gravitational-wave (GW) radiance, $dE^{\rm gw}/(d\omega d\Omega)$, the radiated GW energy spectrum, $dE^{\rm gw}/d\omega$, and the radiated GW angular distribution, $dE^{\rm gw}/d\Omega$, up to order $G^4$ included. We deduce from the radiated angular distribution the multipole expansion of the non-linear memory up to order $G^5$ included, thereby extending previous results. We work in the center-of-mass frame, and our results reach the fractional 7.5PN accuracy. For completeness, we include the tree-level information (considered in the center-of-mass frame).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    linear memory

    and the NLO levels (G 4) [16]; at the 2PN fractional accuracy (using the dimensionless angular momentumj in place of the impact parameterb, as in the present case) the corresponding expressions were obtained in Ref. [17], see Appendices G and H there. The beginning of the PN expansion of these expression are given by P rad x = (m 2 −m 1)ν2 GM b 4 πP radG ...

    2016

  2. [2]

    M. Picone,

    in the frame of one of the two bodies at orderO(v 30). In the present paper we have chosen to work in the cm frame. Using the simple transformation indicated in Ap- pendix B of Ref. [11] (see also Ref. [32]) it is straightfor- ward to transform the rest-frame energy spectrum into its cm-frame counterpart. Let us indicate here the beginning of the PN expan...

    1911

  3. [3]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves,

    L. Blanchet, “Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves,” Living Rev. Rel.17, 2 (2014) doi:10.12942/lrr- 2014-2 Living Rev.Rel.271, 4 (2024) doi:10.1007/s41114- 024-00050-z [arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.12942/lrr- 2014

  4. [4]

    Snowmass White Pa- per: Gravitational Waves and Scattering Amplitudes,

    A. Buonanno, M. Khalil, D. O’Connell, R. Roiban, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng, “Snowmass White Pa- per: Gravitational Waves and Scattering Amplitudes,” [arXiv:2204.05194 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    The SAGEX review on scattering ampli- tudes Chapter 13: Post-Minkowskian expansion from scattering amplitudes,

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plante and P. Vanhove, “The SAGEX review on scattering ampli- tudes Chapter 13: Post-Minkowskian expansion from scattering amplitudes,” J. Phys. A55, no.44, 443014 (2022) doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac7a78 [arXiv:2203.13024 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac7a78 2022

  6. [6]

    The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 14: Classical gravity from scattering amplitudes,

    D. A. Kosower, R. Monteiro and D. O’Connell, “The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 14: Classical gravity from scattering amplitudes,” J. Phys. A 55, no.44, 443015 (2022) doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac8846 [arXiv:2203.13025 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac8846 2022

  7. [7]

    Novel Lagrange-multiplier approach to the effective-one- body dynamics of binary systems in post-Minkowskian gravity,

    T. Damour, A. Nagar, A. Placidi and P. Rettegno, “Novel Lagrange-multiplier approach to the effective-one- body dynamics of binary systems in post-Minkowskian gravity,” Phys. Rev. D113, no.2, 024042 (2026) doi:10.1103/41sd-g2gb [arXiv:2503.05487 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1103/41sd-g2gb 2026

  8. [8]

    The sub-leading scattering waveform from amplitudes,

    A. Herderschee, R. Roiban and F. Teng, “The sub-leading scattering waveform from amplitudes,” JHEP06, 004 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)004 [arXiv:2303.06112 [hep-th]]. 17 TABLE XI: Energy spectrum at the tree level: list of coefficients fromp 5 ∞ up top 11 ∞ C (5) 00 ν2 32u8 63 + 5576u6 945 − 256u4 945 − 128u2 315 +ν − 64u8 189 − 544u6 63 + 64u4 27 − 14...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2023)004 2023

  9. [9]

    In- elastic exponentiation and classical gravitational scat- tering at one loop,

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg and I. Vazquez-Holm, “In- elastic exponentiation and classical gravitational scat- tering at one loop,” JHEP2023, no.06, 126 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)126 [arXiv:2303.07006 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2023)126 2023

  10. [10]

    One-loop gravi- tational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy- mass effective field theory,

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, S. De An- gelis, J. Gowdy and G. Travaglini, “One-loop gravi- tational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy- mass effective field theory,” JHEP06, 048 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)048 [arXiv:2303.06111 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2023)048 2023

  11. [11]

    Ana- lytic One-loop Scattering Waveform in General Relativ- ity,

    B. Giacomo, S. De Angelis and D. A. Kosower, “Ana- lytic One-loop Scattering Waveform in General Relativ- ity,” [arXiv:2511.05412 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  12. [12]

    Reconstructing the Gravitational Waveform from Its Probe Limit,

    C. Heissenberg and R. Russo, “Reconstructing the Gravitational Waveform from Its Probe Limit,” [arXiv:2511.13835 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  13. [13]

    Quadrupolar bremsstrahlung waveform at the third-and-a-half post- Newtonian accuracy,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Quadrupolar bremsstrahlung waveform at the third-and-a-half post- Newtonian accuracy,” [arXiv:2604.21522 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    The mass quadrupole mo- ment of compact binary systems at the fourth post- Newtonian order,

    T. Marchand, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou, S. Marsat, G. Faye and L. Blanchet, “The mass quadrupole mo- ment of compact binary systems at the fourth post- Newtonian order,” Class. Quant. Grav.37, no.21, 215006 (2020) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab9ce1 [arXiv:2003.13672 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab9ce1 2020

  15. [15]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou and D. Trestini, “Gravitational-Wave Phasing of Quasicircu- 20 TABLE XIV: Energy spectrum at 1-loop: list of coefficients fromp 2 ∞ up top 6 ∞. A(2) 00 64u5 5 + 64u3 15 A(2) 01 192 5 u4 A(2) 11 64u5 5 + 64u3 5 A(2) 0exp 0 A(2) 1exp 0 A(3) 00 ν2 32u9 63 + 4136u7 945 − 1012u5 945 − 4u3 63 +ν − 64u9 189 − 232u7 ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.121402 2079

  16. [16]

    Gravitational-wave flux and quadrupole modes from quasicircular nonspinning compact binaries to the fourth post-Newtonian order,

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, Q. Henry, F. Larrouturou and D. Trestini, “Gravitational-wave flux and quadrupole modes from quasicircular nonspinning compact binaries to the fourth post-Newtonian order,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.6, 064041 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.064041 [arXiv:2304.11186 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.064041 2023

  17. [17]

    Radiative classical gravitational observables atO(G 3) from scattering amplitudes,

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf and M. Zeng, “Radiative classical gravitational observables atO(G 3) from scattering amplitudes,” JHEP10, 148 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2021)148 [arXiv:2104.03957 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2021)148 2021

  18. [18]

    Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, J. Neef and R. A. Porto, “Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, no.10, 101401 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.101401 [arXiv:2210.05541 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.101401 2023

  19. [19]

    Radiative contri- butions to gravitational scattering,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Radiative contri- butions to gravitational scattering,” Phys. Rev. D104, no.8, 084031 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084031 [arXiv:2107.08896 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.084031 2021

  20. [20]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour (1989), draft of [20] incorpo- rated as chapter 6 (pp 194-227) in the 1990 Habilitation thesis of Luc Blanchet; see [19]

    1989

  21. [21]

    Blanchet, “Contribution ` a l’´ etude du rayonnement 21 TABLE XV: Energy spectrum at 1-loop: list of coefficients atp 7 ∞

    L. Blanchet, “Contribution ` a l’´ etude du rayonnement 21 TABLE XV: Energy spectrum at 1-loop: list of coefficients atp 7 ∞. A(7) 00 ν4 128u13 57915 + 3488u11 9009 + 37892u9 7371 + 922717u7 135135 − 52597u5 180180 + 439u3 12012 +ν3 − 256u13 57915 − 6056u11 6237 − 4739698u9 405405 − 456674u7 31185 − 140879u5 90090 + 1819u3 8190 +ν2 896u13 289575 + 321064u...

    2079

  22. [22]

    Hereditary effects in grav- itational radiation,

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, “Hereditary effects in grav- itational radiation,” Phys. Rev. D46, 4304-4319 (1992) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.4304

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.46.4304 1992

  23. [23]

    Theory of the detection of short bursts of gravitational radiation,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Theory of the detection of short bursts of gravitational radiation,” Phys. Rev. D4(1971), 2191-2197 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.4.2191

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.4.2191 1971

  24. [24]

    Radiation of grav- itational waves by a cluster of superdense stars,

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and A. G. Polnarev, “Radiation of grav- itational waves by a cluster of superdense stars,” Sov. Astron.18(1974), 17

    1974

  25. [25]

    Kinematic Res- onance and Memory Effect in Free Mass Gravitational Antennas,

    V. B. Braginsky and L. P. Grishchuk, “Kinematic Res- onance and Memory Effect in Free Mass Gravitational Antennas,” Sov. Phys. JETP62(1985), 427-430

    1985

  26. [26]

    Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational wave experiments,

    D. Christodoulou, “Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational wave experiments,” Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 1486-1489 (1991) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1486

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.1486 1991

  27. [27]

    A. G. Wiseman and C. M. Will, “Christodoulou’s non- 22 TABLE XVII: Energy spectrum at 1-loop: list of coefficients atp 9 ∞. A(9) 00 ν5 − 256u15 3378375 − 970432u13 30405375 − 1574008u11 1216215 − 5888416u9 675675 − 78549157u7 10135125 + 202117u5 1081080 − 10027u3 360360 +ν4 64u15 289575 + 221696u13 2027025 + 24551302u11 6081075 + 30098609u9 1351350 + 2470...

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.44.r2945 1991

  28. [28]

    Post-Newtonian corrections to the gravitational-wave memory for quasi-circular, in- spiralling compact binaries,

    M. Favata, “Post-Newtonian corrections to the gravitational-wave memory for quasi-circular, in- spiralling compact binaries,” Phys. Rev. D80, 024002 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.024002 [arXiv:0812.0069 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.024002 2009

  29. [29]

    Gravitational-wave bursts with memory: The Christodoulou effect,

    K. S. Thorne, “Gravitational-wave bursts with memory: The Christodoulou effect,” Phys. Rev. D45, no.2, 520- 524 (1992) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.520

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.45.520 1992

  30. [30]

    Zosso, L

    J. Zosso, L. Maga˜ na Zertuche, S. Gasparotto, A. Cogez, H. Inchausp´ e and M. Jacobs, Phys. Rev. D113, no.10, 104033 (2026) doi:10.1103/51xv-zlfy [arXiv:2601.23019 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/51xv-zlfy 2026

  31. [31]

    On BMS Invariance of Grav- itational Scattering,

    A. Strominger, “On BMS Invariance of Grav- itational Scattering,” JHEP07, 152 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)152 [arXiv:1312.2229 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)152 2014

  32. [32]

    Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory,

    A. Strominger, “Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory,” Princeton University Press, 2018, ISBN 978-0-691-17973-5 [arXiv:1703.05448 [hep- 23 TABLE XVIII: Energy spectrum at 1-loop: list of coefficients atp 10 ∞. A(10) 00 ν4 256u13 57915 + 6976u11 9009 + 75784u9 7371 + 1845434u7 135135 − 52597u5 90090 + 439u3 6006 +ν3 − 512u13 57915...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Nonlinear Gravitational Mem- ory in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,

    A. Georgoudis, V. Goncalves, C. Heissenberg and J. Parra-Martinez, “Nonlinear Gravitational Mem- ory in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.136, no.12, 121401 (2026) doi:10.1103/8m17-s2y8 [arXiv:2506.20733 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/8m17-s2y8 2026

  34. [34]

    Gravita- tional bremsstrahlung waveform at the fourth post- Minkowskian order and the second post-Newtonian level,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Gravita- tional bremsstrahlung waveform at the fourth post- Minkowskian order and the second post-Newtonian level,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.6, 064035 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.064035 [arXiv:2407.02076 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.064035 2024

  35. [35]

    Gravitational waveforms: A tale of two formalisms,

    D. Bini, T. Damour, S. De Angelis, A. Geralico, A. Herderschee, R. Roiban and F. Teng, “Gravitational waveforms: A tale of two formalisms,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.12, 125008 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.125008 [arXiv:2402.06604 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.125008 2024

  36. [36]

    Compar- ing one-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung ampli- tudes to the multipolar-post-Minkowskian wave- form,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Compar- ing one-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung ampli- tudes to the multipolar-post-Minkowskian wave- form,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.12, 124052 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.124052 [arXiv:2309.14925 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.124052 2023

  37. [37]

    Local in Time Conservative Binary Dynamics at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto, “Local in Time Conservative Binary Dynamics at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, no.22, 221401 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.221401 [arXiv:2403.04853 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.221401 2024

  38. [38]

    Fourth post-Minkowskian local-in-time conservative dynamics of binary sys- tems,

    D. Bini and T. Damour, “Fourth post-Minkowskian local-in-time conservative dynamics of binary sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.6, 064005 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.064005 [arXiv:2406.04878 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.064005 2024