Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Probing the Natural Language Inference Task with Automated Reasoning Tools

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.02573 v1 pith:KCPADMGD submitted 2020-05-06 cs.AI cs.CLcs.SC

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.SC
keywords tasklanguagenaturalautomatedcontrolledinferenceotherperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Natural Language Inference (NLI) task is an important task in modern NLP, as it asks a broad question to which many other tasks may be reducible: Given a pair of sentences, does the first entail the second? Although the state-of-the-art on current benchmark datasets for NLI are deep learning-based, it is worthwhile to use other techniques to examine the logical structure of the NLI task. We do so by testing how well a machine-oriented controlled natural language (Attempto Controlled English) can be used to parse NLI sentences, and how well automated theorem provers can reason over the resulting formulae. To improve performance, we develop a set of syntactic and semantic transformation rules. We report their performance, and discuss implications for NLI and logic-based NLP.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools