Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 11 cited by

Regular black holes from Oppenheimer-Snyder collapse

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read In a broad class of higher-curvature gravities, dust collapse bounces at finite size, making regular black holes.

desk verdict A coherent, well-written extension of the quasi-topological-gravity program to dust collapse; the bounce conclusion follows from their equations, and the one stress-test worry about junction conditions does not survive contact with (2.26). read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09680 v1 pith:KDQQ4OEX submitted 2025-05-14 gr-qc hep-th

classification gr-qchep-th
keywords regularblackholesOppenheimer-Snydercollapsequasi-topologicalgravityhigher-curvaturecorrectionsdustcosmologicalbouncejunctionconditionsFLRWcosmology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that in a broad family of higher-curvature gravity theories, the Oppenheimer-Snyder collapse of a pressureless dust star does not end in a singularity. The same infinite tower of curvature corrections that earlier work found to produce regular black holes as vacuum solutions now makes the collapse itself nonsingular: the star surface follows a timelike geodesic, shrinks to a minimum radius inside the black hole's inner horizon, reaches a maximum finite density, and bounces. If correct, this turns an idealized textbook collapse model into evidence that singularity avoidance is a general feature of these theories, not an artifact of eternal vacuum solutions. The paper also shows that the same regularity conditions eliminate the big bang and big crunch singularities of FLRW cosmology, replacing them with a universal cosmological bounce for matter with equation-of-state parameter $w>-1$.

What carries the argument

The central object is the characteristic function $h(\psi)=\psi+\sum_{n=2}^\infty \alpha_n\frac{D-2n}{D-2}\psi^n$, which encodes the entire infinite tower of curvature corrections in the reduced two-dimensional Horndeski description. All spherically symmetric physics — vacuum black holes, FLRW cosmologies, and the star surface — reduces to algebraic equations built from $h$ and its inverse. The master equation for collapse is $\dot R(\tau)^2+f(R(\tau))=f(R_0)$, the equation of a timelike radial geodesic of energy $E^2=1-\eta_0^2$ in the exterior metric; it follows from the junction conditions and identifies the exterior geodesic motion with the interior FLRW scale factor. The two crucial properties are that the regularity conditions (2.58) make $h$ invertible with $h^{-1}(x)\to 1/C$ as $x\to\infty$, giving the universal small-radius behavior $f\simeq 1-r^2/C$, and that this same limit produces both the regular black-hole core and the cosmological bounce.

What would settle it

Compute the angular component $g^{ij}\Pi_{ij}$ of the second junction condition (2.25) for a dust surface in the five-dimensional Hayward model and check whether it is automatically satisfied once the radial component is imposed; if it is an independent constraint, the surface equation of motion would change and the bounce would need re-derivation. A complementary check is to evolve the full spherically symmetric equations (2.18)-(2.20) numerically with dust initial data, without imposing the junction conditions, and see whether the star actually reaches the predicted turning point.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For any quasi-topological gravity of the form (2.8) with an infinite tower of higher-curvature terms obeying the regularity conditions (2.58), the paper establishes that spherically symmetric collapse of pressureless dust is completely nonsingular. The modified junction conditions force the dust surface to follow a timelike radial geodesic in the exterior regular black hole geometry, just as in Einstein gravity. Because the exterior metric has a de Sitter-like core with $f(r)\simeq 1-r^2/C$ near $r=0$, the geodesic has a turning point: the star reaches a minimum radius (and maximum density) inside the inner horizon, bounces, and re-emerges through a white hole in a new universe, eventually returning to its original radius and repeating the process. The claim is made explicit for the Hayward model in $D=5$ and the modified Hayward model in $D=6$, with a general argument covering every theory satisfying the regularity conditions. The same conditions imply that FLRW cosmologies with $w>-1$ undergo a universal bounce with scale factor $a(\tau)\simeq \sqrt{C}\,\cosh\big((\tau-\tau_{\min})/\sqrt{C}\big)$ near the minimum, replacing the Einstein big bang and big crunch.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the generalized junction conditions imported from the authors' earlier thin-shell work are the complete and correct second junction conditions for the infinite-tower theory on a timelike dust surface; if the angular component $g^{ij}\Pi_{ij}$ must be imposed as a separate constraint and is not automatically satisfied, the geodesic equation (3.10) and the entire collapse analysis would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In these theories the Oppenheimer-Snyder dust star never reaches $R=0$; it reaches a minimum radius $R_{\min}<R_-$ inside the inner horizon and bounces, and the exterior is exactly the regular black hole solution of the same theory.
  • With any finite truncation of the tower the collapse remains singular, so full resummation of the infinite higher-curvature series is the operative mechanism of singularity resolution.
  • The same sufficient conditions (2.58) imply a universal FLRW bounce for any $w>-1$, with $a(\tau)\simeq \sqrt{C}\,\cosh\big((\tau-\tau_{\min})/\sqrt{C}\big)$ near the turnaround.
  • The motion is periodic: after the bounce the star re-expands to its original radius, stops, and begins a new collapse, each cycle taking place in a new universe joined through a white hole.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the junction conditions are correct, the same geodesic argument should apply to any spherically symmetric dust cloud whose exterior is a regular quasi-topological black hole; one testable consequence is that inhomogeneous dust shells should also bounce individually, though shell-crossing singularities of the classical Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi model would need a dedicated treatment.
  • The paper leaves open the stability of the inner horizon through which the star emerges into the new universe; if that horizon is unstable under perturbations, the periodic bounce picture would change even though the singularity is resolved.
  • A natural extension is to check whether the same infinite-tower mechanism removes the Cauchy horizon instability of charged black holes, since the regularity conditions here operate on the deep interior rather than on the horizon.
  • The four-dimensional astrophysical case is not covered by these constructions; extending the argument would require infinite towers of Horndeski scalar-tensor theories rather than pure quasi-topological gravity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies Oppenheimer-Snyder collapse of pressureless dust in quasi-topological gravities with an infinite tower of higher-curvature corrections in D≥5. Using the two-dimensional Horndeski reduction and generalized junction conditions, the authors show that the surface of the dust star obeys the timelike geodesic equation of the static exterior, Eqs. (3.10)-(3.11). For regular exteriors with f≈1−r²/C near r=0, this equation implies a turning point, so the star reaches a finite maximum density and bounces rather than forming a singularity; explicit D=5 Hayward and D=6 modified-Hayward examples are integrated numerically. The paper also analyzes FLRW interiors with spherical sections and claims that the same conditions that make the black holes regular imply a universal bounce for w>−1, replacing the big bang and big crunch singularities of Einstein gravity.

Significance. If the main result is correct, it significantly strengthens the case that infinite towers of higher-curvature corrections can resolve singularities in dynamical collapse, extending earlier thin-shell results to a standard dust model and connecting black-hole regularization with bouncing cosmologies. The analytic derivation of the geodesic equation and the explicit exact treatment of the D=5 Hayward example, including R_min and the horizon ordering, are valuable and clearly presented. The manuscript is transparent about its reliance on the junction conditions and regularity conditions from earlier work and acknowledges the restriction to spherical symmetry and D≥5. However, the claimed universality of the FLRW bounce rests on an unjustified analytic step, and the completeness of the angular junction condition at the bounce needs to be spelled out.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 2.3, Eqs. (2.57)-(2.60)] The step 'because of the first condition, will diverge at x=1/C' is not justified. Positivity of the coefficients b_n = (D−2n)α_n/(D−2) and lim |α_n|^{1/n}=C do not imply that the series h(x) diverges at x=1/C; for example, b_n = C^n/n^2 satisfies both conditions and gives a finite value of h at 1/C. In that case h is bounded on its interval of convergence, so h^{-1}(x) is not defined for arbitrarily large x, and the universal near-zero-scale behavior ˙a^2−a^2/C=−1 in (2.60) does not follow from (2.58). An extra assumption ensuring that h is unbounded at the radius of convergence, or a revised argument, is needed. Since the same conditions are invoked in Sec. 2.2 to guarantee regular black holes, this also affects the foundational input for the collapse analysis.
  2. [Sec. 3, Eqs. (3.4)-(3.9)] The second junction condition is imposed only through the ττ component, Π^+_ττ = Π^-_ττ. The angular components of (2.25) must also be checked. From the second relation in (2.26), g^{ij}Π_ij is proportional to d(φ^{D−2}Π_ττ)/dτ divided by ˙φ, so continuity of Π_ττ appears to imply continuity of the angular components away from turning points. However, at the minimum radius ˙R=0 this relation is singular and the paper does not explain why the angular junction condition is still satisfied. Please add an explicit verification, or a limiting argument, that the full tensor junction condition holds along the entire trajectory including R_min. Without this, the geodesic equation (3.10) and the bounce are not fully established.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, after Eq. (3.18)] The sentence 'This evolution is illustrated in Fig. 3' appears to refer to the wrong figure; the GR collapse is shown in Fig. 1.
  2. [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.8)] The conclusion that equality of the two integrals forces equality of the upper limits assumes monotonicity of the integral in its upper limit; under the regularity conditions (2.58) one has h'(ψ)>0, but this should be stated explicitly.
  3. [Sec. 2.3, Eq. (2.53)] The notation in Eq. (2.53) is ambiguous: the integration constant and the scale factor are both denoted by variants of 'a'. Please use a distinct symbol, such as \mathcal{A}, for the integration constant.
  4. [Sec. 3.3.2, after Eq. (3.26)] The inequality R_min<R_-<R_+<R_0 is stated as 'always' satisfied but not proven; a short analytic demonstration for the D=5 Hayward case would make the claim easier to verify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction in the derivation chain; the dust bounce and FLRW bounce are derived consequences of the imported regularity and junction conditions, though those conditions are drawn from the authors' own earlier work.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: h(psi) is defined in (2.16), the vacuum equation is h(psi)=2M/r^{D-1} (2.29), and the regularity conditions (2.58) imply the inversion limit h^{-1}(x)->1/C. This yields the universal near-core form f~1-r^2/C in (2.32), and for FLRW it yields the small-scale-factor limit (2.60), whose solution is the cosh bounce (2.56). These are direct mathematical consequences of the stated conditions, not restatements of them. In the collapse section, the generalized Israel junction conditions (2.25)-(2.26), imported from [101,102] and [111], are applied to a dust surface with zero surface stress. The tau-tau component (3.4), together with the explicit integral expressions (3.5)-(3.8), gives f(R)Tdot = sqrt(1-eta_0^2), and hence the timelike geodesic equation (3.10). The bounce follows from the turning-point structure of that equation combined with f~1-r^2/C. No constant is fitted to data, and no prediction is an input renamed. The Birkhoff statement is re-derived from (2.27), not merely imported. The only caveat is that the completeness of the angular component of the second junction condition is assumed from the authors' prior work rather than re-derived here; if that completeness failed, equations (3.4)-(3.10) would be invalid. That is a correctness risk, not circularity, because the prior derivation does not assume the dust-bounce conclusion and the cited result is parameter-free with stated assumptions that do not include the target result.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result inherits its main assumptions from the authors' previous works: the regularity of the static solutions [14] and the junction conditions [101,102]. No new entities are introduced. The free parameters are theory couplings and example initial data, not fitted to observations.

free parameters (1)
  • alpha (Hayward coupling scale) = 0.05 in D=5 example; 0.05 in D=6 example
    Length^2 coupling defining the infinite tower via alpha_n = (D-2)/(D-2n) alpha^{n-1} for odd D, or (2.37) for even D. Chosen for illustration in the explicit examples; not fitted to data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Generalized junction conditions (2.25)-(2.26) from [101,102] are the correct second junction condition for the theory (2.8) on spherically symmetric configurations.
    The paper applies these conditions without re-deriving them; they come from the same authors' prior work and are load-bearing for the geodesic result.
  • domain assumption Regularity conditions (2.58) guarantee h^{-1} exists and f(r) ~ 1 - r^2/C near r=0, as established in [14].
    The bounce argument relies on f(0)=1 and the de Sitter core behavior, which are imported from the authors' previous regular-black-hole paper.
  • domain assumption The interior dust star is exactly described by the FLRW ansatz (2.42) with spherical sections for all times, and the exterior is the static vacuum solution by Birkhoff.
    The matching construction assumes these metric forms remain valid throughout the collapse, including after the bounce.
  • domain assumption The matter is pressureless dust with no surface stress-energy on the junction.
    The collapse model and the vanishing surface stress-energy tensor in the junction conditions require the dust to be pressureless and the surface to be a timelike boundary.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Regular black holes from Oppenheimer-Snyder collapse." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KDQQ4OEX

@misc{pith2026250509680,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Regular black holes from Oppenheimer-Snyder collapse},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KDQQ4OEX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09680}
}
abstract

It has been recently shown that regular black holes arise as the unique spherically symmetric solutions of broad families of generalizations of Einstein gravity involving infinite towers of higher-curvature corrections in $D\geq 5$ spacetime dimensions. In this paper we argue that such regular black holes arise as the byproduct of the gravitational collapse of pressureless dust stars. We show that, just like for Einstein gravity, the modified junction conditions for these models impose that the dust particles on the star surface follow geodesic trajectories on the corresponding black hole background. Generically, in these models the star collapses until it reaches a minimum size (and a maximum density) inside the inner horizon of the black hole it creates. Then, it bounces back and reappears through a white hole in a different universe, where it eventually reaches its original size and restarts the process. Along the way, we study FLRW cosmologies in the same theories that regularize black hole singularities. We find that the cosmological evolution is completely smooth, with the big bang and big crunch singularities predicted by Einstein gravity replaced by cosmological bounces.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 11 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Regular Black Holes in Nonlocal Quasitopological Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Infinite-derivative completions of quasitopological gravities are ghost-free, avoid strong coupling, and admit exact spherically symmetric vacuum regular black holes obeying a perturbative Birkhoff theorem.

  2. Obstructions to Minimal Regular Black Hole Cosmologies

    gr-qc 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Obstructions from matching conditions and completeness theorems prevent minimal regular black hole models from hosting unbounded FRW daughter cosmologies.

  3. All $2D$ generalised dilaton theories from $d\geq 4$ gravities

    hep-th 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Generic 2D Horndeski theories arise from dimensional reduction of d≥4 gravities, yielding a Birkhoff theorem for quasi-topological gravities where static spherically symmetric solutions satisfy g_tt g_rr = -1 and are ...

  4. Quasitopological Gravity with Matter: Modified Double-Copy Approach

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Spherically symmetric quasitopological gravity with matter is mapped exactly to a flat-space nonlinear gauge theory in D+1 dimensions, with the Einstein limit giving Maxwell theory.

  5. Asymmetric Quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder Collapse

    gr-qc 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Asymmetric loop-quantum-cosmology collapse of a dust ball yields a geodesically complete, bouncing regular black hole spacetime with a C^0 shock at the dust surface and two joined vacuum geometries.

  6. Charging up regular black holes

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Charged Bardeen and Hayward metrics become singular under deformed Einstein–Maxwell equations; more stringent regularity conditions are derived and improved regular charged metrics are constructed.

  7. Holographic explorations of regular black holes in pure gravity

    hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Regular, asymptotically AdS black holes are shown to exist in pure quasi-topological gravity, and their thermodynamics, quasinormal modes, Wilson loops, and a Type IIB field redefinition map are worked out.

  8. Vaidya-Type Solutions of Quasitopological Gravity Interacting with Nonlinear Electrodynamics

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Radiating (Vaidya-type) charged black holes in quasitopological gravity are generated from static ones by promoting mass and charge to functions of time, with the required currents and radiation fluxes constructed explicitly.

  9. Quasinormal spectra of higher dimensional regular black holes in theories with infinite curvature corrections

    gr-qc 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For six families of higher-dimensional regular black holes, positive higher-curvature coupling reduces quasinormal-mode oscillation frequencies and damping rates, a trend verified at low and eikonal multipoles.

  10. Can we distinguish whether black holes have singularities or not through echoes and light rings?

    gr-qc 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In the Bardeen and Hayward black hole families, the singular type II branch can have two light rings and echo-like quasinormal signals, while regular black holes have one light ring.

  11. Thermodynamic Phase Transitions and Quantum Entropy Corrections in the Simpson-Visser Regular Black Hole

    gr-qc 2025-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    For the Simpson-Visser regular black hole, the heat capacity diverges at a = √2 m, but the claimed quantum entropy corrections are internally inconsistent: the 1/a² term has the wrong sign and the remnant-entropy form...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

132 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 11 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J. R. Oppenheimer and H. Snyder, On Continued gravitational contraction, Phys. Rev. 56 (1939) 455–459

  2. [2]

    Penrose, Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities , Phys

    R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities , Phys. Rev. Lett. 14 (1965) 57–59

  3. [3]

    Penrose, Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity , Riv

    R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity , Riv. Nuovo Cim. 1 (1969) 252–276

  4. [4]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, One loop divergencies in the theory of gravitation , Ann. Inst. H. Poincare A Phys. Theor. 20 (1974) 69–94

  5. [5]

    M. H. Goroff and A. Sagnotti, The Ultraviolet Behavior of Einstein Gravity , Nucl. Phys. B 266 (1986) 709–736

  6. [6]

    Zwiebach, Curvature Squared Terms and String Theories , Phys

    B. Zwiebach, Curvature Squared Terms and String Theories , Phys. Lett. B 156 (1985) 315–317

  7. [7]

    D. J. Gross and J. H. Sloan, The Quartic Effective Action for the Heterotic String , Nucl. Phys. B 291 (1987) 41–89

  8. [8]

    M. T. Grisaru and D. Zanon, σ Model Superstring Corrections to the Einstein-hilbert Action , Phys. Lett. B 177 (1986) 347–351

Show all 132 references
  1. [9]

    A. D. Sakharov, Vacuum Quantum Fluctuations in Curved Space and the Theory of Gravitation, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 177 (1967), no. 1 70–71

  2. [10]

    Visser, Sakharov’s induced gravity: A Modern perspective , Mod

    M. Visser, Sakharov’s induced gravity: A Modern perspective , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17 (2002) 977–992 [gr-qc/0204062]

  3. [11]

    Endlich, V

    S. Endlich, V. Gorbenko, J. Huang and L. Senatore, An effective formalism for testing extensions to General Relativity with gravitational waves , JHEP 09 (2017) 122 [ 1704.01590]

  4. [12]

    Eichhorn, Asymptotically safe gravity , in 57th International School of Subnuclear Physics: In Search for the Unexpected , 2, 2020

    A. Eichhorn, Asymptotically safe gravity , in 57th International School of Subnuclear Physics: In Search for the Unexpected , 2, 2020. 2003.00044. – 24 –

  5. [13]

    J. N. Borissova and B. Dittrich, Towards effective actions for the continuum limit of spin foams, Class. Quant. Grav. 40 (2023), no. 10 105006 [ 2207.03307]

  6. [14]

    Bueno, P

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano and R. A. Hennigar, Regular black holes from pure gravity , Phys. Lett. B 861 (2025) 139260 [ 2403.04827]

  7. [15]

    Oliva and S

    J. Oliva and S. Ray, A new cubic theory of gravity in five dimensions: Black hole, Birkhoff’s theorem and C-function, Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 225002 [ 1003.4773]

  8. [16]

    R. C. Myers and B. Robinson, Black Holes in Quasi-topological Gravity , JHEP 08 (2010) 067 [1003.5357]

  9. [17]

    M. H. Dehghani, A. Bazrafshan, R. B. Mann, M. R. Mehdizadeh, M. Ghanaatian and M. H. Vahidinia, Black Holes in Quartic Quasitopological Gravity , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 104009 [1109.4708]

  10. [18]

    Ahmed, R

    J. Ahmed, R. A. Hennigar, R. B. Mann and M. Mir, Quintessential Quartic Quasi-topological Quartet, JHEP 05 (2017) 134 [ 1703.11007]

  11. [19]

    Cisterna, L

    A. Cisterna, L. Guajardo, M. Hassaine and J. Oliva, Quintic quasi-topological gravity, JHEP 04 (2017) 066 [ 1702.04676]

  12. [20]

    Bueno, P

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano and R. A. Hennigar, (Generalized) quasi-topological gravities at all orders, Class. Quant. Grav. 37 (2020), no. 1 015002 [ 1909.07983]

  13. [21]

    Bueno, P

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, M. Lu and J. Moreno, Generalized quasi-topological gravities: the whole shebang , Class. Quant. Grav. 40 (2023), no. 1 015004 [ 2203.05589]

  14. [22]

    Moreno and ´A

    J. Moreno and ´A. J. Murcia, Classification of generalized quasitopological gravities, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 4 044016 [ 2304.08510]

  15. [23]

    Bueno, P

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, J. Moreno and ´A. Murcia, All higher-curvature gravities as Generalized quasi-topological gravities, JHEP 11 (2019) 062 [ 1906.00987]

  16. [24]

    P. A. Cano and ´A. Murcia, Electromagnetic Quasitopological Gravities, JHEP 10 (2020) 125 [2007.04331]

  17. [25]

    P. A. Cano and ´A. Murcia, Resolution of Reissner-Nordstr¨ om singularities by higher-derivative corrections, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021), no. 7 075014 [ 2006.15149]

  18. [26]

    Bueno, P

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, J. Moreno and G. van der Velde, Regular black holes in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 2 L021501 [ 2104.10172]

  19. [27]

    Bueno, O

    P. Bueno, O. Lasso Andino, J. Moreno and G. van der Velde, On regular charged black holes in three dimensions, 2503.02930

  20. [28]

    Arciniega, P

    G. Arciniega, P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, J. D. Edelstein, R. A. Hennigar and L. G. Jaime, Geometric Inflation, Phys. Lett. B 802 (2020) 135242 [ 1812.11187]

  21. [29]

    P. Wang, H. Wu, H. Yang and S. Ying, Non-singular string cosmology via α′ corrections, JHEP 10 (2019) 263 [ 1909.00830]

  22. [30]

    P. G. S. Fernandes, Singularity resolution and inflation from an infinite tower of regularized curvature corrections, 2504.07692

  23. [31]

    P. G. S. Fernandes, Regular BTZ black holes from an infinite tower of corrections , 2504.08565. – 25 –

  24. [32]

    A. D. Sakharov, Nachal’naia stadija rasshirenija Vselennoj i vozniknovenije neodnorodnosti raspredelenija veshchestva, Sov. Phys. JETP 22 (1966) 241

  25. [33]

    Bardeen, Non-singular general relativistic gravitational collapse , in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity , p

    J. Bardeen, Non-singular general relativistic gravitational collapse , in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity , p. 87, Sept., 1968

  26. [34]

    Poisson and W

    E. Poisson and W. Israel, Structure of the Black Hole Nucleus , Class. Quant. Grav. 5 (1988) L201–L205

  27. [35]

    Dymnikova, Vacuum nonsingular black hole , Gen

    I. Dymnikova, Vacuum nonsingular black hole , Gen. Rel. Grav. 24 (1992) 235–242

  28. [36]

    S. A. Hayward, Formation and evaporation of regular black holes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 031103 [gr-qc/0506126]

  29. [37]

    V. P. Frolov, Information loss problem and a ’black hole‘ model with a closed apparent horizon , JHEP 05 (2014) 049 [ 1402.5446]

  30. [38]

    Carballo-Rubio, F

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, C. Pacilio and M. Visser, On the viability of regular black holes, JHEP 07 (2018) 023 [ 1805.02675]

  31. [39]

    Carballo-Rubio, F

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati and M. Visser, Phenomenological aspects of black holes beyond general relativity , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 12 124009 [ 1809.08238]

  32. [40]

    Carballo-Rubio, F

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati and M. Visser, Opening the Pandora’s box at the core of black holes , Class. Quant. Grav. 37 (2020), no. 14 14 [ 1908.03261]

  33. [41]

    Carballo-Rubio, F

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati and M. Visser, Geodesically complete black holes , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 084047 [ 1911.11200]

  34. [42]

    Franzin, S

    E. Franzin, S. Liberati, J. Mazza and V. Vellucci, Stable rotating regular black holes , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022), no. 10 104060 [ 2207.08864]

  35. [43]

    Ghosh, M

    R. Ghosh, M. Rahman and A. K. Mishra, Regularized stable Kerr black hole: cosmic censorships, shadow and quasi-normal modes , Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023), no. 1 91 [2209.12291]

  36. [44]

    Vagnozzi et

    S. Vagnozzi et. al., Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A , Class. Quant. Grav. 40 (2023), no. 16 165007 [2205.07787]

  37. [45]

    Pedrotti and S

    D. Pedrotti and S. Vagnozzi, Quasinormal modes-shadow correspondence for rotating regular black holes, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 8 084075 [ 2404.07589]

  38. [46]

    Calz` a, D

    M. Calz` a, D. Pedrotti and S. Vagnozzi,Primordial regular black holes as all the dark matter. II. Non-time-radial-symmetric and loop quantum gravity-inspired metrics , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025), no. 2 024010 [ 2409.02807]

  39. [47]

    Calz` a, D

    M. Calz` a, D. Pedrotti and S. Vagnozzi,Primordial regular black holes as all the dark matter. I. Time-radial-symmetric metrics , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025), no. 2 024009 [ 2409.02804]

  40. [48]

    P. C. W. Davies, D. A. Easson and P. B. Levin, Nonsingular black holes as dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025), no. 10 103512 [ 2410.21577]

  41. [49]

    Borissova, S

    J. Borissova, S. Liberati and M. Visser, Violations of the null convergence condition in kinematical transitions between singular and regular black holes, horizonless compact objects, and bounces, 2502.00548. – 26 –

  42. [50]

    Coviello, L

    C. Coviello, L. Lehner and V. Vellucci, Tidal response of regular black holes , 2503.04287

  43. [51]

    Carballo-Rubio et

    R. Carballo-Rubio et. al., Towards a non-singular paradigm of black hole physics , JCAP 05 (2025) 003 [ 2501.05505]

  44. [52]

    V. P. Frolov, M. A. Markov and V. F. Mukhanov, THROUGH A BLACK HOLE INTO A NEW UNIVERSE?, Phys. Lett. B 216 (1989) 272–276

  45. [53]

    Barrabes and V

    C. Barrabes and V. P. Frolov, How many new worlds are inside a black hole? , Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 3215–3223 [ hep-th/9511136]

  46. [54]

    D. A. Easson, Hawking radiation of nonsingular black holes in two-dimensions , JHEP 02 (2003) 037 [ hep-th/0210016]

  47. [55]

    Nicolini, A

    P. Nicolini, A. Smailagic and E. Spallucci, Noncommutative geometry inspired Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Lett. B 632 (2006) 547–551 [ gr-qc/0510112]

  48. [56]

    G. J. Olmo and D. Rubiera-Garcia, Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes in extended Palatini theories, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 044014 [ 1207.6004]

  49. [57]

    A. B. Balakin, J. P. S. Lemos and A. E. Zayats, Regular nonminimal magnetic black holes in spacetimes with a cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016), no. 2 024008 [ 1512.02653]

  50. [58]

    Bazeia, L

    D. Bazeia, L. Losano, G. J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Garcia and A. Sanchez-Puente, Classical resolution of black hole singularities in arbitrary dimension , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015), no. 4 044018 [1507.07763]

  51. [59]

    A. H. Chamseddine and V. Mukhanov, Nonsingular Black Hole , Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017), no. 3 183 [ 1612.05861]

  52. [60]

    Bambi, D

    C. Bambi, D. Rubiera-Garcia and Y. Wang, Black hole solutions in functional extensions of Born-Infeld gravity, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016), no. 6 064002 [ 1608.04873]

  53. [61]

    D. A. Easson, Nonsingular Schwarzschild–de Sitter black hole , Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018), no. 23 235005 [ 1712.09455]

  54. [62]

    Bejarano, G

    C. Bejarano, G. J. Olmo and D. Rubiera-Garcia, What is a singular black hole beyond General Relativity?, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017), no. 6 064043 [ 1702.01292]

  55. [63]

    Coll´ eaux, S

    A. Coll´ eaux, S. Chinaglia and S. Zerbini, Nonpolynomial Lagrangian approach to regular black holes, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27 (2018), no. 03 1830002 [ 1712.03730]

  56. [64]

    P. A. Cano, S. Chimento, T. Ort´ ın and A. Ruip´ erez,Regular Stringy Black Holes? , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 4 046014 [ 1806.08377]

  57. [65]

    Colleaux, Regular black hole and cosmological spacetimes in Non-Polynomial Gravity theories

    A. Colleaux, Regular black hole and cosmological spacetimes in Non-Polynomial Gravity theories. PhD thesis, Trento U., 6, 2019

  58. [66]

    Guerrero and D

    M. Guerrero and D. Rubiera-Garcia, Nonsingular black holes in nonlinear gravity coupled to Euler-Heisenberg electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 2 024005 [ 2005.08828]

  59. [67]

    Brandenberger, L

    R. Brandenberger, L. Heisenberg and J. Robnik, Through a black hole into a new universe , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 30 (2021), no. 14 2142001 [ 2105.07166]

  60. [68]

    G. J. Olmo and D. Rubiera-Garcia, Regular black holes in Palatini gravity , 2209.05061

  61. [69]

    Biasi, O

    A. Biasi, O. Evnin and S. Sypsas, de Sitter Bubbles from Anti–de Sitter Fluctuations , Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022), no. 25 251104 [ 2209.06835]. – 27 –

  62. [70]

    J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo and M. E. Rodrigues, Black holes and regular black holes in coincidentf(Q, BQ) gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics, 2402.02534

  63. [71]

    Ovalle, Schwarzschild black hole revisited: Before the complete collapse , Phys

    J. Ovalle, Schwarzschild black hole revisited: Before the complete collapse , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 10 104032 [ 2405.06731]

  64. [72]

    Alencar, K

    G. Alencar, K. A. Bronnikov, M. E. Rodrigues, D. S´ aez-Chill´ on G´ omez and M. V. de S. Silva, On black bounce space-times in non-linear electrodynamics , Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024), no. 7 745 [2403.12897]

  65. [73]

    K. A. Bronnikov, Regular black holes as an alternative to black bounce , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 2 024021 [ 2404.14816]

  66. [74]

    S. V. Bolokhov, K. A. Bronnikov and M. V. Skvortsova, A Regular Center Instead of a Black Bounce, Grav. Cosmol. 30 (2024), no. 3 265–278 [ 2405.09124]

  67. [75]

    Skvortsova, Ringing of Extreme Regular Black Holes , Grav

    M. Skvortsova, Ringing of Extreme Regular Black Holes , Grav. Cosmol. 30 (2024), no. 3 279–288 [2405.15807]

  68. [76]

    Ayon-Beato and A

    E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 5056–5059 [ gr-qc/9911046]

  69. [77]

    K. A. Bronnikov, Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics , Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 044005 [ gr-qc/0006014]

  70. [78]

    Ayon-Beato and A

    E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole , Phys. Lett. B 493 (2000) 149–152 [ gr-qc/0009077]

  71. [79]

    K. A. Bronnikov, Comment on ‘Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics’, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 4641

  72. [80]

    Ayon-Beato and A

    E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, Four parametric regular black hole solution , Gen. Rel. Grav. 37 (2005) 635 [ hep-th/0403229]

  73. [81]

    Dymnikova, Regular electrically charged structures in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to general relativity, Class

    I. Dymnikova, Regular electrically charged structures in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to general relativity, Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 4417–4429 [ gr-qc/0407072]

  74. [82]

    Berej, J

    W. Berej, J. Matyjasek, D. Tryniecki and M. Woronowicz, Regular black holes in quadratic gravity, Gen. Rel. Grav. 38 (2006) 885–906 [ hep-th/0606185]

  75. [83]

    Balart and E

    L. Balart and E. C. Vagenas, Regular black hole metrics and the weak energy condition , Phys. Lett. B 730 (2014) 14–17 [ 1401.2136]

  76. [84]

    Fan, Critical phenomena of regular black holes in anti-de Sitter space-time , Eur

    Z.-Y. Fan, Critical phenomena of regular black holes in anti-de Sitter space-time , Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017), no. 4 266 [ 1609.04489]

  77. [85]

    K. A. Bronnikov, Nonlinear electrodynamics, regular black holes and wormholes , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27 (2018), no. 06 1841005 [ 1711.00087]

  78. [86]

    Shojai, A

    F. Shojai, A. Sadeghi and R. Hassannejad, Generalized Oppenheimer–Snyder gravitational collapse into regular black holes , Class. Quant. Grav. 39 (2022), no. 8 085003 [ 2202.14024]

  79. [87]

    J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo and M. E. Rodrigues, (Regular) Black holes in conformal Killing gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics and scalar fields , Class. Quant. Grav. 41 (2024), no. 5 055012 [ 2310.19508]. – 28 –

  80. [88]

    Murk and I

    S. Murk and I. Soranidis, Light rings and causality for nonsingular ultracompact objects sourced by nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 4 044064 [ 2406.07957]

  81. [89]

    Li and H

    Z.-C. Li and H. L¨ u,Regular electric black holes from Einstein-Maxwell-scalar gravity , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 10 104046 [ 2407.07952]

  82. [90]

    Zhang, L

    X.-Y. Zhang, L. Zhao and Y.-Q. Wang, Bardeen-Dirac stars in Anti-de Sitter spacetime , JCAP 01 (2025) 117 [ 2409.14402]

  83. [91]

    Erices, L

    C. Erices, L. Guajardo and K. Lara, Reverse stealth construction and its thermodynamic imprints, JCAP 03 (2025) 051 [ 2410.13719]

  84. [92]

    Estrada and R

    M. Estrada and R. Aros, Pure Lovelock Gravity regular black holes , 2409.09559

  85. [93]

    Huang and X.-P

    H. Huang and X.-P. Rao, Regular black holes and their singular families , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025), no. 10 104040 [ 2503.13133]

  86. [94]

    Calz´ a, M

    M. Calz´ a, M. Rinaldi and S. Zerbini, Topological regular black holes without Cauchy horizon , 2505.04427

  87. [95]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Infinite tower of higher-curvature corrections: Quasinormal modes and late-time behavior of D-dimensional regular black holes , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 10 104005 [ 2403.07848]

  88. [96]

    Di Filippo, I

    F. Di Filippo, I. Kol´ aˇ r and D. Kubiznak,Inner-extremal regular black holes from pure gravity , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025), no. 4 L041505 [ 2404.07058]

  89. [97]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Dymnikova black hole from an infinite tower of higher-curvature corrections, Phys. Lett. B 856 (2024) 138945 [ 2404.09063]

  90. [98]

    Ma and Y.-Q

    T.-X. Ma and Y.-Q. Wang, Frozen boson stars in an infinite tower of higher-derivative gravity , 2406.08813

  91. [99]

    V. P. Frolov, A. Koek, J. P. Soto and A. Zelnikov, Regular black holes inspired by quasitopological gravity, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025), no. 4 044034 [ 2411.16050]

  92. [100]

    Wang, S.-P

    S.-W. Wang, S.-P. Wu and S.-W. Wei, Are regular black holes from pure gravity classified within the same thermodynamical topology? , Phys. Lett. B 864 (2025) 139402 [ 2412.05811]

  93. [101]

    Bueno, P

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar and A. J. Murcia, Dynamical Formation of Regular Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025), no. 18 181401 [ 2412.02742]

  94. [102]

    Bueno, P

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar and A. J. Murcia, Regular black holes from thin-shell collapse, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025), no. 10 104009 [ 2412.02740]

  95. [103]

    P. S. Joshi, ed., Gravitational Collapse and Spacetime Singularities . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 9, 2012

  96. [104]

    Ilha and J

    A. Ilha and J. P. S. Lemos, Dimensionally continued Oppenheimer-Snyder gravitational collapse. 1. Solutions in even dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 1788–1794 [gr-qc/9608004]

  97. [105]

    Padmanabhan, Some aspects of field equations in generalised theories of gravity , Phys

    T. Padmanabhan, Some aspects of field equations in generalised theories of gravity , Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 124041 [ 1109.3846]

  98. [106]

    Lovelock, Divergence-free tensorial concomitants, aequationes mathematicae 4 (1970), no

    D. Lovelock, Divergence-free tensorial concomitants, aequationes mathematicae 4 (1970), no. 1 127–138

  99. [107]

    Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations , J

    D. Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations , J. Math. Phys. 12 (1971) 498–501. – 29 –

  100. [108]

    Padmanabhan and D

    T. Padmanabhan and D. Kothawala, Lanczos-Lovelock models of gravity, Phys. Rept. 531 (2013) 115–171 [ 1302.2151]

  101. [109]

    G. W. Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10 (1974) 363–384

  102. [110]

    Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity , Nuovo Cim

    W. Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity , Nuovo Cim. B 44S10 (1966) 1. [Erratum: Nuovo Cim.B 48, 463 (1967)]

  103. [111]

    Padilla and V

    A. Padilla and V. Sivanesan, Boundary Terms and Junction Conditions for Generalized Scalar-Tensor Theories, JHEP 08 (2012) 122 [ 1206.1258]

  104. [112]

    R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C. W. Misner, Canonical variables for general relativity , Phys. Rev. 117 (1960) 1595–1602

  105. [113]

    R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C. W. Misner, Coordinate invariance and energy expressions in general relativity, Phys. Rev. 122 (1961) 997

  106. [114]

    Deser and B

    S. Deser and B. Tekin, Energy in generic higher curvature gravity theories , Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 084009 [ hep-th/0212292]

  107. [115]

    Moreno and ´A

    J. Moreno and ´A. J. Murcia, Cosmological higher-curvature gravities, Class. Quant. Grav. 41 (2024), no. 13 135017 [ 2311.12104]

  108. [116]

    Smoller and B

    J. Smoller and B. Temple, Shock-wave solutions of the einstein equations: The oppenheimer–snyder model of gravitational collapse extended to the case of non-zero pressure , Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 128 (1994), no. 3 249–297

  109. [117]

    Poisson, A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics

    E. Poisson, A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics . Cambridge University Press, 12, 2009

  110. [118]

    D. G. Boulware and S. Deser, String Generated Gravity Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 2656

  111. [119]

    J. T. Wheeler, Symmetric Solutions to the Gauss-Bonnet Extended Einstein Equations , Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 737–746

  112. [120]

    Lemaitre, The Expanding Universe , Mon

    G. Lemaitre, The Expanding Universe , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 91 (1931) 490–501

  113. [121]

    R. C. Tolman, Effect of imhomogeneity on cosmological models , Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 20 (1934) 169–176

  114. [122]

    Bondi, Spherically symmetrical models in general relativity , Mon

    H. Bondi, Spherically symmetrical models in general relativity , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 107 (1947) 410–425

  115. [123]

    Christodoulou, Violation of cosmic censorship in the gravitational collapse of a dust cloud , Commun

    D. Christodoulou, Violation of cosmic censorship in the gravitational collapse of a dust cloud , Commun. Math. Phys. 93 (1984) 171–195

  116. [124]

    H. A. Buchdahl, General Relativistic Fluid Spheres , Phys. Rev. 116 (1959) 1027

  117. [125]

    Bueno, P

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, ´A. J. Murcia and A. Vicente-Cano, Buchdahl’s Theorem in Quasitopological Gravity, to appear (2025)

  118. [126]

    R. A. Hennigar, D. Kubiznak, S. Murk and I. Soranidis, Thermodynamics of Regular Black Holes in Anti-de Sitter Space , to appear (2025)

  119. [127]

    Davies and H

    I. Davies and H. S. Reall, Nonperturbative Second Law of Black Hole Mechanics in Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024), no. 17 171402 [ 2312.07659]. – 30 –

  120. [128]

    Hollands, R

    S. Hollands, R. M. Wald and V. G. Zhang, Entropy of dynamical black holes , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 2 024070 [ 2402.00818]

  121. [129]

    A. C. Wall and Z. Yan, Linearized second law for higher curvature gravity and nonminimally coupled vector fields, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 8 084005 [ 2402.05411]

  122. [130]

    M. W. Choptuik, Universality and scaling in gravitational collapse of a massless scalar field , Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 9–12

  123. [131]

    Golod and T

    S. Golod and T. Piran, Choptuik’s Critical Phenomenon in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 104015 [ 1201.6384]

  124. [132]

    Deppe, C

    N. Deppe, C. D. Leonard, T. Taves, G. Kunstatter and R. B. Mann, Critical Collapse in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity in Five and Six Dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 104011 [1208.5250]. – 31 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.