Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 major objections 4 minor 72 references

This paper claims that adding quantum-gravity and dark-matter corrections to a rotating black hole makes photon trajectories increasingly chaotic as the correction strengths grow.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 04:40 UTC pith:KDR6W4L7

load-bearing objection The abstract says the quantum and PFDM parameters drive photons toward chaos, but the paper's own Lyapunov and KS-entropy curves decay to regular motion, and the printed formulas fail standard Schwarzschild limits – the central claim is contradicted by the paper's own evidence. the 6 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14170 v1 pith:KDR6W4L7 submitted 2026-07-15 gr-qc

Probing Quantum Gravity through Chaotic Orbits and Strong-Field Effects in Kerr Black Holes Embedded in Perfect Fluid Dark Matter

Shubham Kala , Sara Saghafi , M. Yousaf , Hemwati Nandan , Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov , Chengxun Yuan , G. Mustafa This is my paper
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C1037D45
keywords quantum-improved black holesperfect fluid dark matterphoton chaosnull geodesicsLyapunov exponentsKolmogorov-Sinai entropyweighted Birkhoff averagesblack hole shadow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a rotating black hole metric that combines renormalization-group quantum corrections (parameter ω̃) with a perfect-fluid dark matter environment (parameter ζ), then studies how these parameters affect the motion of light rays. It claims that increasing either parameter transforms photon dynamics from regular, quasi-periodic orbits into chaotic motion: the invariant tori in phase space fragment, chaotic bands spread, and indicators such as Lyapunov exponents, KS entropy, and weighted Birkhoff averages all confirm stronger sensitivity to initial conditions. If true, the result matters because it links two speculative additions to gravity — quantum improvement and dark matter halos — to observable optical signatures like black hole shadows and lensing, and to timing variability in accretion flows.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in the quantum-improved Kerr metric surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter, the two extra parameters ω̃ and ζ act as chaos-inducing controls on null geodesics. Starting from a spherically symmetric seed metric with lapse function f(r)=1−2GM/(r+ω̃G)+ζ/r ln(r/|ζ|), the authors apply a standard non-complexification rotation prescription to obtain a Kerr-like rotating metric whose mass profile is m(r)=GM r²/(r²+ω̃G) − (ζ/2) ln(r/|ζ|). They then analyze the photon phase space with Poincaré sections, Lyapunov exponents, Kolmogorov–Sinai entropy, and weighted Birkhoff averages. Their numerical results show that raising ζ or ω̃ deforms and fragments the invariant t

What carries the argument

The machinery is a two-parameter rotating metric (Eqs. 21–22) with mass function m(r)=GM r²/(r²+ω̃G)−(ζ/2)ln(r/|ζ|), which reduces to Kerr when ω̃=ζ=0. The logarithmic PFDM term and the RG-improved coupling G(r)=G/(1+ω̃G/r²) modify the effective potential for photons. The paper uses four complementary diagnostics to classify orbits: Poincaré sections, the largest Lyapunov exponent and fast Lyapunov indicator, Kolmogorov–Sinai entropy (via the sum of positive Lyapunov exponents), and the weighted Birkhoff average with its difference-based chaos indicator (DIC), which provides a fast, quantitative map of regular and chaotic regions in phase space.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument rests on the unverified assumption that the two-parameter metric obtained by applying the rotation algorithm to the quantum-improved dark-matter seed is a genuine rotating black hole—with a real event horizon for the scanned parameters—whose geodesic flow is non-integrable, so the plotted scattered points are physical chaos rather than projection artifacts.

What would settle it

Integrate the full non-equatorial geodesic equations for the metric (21)–(22) at the parameter values used in Figs. 2–4 and compute the full Lyapunov spectrum or a frequency analysis (e.g., spectral entropy) on a dense grid of initial conditions; if the scattered Poincaré points disappear when the section is taken with a different projection or when the Hamiltonian is numerically verified to be integrable, the chaos claim fails. More directly: check whether ∆(r)=r²+a²−2m(r)r has a positive root for, say, ω̃=0.8, ζ=0.4, a=0.4—if no event horizon exists for the plotted parameters, the orbits are

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, black hole shadows and lensing images computed from this metric will show parameter-dependent signatures: increasing ζ or ω̃ shifts the photon sphere radii and changes the instability timescales of null circular orbits.
  • The chaotic transition implies that photon trajectories in strong-field regimes can become unpredictable over long integration times, with implications for ray-tracing and accretion-disk imaging codes.
  • Because the equatorial motion is integrable (as the paper notes), the chaos is a genuinely non-equatorial effect; any observational test would need to access off-equatorial photon paths.
  • The KS-entropy growth implies faster loss of predictability in the photon flow, which could appear as decorrelation timescales in high-frequency variability from black hole accretion environments.
  • The paper explicitly suggests QPO-related observables: parameter-dependent shifts in photon orbital frequencies could show up in quasi-periodic oscillation timing from accreting black holes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A concrete extension would be to compute the shadow boundary and lensing deflection angles from the metric (21)–(22) and compare them with Event Horizon Telescope-like observations to place upper bounds on ω̃ and ζ; the paper's chaos analysis does not itself yield an observational prediction, but it identifies the parameter range where such signatures would be visible.
  • There is a quantitative tension between the decreased Lyapunov exponent of the circular orbits (Sec. IV) and the overall growth of phase-space chaos claimed in the abstract; separating these two notions—local circular-orbit instability versus global geodesic chaos—would sharpen the physical interpretation.
  • If the chaotic regions are as large as the DIC maps suggest, long-time geodesic integration in this spacetime is genuinely unpredictable, which could affect numerical relativity and plasma-photon interaction simulations that assume stable photon rings.
  • The non-integrability of the full four-dimensional flow is asserted but not proved; a Melnikov-type or frequency-analysis calculation on the non-equatorial reduction would settle whether the scattered points are real chaos rather than artifacts of projecting a quasi-periodic higher-dimensional flow onto a two-dimensional surface.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

6 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a rotating 'quantum-improved Kerr' metric surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter by applying the Azreg-Aïnou algorithm to a static seed with RG-improved Newton constant, and then studies null geodesic dynamics. The central claim is that increasing the quantum-improvement parameter ω̃ and the PFDM parameter ζ drives photon motion from regular to chaotic, with quantitative support claimed from Poincaré sections, Lyapunov indicators (LLE, FLI), Kolmogorov–Sinai entropy, and weighted Birkhoff averages (WBA/DIC). The paper also derives expressions for the null circular orbit radii, critical impact parameter, and null Lyapunov exponent, and argues for observational implications for shadows and lensing.

Significance. The topic is timely, and the use of multiple independent diagnostics (Poincaré sections, LLE/FLI, KS entropy, WBA/DIC) is in principle a strength. If the claimed regular-to-chaotic transition with ω̃ and ζ were established for a validated black hole spacetime, it would be of interest to the strong-field gravity and quantum-gravity phenomenology communities. However, the manuscript has load-bearing errors: the paper's own Lyapunov and KS-entropy curves indicate convergence to regular motion, contradicting the abstract; the null Lyapunov formula (44) and critical impact parameter (39) fail simple Schwarzschild limits; the rotating spacetime's horizon structure is not checked for the plotted parameters; the chaos diagnostics are based on an under-specified system; and the 'independent' KS entropy is computed from the same largest Lyapunov exponent. These issues collectively invalidate the central claims as presented.

major comments (6)
  1. [Abstract; Secs. IV, VI, VII] The abstract claims a 'transition from regular to chaotic motion' and that ω̃ and ζ 'enhance the sensitivity of photon trajectories to initial conditions.' The paper's own quantitative sections state the opposite: Sec. IV says both parameters 'reduce the instability of black hole spacetime'; Sec. VI reports that the LLE curves 'gradually mov[e] towards the monotic decay' and that 'the similar pattern of gradually monotonic decay in the asymptotic dynamics regime is observed'; Sec. VII describes KS entropy oscillations that 'gradually decrease as the time increases, indicating the transition towards weak chaotic and regular motion.' A Lyapunov exponent decaying to zero and an entropy damping to zero are diagnostics of regular/quasi-periodic motion, not of growing chaos. This is a direct contradiction of the central claim, not a wording issue.
  2. [Eq. (44), Fig. 1] The null Lyapunov formula (44) fails the Schwarzschild test. Setting a=0, ω̃=ζ=0, m=M, r_c=3M gives 2∆_c − r_c²∆_c'' = −12M² and denominator 2r_c²(r_c²)² = 1458M⁶, hence λ² = −12/(1458M⁴) < 0 with the wrong dimension. The standard Schwarzschild photon-sphere Lyapunov exponent is λ² = 1/(27M²). Therefore Eq. (44) cannot be the expression used to produce the positive λ² values in Fig. 1; either the derivation from Eq. (43) is wrong or the plotted quantity is not the stated one. This invalidates the circular-orbit stability analysis.
  3. [Eq. (39)] The critical impact parameter formula (39) is also incorrect in the Schwarzschild limit. For a=0 it reduces to |b_c| = r_c√(2Mr_c∆_c)/(2Mr_c−r_c²), which at r_c=3M gives |b_c|=3√2 M, whereas the exact Schwarzschild photon-sphere impact parameter is 3√3 M. The correct circular-orbit relation is b_c = a ± 4r_c√∆_c/∆'_c. Since b_c enters Eq. (44), the numerical Lyapunov values and the photon-sphere plots are affected by this error as well.
  4. [Sec. II, Eqs. (21)–(23); Fig. 1] The rotating metric is generated from the effective mass (22) without verifying that it solves the Einstein equations with the PFDM energy-momentum tensor, and without checking the horizon condition ∆(r)=0 for the scanned parameters. For the right panel of Fig. 1, M=1, a=0.4, ζ=0.2, ω̃=0.4, numerical evaluation of Eq. (22) gives ∆(r)>0 for all r>0, i.e. no event horizon; for ζ=0.2, ω̃=0.2 a horizon may exist, but the plotted range r_c∈[0.6,2.0] anyway extends below the classical Kerr horizon r₊≈1.92. The authors must restrict to genuinely black-hole parameter sets, state the horizon radii, and show that the spacetime is a valid solution before drawing physical conclusions.
  5. [Secs. III, V; Eq. (36)] The chaos analysis is under-specified. The Poincaré sections are described as constructed at θ=π/2 with pθ>0 and as using 'the equations of motion given in Eqs. 34-36,' but Eq. (36) is the equatorial radial equation and no equation for θ̇ or the Carter constant is provided. The equatorial reduction of Sec. III is Liouville integrable (one radial degree of freedom with two conserved quantities), so any claim of chaos in the (r,ṙ) sections must come from a full four-dimensional geodesic system that the paper never defines. Without the θ dynamics and the surface-of-section definition, the scattered points in Figs. 2–4 cannot be interpreted as physical chaos.
  6. [Sec. VII, Eq. (47); Sec. VI, Eq. (45)] The abstract calls the KS entropy 'an independent measure of dynamical complexity,' but Sec. VII explicitly computes h_KS from the largest finite-time Lyapunov exponent via the Pesin form (47). This is the same number relabeled, not independent confirmation. It is also not a correct application of Pesin's theorem, which requires the sum over all positive Lyapunov exponents. Additionally, Eq. (45) defines the LLE from the coordinate-space separation d(τ); the text claims this formula is coordinate-independent, but no such invariance is established for two-particle separations in curved spacetime, and standard results (e.g. Motter 2003) show that naive coordinate-dependent Lyapunov exponents are not invariant.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (7)] There is an algebraic error in the second equality of Eq. (7): with G(r)=G/(1+ω̃G/r²), one has 2G(r)M/r = 2GM r/(r²+ω̃G), not 2GM/(r+ω̃G). The later mass function (10) uses the correct form, but the displayed equality in (7) is inconsistent and should be corrected.
  2. [Throughout] Numerous typos: 'quantum-impoved' (Sec. II heading), 'PDFM' (Figs. 5 and 7 captions), 'quantum-proved' (Sec. VI), 'monotic decay' (Sec. VI), 'Weyl conformal gravity' (Sec. VII, should refer to the present spacetime). These should be fixed.
  3. [Fig. 1] The y-axis in Fig. 1 is labeled λ²_null, but Eq. (44) gives negative values for the plotted parameter ranges; the figure caption should state explicitly whether the plotted quantity is |λ²|, a corrected formula, or something else.
  4. [Sec. VIII, Eq. (49)] The WBA observable f(r,p_r)=sin(2π(r+p_r)) mixes a coordinate and a momentum with possibly different physical dimensions; in geometrized units this may be acceptable, but the units should be stated.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The 'independent' KS-entropy confirmation is the same finite-time Lyapunov observable relabeled via Pesin's theorem.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract; Sec. VII, Eq. (47) and surrounding text]
    "Abstract: 'The KS entropy provides an independent measure of dynamical complexity and confirms the growth of chaotic behavior with increasing quantum and PFDM corrections.' Sec. VII: 'In this study, the KS entropy is calculated based on the largest finite-time Lyapunov exponent, which is determined by analyzing the divergence of initially nearby null geodesics [44, 45]' and Eq. (47): 'hKS = X λi>0 λi.'"

    The paper presents KS entropy as an independent confirmation of the Lyapunov-based chaos growth, but Eq. (47) defines h_KS via Pesin's theorem as the sum of positive Lyapunov exponents, and the text states that it is 'calculated based on the largest finite-time Lyapunov exponent.' Therefore the 'independent measure' is the same finite-time divergence observable used for the LLE diagnostic in Sec. VI, relabeled as entropy; it cannot independently confirm the Lyapunov result. Poincaré sections and WBA/DIC remain separate diagnostics, so the circularity is partial rather than total.

full rationale

The metric construction (Eqs. 1-22) is a direct substitution of an RG-running Newton constant into a PFDM seed metric followed by a standard Azreg-Ainou rotation procedure; the null geodesic equations and the null-circular Lyapunov formula (Eqs. 36-44) are derived from the metric without fitted parameters, so no circularity appears there. No curve-fitting is performed, and the paper does not invoke an imported uniqueness theorem or a load-bearing self-citation chain: the self-citations are mostly methodological (Poincaré, Lyapunov, WBA tooling) or used for a parameter range, not as the argument that forces the chaos claim. The one concrete circular step is the KS-entropy 'independent measure': because h_KS is computed from the largest finite-time Lyapunov exponent via Pesin's theorem (Eq. 47), the abstract's claim that KS entropy independently confirms the Lyapunov results is the same number relabeled. This does not destroy the entire paper—Poincaré sections and WBA/DIC maps are genuinely separate diagnostics—but it removes the stated independence of one confirmatory method. Separately, the manuscript contains a consistency problem (the abstract claims a transition to chaos, while Sec. IV says both parameters 'reduce the instability of black hole spacetime' and Secs. VI-VII describe asymptotic monotonic decay toward regular motion); that is a scientific-contradiction issue rather than a circular-derivation issue and therefore does not further raise the circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 8 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper's contribution rests on a model metric assembled from literature ingredients plus hand-scanned parameters; no step is machine-checked and no field-equation verification of the rotating metric is given. The main burdens: validity of the RG-improved+PFDM rotating metric, the unproven non-integrability of its geodesic flow, and the unvalidated chaos diagnostics (no Kerr baseline, KS entropy relabeled from the LLE).

free parameters (4)
  • ω̃ (quantum-improvement parameter) = scanned 0.0–0.8 (Planck units); O(0.2–0.4) in most runs
    Quantum-improvement parameter in the RG-running G(r)=G/(1+ω̃G/r²); taken from asymptotic-safety literature, not constrained by data in this paper. The claimed chaos transition is driven by hand-picked values.
  • ζ (PFDM parameter) = scanned 0.1–0.6; |ζ| ≲ M stated as physical bound
    PFDM strength in the logarithmic metric term; free model parameter scanned to vary the background; no fit.
  • a (rotation parameter) = 0.2–0.99 across figures (0.2–0.4 in Poincaré/DIC runs)
    Standard Kerr spin parameter; its scanning is routine and not constrained by data here.
  • E, L (photon conserved quantities) = E = 0.94–0.97, L = 3–4 (figure-dependent)
    Initial-condition/energy-surface choices for the Poincaré and DIC scans; the paper notes E is 'the primary parameter governing the global extent' but does not scan it systematically with the chaos diagnostics.
axioms (8)
  • domain assumption RG improvement via G(r) = G/(1+ω̃G/r²) (Eq. 6) captures the leading quantum-gravity correction to the spacetime.
    Imported from asymptotic-safety literature [67–70]; applied here heuristically inside the seed metric before rotation (Eqs. 7–10).
  • domain assumption PFDM is described by T^μ_ν = diag(−ρ,−ρ,P,P) with P/ρ = 1/2, yielding the log term in f(r) (Eqs. 2–5, 7).
    Standard phenomenological PFDM ansatz [64–66]; assumed to survive the rotation procedure as the matter content of Eq. (21).
  • ad hoc to paper The Azreg-Aïnou algorithm produces a valid rotating metric that solves the field equations with the same m(r) (Eqs. 15–22).
    The paper does not check the Einstein/PFDM field equations for the rotating metric, nor horizon existence for the plotted parameter ranges; the validity of (21) is asserted.
  • standard math Null geodesic motion restricted to θ=π/2 yields the radial equation (Eq. 36).
    Standard reduction; used for the effective potential and circular-orbit analysis, but the chaos sections use pθ>0 without writing the corresponding equations.
  • domain assumption Two-nearby-trajectory divergence defines coordinate-independent Lyapunov exponents (Sec. VI, Eqs. 45–46).
    Standard method [34–36]; the deviation-vector propagation is stated but never written down.
  • domain assumption Pesin's theorem with only the largest finite-time Lyapunov exponent approximates the KS entropy (Eq. 47).
    h_KS = Σ_{λ_i>0} λ_i; the paper retains only λ_max, so the 'independent' chaos measure is a relabeling of the LLE.
  • domain assumption WBA/DIC convergence distinguishes regular from chaotic orbits with the chosen observable f = sin(2π(r+p_r)) (Eqs. 49–53).
    Standard WBA method [47–54]; the observable selection is arbitrary and no convergence validation is reported.
  • ad hoc to paper A (r, ṙ) Poincaré section with pθ>0 at fixed E, L faithfully represents the 4-D null geodesic flow (Sec. V).
    For a 4-D flow a 2-D section produces fuzzy projections even for regular quasi-periodic orbits; the paper does not distinguish torus-projection structure from true chaos, and calls the orbits 'equatorial' while taking pθ>0.
invented entities (1)
  • Quantum-improved Kerr–PFDM background (Eqs. 21–22) no independent evidence
    purpose: Composite effective spacetime carrying the RG-improvement parameter ω̃ and the PFDM parameter ζ; all dynamics and chaos claims live in this geometry.
    No observable unique to this composite (shadow radius, lensing deflection, QPO frequency) is computed; the metric is a heuristic assembly of components from [25,26,64–66] without a field-equation verification.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 20734 in / 41407 out tokens · 346019 ms · 2026-08-02T04:40:21.538459+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the nonlinear photon dynamics in quantum improved rotating black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter (PFDM) using several methods of analysis, including Poincar\'e sections, Lyapunov exponents, Kolmogorov-Sinai (KS) entropy and weighted Birkhoff averages (WBA). In particular, we examine the effect of quantum-improved parameter $(\tilde{\omega})$ and PFDM parameter $(\zeta)$ on the null geodesic motion hence stability of circular orbit. Poincar\'e sections illustrate the transition from regular to chaotic motion as these parameters increase, characterized by the deformation and fragmentation of invariant tori and the emergence of scattered chaotic regions in phase space. The stability properties of null circular orbits are quantified through the Lyapunov indicators, revealing that both the quantum improvement parameter and the PFDM parameter enhance the sensitivity of photon trajectories to initial conditions. The KS entropy provides an independent measure of dynamical complexity and confirms the growth of chaotic behavior with increasing quantum and PFDM corrections. Additionally, the WBA method offers a robust quantitative criterion for distinguishing regular and chaotic orbits and allows a detailed mapping of the phase-space structure. The results demonstrate that the combined effects of quantum gravity corrections and PFDM significantly modify the effective potential governing photon motion, leading to a rich mixed phase-space structure with coexisting regular and chaotic regions. These findings underscore the crucial role of quantum and dark matter contributions in shaping photon dynamics near rotating black holes and suggest possible observational implications on black hole shadows and gravitational lensing in strong-field regimes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14170 by Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, Chengxun Yuan, G. Mustafa, Hemwati Nandan, M. Yousaf, Sara Saghafi, Shubham Kala.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Variation of Lyapunov exponent as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Poincar´e sections of null geodesic motion around the quantum-improved Kerr black hole surrounded by PFDM, constructed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Poincar´e sections of null geodesic motion around the quantum-improved Kerr black hole surrounded by PFDM, constructed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Poincar´e sections of null geodesic motion around the quantum-improved Kerr black hole surrounded by PFDM, constructed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Logarithmic Lyapunov exponent log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Logarithmic Lyapunov exponent log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The FLI versus proper time for Quantum improved Kerr black hole surrounded by PFDM, shown for different values of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The FLI versus proper time for Quantum improved Kerr black hole surrounded by PFDM, shown for different values of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Time evolution of the Kolmogorov–Sinai (KS) entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Time evolution of the Kolmogorov–Sinai (KS) entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: presents the Dynamical Indicator of Chaos (DIC) maps in the (r, pr) phase space for null geodesics around the quantum-improved Kerr black hole surrounded by PFDM, for different values of the PFDM parameter ζ, with fixed parameters a = 0.4, ˜ω = 0.2, E = 0.95, and L = 3. The color scale represents the DIC defined as − log10 |W B1 − W B2|, where darker (purple) regions correspond to regular and stable motio… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: DIC maps in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes.Phys

    Stephen W Hawking. Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes.Phys. Rev. Lett., 26(21):1344, 1971

    1971

  2. [2]

    Black holes and entropy.Phys

    Jacob D Bekenstein. Black holes and entropy.Phys. Rev. D, 7(8):2333, 1973

    1973

  3. [3]

    Black hole ther- modynamical entropy.Eur

    Constantino Tsallis and Leonardo JL Cirto. Black hole ther- modynamical entropy.Eur. Phys. J. C, 73(7):2487, 2013

    2013

  4. [4]

    Black hole explosions?Nature, 248(5443):30–31, 1974

    Stephen W Hawking. Black hole explosions?Nature, 248(5443):30–31, 1974

    1974

  5. [5]

    Black hole explosions as probes of new physics.Phys

    Kevin Federico and Stefano Profumo. Black hole explosions as probes of new physics.Phys. Rev. D, 111(6):063006, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Particle creation by black holes

    Stephen W Hawking. Particle creation by black holes. Comm. Math. Phys., 43(3):199–220, 1975

    1975

  7. [7]

    Thermodynamics of black holes in anti-de sitter space.Comm

    Stephen W Hawking and Don N Page. Thermodynamics of black holes in anti-de sitter space.Comm. Math. Phys., 87(4):577–588, 1983

    1983

  8. [8]

    The large-n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity.Int

    Juan Maldacena. The large-n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity.Int. j. Theor. Phys., 38(4):1113– 1133, 1999

    1999

  9. [9]

    Phases of r-charged black holes, spinning branes and strongly coupled gauge the- 15 ories.J

    Mirjam Cvetic and Steven S Gubser. Phases of r-charged black holes, spinning branes and strongly coupled gauge the- 15 ories.J. High Energy Phys., 1999(04):024–024, 1999

    1999

  10. [10]

    Thermodynamics of kerr-newman-ads black holes and con- formal field theories.Class

    Marco M Caldarelli, Guido Cognola, and Dietmar Klemm. Thermodynamics of kerr-newman-ads black holes and con- formal field theories.Class. Quant. Grav., 17(2):399–420, 2000

    2000

  11. [11]

    Disappearance of the black hole singu- larity in loop quantum gravity.Phys

    Leonardo Modesto. Disappearance of the black hole singu- larity in loop quantum gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 70(12):124009, 2004

    2004

  12. [12]

    Semiclassical loop quantum black hole

    Leonardo Modesto. Semiclassical loop quantum black hole. Int. J. Theor. Phys., 49(8):1649–1683, 2010

    2010

  13. [13]

    Non-singular quantum-inspired gravitational collapse.Phys

    Cosimo Bambi, Daniele Malafarina, and Leonardo Modesto. Non-singular quantum-inspired gravitational collapse.Phys. Rev. D, 88(4):044009, 2013

    2013

  14. [14]

    Quantum extension of the kruskal spacetime.Phys

    Abhay Ashtekar, Javier Olmedo, and Parampreet Singh. Quantum extension of the kruskal spacetime.Phys. Rev. D, 98(12):126003, 2018

    2018

  15. [15]

    Regular rotating black holes: A review.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.12713, 2022

    Ram´ on Torres. Regular rotating black holes: A review.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.12713, 2022

    arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Reg- ular black holes: a short topic review.Int

    Chen Lan, Hao Yang, Yang Guo, and Yan-Gang Miao. Reg- ular black holes: a short topic review.Int. J. Theor. Phys., 62(9):202, 2023

    2023

  17. [17]

    Formation and evaporation of regular black holes

    Sean A Hayward. Formation and evaporation of regular black holes. InThe Twelfth Marcel Grossmann Meeting: On Re- cent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics and Relativistic Field Theories (In 3 Volumes), pages 1181–1183. World Scientific, 2012

    2012

  18. [18]

    Black holes in modified gravity (mog).Eur

    JW Moffat. Black holes in modified gravity (mog).Eur. Phys. J. C, 75(4):175, 2015

    2015

  19. [19]

    Deflection of light and shadow cast by a dual-charged stringy black hole.Int

    Shubham Kala, Saurabh, Hemwati Nandan, and Pra- teek Sharma. Deflection of light and shadow cast by a dual-charged stringy black hole.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 35(28):2050177, 2020

    2020

  20. [20]

    Geodesics and bending of light around a BTZ black hole surrounded by quintessential matter.Mod

    Shubham Kala, Hemwati Nandan, Prateek Sharma, and Maye Elmardi. Geodesics and bending of light around a BTZ black hole surrounded by quintessential matter.Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 36(31):2150224, 2021

    2021

  21. [21]

    Optical appearance of einstein-æther black hole surrounded by thin disk.Nucl

    Hui-Min Wang, Zi-Chao Lin, and Shao-Wen Wei. Optical appearance of einstein-æther black hole surrounded by thin disk.Nucl. Phys. B, 985:116026, 2022

    2022

  22. [22]

    Investigating shadow images and rings of the charged horndeski black hole illuminated by various thin accretions.Eur

    Xiao-Jun Gao, Tao-Tao Sui, Xiao-Xiong Zeng, Yu-Sen An, and Ya-Peng Hu. Investigating shadow images and rings of the charged horndeski black hole illuminated by various thin accretions.Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(11):1052, 2023

    2023

  23. [23]

    Fuzzy black hole models inf(G) gravity.Phys

    M Yousaf, H Asad, Bander Almutairi, S Hasan, and A S Khan. Fuzzy black hole models inf(G) gravity.Phys. Scr., 99:115270, 2024

    2024

  24. [24]

    Saswati Roy, Shubham Kala, Prasanjit Ghosh, Hemwati Nandan, and Asoke K. Sen. Non-equatorial deflection of light due to Kerr–Newman black hole: a material medium approach.Eur. Phys. J. C, 85(8):925, 2025

    2025

  25. [25]

    Quantum improved regular kerr black holes.Chin

    Chiang-Mei Chen, Yi Chen, Akihiro Ishibashi, and Nobuyoshi Ohta. Quantum improved regular kerr black holes.Chin. J. Phys., 92:766–778, 2024

    2024

  26. [26]

    Quasi-normal modes of quantum gravity black hole with per- fectly fluid dark matter.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02527, 2026

    Arpita Jana, Manjari Dutta, and Sunandan Gangopadhyay. Quasi-normal modes of quantum gravity black hole with per- fectly fluid dark matter.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02527, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Dilara A¸ can Yildiz, Allah Ditta, Asifa Ashraf, Ertan G¨ udekli, Yousef Mohammed Alanazi, and Anvar Reyim- berganov

    G. Dilara A¸ can Yildiz, Allah Ditta, Asifa Ashraf, Ertan G¨ udekli, Yousef Mohammed Alanazi, and Anvar Reyim- berganov. Optical properties of Euler–Heisenberg black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter.Phys. Dark Univ., 46:101583, 2024

    2024

  28. [28]

    Observational constraints on QPOs with or- bital motion around charged non-commutative Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter.Nucl

    Asifa Ashraf, Tayyab Naseer, Himanshu Chaudhary, Abdel- malek Bouzenada, Farruh Atamurotov, Batuhan C ¸ il, and Ertan G¨ udekli. Observational constraints on QPOs with or- bital motion around charged non-commutative Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter.Nucl. Phys. B, 1014:116873, 2025

    2025

  29. [29]

    Mustafa, Tayyab Naseer, S

    Aylin Caliskan, G. Mustafa, Tayyab Naseer, S. K. Maurya, Ertan G¨ udekli, Sardor Murodov, and Farruh Atamurotov. Particle dynamics with trajectories and epicyclic oscillations around a piece-wise black hole immersed in dark matter. JHEAp, 44:99–115, 2024

    2024

  30. [30]

    Fractal structures in the deflection of light by a pair of charged black holes.Chaos Sol

    Edson E de Souza Filho, Amanda C Mathias, and Ricardo L Viana. Fractal structures in the deflection of light by a pair of charged black holes.Chaos Sol. Fract., 150:111139, 2021

    2021

  31. [31]

    Multifractal chaos in gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers

    FM Oliveira, IRAC Lucena, and J G G S Ramos. Multifractal chaos in gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers. Chaos Sol. Fract., 200:116980, 2025

    2025

  32. [32]

    Generating rotating regular black hole solutions without complexification.Physical Review D, 90(6):064041, 2014

    Mustapha Azreg-A ¨ ınou. Generating rotating regular black hole solutions without complexification.Physical Review D, 90(6):064041, 2014

    2014

  33. [33]

    Mustapha Azreg-A ¨ ınou. From static to rotating to confor- mal static solutions: rotating imperfect fluid wormholes with (out) electric or magnetic field.The European Physical Jour- nal C, 74(5):2865, 2014

    2014

  34. [34]

    X. Wu, T. Y. Huang, and H. Zhang. Lyapunov indices with two nearby trajectories in a curved spacetime.Phys. Rev. D, 74:083001, 2006

    2006

  35. [35]

    Chaos and dynamics of spinning particles in Kerr spacetime.Gen

    Wenbiao Han. Chaos and dynamics of spinning particles in Kerr spacetime.Gen. Rel. Grav., 40:1831–1847, 2008

    2008

  36. [36]

    Chaotic motion of particles in the accelerating and rotating black holes spacetime.JHEP, 09:082, 2016

    Songbai Chen, Mingzhi Wang, and Jiliang Jing. Chaotic motion of particles in the accelerating and rotating black holes spacetime.JHEP, 09:082, 2016

    2016

  37. [37]

    Cornish and Gary W

    Neil J. Cornish and Gary W. Gibbons. The Tale of two centers.Class. Quant. Grav., 14:1865–1881, 1997

    1997

  38. [38]

    Probing phase structure of black holes with Lyapunov ex- ponents.JHEP, 08:153, 2022

    Xiaobo Guo, Yuhang Lu, Benrong Mu, and Peng Wang. Probing phase structure of black holes with Lyapunov ex- ponents.JHEP, 08:153, 2022

    2022

  39. [39]

    Naveena Kumara, Shreyas Punacha, and Md Sabir Ali

    A. Naveena Kumara, Shreyas Punacha, and Md Sabir Ali. Lyapunov exponents and phase structure of Lifshitz and hy- perscaling violating black holes.JCAP, 07:061, 2024

    2024

  40. [40]

    Bounds for Lyapunov exponent of circular light orbits in black holes.Eur

    Emanuel Gallo and Thomas M¨ adler. Bounds for Lyapunov exponent of circular light orbits in black holes.Eur. Phys. J. C, 85(3):299, 2025

    2025

  41. [41]

    Pradeep Singh, Hemwati Nandan, Shubham Kala, Nidhi Handa, Lokesh Kumar Joshi, and G. Mustafa. Probing strong-gravity chaos and stability of circular photon orbits around the Kerr–Sen black hole.Eur. Phys. J. C, 86(3):286, 2026

    2026

  42. [42]

    Pradeep Singh, Hemwati Nandan, Shubham Kala, Nidhi Handa, Lokesh Kumar Joshi, and G. Mustafa. Geodesics stability of Reissner–Nordstr¨ om black hole spacetime.Phys. Lett. B, 876:140403, 2026

    2026

  43. [43]

    Characteristic lyapunov exponents and smooth ergodic theory.Russian Mathematical Surveys, 32(4):55, 1977

    Ya B Pesin. Characteristic lyapunov exponents and smooth ergodic theory.Russian Mathematical Surveys, 32(4):55, 1977

    1977

  44. [44]

    Stability of Equatorial Circular Geodesics for Kerr-newman Spacetime via Lyapunov Expo- nent

    Parthapratim Pradhan. Stability of Equatorial Circular Geodesics for Kerr-newman Spacetime via Lyapunov Expo- nent. In13th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Devel- opments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics, and Relativistic Field Theories, pages 1892– 1894, 2015

    2015

  45. [45]

    New- ton Singh

    Monimala Mondal, Farook Rahaman, and Ksh. New- ton Singh. Lyapunov exponent ISCO and Kolmogorov Senai entropy for Kerr Kiselev black hole.Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(1):84, 2021

    2021

  46. [46]

    Yousaf, Farruh Atamurotov, and G

    Pradeep Singh, Shubham Kala, Hemwati Nandan, M. Yousaf, Farruh Atamurotov, and G. Mustafa. Probing strong-gravity chaos in rotating Kerr–Bertotti–Robinson black holes.Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals, 208:118379, 2026

    2026

  47. [47]

    Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors.Reviews of modern physics, 57(3):617, 1985

    J-P Eckmann and David Ruelle. Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors.Reviews of modern physics, 57(3):617, 1985

    1985

  48. [48]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    Isaac P Cornfeld, Sergei Vasilevich Fomin, and Yakov Grigor’ev ˇ ıc Sinai.Ergodic theory, volume 245. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  49. [49]

    Measuring quasiperiodicity.Europhysics Letters, 114(4):40005, 2016

    Suddhasattwa Das, Chris B Dock, Yoshitaka Saiki, Mar- tin Salgado-Flores, Evelyn Sander, Jin Wu, and James A Yorke. Measuring quasiperiodicity.Europhysics Letters, 114(4):40005, 2016

    2016

  50. [50]

    Birkhoff averages and the break- down of invariant tori in volume-preserving maps.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 428:133048, 2021

    JD Meiss and E Sander. Birkhoff averages and the break- down of invariant tori in volume-preserving maps.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 428:133048, 2021

    2021

  51. [51]

    Birkhoff averages and rota- tional invariant circles for area-preserving maps.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 411:132569, 2020

    Evelyn Sander and JD Meiss. Birkhoff averages and rota- tional invariant circles for area-preserving maps.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 411:132569, 2020

    2020

  52. [52]

    Distinguishing between regular and chaotic orbits of flows by the weighted birkhoff average.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 449:133749, 2023

    Nathan Duignan and James D Meiss. Distinguishing between regular and chaotic orbits of flows by the weighted birkhoff average.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 449:133749, 2023. 16

    2023

  53. [53]

    pynamicalsys: A python toolkit for the anal- ysis of dynamical systems.Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 201(3):117269–117269, 2025

    Matheus Rolim Sales, Leonardo Costa de Souza, Daniel Borin, Michele Mugnaine, Ricardo Luiz Viana, Ibere Luiz Caldas, Edson Denis Leonel, Christos Antonopou- los, et al. pynamicalsys: A python toolkit for the anal- ysis of dynamical systems.Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 201(3):117269–117269, 2025

    2025

  54. [54]

    Yousaf, Farruh Atamurotov, and G

    Shubham Kala, Pradeep Singh, Hemwati Nandan, M. Yousaf, Farruh Atamurotov, and G. Mustafa. In- frared signatures of asymptotically safe gravity on chaos with weighted Birkhoff average in the Kerr black hole.Phys. Lett. B, 879:140597, 2026

    2026

  55. [55]

    Computation of lyapunov ex- ponents in general relativity.Phys

    Xin Wu and Tian-yi Huang. Computation of lyapunov ex- ponents in general relativity.Phys. Lett. A, 313(1-2):77–81, 2003

    2003

  56. [56]

    Lyapunov timescales and black hole binaries.Class

    Neil J Cornish and Janna Levin. Lyapunov timescales and black hole binaries.Class. Quant. Grav., 20(9):1649–1660, 2003

    2003

  57. [57]

    Lya- punov exponents to test general relativity.Phys

    Alexander Deich, Nicol´ as Yunes, and Charles Gammie. Lya- punov exponents to test general relativity.Phys. Rev. D, 110(4):044033, 2024

    2024

  58. [58]

    Relativistic chaos is coordinate invariant

    Adilson E Motter. Relativistic chaos is coordinate invariant. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91(23):231101, 2003

    2003

  59. [59]

    Chaos around holographic regge trajectories

    Pallab Basu, Diptarka Das, Archisman Ghosh, and Leopoldo A Pando Zayas. Chaos around holographic regge trajectories. J. High Energy Phys., 2012(5):1–21, 2012

    2012

  60. [60]

    Stability and chaos in nonstandard hamiltonian planetary dynamics.Chaos Sol

    Rami Ahmad El-Nabulsi, Waranont Anukool, Chinnasamy Thangaraj, and Raja Valarmathi. Stability and chaos in nonstandard hamiltonian planetary dynamics.Chaos Sol. Fract., 202:117410, 2026

    2026

  61. [61]

    Robust chaos in the generalized ceil map.Chaos Sol

    Sishu Shankar Muni. Robust chaos in the generalized ceil map.Chaos Sol. Fract., 206:117913, 2026

    2026

  62. [62]

    Quintessence and black holes.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 20(6):1187–1197, 2003

    VV1966820 Kiselev. Quintessence and black holes.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 20(6):1187–1197, 2003

    2003

  63. [63]

    Quintessential solution of dark matter rotation curves and its simulation by extra dimensions.arXiv preprint gr-qc/0303031, 2003

    VV Kiselev. Quintessential solution of dark matter rotation curves and its simulation by extra dimensions.arXiv preprint gr-qc/0303031, 2003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  64. [64]

    Study of circular geodesics and shadow of rotating charged black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter immersed in plasma.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 39(7):075005, 2022

    Anish Das, Ashis Saha, and Sunandan Gangopadhyay. Study of circular geodesics and shadow of rotating charged black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter immersed in plasma.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 39(7):075005, 2022

    2022

  65. [65]

    Kerr–anti- de sitter/de sitter black hole in perfect fluid dark matter background.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 35(11):115003, 2018

    Zhaoyi Xu, Xian Hou, and Jiancheng Wang. Kerr–anti- de sitter/de sitter black hole in perfect fluid dark matter background.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 35(11):115003, 2018

    2018

  66. [66]

    Stability, quasinormal modes in a charged black hole in perfect fluid dark matter.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 41(1):015018, 2024

    Anish Das, Anirban Roy Chowdhury, and Sunandan Gan- gopadhyay. Stability, quasinormal modes in a charged black hole in perfect fluid dark matter.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 41(1):015018, 2024

    2024

  67. [67]

    Renormalization group improved black hole space-times.Phys

    Alfio Bonanno and Martin Reuter. Renormalization group improved black hole space-times.Phys. Rev. D, 62:043008, 2000

    2000

  68. [68]

    Qed coupled to qeg.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2011(5):119, 2011

    Ulrich Harst and Martin Reuter. Qed coupled to qeg.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2011(5):119, 2011

    2011

  69. [69]

    Upper bound on the abelian gauge coupling from asymptotic safety.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018(1):30, 2018

    Astrid Eichhorn and Fleur Versteegen. Upper bound on the abelian gauge coupling from asymptotic safety.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018(1):30, 2018

    2018

  70. [70]

    Quantum improved charged black holes.Physical Review D, 104(6):066016, 2021

    Akihiro Ishibashi, Nobuyoshi Ohta, and Daiki Yamaguchi. Quantum improved charged black holes.Physical Review D, 104(6):066016, 2021

    2021

  71. [71]

    Shadow of Bonanno-Reuter black hole in plasma medium: Insights from EHT Sgr A* observations

    Shubham Kala. Shadow of Bonanno-Reuter black hole in plasma medium: Insights from EHT Sgr A* observations. Nucl. Phys. B, 1025:117407, 2026

    2026

  72. [72]

    Modeling the Sgr A* Black Hole Immersed in a Dark Matter Spike.Astrophys

    Sourabh Nampalliwar, Saurabh Kumar, Kimet Jusufi, Qiang Wu, Mubasher Jamil, and Paolo Salucci. Modeling the Sgr A* Black Hole Immersed in a Dark Matter Spike.Astrophys. J., 916(2):116, 2021

    2021