pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.03022 · v1 · pith:KEAGYDLMnew · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🪐 quant-ph · math-ph· math.MP

General method for obtaining the energy minimum of spin Hamiltonians for separable states

G\'eza T\'oth , J\'ozsef Pitrik This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 19:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph math-phmath.MP
keywords separable statesspin Hamiltoniansquantum Fisher informationIsing modelHeisenberg chainenergy minimumUhlmann-Jozsa fidelity
0
0 comments X

The pith

The energy minimum of ferromagnetic Ising models over separable states is given by a compact analytic formula involving the quantum Fisher information.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a general method to determine the energy minimum of spin Hamiltonians over separable states when the single-particle reduced density matrices are fixed. For ferromagnetic Ising and Ising-like models with nearest-neighbor interactions on lattices of any dimension and on a fully connected graph in an external field, this minimum takes the form of a compact analytic formula involving the quantum Fisher information. For the ferromagnetic Heisenberg chain of spin-1/2 particles, the minimum is expressed via the Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity. These relations make it possible to extract both the quantum Fisher information and the fidelity directly from correlation measurements on the ground states of suitably engineered spin models.

Core claim

The authors develop a general method for obtaining the energy minimum of spin Hamiltonians over separable states with fixed single-particle reduced density matrices. For ferromagnetic Ising and Ising-like models this minimum is given by a compact analytic formula involving the quantum Fisher information, and for the ferromagnetic Heisenberg chain it is expressed via the Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity, allowing extraction of these quantities from correlation measurements.

What carries the argument

The general minimization procedure over separable states with fixed single-particle reduced density matrices, which yields analytic expressions in the quantum Fisher information for Ising models and the Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity for the Heisenberg chain.

Load-bearing premise

The single-particle reduced density matrices are fixed and the search is restricted to separable states, with the closed formulas derived specifically for ferromagnetic models.

What would settle it

For a small ferromagnetic Ising model, compute the true minimum energy over all separable states with the given single-particle densities and check whether it equals the predicted analytic expression involving the quantum Fisher information.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03022 by G\'eza T\'oth, J\'ozsef Pitrik.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Spin models on two-colorable graphs. (top) Spin view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Ground state energy and bounds for the ferro view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Energy bounds for k-producible states for an Ising spin chain with J = 1 for (a) ⟨σx⟩ϱ = 0.1 and (b) 0.3. (dia￾mond) Bound for a tensor product of k-particle states given in Eq. (22). (circle) Lower bound for k-producible states with the quantum Fisher information of the single particle state Eq. (21). (square) Lower bound for the energy per particle with the Wigner-Yanase skew information. (dotted) Energy… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a general method to determine the energy minimum of spin Hamiltonians over separable states when the single-particle reduced density matrices are fixed. For ferromagnetic Ising and Ising-like models with nearest-neighbor interactions on lattices of any dimension and on a fully connected graph in an external field, this minimum is given by a compact analytic formula involving the quantum Fisher information. For the ferromagnetic Heisenberg chain of spin-1/2 particles, the minimum is expressed via the Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity. These relations enable the direct extraction of both the quantum Fisher information and the fidelity from correlation measurements on the ground states of suitably engineered spin models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a general method to compute the minimum energy of spin Hamiltonians over separable states subject to fixed single-particle reduced density matrices. For ferromagnetic Ising and Ising-like nearest-neighbor models on lattices of arbitrary dimension and on fully connected graphs in an external field, the minimum is claimed to equal a compact analytic expression involving the quantum Fisher information. For the ferromagnetic Heisenberg chain of spin-1/2 particles the minimum is expressed via the Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity. These relations are said to permit direct extraction of the QFI and fidelity from correlation measurements performed on ground states of suitably engineered spin models.

Significance. If the claimed analytic formulas are proven to be globally optimal, the work would establish a direct link between variational energy minimization under marginal constraints and standard quantum-information quantities, enabling experimental access to the QFI through simple two-point correlation measurements. The generality of the method for arbitrary spin Hamiltonians with fixed marginals and the closed-form results for physically relevant ferromagnetic models constitute the primary strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Ising-model derivation): the assertion that the proposed QFI-based expression yields the global minimum over all separable states with given single-particle RDMs is not accompanied by a rigorous proof that the underlying ansatz (a low-point mixture of product states) saturates the maximum of nearest-neighbor zz-correlations under arbitrary Bloch-vector constraints. For marginals possessing nonzero transverse components or for lattices with coordination number greater than two, configurations achieving strictly higher correlation appear possible; an explicit optimality argument or exhaustive comparison is required.
  2. [§2] §2 (general method): the procedure for arbitrary Hamiltonians is outlined only at a high level; it is unclear whether the method reduces to a convex optimization that can be solved efficiently or whether it relies on additional assumptions (e.g., translation invariance or uniformity of marginals) that are not stated as limitations.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to “Ising-like models” without a precise definition; a short paragraph in the introduction specifying the exact Hamiltonian class would improve readability.
  2. [Notation] Notation for the single-particle Bloch vectors and the quantum Fisher information should be introduced once and used consistently; occasional redefinition of symbols in later sections is distracting.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for providing constructive feedback. We address each of the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Ising-model derivation): the assertion that the proposed QFI-based expression yields the global minimum over all separable states with given single-particle RDMs is not accompanied by a rigorous proof that the underlying ansatz (a low-point mixture of product states) saturates the maximum of nearest-neighbor zz-correlations under arbitrary Bloch-vector constraints. For marginals possessing nonzero transverse components or for lattices with coordination number greater than two, configurations achieving strictly higher correlation appear possible; an explicit optimality argument or exhaustive comparison is required.

    Authors: We agree that a rigorous proof of the global optimality of the proposed ansatz is essential. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection in §3 providing an explicit optimality argument. Specifically, we will show that the low-point mixture of product states maximizes the zz-correlations by leveraging the convexity of the separable set and the ferromagnetic nature of the interaction, which favors alignment along the z-direction. For marginals with nonzero transverse components, we will demonstrate that any transverse magnetization can be rotated away without increasing the energy for the Ising Hamiltonian, thus the minimum is still achieved by the ansatz. For lattices with higher coordination numbers, we will include an exhaustive comparison for small systems (e.g., 3x3 lattices) showing that no separable state yields higher correlations than the bound, and argue that the QFI expression provides the tight upper bound on correlations via the known relation between QFI and variance. This will strengthen the claim that the expression gives the global minimum. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§2] §2 (general method): the procedure for arbitrary Hamiltonians is outlined only at a high level; it is unclear whether the method reduces to a convex optimization that can be solved efficiently or whether it relies on additional assumptions (e.g., translation invariance or uniformity of marginals) that are not stated as limitations.

    Authors: We acknowledge that §2 provides only a high-level outline of the general method. In the revision, we will expand this section to explicitly formulate the problem as a convex optimization over the set of separable states with fixed single-particle reduced density matrices. This can be cast as a semidefinite program for small numbers of spins or solved via numerical methods such as projected gradient descent for larger systems. We will clearly state the assumptions: the analytic closed-form expressions for Ising and Heisenberg models assume translation invariance and uniform marginals across sites, while the general method applies to arbitrary fixed marginals without these assumptions. We will also discuss the computational complexity and provide pseudocode for the procedure to make it reproducible. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity; formulas derived from optimization over separable states

full rationale

The paper claims a general method for minimizing spin Hamiltonians over separable states with fixed single-particle RDMs, yielding analytic expressions involving QFI for ferromagnetic Ising models. No quoted step reduces the claimed minimum to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction. The relations are presented as consequences of the optimization, enabling extraction of QFI from correlations rather than presupposing them. This is consistent with an independent derivation; the skeptic concern about global optimality is a correctness issue, not a circularity reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract does not introduce free parameters, new axioms beyond standard quantum mechanics, or invented entities; the method appears to build on existing concepts of separable states, reduced density matrices, QFI, and fidelity.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Quantum mechanics applies to spin systems with Hamiltonians and reduced density matrices
    The entire approach relies on the standard framework of quantum states, density matrices, and expectation values for spin operators.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5401 in / 1332 out tokens · 23561 ms · 2026-05-08T19:22:08.740122+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    J. J. Meyer, Fisher Information in Noisy Intermediate- Scale Quantum Applications, Quantum5, 539 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Helstrom,Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory (Academic Press, New York, 1976)

    C. Helstrom,Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory (Academic Press, New York, 1976)

    work page 1976

  3. [3]

    Holevo,Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quan- tum Theory(North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982)

    A. Holevo,Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quan- tum Theory(North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982)

    work page 1982

  4. [4]

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439 (1994)

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    S. L. Braunstein, C. M. Caves, and G. J. Milburn, Gen- eralized uncertainty relations: Theory, examples, and Lorentz invariance, Ann. Phys.247, 135 (1996)

    work page 1996

  6. [6]

    Petz,Quantum information theory and quantum statistics(Springer, Berlin, Heilderberg, 2008)

    D. Petz,Quantum information theory and quantum statistics(Springer, Berlin, Heilderberg, 2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum- enhanced measurements: Beating the standard quantum 6 limit, Science306, 1330 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Quantum limits in optical interferometry

    R. Demkowicz-Dobrzanski, M. Jarzyna, and J. Kolodyn- ski, Chapter four - Quantum limits in optical interferom- etry, Prog. Optics60, 345 (2015), arXiv:1405.7703

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    Quantum theory of phase estimation

    L. Pezze and A. Smerzi, Quantum theory of phase es- timation, inAtom Interferometry (Proc. Int. School of Physics ’Enrico Fermi’, Course 188, Varenna), edited by G. Tino and M. Kasevich (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2014) pp. 691–741, arXiv:1411.5164

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    Tóth and I

    G. Tóth and I. Apellaniz, Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.47, 424006 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Pezzè, A

    L. Pezzè, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P.Treutlein,Quantummetrologywithnonclassicalstates of atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    M. G. A. Paris, Quantum estimation for quantum tech- nology, Int. J. Quant. Inf.07, 125 (2009)

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    Barbieri, Optical quantum metrology, PRX Quantum 3, 010202 (2022)

    M. Barbieri, Optical quantum metrology, PRX Quantum 3, 010202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Hauke, M

    P. Hauke, M. Heyl, L. Tagliacozzo, and P. Zoller, Mea- suring multipartite entanglement through dynamic sus- ceptibilities, Nat. Phys.12, 778 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Apellaniz, M

    I. Apellaniz, M. Kleinmann, O. Gühne, and G. Tóth, Optimal witnessing of the quantum Fisher information with few measurements, Phys. Rev. A95, 032330 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Müller-Rigat, A

    G. Müller-Rigat, A. K. Srivastava, S. Kurdziałek, G. Rajchel-Mieldzioć, M. Lewenstein, and I. Frérot, Cer- tifying the quantum Fisher information from a given set of mean values: a semidefinite programming approach, Quantum7, 1152 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Vitale, A

    V. Vitale, A. Rath, P. Jurcevic, A. Elben, C. Branciard, and B. Vermersch, Robust estimation of the quantum fisher information on a quantum processor, PRX Quan- tum5, 030338 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    A. Rath, C. Branciard, A. Minguzzi, and B. Vermersch, Quantum Fisher information from randomized measure- ments, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 260501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    C.M.Caves, C.A.Fuchs,andR.Schack,Unknownquan- tum states: The quantum de Finetti representation, J. Math. Phys.43, 4537 (2002)

    work page 2002

  20. [20]

    Christandl, R

    M. Christandl, R. König, G. Mitchison, and R. Renner, One-and-a-Half Quantum de Finetti Theorems, Com- mun. Math. Phys.273, 473 (2007)

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    L. B. Vieira, S. Milz, G. Vitagliano, and C. Budroni, Wit- nessing environment dimension through temporal corre- lations, Quantum8, 1224 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Tóth, Entanglement witnesses in spin models, Phys

    G. Tóth, Entanglement witnesses in spin models, Phys. Rev. A71, 010301(R) (2005)

    work page 2005

  23. [23]

    Tóth and O

    G. Tóth and O. Gühne, Detection of multipartite entan- glement with two-body correlations, Appl. Phys. B82, 237 (2006)

    work page 2006

  24. [24]

    Gühne and G

    O. Gühne and G. Tóth, Energy and multipartite entan- glement in multidimensional and frustrated spin models, Phys. Rev. A73, 052319 (2006)

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    Gühne, G

    O. Gühne, G. Tóth, and H. J. Briegel, Multipartite en- tanglement in spin chains, New J. Phys.7, 229 (2005)

    work page 2005

  26. [26]

    Brukner and V

    C. Brukner and V. Vedral, Macroscopic Thermodynami- cal Witnesses of Quantum Entanglement, arXiv: quant- ph/0406040 (2004)

    work page arXiv 2004

  27. [27]

    M. R. Dowling, A. C. Doherty, and S. D. Bartlett, En- ergy as an entanglement witness for quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. A70, 062113 (2004)

    work page 2004

  28. [28]

    L.-A. Wu, S. Bandyopadhyay, M. S. Sarandy, and D. A. Lidar, Entanglement observables and witnesses for inter- acting quantum spin systems, Phys. Rev. A72, 032309 (2005)

    work page 2005

  29. [29]

    Iglói and G

    F. Iglói and G. Tóth, Entanglement witnesses in thexy chain: Thermal equilibrium and postquench nonequilib- rium states, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013158 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    J. Wang, J. Surace, I. Frérot, B. Legat, M.-O. Renou, V. Magron, and A. Acín, Certifying ground-state prop- erties of many-body systems, Phys. Rev. X14, 031006 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Araújo, I

    M. Araújo, I. Klep, T. Vértesi, A. J. P. Gar- ner, and M. Navascues, Karush-Kuhn-Tucker condi- tions for non-commutative optimization problems (2023), arXiv:2311.18707 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Fawzi, O

    H. Fawzi, O. Fawzi, and S. O. Scalet, Certified algo- rithms for equilibrium states of local quantum hamilto- nians, arXiv:2311.18706 [quant-ph] (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    A. A. Klyachko, Quantum marginal problem and n- representability, J. Phys.: Conference Series36, 72 (2006)

    work page 2006

  34. [34]

    Navascués, F

    M. Navascués, F. Baccari, and A. Acín, Entanglement marginal problems, Quantum5, 589 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    C. L. Benavides-Riveros, J. Wolff, M. A. L. Marques, and C. Schilling, Reduced density matrix functional theory for bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 180603 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Życzkowski and W

    K. Życzkowski and W. Slomczynski, The Monge distance betweenquantumstates,J.Phys.A:Math.Gen.31,9095 (1998)

    work page 1998

  37. [37]

    Życzkowski and W

    K. Życzkowski and W. Slomczynski, The Monge metric on the sphere and geometry of quantum states, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.34, 6689 (2001)

    work page 2001

  38. [38]

    Bengtsson and K

    I. Bengtsson and K. Życzkowski,Geometry of Quan- tum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement (Cambridge University Press, 2006)

    work page 2006

  39. [39]

    Carlen and J

    E. Carlen and J. Maas, An Analog of the 2-Wasserstein Metric in Non-Commutative Probability Under Which the Fermionic Fokker-Planck Equation is Gradient Flow for the Entropy, Commun. Math. Phys.331, 887 (2014)

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    Golse, C

    F. Golse, C. Mouhot, and T. Paul, On the mean field and classical limits of quantum mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys.343, 165 (2016)

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    Golse and T

    F. Golse and T. Paul, The Schrödinger equation in the mean-field and semiclassical regime, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.223, 57 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Golse and T

    F. Golse and T. Paul, Wave packets and the quadratic Monge-Kantorovich distance in quantum mechanics, Comptes Rendus Math.356, 177 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Golse, The quantumN-body problem in the mean- fieldandsemiclassicalregime,Phil.Trans.R.Soc.A376, 20170229 (2018)

    F. Golse, The quantumN-body problem in the mean- fieldandsemiclassicalregime,Phil.Trans.R.Soc.A376, 20170229 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    De Palma and D

    G. De Palma and D. Trevisan, Quantum optimal trans- port with quantum channels, Ann. Henri Poincaré22, 3199 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    De Palma, M

    G. De Palma, M. Marvian, D. Trevisan, and S. Lloyd, The quantum Wasserstein distance of order 1, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory67, 6627 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Friedland, M

    S. Friedland, M. Eckstein, S. Cole, and K. Życzkowski, Quantum Monge–Kantorovich problem and transport distance between density matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 110402 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Caglioti, F

    E. Caglioti, F. Golse, and T. Paul, Quantum optimal transport is cheaper, J. Stat. Phys.181, 149 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    T owards optimal transport for quantum densities, 2021

    E. Caglioti, F. Golse, and T. Paul, Towards opti- mal transport for quantum densities, arXiv:2101.03256 (2021). 7

    work page arXiv 2021

  49. [49]

    G.P.Gehér, J.Pitrik, T.Titkos,andD.Virosztek,Quan- tum Wasserstein isometries on the qubit state space, J. Math. Anal. Appl.522, 126955 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    L. Li, K. Bu, D. Enshan Koh, A. Jaffe, and S. Lloyd, Wasserstein complexity of quantum circuits, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.58, 265302 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Tóth and J

    G. Tóth and J. Pitrik, Quantum Wasserstein distance based on an optimization over separable states, Quantum 7, 1143 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Quantum Wasserstein distance and its relation to several types of fidelities

    G. Tóth and J. Pitrik, Quantum Wasserstein dis- tance and its relation to several types of fidelities, arXiv:2506.14523 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Tóth and J

    G. Tóth and J. Pitrik, Relations between different defi- nitions of the quantum Wasserstein distance for qubits, in preparation (2026)

    work page 2026

  54. [54]

    R. F. Werner, Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model, Phys. Rev. A40, 4277 (1989)

    work page 1989

  55. [55]

    See Supplemental Material for a detailed proof of Theo- rems 2 and 5, for the derivation of the bounds in Tables I and II, and also for additional derivations

    work page

  56. [56]

    G. Tóth, C. Knapp, O. Gühne, and H. J. Briegel, Spin squeezing and entanglement, Phys. Rev. A79, 042334 (2009)

    work page 2009

  57. [57]

    J. K. Korbicz, J. I. Cirac, and M. Lewenstein, Spin squeezing inequalities and entanglement ofNqubit states, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 120502 (2005)

    work page 2005

  58. [58]

    Vandenberghe and S

    L. Vandenberghe and S. Boyd, Semidefinite program- ming, SIAM Review38, 49 (1996)

    work page 1996

  59. [59]

    Horodecki, Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition, Phys

    P. Horodecki, Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition, Phys. Lett. A232, 333 (1997)

    work page 1997

  60. [60]

    Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys

    A. Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 1413 (1996)

    work page 1996

  61. [61]

    A. C. Doherty, P. A. Parrilo, and F. M. Spedalieri, Dis- tinguishing separable and entangled states, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 187904 (2002)

    work page 2002

  62. [62]

    A. C. Doherty, P. A. Parrilo, and F. M. Spedalieri, Com- plete family of separability criteria, Phys. Rev. A69, 022308 (2004)

    work page 2004

  63. [63]

    A. C. Doherty, P. A. Parrilo, and F. M. Spedalieri, Detecting multipartite entanglement, Phys. Rev. A71, 032333 (2005)

    work page 2005

  64. [64]

    E. P. Wigner and M. M. Yanase, Information contents of distributions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.49, 910 (1963)

    work page 1963

  65. [65]

    transition probability

    A. Uhlmann, The "transition probability" in the state space of a *-algebra, Rep. Math. Phys.9, 273 (1976)

    work page 1976

  66. [66]

    41, 2315 (1994)

    R.Jozsa,Fidelityformixedquantumstates,J.Mod.Opt. 41, 2315 (1994)

    work page 1994

  67. [67]

    Sørensen, L.-M

    A. Sørensen, L.-M. Duan, J. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Many- particle entanglement with bose–einstein condensates, Nature (London)409, 63 (2001)

    work page 2001

  68. [68]

    G.Tóth, C.Knapp, O.Gühne,andH.J.Briegel,Optimal spin squeezing inequalities detect bound entanglement in spin models, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 250405 (2007)

    work page 2007

  69. [69]

    Vitagliano, P

    G. Vitagliano, P. Hyllus, I. L. Egusquiza, and G. Tóth, Spin squeezing inequalities for arbitrary spin, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 240502 (2011)

    work page 2011

  70. [70]

    Vitagliano, I

    G. Vitagliano, I. Apellaniz, I. L. Egusquiza, and G. Tóth, Spin squeezing and entanglement for an arbitrary spin, Phys. Rev. A89, 032307 (2014)

    work page 2014

  71. [71]

    Vitagliano, O

    G. Vitagliano, O. Gühne, and G. Tóth,su(d)- squeezing and many-body entanglement geometry in finite-dimensional systems, Quantum9, 1844 (2025)

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    Tóth and D

    G. Tóth and D. Petz, Extremal properties of the variance and the quantum fisher information, Phys. Rev. A87, 032324 (2013)

    work page 2013

  73. [73]

    Quantum Fisher Information as the Convex Roof of Variance

    S. Yu, Quantum Fisher Information as the Convex Roof of Variance, arXiv:1302.5311 (2013)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  74. [74]

    G. Tóth, T. Moroder, and O. Gühne, Evaluating con- vex roof entanglement measures, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 160501 (2015)

    work page 2015

  75. [75]

    Tóth and F

    G. Tóth and F. Fröwis, Uncertainty relations with the variance and the quantum Fisher information based on convex decompositions of density matrices, Phys. Rev. Research4, 013075 (2022)

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    Chiew and M

    S.-H. Chiew and M. Gessner, Improving sum uncertainty relations with the quantum Fisher information, Phys. Rev. Research4, 013076 (2022)

    work page 2022

  77. [77]

    Marvian, Operational interpretation of quantum fisher information in quantum thermodynamics, Phys

    I. Marvian, Operational interpretation of quantum fisher information in quantum thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 190502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    Coffman, J

    V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters, Distributed entanglement, Phys. Rev. A61, 052306 (2000)

    work page 2000

  79. [79]

    T. J. Osborne and F. Verstraete, General monogamy inequality for bipartite qubit entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 220503 (2006)

    work page 2006

  80. [80]

    Pfeuty, The one-dimensional Ising model with a trans- verse field, Ann

    P. Pfeuty, The one-dimensional Ising model with a trans- verse field, Ann. Phys.57, 79 (1970)

    work page 1970

Showing first 80 references.