Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Magnon transport through a graphene junction reveals a skyrmion Wigner crystal, with each burst of noise marking the entry of another skyrmion into the array.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 21:34 UTC pith:KEBIZAOD

load-bearing objection Solid magnon-transport experiment with a genuinely new noise signature; the skyrmion interpretation is plausible but the charge-trap alternative is not quantitatively excluded. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.16023 v1 pith:KEBIZAOD submitted 2026-07-17 cond-mat.mes-hall

Magnons reveal topology and dynamics of a skyrmion crystal

Raphael Ayache , Nilotpal Chakraborty , Manabendra Kuiri , Quentin Benichou , Antonio Lacerda-Santos , Lilian Seyve , Himadri Chakraborti , Leo Pugliese
show 6 more authors
Kenji Watanabe Takashi Taniguchi Cosimo Gorini Roderich Moessner Benoit Doucot Preden Roulleau
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords skyrmion Wigner crystalmagnon transportquantum Hall ferromagnetgraphene junctionnonlocal magnon noisetopological spin texturemagnonic metamaterialskyrmion addition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that a nanoscale graphene junction in the quantum Hall regime hosts a quasi-one-dimensional skyrmion Wigner crystal, and that this crystal's geometry and dynamics can be read out through magnon transport. The central observation is a series of near-periodic, sharp windows of fluctuations in the non-local magnon signal as the left gate voltage is swept slightly past filling factor ν=1. The authors interpret each window as the moment a single skyrmion is added to the crystal, when the lattice stiffness drops and incoming magnons induce non-equilibrium collective motion. If correct, this provides the first real-space probe of skyrmion crystal topology and dynamics in a quantum Hall insulating state, and opens a route to studying correlated topological phases in moiré and multilayer graphene.

Core claim

In a graphene monolayer tuned to a bipolar quantum Hall state with ν_L ≈ ν_R ≈ 1 and a 70 nm split-gate junction, magnons emitted at a remote contact produce a non-local signal only above the Zeeman energy. Slightly above ν_L = 1, the signal develops narrow, near-periodic windows of strong fluctuations, reproducible across emitters and correlated across all detectors. The paper's interpretation is that the junction acts as a quasi-one-dimensional confining potential for skyrmions; each fluctuation window corresponds to the discrete addition of one skyrmion to the crystal, at which the stiffness of the array is reduced and the magnons' back-action drives the crystal into non-equilibrium dynam

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the electric-dipole character of magnons in a quantum Hall ferromagnet: a magnon carries dipole moment p = |e| l_B^2 ẑ × k, so it couples to both the in-plane electric field across the junction and, more importantly, to the spatially modulated topological charge density of a skyrmion crystal. Working in a semiclassical (geometrical optics) limit, the spin texture generates an effective orbital magnetic field equal to 4π times the topological charge density, and the skyrmions themselves act as a one-dimensional array of flux tubes in a confining potential. The reduced phase-space model (4 dimensions for one magnon plus 2N_S for N_S skyrmions) yields Lorentz forces, a

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the near-periodic gate-voltage noise windows are caused by successive single-skyrmion additions to a quasi-one-dimensional crystal in the junction, rather than by another gate-controlled mesoscopic charging or instability such as an accidental quantum dot; the electrostatic simulations show only a confined density pocket, not crystalline order or a quantized skyrmion number.

What would settle it

A local probe of the junction's spin texture—for instance, nitrogen-vacancy center magnetometry or spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy—that could resolve whether each sharp fluctuation window coincides with the addition of one skyrmion carrying a quantized winding number; if the fluctuation windows persist when the confined density pocket is removed, or if a 500-nm-scale accidental dot can reproduce the observed period and bias scaling, the skyrmion-addition interpretation would be falsified.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Magnon transport becomes a real-space probe of skyrmion crystal geometry and collective dynamics in quantum Hall insulators, complementing transport and heat-capacity measurements.
  • The near-periodic noise windows imply that individual skyrmions can be added one by one under gate control, allowing the skyrmion number in the junction to be counted.
  • Period doubling of the fluctuation windows is directly interpreted as a structural transition between a one-row and a two-row skyrmion crystal in the confining potential.
  • The asymmetry of scattered magnon flux between top and bottom detectors grows with skyrmion number, suggesting a route to measure individual skyrmion size by tracking this asymmetry with gate voltage.
  • The same non-local magnon-transport scheme can be extended to moiré and multilayer graphene systems, where other internal degrees of freedom (such as spin-valley entangled phases) might also be probed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the skyrmion-addition interpretation holds, the gate-voltage period of the noise windows provides a direct measurement of the junction's effective capacitance per skyrmion, which could be compared with the electrostatic simulations to infer the actual confinement width.
  • The phenomenological model deliberately neglects the electromotive force induced by moving skyrmions on the magnons; including this back-reaction could predict an additional gate-voltage-dependent phase shift or energy loss that might be observable in the non-local signal.
  • The claim that magnons act as a probe of non-equilibrium dynamics suggests a testable prediction: the noise variance should depend on the magnon flux in a way that saturates at the same skyrmion-addition points, and time-resolved measurements could reveal the relaxation time of the crystal after each addition.
  • One could attempt to engineer the same experiment with a two-dimensional (non-confined) skyrmion crystal and look for the predicted absence of sharp single-skyrmion noise windows, which would confirm the quasi-one-dimensional confinement as the essential ingredient.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports nonlocal magnon transport measurements in a graphene quantum Hall heterojunction at filling factor ν≈1 and claims that near-periodic windows of sharp fluctuations in the nonlocal signal, appearing as the left-gate filling is tuned to ν=1+ε, reflect the sequential addition of individual skyrmions to a quasi-one-dimensional skyrmion Wigner crystal confined in the 70 nm gate gap. The authors support this interpretation with self-consistent electrostatic simulations showing a localized density pocket and with a phenomenological flux-tube-array model that qualitatively reproduces the linear bias dependence of the variance and the cross-detector correlations. They conclude that the skyrmion crystal acts as a magnonic metamaterial and that magnon scattering provides a real-space-sensitive probe of skyrmion topology and collective dynamics.

Significance. If the central identification holds, this is a substantial advance: it would be the first real-space-sensitive probe of a quantum Hall skyrmion crystal's internal dynamics via magnon transport, with implications for generalized Wigner crystals in moiré systems. The experimental data are of high quality: the Zeeman-threshold onset, the simultaneous multi-detector correlation, the VSi dependence, and the linear variance above threshold are all consistent with a junction-localized magnon-scattering process. The paper also contains a useful semiclassical derivation connecting the dipole picture and the nonlinear-sigma-model description of magnon-skyrmion scattering (Methods IV), and the data/analysis code are deposited on Zenodo. However, the leap from gate-periodic noise to quantized skyrmion addition is not quantitatively supported; the principal alternative of an accidental quantum dot or charge trap is not excluded by the arguments presented. The result is therefore conditional on a missing control experiment or a quantitative microscopic calculation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplementary Sec. XIII; E.D.17] The exclusion of a quantum dot is quantitatively inverted. The observed period is ΔV_g≈6.8 mV (dashed lines in E.D.17c), giving C_g=e/ΔV_g≈2.4×10^-17 F. For the device hBN thickness (40–60 nm, ε≈4), the equivalent disc radius is ≈80–110 nm, comparable to the 70 nm junction width and easily accommodated in the 700 nm-long junction. The SI's statement that a 500 nm dot would give ΔV_g≈1 mV and that the observed 6.8 mV period is therefore too large is backwards: a smaller capacitance gives a larger period. A small accidental dot would produce regular, reproducible Coulomb-blockade oscillations with the observed period and would also shift with VSi and be seen by all detectors. This removes the main quantitative argument against the dot picture and makes the load-bearing 'each burst = one skyrmion' identification unestablished. A B-field dependence of the period would discriminate: skyrmion
  2. [Transition near...; SI XII.4] The electrostatic simulations (SI XII.4, Figs. S.12–S.13) demonstrate only a smooth, gate-tunable density pocket in the junction. They do not show crystalline order, a quantized topological charge, or the addition of one skyrmion per period. The statement in the main text that 'Figures 2.D-E thus present direct evidence of a crystalline phase' overstates what the data show: quasi-periodic noise windows are equally consistent with sequential charging of a localized mesoscopic state. The theoretical model in Methods VII contains numerous free parameters (Kx, x0, Ky, yJ, a, b, N_S), and the comparison in Figs. 3D–E and 4C is qualitative. The period-to-skyrmion-number mapping is assumed, not derived from an independent lever-arm or charging-energy calculation.
  3. [Methods VII; E.D.5] The proposed microscopic mechanism—softening of the crystal at the addition point and magnon-induced shaking—is implemented in the numerics by manually reducing Kx, not by computing the stiffness from a skyrmion-crystal Hamiltonian at a given N_S. The model's linear-variance result (Fig. 4C) is therefore partly an input assumption, and the qualitative agreement does not add independent evidence for the skyrmion picture. The authors acknowledge neglecting inductive back-reaction; a quantitative estimate of its magnitude would strengthen the claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1B / main text near Fig. 1] The sentence 'the local filling factor near the ohmic contacts being .' is incomplete—the numerical value is missing.
  2. [Section VI heading] The heading 'MAGNON REFLECTION AND ADSORPTION AT BOUNDARIES' should read 'ABSORPTION'.
  3. [SI references [48] and [49]] References [48] and [49] appear to be the same paper (same title, same journal, same DOI); one reference should be removed or replaced.
  4. [Throughout] Capitalization of 'Skyrmion/skyrmion' is inconsistent, and the header of the second section contains a typo: 'T ransition near and emergence of skyrmion crystallization'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No by-construction circularity; skyrmion-addition identification is an interpretive overlay with a weak but non-circular quantum-dot exclusion.

full rationale

The paper's central experimental content—non-local magnon signals, correlated fluctuations across detectors, and their gate-voltage, bias, and V_Si dependencies—is independent of the theoretical model. The skyrmion-crystal interpretation is an overlay: the paper explicitly says it 'develop[s] an interpretation' and 'argue[s]' that the near-periodic noise windows correspond to single-skyrmion additions, but it never derives the observed gate-voltage period from skyrmion parameters, nor does it fit the model to the period and then present that fit as a prediction. The phenomenological model is openly post hoc: it 'postulate[s]' flux-tube forms (Eqs. 19-21), tunes a stiffness parameter K_x by hand to reach a low-stiffness regime, and produces only qualitative agreement (linear variance, skewness, cross-detector asymmetry). No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction. The main self-citation burden is Ref. [18] (Chakraborty, Moessner, Doucot, all co-authors here), used to motivate the magnon–skyrmion-crystal coupling: 'we resort to a phenomenological description of the problem inspired from the analysis in Ref.[18]'. But the existence and physics of skyrmion crystals are supported by external refs [2,5,10], and the magnon dipole picture is independently established (Refs. [16,37]); Ref. [18] is not the unique load-bearing basis for the core claim. The Supplementary Item XIII exclusion of an accidental quantum dot is logically flawed—the observed ~6.8 mV period implies C_g ≈ e/ΔV_g ≈ 2.4×10^-17 F, which for the stated hBN thickness/ε corresponds to a ~100 nm-scale dot, not the argued 500 nm dot—and the paper's own limitation statement concedes it 'cannot fully exclude the presence of local charge inhomogeneities'. This is a genuine evidential weakness and a correctness risk, but it is not a circular reduction: the paper does not define skyrmion number as the number of noisy windows and then 'predict' the window spacing from that definition. Under the hard rules requiring an explicit equation/fit reduction, no significant circularity is present; score 2 reflects the presence of some self-citation plus an interpretive step that is weaker than claimed, while the experimental observations and the model's qualitative checks retain independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central interpretation rests on several hand-chosen potentials and length scales (a, b, K_x, K_y, N_S) and on prior skyrmion/magnon theory. The model's qualitative agreement is a consistency check, not an independent confirmation of the skyrmion-addition picture.

free parameters (6)
  • K_x and x0 (transverse confining potential) = not reported; chosen by hand
    Define V_cx = K_x x^2/(1+(x/x0)^2) for the junction width; reducing K_x models the 'soft' crystal, so the noise result depends on this choice (Methods VII).
  • K_y and yJ (longitudinal hard-wall potential) = not reported; chosen by hand
    Define V_cy = K_y(|y|-yJ)^4 beyond the junction; affects magnon confinement and trajectories (Methods VII).
  • a (flux-tube radius in effective magnetic field) = of order l_B; chosen by hand
    Appears in Eq. 20, B(r-R) = 4a^2/(|r-R|^2+a^2)^2; sets the Lorentz force profile from each skyrmion.
  • b (screening length in local potential) = of order l_B; chosen by hand
    Appears in Eq. 21, Vloc terms 1/(|r-R|^2+b^2)^(1/2); sets the electrostatic profile of each skyrmion.
  • N_S (number of skyrmions in simulations) = 5
    The simulations start with five skyrmions; the predicted detector asymmetry and variance depend on this number (Methods VII, Fig. 3E).
  • E_ex (exchange splitting in electrostatic simulations) = 30 meV
    Phenomenological Landau-level splitting taken from Ref [46]; controls the width of the simulated density pocket and hence the confinement argument (SI XII).
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Skyrmions are the lowest-energy charged excitations at ν=1+ε in quantum Hall ferromagnets.
    Standard QH skyrmion theory (Sondhi et al., Brey et al.); invoked to interpret excess charge beyond ν=1 as skyrmion textures.
  • standard math The nonlinear sigma model with stiffness ρ_s and topological charge density 4πQ provides the effective magnon dynamics in a skyrmion background.
    Methods IV.B; the Berry-phase/orbital-field substitution follows prior QH magnon theory and Ref [40].
  • domain assumption A magnon can be treated as a semiclassical dipole with effective Hamiltonian Eq. 15 in the limit l_B << d_ext.
    Methods IV.A; the validity of the dipole picture and the WKB wave-packet ansatz is assumed throughout.
  • ad hoc to paper Skyrmion dynamics reduce to 2N_S phase-space coordinates with nearest-neighbor Coulomb interactions and no inductive back-reaction.
    Methods IV; the authors explicitly 'postulate' the elastic energy (Eq. 19), flux-tube forms (Eqs. 20-21), and neglect magnon-induced electromotive force.
  • domain assumption The junction electrostatically confines excess charge into a quasi-1D pocket of width a few l_B.
    SI XII Schrödinger-Poisson simulations show a density pocket, but crystallization and single-skyrmion quantization are inferred, not observed.
  • ad hoc to paper The observed sharp noise is intrinsic magnon-induced crystal dynamics rather than measurement noise or contact effects.
    Central interpretation; supported by correlation across detectors and VSi dependence, but competing charge-trap mechanisms are not fully excluded.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 26161 in / 14434 out tokens · 146212 ms · 2026-08-01T21:34:06.757848+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magnons reveal topology and dynamics of a skyrmion crystal." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KEBIZAOD

@misc{pith2026260716023,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magnons reveal topology and dynamics of a skyrmion crystal},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KEBIZAOD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.16023}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Although individual skyrmions are topologically protected objects, their cooperative crystalline order is fragile, easily disrupted by thermal fluctuations or other external perturbations. Probing the internal dynamics of such a crystal is both compelling and challenging, as its intricate and delicate spin texture must remain stable during measurement. Here, we engineer a nanoscale graphene junction hosting a skyrmion Wigner crystal, embedded between magnon emitters and detectors. The skyrmion crystal geometry leaves a striking imprint on magnon transport: as the gate voltage is varied, near-periodic windows of sharp fluctuations in magnon count are detected across the entire sample. We develop an interpretation that this results from skyrmions being added one by one to a quasi-one-dimensional array. Each burst of the fluctuations thus corresponds to the entry of an additional skyrmion, during which the lattice stiffness reduces. The impinging magnons induce and act as a probe of non-equilibrium collective dynamics of the crystal. These results establish a real-space probe of topological spin textures in quantum Hall-type insulating ground states via magnon transport and open opportunities to explore correlated, topologically ordered phases in moire and multilayer graphene systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16023 by Antonio Lacerda-Santos, Benoit Doucot, Cosimo Gorini, Himadri Chakraborti, Kenji Watanabe, Leo Pugliese, Lilian Seyve, Manabendra Kuiri, Nilotpal Chakraborty, Preden Roulleau, Quentin Benichou, Raphael Ayache, Roderich Moessner, Takashi Taniguchi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The self-consistent Quantum-Electrostatics problem First, we formulate the electrostatic problem. Taking the carrier charge asq=−ewithethe elementary charge, the electrostatic potential satisfies: ∇ ·(ε(⃗ r)∇U(⃗ r)) =en(⃗ r, µ)−end(⃗ r); (32) with the local chemical potential given byµ=µ(⃗ r) =eU(⃗ r), assumingEF = 0. Hereε(⃗ r) is the position-dependent ...

  2. [2]

    We refer to Refs

    Technical details To solve this problem, we use the open-source software PESCADO. We refer to Refs. [48, 49] for a description of the algorithms implemented in the package. Pescado discretizes Eq. 32 using finite volume scheme, which ensures local (and global) charge and flux conservation. The system’s boundary condition are applied to the electric flux. ...

  3. [3]

    Calibrating the electrostatics: PN junction in the(ν L, νR) = (1,−2)regime We start by calibrating the electrostatic simulations against experimental data of the studied device in the config- uration of anP N-junction type Mach-Zehnder interferometer, see Figure S.11 a-c. 23 FIG. S.10. Potential profile for (ν L, νR) = (1,−2) withV Si = 0Vand gate separat...

  4. [4]

    We normalise all lengths to the magnetic lengthl B ≈7.1 nm atB= 13 T

    Electrostatics of the junction in the(1 +ϵ,1)regime We now consider the electrostatics in the regime relevant for the skyrmion - magnon scattering experiments. We normalise all lengths to the magnetic lengthl B ≈7.1 nm atB= 13 T. Figure S.12 shows the evolution of the charge density profile as a function ofν L = 1 +ϵforV Si = 20V(top) andV Si = 30V(bottom...

  5. [5]

    Physical interpretation of the confined skyrmion regime Overall, the self-consistent electrostatic simulations support the interpretation that the experimentally observed oscillatory regime originates from a confined skyrmionic phase localized at the junction. In the experimentally relevant (1 +ϵ,1) regime, the combination of the split graphite gates and ...

  6. [6]

    T. H. R. Skyrme, A unified field theory of mesons and baryons, Nuclear Physics31, 556 (1962)

    1962

  7. [7]

    S. L. Sondhi, A. Karlhede, S. A. Kivelson, and E. H. Rezayi, Skyrmions and the crossover from the integer to fractional quantum hall effect at small zeeman energies, Physical Review B47, 16419 (1993)

    1993

  8. [8]

    A. A. Belavin and A. M. Polyakov, Metastable states of two-dimensional isotropic ferromagnets, JETP Letters22, 245 (1975)

    1975

  9. [9]

    S. M. Girvin, The quantum hall effect: Novel excitations and broken symmetries, inTopological Aspects of Low Dimensional Systems, Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School, edited by A. Comtet, T. Jolicœur, S. Ouvry, and F. David (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999) pp. 53–175

    1999

  10. [10]

    L. Brey, H. A. Fertig, R. Cˆ ot´ e, and A. H. MacDonald, Skyrme crystal in a two-dimensional electron gas, Physical Review Letters75, 2562 (1995)

    1995

  11. [11]

    Tycko, S

    R. Tycko, S. E. Barrett, G. Dabbagh, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Electronic states in gallium arsenide quantum wells probed by optically pumped NMR, Science268, 1460 (1995)

    1995

  12. [12]

    S. E. Barrett, G. Dabbagh, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, and R. Tycko, Optically pumped NMR evidence for finite-size skyrmions in GaAs quantum wells near landau level fillingν= 1, Physical Review Letters74, 5112 (1995)

    1995

  13. [13]

    Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, Journal of Physics and Chem- istry of Solids4, 241 (1958)

    I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, Journal of Physics and Chem- istry of Solids4, 241 (1958)

    1958

  14. [14]

    Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Physical Review120, 91 (1960)

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Physical Review120, 91 (1960)

    1960

  15. [15]

    K. Yang, S. Das Sarma, and A. H. MacDonald, Collective modes and skyrmion excitations in grapheneSU(4) quantum hall ferromagnets, Physical Review B74, 075423 (2006)

    2006

  16. [16]

    Bayot, E

    V. Bayot, E. Grivei, S. Melinte, M. B. Santos, and M. Shayegan, Giant low-temperature heat capacity of GaAs quantum wells near landau level fillingν= 1, Physical Review Letters76, 4584 (1996)

    1996

  17. [17]

    Plochockaet al., Optical absorption to probe the quantum hall ferromagnet at filling factorν= 1, Physical Review Letters102, 126806 (2009)

    P. Plochockaet al., Optical absorption to probe the quantum hall ferromagnet at filling factorν= 1, Physical Review Letters102, 126806 (2009)

    2009

  18. [18]

    I. V. Kukushkin, K. von Klitzing, and K. Eberl, Spin polarization of two-dimensional electrons in different fractional states and around filling factorν= 1, Physical Review B55, 10607 (1997)

    1997

  19. [19]

    D. S. Weiet al., Electrical generation and detection of spin waves in a quantum hall ferromagnet, Science362, 229 (2018)

    2018

  20. [20]

    H. Zhou, H. Polshyn, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and A. Young, Solids of quantum hall skyrmions in graphene, Nature Physics16, 154 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    Assoulineet al., Excitonic nature of magnons in a quantum hall ferromagnet, Nature Physics17, 1369 (2021)

    A. Assoulineet al., Excitonic nature of magnons in a quantum hall ferromagnet, Nature Physics17, 1369 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    Kallin and B

    C. Kallin and B. I. Halperin, Excitations from a filled landau level in the two-dimensional electron gas, Physical Review B 30, 5655 (1984)

    1984

  23. [23]

    Chakraborty, R

    N. Chakraborty, R. Moessner, and B. Doucot, Magnon scattering off quantum hall skyrmion crystals probes interplay of topology and symmetry breaking, Physical Review B108, 104401 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    A. P. Reddy, N. Paul, A. Abouelkomsan, and L. Fu, Non-abelian fractionalization in topological minibands, Physical Review Letters133, 166503 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    N. Paul, Y. Zhang, and L. Fu, Giant proximity exchange and flat chern band in 2d magnet-semiconductor heterostructures, Science Advances9, eabn1401 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    Guerci, J

    D. Guerci, J. Wang, and C. Mora, Layer skyrmions for ideal chern bands in twisted graphene systems, Physical Review B 112, L041108 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    H. Pan, F. Wu, and S. Das Sarma, Band topology, hubbard model, heisenberg model, and dzyaloshinskii–moriya interaction in twisted bilayer WSe 2, Physical Review Research2, 033087 (2020)

    2020

  28. [28]

    Wuet al., Topological insulators in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homobilayers, Physical Review Letters122, 086402 (2019)

    F. Wuet al., Topological insulators in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homobilayers, Physical Review Letters122, 086402 (2019)

    2019

  29. [29]

    Donget al., Anomalous hall crystals in rhombohedral multilayer graphene

    J. Donget al., Anomalous hall crystals in rhombohedral multilayer graphene. i. interaction-driven chern bands and fractional quantum hall states at zero magnetic field, Physical Review Letters133, 206503 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Donget al., Theory of quantum anomalous hall phases in pentalayer rhombohedral graphene moir´ e structures, Physical Review Letters133, 206502 (2024)

    Z. Donget al., Theory of quantum anomalous hall phases in pentalayer rhombohedral graphene moir´ e structures, Physical Review Letters133, 206502 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Zhouet al., Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in rhombohedral multilayer graphene in the moir´ eless limit, Physical Review Letters133, 206504 (2024)

    B. Zhouet al., Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in rhombohedral multilayer graphene in the moir´ eless limit, Physical Review Letters133, 206504 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    F. Desrocherset al., Elastic response and instabilities of anomalous hall crystals, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08784 10.48550/arXiv.2503.08784 (2025), arXiv:2503.08784 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.08784 2025

  33. [33]

    H. Xianget al., Continuously tunable anomalous hall crystals in rhombohedral heptalayer graphene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18031 10.48550/arXiv.2502.18031 (2025), arXiv:2502.18031 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.18031 2025

  34. [34]

    Lian and M

    Y. Lian and M. O. Goerbig, Spin-valley skyrmions in graphene at filling factorν= 1, Physical Review B95, 245428 (2017)

    2017

  35. [35]

    Murthy, E

    G. Murthy, E. Shimshoni, and H. A. Fertig, Spin-valley coherent phases of theν= 0 quantum hall state in bilayer graphene, Physical Review B96, 245125 (2017)

    2017

  36. [36]

    Stefanidis and I

    N. Stefanidis and I. Sodemann Villadiego, Spin-valley entangled quantum hall states in graphene, Physical Review B108, 235137 (2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    Chakraborty, R

    N. Chakraborty, R. Moessner, and B. Doucot, Entanglement smectic and stripe order, Physical Review Letters133, 206604 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    Psaroudaki, Skyrmion qubits: A new class of quantum logic elements based on nanoscale magnetization, Physical 33 Review Letters127, 067201 (2021)

    C. Psaroudaki, Skyrmion qubits: A new class of quantum logic elements based on nanoscale magnetization, Physical 33 Review Letters127, 067201 (2021)

    2021

  39. [39]

    Chakraborty, R

    N. Chakraborty, R. Moessner, and B. Doucot, Cross-platform protected qubits from entanglement, Physical Review B 112, 155111 (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    Canright, D

    A. Canright, D. Iyer, and M. S. Foster, Magnon scattering and transduction in coulomb-coupled quantum hall ferromagnets, Physical Review B113, 125301 (2026)

    2026

  41. [41]

    Ayache and P

    R. Ayache and P. Roulleau, Replication data for: Magnons reveal a wigner crystal with non-trivial topology and its collective dynamics in graphene, 10.5281/zenodo.17700899 (2025)

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17700899 2025

  42. [42]

    Kallin and B

    C. Kallin and B. I. Halperin, Excitations from a filled landau level in the two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B30, 5655 (1984)

    1984

  43. [43]

    S. L. Sondhi, A. Karlhede, S. A. Kivelson, and E. H. Rezayi, Skyrmions and the crossover from the integer to fractional quantum hall effect at small zeeman energies, Phys. Rev. B47, 16419 (1993)

    1993

  44. [44]

    K. Moon, H. Mori, K. Yang, S. M. Girvin, A. H. MacDonald, L. Zheng, D. Yoshioka, and S.-C. Zhang, Spontaneous interlayer coherence in double-layer quantum hall systems: Charged vortices and kosterlitz-thouless phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B51, 5138 (1995)

    1995

  45. [45]

    Chakraborty, R

    N. Chakraborty, R. Moessner, and B. Doucot, Magnon scattering off quantum hall skyrmion crystals probes interplay of topology and symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. B108, 104401 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, Edge channels for the fractional quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 216 (1990)

    1990

  47. [47]

    A. Chang, A unified transport theory for the integral and fractional quantum hall effects: Phase boundaries, edge currents, and transmission/reflection probabilities, Solid State Communications74, 871 (1990)

    1990

  48. [48]

    D. B. Chklovskii, B. I. Shklovskii, and L. I. Glazman, Electrostatics of edge channels, Phys. Rev. B46, 4026 (1992)

    1992

  49. [49]

    D. B. Chklovskii, K. A. Matveev, and B. I. Shklovskii, Ballistic conductance of interacting electrons in the quantum hall regime, Phys. Rev. B47, 12605 (1993)

    1993

  50. [50]

    Armagnat and X

    P. Armagnat and X. Waintal, Reconciling edge states with compressible stripes in a ballistic mesoscopic conductor, Journal of Physics: Materials3, 02LT01 (2020)

    2020

  51. [51]

    I. M. Fl´ or, A. Lacerda-Santos, G. Fleury, P. Roulleau, and X. Waintal, Positioning of edge states in a quantum hall graphenepnjunction, Phys. Rev. B105, L241409 (2022)

    2022

  52. [52]

    Laturia, M

    A. Laturia, M. L. Van de Put, and W. G. Vandenberghe, Dielectric properties of hexagonal boron nitride and transition metal dichalcogenides: from monolayer to bulk, npj 2D Materials and Applications2, 6 (2018)

    2018

  53. [54]

    Lacerda-Santos and X

    A. Lacerda-Santos and X. Waintal, Electrostatics in semiconducting devices I: The pure electrostatics self consistent approximation, SciPost Phys.20, 100 (2026)

    2026