REVIEW 2 cited by
QECV: Quantum Error Correction Verification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
QECV: Quantum Error Correction Verification
read the original abstract
Quantum Error Correction (QEC) is essential for fault-tolerant quantum copmutation, and its implementation is a very sophisticated process involving both quantum and classical hardware. Formulating and verifying the decomposition of logical operations into physical ones is a challenge in itself. In this paper, we propose QECV, a verification framework that can efficiently verify the formal correctness of stabilizer codes, arguably the most important class of QEC codes. QECV first comes with a concise language, QECV-Lang, where stabilizers are treated as a first-class object, to represent QEC programs. Stabilizers are also used as predicates in our new assertion language, QECV-Assn, as logical and arithmetic operations of stabilizers can be naturally defined. We derive a sound quantum Hoare logic proof system with a set of inference rules for QECV to efficiently reason about the correctness of QEC programs. We demonstrate the effectiveness of QECV with both theoretical complexity analysis and in-depth case studies of two well-known stabilizer QEC codes, the repetition code and the surface code.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
End-to-End Formalization of Quantum Error Correction
Lean-QEC delivers the first end-to-end Lean 4 formalization of stabilizer-code theory with verified distance certificates for large qLDPC codes in the Bivariate Bicycle family.
-
Reasoning about Continuous-Variable Quantum Systems
A cost-parametric quantum Hoare logic with continuous-outcome bind is proved sound and relatively complete over closed positive quadratic-form predicates, with case studies on a null-recurrent quantum walk and one-rou...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.