Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Exploring Faithful Rationale for Multi-hop Fact Verification via Salience-Aware Graph Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.01060 v1 pith:KFIFRRTA submitted 2022-12-02 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords evidencefactmulti-hoprationaleverificationgraphinformationextraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The opaqueness of the multi-hop fact verification model imposes imperative requirements for explainability. One feasible way is to extract rationales, a subset of inputs, where the performance of prediction drops dramatically when being removed. Though being explainable, most rationale extraction methods for multi-hop fact verification explore the semantic information within each piece of evidence individually, while ignoring the topological information interaction among different pieces of evidence. Intuitively, a faithful rationale bears complementary information being able to extract other rationales through the multi-hop reasoning process. To tackle such disadvantages, we cast explainable multi-hop fact verification as subgraph extraction, which can be solved based on graph convolutional network (GCN) with salience-aware graph learning. In specific, GCN is utilized to incorporate the topological interaction information among multiple pieces of evidence for learning evidence representation. Meanwhile, to alleviate the influence of noisy evidence, the salience-aware graph perturbation is induced into the message passing of GCN. Moreover, the multi-task model with three diagnostic properties of rationale is elaborately designed to improve the quality of an explanation without any explicit annotations. Experimental results on the FEVEROUS benchmark show significant gains over previous state-of-the-art methods for both rationale extraction and fact verification.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fact in Fragments: Deconstructing Complex Claims via LLM-based Atomic Fact Extraction and Verification

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    AFEV iteratively decomposes complex claims into atomic facts, verifies each with reranked evidence and dynamic demonstrations, and reports state-of-the-art results on five fact verification benchmarks.

Pith tools