Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 49 references

Interlayer sliding direction as a symmetry selector in altermagnetic bilayer Fe2WS4: Switchable anomalous Hall and anomalous valley Hall effects

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Interlayer sliding direction acts as a symmetry selector in altermagnetic bilayer Fe2WS4, enabling switchable anomalous Hall and valley Hall effects.

desk verdict Clean symmetry logic for sliding-controlled AHE/AVHE in an altermagnetic bilayer, but the switchability claim needs kinetic barriers before it fully lands. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.14459 v1 pith:KFLPZMJE submitted 2026-07-16 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Quan Shen , Jianing Tan , Tao Yao , Wenhu Liao , Jiansheng Dong This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords altermagnetismslidingferroelectricityanomalousHalleffectvalleypolarizationBerrycurvatureFe2WS4bilayer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that in the altermagnetic bilayer Fe2WS4, the direction the top layer slides relative to the bottom is a nonvolatile symmetry-selective control knob. Diagonal sliding breaks inversion symmetry and gives two ferroelectric states with opposite out-of-plane polarizations; switching between these reverses the momentum-dependent spin texture and the anomalous Hall conductivity. Axial sliding preserves inversion symmetry but breaks the mirror that connects the X and Y valleys, producing reversible valley polarization and a switchable anomalous valley Hall effect. If this is right, a single material offers separate, nonvolatile switches for ferroelectricity, spin texture, valley polarization, and transverse Hall transport, without strain or external magnetic fields.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the set of symmetry operations relating the sliding configurations: inversion P, the diagonal mirror M_xy, and the interlayer mirror M_z. In the AA stack, P and M_z together force opposite-spin states to be degenerate at every k, while M_xy exchanges the X and Y valleys. Diagonal sliding breaks P, but the in-plane twofold rotation 2_100 connects AB1 and AB2, reversing the out-of-plane polarization and the Berry curvature, hence the anomalous Hall conductivity. Axial sliding keeps P but breaks M_xy, and M_xy itself connects AC1 and AC2, exchanging the X and Y valleys and reversing the valley polarization and valley-contrasting Berry curvature. These magnetic-space-gro

What would settle it

Compute the minimum-energy path for sliding the top layer from AA to AB1/AB2 and AC1/AC2. If the energy barriers are too high for thermal or field-assisted switching at device temperatures, or if the path passes through unstable states that prevent reversible switching, the central claim fails. A higher-level calculation that changes the sign of the Berry curvature at the valleys would also falsify the predicted sign reversal.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Monolayer Fe2WS4 is an altermagnet with momentum-dependent spin splitting and spin-valley locking. When two layers are stacked in the high-symmetry AA geometry, inversion, an interlayer mirror, and a diagonal mirror collectively enforce spin degeneracy and valley equivalence. The paper shows that translating one layer along a diagonal direction (AB1 and AB2 stackings) breaks inversion symmetry, producing two states with equal and opposite out-of-plane polarizations; the symmetry operation connecting them forces the anomalous Hall conductivity to reverse sign. Translating along an axial direction (AC1 and AC2 stackings) keeps inversion symmetry, so no polarization appears, but breaks the mirr

Load-bearing premise

The four relaxed sliding configurations are claimed to be metastable and accessible, but the paper does not compute energy barriers or switching paths between them; if the barriers are too high or the switch is not reversible, the nonvolatile switching claim collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Bilayer Fe2WS4 provides two independent nonvolatile switches: one controls ferroelectric polarization and the anomalous Hall effect, the other controls valley polarization and the anomalous valley Hall effect.
  • The reversal of the anomalous Hall conductivity upon ferroelectric switching demonstrates strong magnetoelectric coupling, where a polarization switch changes the spin texture and the transport response.
  • The anomalous valley Hall effect can be switched without net polarization or net magnetization, purely by lowering a crystalline mirror symmetry.
  • Interlayer sliding alone, without strain or magnetic fields, can selectively address spin, valley, and Hall degrees of freedom in a single material.
  • The mechanism offers a design principle for nonvolatile, Hall-readable multifunctional states in two-dimensional magnetic van der Waals materials.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper establishes static energetics but not kinetic feasibility; computing sliding energy barriers and switching paths would test whether the states are truly switchable at practical temperatures.
  • The symmetry-based argument likely generalizes to other altermagnetic bilayers with square lattices and similar mirror symmetries, suggesting a broader class of sliding-controlled multifunctional materials.
  • The predicted valley-dependent Berry curvature could be probed by nonlocal transport or circular dichroism measurements; the sign reversal should be robust because it is symmetry-enforced, even if magnitudes depend on computational details.
  • The valley polarization magnitude (97.1 meV) may depend on the Hubbard U parameter, but the symmetry-enforced sign reversal between AC1 and AC2 should be independent of that choice.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses first-principles DFT+U to argue that interlayer sliding direction acts as a symmetry-selective control in altermagnetic bilayer Fe2WS4. Starting from an AA-stacked bilayer with inversion, out-of-plane mirror, and diagonal mirror symmetries, the authors show that diagonal sliding (AB1/AB2) breaks inversion and creates two ferroelectric states with opposite out-of-plane polarization, reversing the calculated anomalous Hall conductivity and switching the spin texture. Axial sliding (AC1/AC2) preserves inversion but breaks the mirror symmetry relating X and Y valleys, producing reversible valley polarization and a switchable anomalous valley Hall effect, inferred from valley-contrasting Berry curvature. The symmetry analysis is internally consistent, and the sign reversals in the calculated band structures, Berry curvature, and AHE for AB1/AB2 support the central mechanism.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work provides a conceptually attractive design principle: a single structural knob—interlayer sliding direction—can selectively address ferroelectricity, spin texture, valley polarization, and Hall transport in a compensated magnetic bilayer. The paper connects altermagnetism, sliding ferroelectricity, and valleytronics in a way that could inspire further studies in 2D magnetic van der Waals stacks. The symmetry-based reasoning is transparent and is not fitted to the DFT results; the sign-reversal predictions are stated before the calculations and follow directly from magnetic space-group symmetries. However, the 'nonvolatile, switchable' framing requires kinetic evidence that is not provided, and the AVHE is inferred rather than computed as a transport quantity.

major comments (4)
  1. [III.B] The metastability and switchability of the four sliding configurations is load-bearing for the paper's central claim, but it is not established. The text states that after full relaxation the configurations 'exhibit comparable energies ... indicating that they are metastable states accessible via interlayer sliding' (Fig. S6). Comparable relaxed energies do not distinguish local minima from saddle points, and no minimum-energy path, barrier height, or finite-temperature AIMD for the bilayer stackings is reported. Thermal/dynamical stability is only shown for the monolayer (Sec. III.A). The title and abstract promise a 'nonvolatile, symmetry-selective control knob'; this requires barriers that prevent spontaneous relaxation to AA and are surmountable by a feasible stimulus. Please add NEB or analogous sliding-barrier calculations between AA and AB1/AB2/AC1/AC2, and ideally bilayer AIMD, t
  2. [III.D] The 'switchable anomalous valley Hall effect' is inferred from the valence-band Berry curvature imbalance near the X and Y valleys, but no anomalous Hall conductivity (valley-resolved or total) is computed for AC1 and AC2. Unlike the diagonal-sliding case, where σ_xy is calculated for AB1/AB2 and its sign reversal is demonstrated in Fig. 2(e), the axial-sliding case only shows Berry curvature at two points. To support the claim of a switchable AVHE, please compute the integrated σ_xy for AC1 and AC2 and demonstrate its sign reversal, or state explicitly why the Berry-curvature imbalance is sufficient for the conclusion.
  3. [II/III.A] All DFT+U calculations use a single effective Hubbard parameter, U_eff = 2.0 eV. Quantitative results—the 97.1 meV valley splitting, the 15 meV potential step, and the magnitudes of σ_xy—may be sensitive to U. Because the paper makes quantitative claims about 'large' valley polarization and 'strong' magnetoelectric coupling, a Hubbard-U sensitivity test (e.g., U_eff = 1–4 eV) is needed to show that the sign reversals and the symmetry-selection mechanism are robust, and to quantify the uncertainty in the reported magnitudes.
  4. [Data Availability] The manuscript reports highly specific quantitative values (e.g., Berry curvature of 0.38/0.42 Å^2, σ_xy sign reversal) but only states that data are available 'upon reasonable request.' No input structures (POSCARs), VASP/Wannier90 settings, or scripts are provided. To make the first-principles results independently checkable, please deposit the full calculation inputs and key outputs in a public repository (e.g., the Materials Cloud or Zenodo).
minor comments (3)
  1. [III.C] The symmetry relation involving the 2_100 operation is described in a way that is hard to parse: '2_{100} transforms the in-plane momentum as (k_x,k_y)→(-k_x,k_y)' (or similar) appears garbled. Please state explicitly that for a twofold rotation about the x axis, (k_x,k_y)→(k_x,-k_y), and then give the resulting connection between AB1 and AB2, which would fix the equation for E^{AB1}(s,k) = E^{AB2}(-s, 2_{100} k).
  2. [Section III.D] The Berry-curvature values in the text (e.g., '0 2 Å. 38') are misformatted and difficult to read. Please write them as −0.38 Å^2 and +0.42 Å^2, or similar clearly formatted values, and verify the units.
  3. [General] The phrase 'the zM symmetry ... enforces spin degeneracy' could be clarified: it is the combination of zM and P, not zM alone, that together enforce the (s,k)→(−s,−k) constraint. The text does state this, but the flow could be improved by making the individual roles explicit before combining them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: symmetry-enforced relations are checked by DFT, not fitted; minor self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are derived from explicit symmetry operations applied to defined stacking configurations. AB1/AB2 are connected by the 2_100 operation and AC1/AC2 by M_xy; the sign reversals of ferroelectric polarization, spin polarization, valley polarization, and Berry-curvature/AHE responses are symmetry-enforced consequences of these defined structures. The DFT+U calculations and Wannier interpolation provide independent numerical checks rather than fitting parameters to the claimed outcomes. The self-citations (refs 15, 22, 37) are contextual: refs 15 and 22 are prior strain and sliding-FE studies, and ref 37 is cited for the choice of Hubbard U; none of these carries the central derivation, which is computed in this work. No fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force the conclusions. The main caveat is a correctness/completeness issue rather than circularity: the 'nonvolatile, switchable' framing rests on comparable relaxed energies without computed minimum-energy paths or sliding barriers, and the switchable AVHE is inferred from Berry-curvature imbalance rather than a directly computed transverse valley-Hall conductivity. These concerns do not reduce the derivation to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests primarily on symmetry assignments (P, zM, xyM) and DFT+U calculations. The only hand-set numerical parameter is Ueff=2.0 eV; the key untested assumption is kinetic accessibility of the sliding states. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Hubbard Ueff = 2.0 eV
    Effective on-site Coulomb parameter for Fe 3d electrons, taken from previous studies (refs 36, 37) rather than derived or fit here. It affects quantitative band splittings, valley polarization magnitudes, and Berry curvature values, though not the symmetry-enforced sign relations.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption PBE+U with Ueff=2.0 eV and J=0 describes the electronic structure of Fe2WS4 accurately enough for the qualitative spin and valley physics.
    All band structures, Berry curvatures, and AHC signs come from DFT+U; no experimental verification or U-convergence analysis is reported (Sec. II and III).
  • domain assumption The assigned space group P-42m (No. 111) and the AFM1 magnetic configuration (antiparallel Fe moments related by the xy mirror) are the correct ground-state symmetries.
    The symmetry analysis in Sec. III.A-B rests on these assignments; a different magnetic configuration or space group would change the spin-degeneracy and valley-equivalence arguments.
  • ad hoc to paper The four sliding configurations are metastable and switchable with accessible interlayer-sliding barriers.
    The paper shows comparable relaxed energies but computes no minimum-energy paths or barriers for AB1/AB2 or AC1/AC2 switching. The 'nonvolatile switchable' claim depends on this unverified kinetic assumption (Sec. III.B).
  • domain assumption Wannier interpolation preserves the Berry curvature and anomalous Hall conductivity of the DFT bands.
    AHC is computed via Wannier90 interpolation (Sec. II); no Wannier convergence checks or comparison with direct DFT Berry curvature integration is provided.
  • standard math The Kubo-formula Berry-curvature expression for AHC is valid for this 2D system.
    Equation (1) and the AHC integral are standard, but implicitly assume a clean noninteracting single-particle picture from DFT.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Interlayer sliding direction as a symmetry selector in altermagnetic bilayer Fe2WS4: Switchable anomalous Hall and anomalous valley Hall effects." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KFLPZMJE

@misc{pith2026260714459,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Interlayer sliding direction as a symmetry selector in altermagnetic bilayer Fe2WS4: Switchable anomalous Hall and anomalous valley Hall effects},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KFLPZMJE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.14459}
}
read the original abstract

Altermagnets combine compensated collinear magnetic order with momentum-dependent spin splitting, offering a promising platform for coupling spin and valley degrees of freedom with ferroelectricity and Berry-curvature driven transport in the absence of net magnetization. However, achieving nonvolatile and selective control of these intertwined degrees of freedom remains a key challenge. Here, using first-principles calculations, we show that the direction of interlayer sliding serves as a symmetry selective control parameter in altermagnetic bilayer Fe2WS4. Diagonal sliding breaks inversion symmetry and produces two sliding ferroelectric states with opposite out-of-plane polarizations. Reversal of the ferroelectric polarization switches the momentum-dependent spin texture and reverses the anomalous Hall conductivity, revealing strong magnetoelectric coupling and enabling a ferroelectrically switchable anomalous Hall effect. In contrast, axial sliding preserves inversion symmetry but breaks the crystalline symmetry relating the X and Y valleys, leading to reversible valley polarization and a switchable anomalous valley Hall effect. These results establish the direction of interlayer sliding as a nonvolatile symmetry selector for controlling ferroelectricity, spin texture, valley polarization, and Hall transport responses in two-dimensional altermagnetic bilayers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14459 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    Mazin, Altermagnetism : A new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys

    I. Mazin, Altermagnetism : A new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    Y . Noda, K. Ohno, and S. Nakamura, Momentum-dependent band spin splitting in semiconducting MnO2: A density functional calculation, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 13294 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    K. H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K. W. Lee, and J. Kuneš, Antiferromagnetism in RuO 2 as d- wave Pomeranchuk instability, Phys. Rev. B 99, 184432 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y . Yanagi, Y . Motome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 10, 4305 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y . Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum -dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 123702 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    H. Bai, Y . C. Zhang, Y . J. Zhou, P. Chen, C. H. Wan, L. Han, W. X. Zhu, S. X. Liang, Y . C. Su, X. F. Han, F. Pan, and C. Song, Efficient spin-to-charge conversion 16 via altermagnetic spin splitting effect in antiferromagnet RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 216701 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    D.-F. Shao, S. -H. Zhang, M. Li, C. -B. Eom, and E. Y . Tsymbal, Spin -neutral currents for spintronics, Nat. Commun. 12, 7061 (2021)

    2021

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    H. Chen, F. Chen, H. Cheng, X. Zhao, G . Hu, X. Yuan, and J. Ren, Layer-locked multiple valley Hall effects in tetragonal altermagnetic/ferromagnetic monolayers M2SiCX2 (M = transition metal ; X = S , Se ), Phys. Rev. B 111, 155428 (2025)

    2025

  2. [10]

    K. F. Mak, K. L. McGill, J. Park , and P. L. McEuen, The valley Hall effect in MoS2 transistors, Science 344, 1489 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    D. Xiao, G . B. Liu, W. X. Feng, X. D. Xu, and W. Yao, Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS 2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196802 (2012)

    2012

  4. [12]

    X. D. Xu, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and T. F. Heinz, Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Phys. 10, 343 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    H. Y . Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. P. Liu, W. Yao, J. F. Jia, and J. W. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun. 12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    S. D. Guo, X. -S. Guo, K. Cheng, K. Wang, and Y . S. Ang, Piezoelectric altermagnetism and spin -valley polarization in Janus monolayer Cr 2SO, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 082401 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Q. Shen, J. Tan, T. Yao, W. Liao, and J. Dong, Strain -tunable multipiezoeffects in the Janus monolayer Cr2SSe: Selective reversal of valley polarization and single - spin-channel anomalous valley Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 113, 224428 (2026)

    2026

  8. [16]

    M. Naka, Y . Motome, and H. Seo, Perovskite as a spin current generator, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125114 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Y asuda, X

    K. Y asuda, X. Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo -Herrero, Stacking-engineered ferroelectricity in bilayer boron nitride, Science 372, 1458 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Yang and S

    Q. Yang and S. Meng, Light -induced complete reversal of ferroelectric polarization in sliding ferroelectrics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 136902 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    H. Gao, Z. Liu, Y . Gong, C. Ke, N. Guo, J. Wu, X. Zeng, J. Guo, S. Li, Z. Cheng, J. Li, H. Zhu, L. -Z. Zhang, X. Liu, S. Liu, L. Xie, and Q. Zheng, Picometer -level in situ manipulation of ferroelectri c polarization in van der Waals layered InSe, Adv. 17 Mater. 36, 2404628 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    F. Sui, M. Jin, Y . Zhang, R. Qi, Y .-N. Wu, R. Huang, F. Yue, and J. Chu, Sliding ferroelectricity in van der Waals layered γ -InSe semiconductor, Nat. Commun. 14, 36 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    W. Sun, C. Yang, W. Wang, Y . Liu, X. Wang, S. Huang, and Z. Cheng, Proposing altermagnetic-ferroelectric type-III multiferroics with robust magnetoelectric coupling, Adv. Mater. 37, 2502575 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Q. Shen, W. Liao, D. Xu, J. Dong, and J. Tan, D ual-switch control of a layer - locked anomalous valley Hall effect in a sliding ferroelectric antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 113, 184407 (2026)

    2026

  15. [23]

    Tong and C

    W.-Y . Tong and C. -G . Duan, Electrical control of the anomalous valley Hall effect in antiferrovalley bilayers, Npj Quantum Mater. 2, 47 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Kresse and J

    G . Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  17. [25]

    Kresse and J

    G . Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid - metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium, Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251 (1994)

    1994

  18. [26]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  19. [27]

    Grimme, S

    S. Grimme, S. Ehrlich, and L. Goerigk, Effect of the damping func tion in dispersion corrected density functional theory, J. Comput. Chem. 32, 1456 (2011)

    2011

  20. [28]

    V . I. Anisimov, J. Zaanen, and O. K. Andersen, Band theory and Mott insulators: Hubbard U instead of Stoner I, Phys. Rev. B 44, 943 (1991)

    1991

  21. [29]

    A. I. Liechtenstein, V . I. Anisimov, and J. Zaanen, Density-functional theory and strong int eractions: Orbital ordering in Mott -Hubbard insulators, Phys. Rev. B 52, R5467 (1995)

    1995

  22. [30]

    Nosé , A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods, J

    S. Nosé , A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511 (1984)

    1984

  23. [31]

    Alfè , PHON: A program to calculate phonons using the small displacement method, Comput

    D. Alfè , PHON: A program to calculate phonons using the small displacement method, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 2622 (2009)

    2009

  24. [32]

    Kim, H.-J

    S.-W. Kim, H.-J. Kim, S. Cheon, and T.-H. Kim, Circular dichroism of emergent chiral stacking orders in quasi-one-dimensional charge density waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 046401 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized generalized Wannier 18 functions for composite energy bands, Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  26. [34]

    Souza, N

    I. Souza, N. Ma rzari, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized Wannier functions for entangled energy bands, Phys. Rev. B 65, 035109 (2001)

    2001

  27. [35]

    Pizzi, D

    G . Pizzi, D. V olja, B. Kozinsky, M. Fornari, and N. Marzari, BOLTZWANN: A code for the evaluation of thermoelectric and electro nic transport properties with a maximally-localized Wannier functions basis, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 422 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    Y . Q. Li, Y . K. Zhang, X. L. Lu, Y . P. Shao, Z. Q. Bao, J. D. Zheng, W. Y . Tong, and C. G . Duan, Ferrovalley physics in stacked bilayer altermagnetic systems, Nano Lett. 25, 6032 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Q. Shen, W. Liao, H. Bao, D. Xu, J. Tan, J. Dong, and G . Ouyang, Tunable valley polarization and spin splitting in altermagnetic Fe2MoS2X2 (X = S , Se , Te) via symmetry engineering, Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 114404 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Xu and L

    X. Xu and L. Yang, Alterpiezoresponse in two -dimensional Lieb -lattice altermagnets, Nano Lett. 25, 11870 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    H. Sun, P. Dong, C. Wu, and P. Li, Multifield -induced antiferromagnet transformation into altermagnet and realiz ed anomalous valley Hall effect in monolayer VPSe3, Phys. Rev. B 111, 235431 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    W. Sun, H. Ye, L. Liang, N. Ding, S. Dong, and S.-S. Wang, Stacking-dependent ferroicity of a reversed bilayer: Altermagnetism or ferroelectricity, Phys. Rev. B 110, 224418 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    X. Liu, A. P. Pyatakov, and W. Ren, Magnetoelectric coupling in multiferroic bilayer VS2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 247601 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    W. Sun, W. Wang, C. Yang, R. Hu, S. Yan, S. Huang, and Z. Cheng, Altermagnetism induced by sliding ferro electricity via lattice symmetry -mediated magnetoelectric coupling, Nano Lett. 24, 11179 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Serlin, C

    M. Serlin, C. L. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y . Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Young, Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall effect in a moiré heterostructure, Science 367, 900 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    Y . Deng, Y . Yu, M. Z. Shi, Z. Guo, Z. Xu, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y . Zhang, Quantum anomalous Hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi 2Te4, Science 367, 895 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Y . Wu, J. Tong, L. Deng, F. Luo, F. Tian, G . Qin, and X. Zhang, Coexisting 19 ferroelectric and ferrovalley polarizations in bilayer stacked magnetic semiconductors, Nano Lett. 23, 6226 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    C. M. Zhang, Y . H. Nie, S. Sanvito, and A. J. Du, First-principles prediction of a room-temperature ferromagnetic Janus VSSe monolayer with piezoelectricity, ferroelasticity, and large valley polarization, Nano Lett. 19, 1366 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Y . Zhu, M. Gu, Y . Liu, X. Chen, Y . Li, S. Du, and Q. Liu, Sliding ferroelectric control of unconventional magnetism in stacked bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 056801 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized Hall conductance in a two-dimensional periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  41. [49]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010)

    1959

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.