Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 64 references

Multiple backward Schramm--Loewner evolution and coupling with Gaussian free field

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Coupling with a Gaussian free field fixes the partition function and boundary perturbation of a multiple backward SLE.

desk verdict Genuinely new multiple-backward-SLE machinery, and the GFF coupling uniqueness is right, but two proof gaps (finite commutation, BPZ uniqueness) need patching. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07180 v3 pith:KGQMO6WA submitted 2019-08-20 math.PR cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.CVmath.MP

Shinji Koshida This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRcond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.CVmath.MP MSC 60D0560J6728C20
keywords multiplebackwardSLESchramm-LoewnerevolutionGaussianfreefieldconformalweldingBPZequationspartitionfunctionGirsanovtransformLiouvillequantumgravity
topics Quantum Gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a definition of multiple backward SLE as a consistent family of backward Loewner chains and asks when such a family can be coupled to a free-boundary Gaussian free field (GFF) carrying a harmonic boundary perturbation. Its main theorem states that the coupling requirement is so strong that it fixes both the partition function and the boundary perturbation up to multiplicative and additive constants. The only admissible partition function is the pairwise product $\prod_{i

What carries the argument

Two mechanisms carry the argument. The first is the commutation relation among infinitesimal generators of backward Loewner chains, $[L_i,L_j]=\frac{4}{(x_i-x_j)^2}(L_i-L_j)$, which forces each drift to be $\kappa\partial_{x_i}\log Z$ for a common function $Z$ satisfying the BPZ-type null-state equations $D_i^\kappa Z=0$, where $D_i^\kappa=\frac{\kappa}{2}\partial_{x_i}^2-2\sum_{j\ne i}(\frac{1}{x_j-x_i}\partial_{x_j}-\frac{h_\kappa}{(x_j-x_i)^2})$ with $h_\kappa=-\frac{\kappa+6}{2\kappa}$. The second is Girsanov's theorem: each backward Loewner chain in the multiple SLE is the law of an ordinary backward SLE($\kappa$) weighted by the local martingale $M^{(i)}_{X,t}$, so all coupling questions reduce to differential equations for the product $\mathcal X=\tilde u Z$. These equations, together with the uniqueness of solutions of the regular-singular BPZ system given their pairwise exponents, are what pin down $Z$ and $u$.

What would settle it

Find two linearly independent analytic, translation-invariant, homogeneous solutions of the system $D_i^\kappa Z=0$ on one connected component of $\operatorname{Conf}_N(\mathbb{R})$ with the same pairwise collision exponents; that would falsify the uniqueness step and supply a different coupled partition function.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 4.6: a $Z$-multiple backward SLE($\kappa$) starting at $X$ is coupled with a $(u,X)$-perturbed free boundary GFF with coupling constant $\gamma$ for every initial condition $X$ if and only if $\sqrt{\kappa}=\gamma$ or $\sqrt{\kappa}=4/\gamma$, the partition function is $Z(x_1,\dots,x_N)=\prod_{1\le i<j\le N}|x_i-x_j|^{-2/\kappa}$ up to a multiplicative constant, and the boundary perturbation is $u(z;x_1,\dots,x_N)=\frac{2}{\sqrt{\kappa}}\sum_{i=1}^N\log|z-x_i|$ up to an additive constant. The forward direction is a direct check. The reverse direction writes the perturbed field process as a ratio of two local martingales, reads off differential equations for the product $\tilde u Z$, and then uses the asymptotic behaviour of solutions of the BPZ system of equations to conclude that $Z$ must be the pairwise product.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing step is the claim that a solution of the system of BPZ equations, the second-order partial differential equations the partition function must satisfy, is uniquely determined up to a constant by its asymptotic behaviour as pairs of points collide; the paper invokes this without verifying the hypotheses of the regular-singular-point theory on the disconnected configuration space $\operatorname{Conf}_N(\mathbb{R})$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Each constituent chain of a multiple backward SLE is a Girsanov transform of an ordinary backward SLE, so the family inherits the usual Loewner construction and only the probability law changes.
  • The conformal welding problem for a quantum surface with $N$ marked boundary points admits exactly one backward-SLE solution under this coupling structure, generated by the pairwise-product partition function.
  • For a fixed Gaussian free field, only two values of $\kappa$ are possible, related by $\sqrt{\kappa}=4/\gamma$ versus $\sqrt{\kappa}=\gamma$.
  • The forward-flow analogue in Appendix B is equally rigid: for $\kappa\ne 4$, the multiple SLE coupled with a Dirichlet GFF must have partition function $\prod |x_i-x_j|^{2/\kappa}$ and one of two explicit boundary perturbations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The pairwise-product partition function is the Boltzmann weight of a one-dimensional log-gas, so the theorem implies that the only GFF-couplable multiple backward SLE is the one driven by a non-colliding log-gas particle system.
  • The uniqueness step relies on the two collision exponents being distinct; at $\kappa=4$ they coincide, so one would expect non-unique couplings for backward SLE(4), mirroring the forward case the paper flags in Appendix B.
  • Rigidity of this kind suggests that conformal welding with more than two marked points cannot be engineered by choosing boundary perturbations freely; radial or multiply connected generalizations are the natural places to look for additional solutions.
  • A direct check of the hypotheses of the cited regular-singular-point theorem on each connected component of $\operatorname{Conf}_N(\mathbb{R})$ would either complete the proof or reveal that only the pairwise product is a possible coupling, not the only one.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a notion of multiple backward SLE as a family of mutually commuting backward Loewner chains. The author derives conditions for commutativity of two chains (Theorem 2.7), obtaining that the drifts must be logarithmic derivatives of a partition function satisfying a system of BPZ-like equations, with the duality condition κ_i = κ_j or κ_i κ_j = 16. A Z-multiple backward SLE is then defined from such a partition function, and each constituent chain is shown to be a Girsanov transform of an ordinary backward SLE (Theorem 3.3). The main result, Theorem 4.6, characterizes when a Z-multiple backward SLE for arbitrary initial configurations is coupled with a free boundary Gaussian free field with a boundary perturbation: this forces the parameters to satisfy √κ = γ or √κ = 4/γ, the partition function to be the pairwise product ∏|x_i-x_j|^{-2/κ}, and the boundary perturbation to be (2/√κ)Σ log|z-x_i|. An analogous forward-flow result is stated in Appendix B.

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, it gives a strong and explicit uniqueness statement: the coupling with the GFF fixes both the partition function and the boundary perturbation up to trivial constants, with the expected κ↔16/κ duality. The paper is written in a purely probabilistic style, avoiding CFT formalism, and provides detailed Itô-calculus computations for the local martingales. It also includes a forward-flow analogue (Theorem B.6) that is of independent interest. The main claim is falsifiable and concrete, and the proof strategy has no fitted free parameters. The principal weakness is the reliance on an unverified PDE uniqueness theorem at a load-bearing point of the proof, as detailed below.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3 before Definition 3.1 and proof of Theorem 4.6] The 'only if' direction of Theorem 4.6 depends on the assertion, made before Definition 3.1, that a solution of the BPZ system D^κ_i Z=0 is uniquely determined up to scalar by the Frobenius exponents Δ_ij = -2/κ at every pair. The cited theorem [Kna86, Appendix B] is not shown to apply to this system: Conf_N(R) is disconnected with N! components, the system is overdetermined, the indicial equations are not computed, and the possibility of extra solutions is not excluded. Moreover, even if the Frobenius analysis were valid on each connected component, it would give one multiplicative constant per component, so the global uniqueness 'up to multiplicative constants' would require further argument or a component-wise formulation. Since this uniqueness is exactly what forces Z to be the pairwise product in Theorem 4.6, the argument as written is incomplete. I note that equation (4.8) is a first-order system that can be integrated directly on each connected component to yield Z = C ∏_{i<j}|x_i-x_j|^{-2/κ}; replacing the appeal to [Kna86] by this direct integration would repair the gap.
  2. [Theorem 2.7] The converse direction of Theorem 2.7, namely that the infinitesimal commutation relation (2.6) implies the finite commutation relation (2.5), is only sketched. The argument after (2.6) refers to 'the analogous argument as in [Dub07, Section 6]' and gives a product-to-infinity heuristic, but it does not control the accumulation of the o((ε̃/M)^2) errors when the M^2 elementary permutations are performed. Because Corollary 2.8 and Definition 3.2 are built on Theorem 2.7, this step requires a rigorous proof or a precise statement of the applicable theorem from [Dub07] with all hypotheses verified.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Equation (2.2) and surrounding text] The sentence 'o(ε̃²) in (2.2) is independent of ε' is unclear; the expansion should specify that the error term is uniform in the relevant parameters, not literally independent of the initial configuration.
  2. [Definition 3.1 and Section 4 proof] The statement 'these BPZ equations only have regular singular points' is asserted without demonstration. Even if the cited theorem in [Kna86] were applicable, the regular-singularity property of this overdetermined system on Conf_N(R) should be established or replaced by a self-contained argument.
  3. [Statement of Theorem 4.6] The phrase 'up to multiplicative constants' should be clarified: because Conf_N(R) has N! connected components, the direct integration of (4.8) yields a possibly different constant on each component, so the intended meaning (a single global constant, or one constant per component) should be stated explicitly.
  4. [Appendix B] There are minor typographical issues: 'Drichlet' in Example B.2 should be 'Dirichlet', and in the proof of Theorem B.6 the line 'z ∈ H, quadt ≥ 0' contains a stray insertion 'quadt'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper solves for the drift, partition function, and boundary perturbation from commutation and coupling constraints; the flagged BPZ-uniqueness reliance is an external proof gap, not a self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is genuinely generative. Theorem 2.7 derives the functional form b_i = κ ∂_{x_i} log Z and the BPZ system from the commutator [L_i,L_j] = 4/(x_i-x_j)^2(L_i-L_j), which itself follows from requiring the two Loewner schemes to have the same law; the drift is not postulated to force the conclusion. Theorem 4.6 starts from the coupling condition of Definition 4.4, derives the martingale condition (4.5), obtains the boundary perturbation u from (4.7), and then obtains the additional equation (4.8) for Z. Equation (4.8) is solved explicitly by the pairwise product, which is then checked to satisfy the BPZ equations. No parameter is fitted to a data subset and renamed a prediction, and no target conclusion is built into the definition of the objects. The paper's self-citations to [KK20a] and [KK20c] are contextual or programmatic, not load-bearing in the proofs of Theorems 2.7, 3.3, or 4.6. The one substantive concern is the appeal, before Definition 3.1 and again in the proof of Theorem 4.6, to the general theory of regular-singular PDEs [Kna86, Appendix B] to assert that the Frobenius exponents uniquely determine the solution of the multi-variable BPZ system up to scalar. That is an external theorem whose hypotheses are not verified in the paper; if it fails, the 'only if' direction of Theorem 4.6 would not follow. This is a correctness/completeness gap, not circularity, because the cited uniqueness result is independent of the paper's own conclusions and is not itself derived from the coupling assumption. Moreover (4.8) is a first-order system whose direct integration on each connected component of Conf_N(R) already yields the product form, so even the unverified uniqueness shortcut is not essential to the final formula. Score 1 reflects the ordinary presence of self-citations and the unverified external uniqueness claim, not any reduction of the claimed results to their inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard stochastic analysis, the Loewner equation, and prior SLE/GFF literature. The main non-elementary inputs are the uniqueness theory for BPZ solutions cited to Knapp and the finite-commutation argument cited to Dubedat. No free parameters are fitted to data; the coupling condition fixes the partition function and boundary perturbation up to the stated constants.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Ito calculus and Girsanov's theorem are valid for the driving processes and measure changes used in the paper.
    Used throughout, for example in Theorem 3.3 to represent each backward Loewner chain as a Girsanov transform of a backward SLE, and in the increments computed in Section 4.
  • standard math The Loewner equation has unique solutions for continuous driving functions with sufficient regularity.
    Underpins Definitions 2.1 and 2.2 and the entire construction of backward Loewner chains and backward SLE.
  • domain assumption Solutions of the BPZ system are uniquely determined by asymptotic exponents via the theory of regular singular points (Knapp 1986, Appendix B).
    Invoked in Section 4 (proof of Theorem 4.6) and Appendix B (Theorem B.6) to identify the partition function from its asymptotic behavior. The hypotheses are not verified in the paper.
  • domain assumption Infinitesimal commutation of Loewner generators implies finite commutation of the Loewner chains (Dubedat 2007, Section 6).
    Used in the proof of Theorem 2.7 to go from equation (2.6) to (2.5); the paper gives only a sketch with a citation.
  • domain assumption The free boundary GFF and its boundary perturbations exist and are characterized by the stated Neumann Green's functions.
    Background for Section 4, taken from She16, Ber16, and QW18.
  • domain assumption Conformal welding of quantum surfaces is represented by backward SLE coupled with GFF as in She16 and KK20a.
    Provides the motivation and interpretation of the coupling definition (Definition 4.4).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multiple backward Schramm--Loewner evolution and coupling with Gaussian free field." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KGQMO6WA

@misc{pith2026190807180,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multiple backward Schramm--Loewner evolution and coupling with Gaussian free field},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KGQMO6WA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07180}
}
read the original abstract

It is known that a backward Schramm--Loewner evolution (SLE) is coupled with a free boundary Gaussian free field (GFF) with boundary perturbation to give conformal welding of quantum surfaces. Motivated by a generalization of conformal welding for quantum surfaces with multiple marked boundary points, we propose a notion of multiple backward SLE. To this aim, we investigate the commutation relation between two backward Loewner chains, and consequently, we find that the driving process of each backward Loewner chain has to have a drift term given by logarithmic derivative of a partition function, which is determined by a system of Belavin--Polyakov--Zamolodchikov-like equations so that these Loewner chains are commutative. After this observation, we define a multiple backward SLE as a tuple of mutually commutative backward Loewner chains. It immediately follows that each backward Loewner chain in a multiple backward SLE is obtained as a Girsanov transform of a backward SLE. We also discuss coupling of a multiple backward SLE with a GFF with boundary perturbation and find that a partition function and a boundary perturbation are uniquely determined so that they are coupled with each other.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07180 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Commutation relation of backward Loewner chains. (1) Either κi = κj or κi = 16/κj . (2) There exists a translation invariant homogeneous function Z = Z(x1, . . . , xN ) on ConfN (R) with the following properties: (a) The functions bk, k = i, j are given by bk = κk∂xk log Z, k = i, j. (b) There exists a function Fij = Fij (x, x1, . . . , xˆi , . . . , xˆj , . . . , xN ) on ConfN−1(R) homogeneous of degree −2 such tha… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bauer and D

    M. Bauer and D. Bernard. Conformal field theories of stochastic Loewner evolutions. Commun. Math. Phys. , 239:493--521, 2003

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    Bauer and D

    M. Bauer and D. Bernard. Conformal transformations and the SLE partition function martingale. Ann. Henri Poincar \'e , 5:289--326, 2004

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    Bauer, D

    M. Bauer, D. Bernard, and K. Kyt \"o l \"a . Multiple Schramm--Loewner evolutions and statistical mechanics martingales. J. Stat. Phys. , 120:1125--1163, 2005

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Berestycki

    N. Berestycki. Introduction to the Gaussian free field and Liouville quantum gravity, 2016. available at https://homepage.univie.ac.at/nathanael.berestycki/articles.html

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Bauer and R

    R. Bauer and R. Friedrich. On chordal and bilateral SLE in multiply connected domains. Math. Z. , 258:241--265, 2008

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Conformal field theory for annulus SLE: partition functions and martingale-observables

    S.-S. Byun, N.-G. Kang, and H.-J. Tak. Annulus SLE partition functions and martingale-observables, 2018. arXiv:1806.03638

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Beffara, E

    V. Beffara, E. Peltola, and H. Wu. On the uniqueness of global multiple SLEs . Ann. Probab. , 49:400--434, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov. Infinite conformal symmetry in two-dimensional quantum field theory. Nucl. Phys. B , 241:333--380, 1984

    work page 1984

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Chen and M

    Z.-Q. Chen and M. Fukushima. Stochastic Komatu -- Loewner evolutions and BMD domain constant. Stochastic Process. Appl. , 128:545--594, 2018

    2018

  2. [10]

    David, A

    F. David, A. Kupiainen, R. Rhodes, and V. Vargas. Liouville quantum gravity on the Riemann sphere. Commun. Math. Phys. , 342:869--907, 2016

    2016

  3. [11]

    Duplantier, J

    B. Duplantier, J. Miller, and S. Sheffield. Liouville quantum gravity as a mating of trees, 2014. arXiv:1409.7055

    2014 arXiv

  4. [12]

    David, R

    F. David, R. Rhodes, and V. Vargas. Liouville quantum gravity on complex tori. J. Math. Phys. , 57:022302, 2016

    2016

  5. [13]

    Duplantier and S

    B. Duplantier and S. Sheffield. Duality and Knizhnik-Polyakov-Zamokodchikov relation in Liouville quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 102:150603, 2009

    2009

  6. [14]

    Duplantier and S

    B. Duplantier and S. Sheffield. Liouville quantum gravity and KPZ . Invent. Math. , 185:333--393, 2011

    2011

  7. [15]

    Dub \'e dat

    J. Dub \'e dat. Euler integrals for commuting SLE s. J. Stat. Phys. , 123:1183--1218, 2006

    2006

  8. [16]

    Dub \'e dat

    J. Dub \'e dat. Commutation relations for Schramm--Loewner evolutions. Commun. Pure and Appl. Math. , LX:1792--1847, 2007

    2007

  9. [17]

    Dub\' e dat

    J. Dub\' e dat. SLE and the free field: Partition functions and couplings. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 22:995--1054, 2009

    2009

  10. [18]

    F. J. Dyson. A Brownian -motion model for the eigenvalues of a random matrix. J. Math. Phys. , 3:1191--1198, 1962

    1962

  11. [19]

    Flores and P

    S. Flores and P. Kleban. A solution space for a system of null-state partial differential equations, part I . Commun. Math. Phys. , 333:389--434, 2015

    2015

  12. [20]

    Flores and P

    S. Flores and P. Kleban. A solution space for a system of null-state partial differential equations, part II . Commun. Math. Phys. , 333:435--481, 2015

    2015

  13. [21]

    Flores and P

    S. Flores and P. Kleban. A solution space for a system of null-state partial differential equations, part III . Commun. Math. Phys. , 333:597--667, 2015

    2015

  14. [22]

    Flores and P

    S. Flores and P. Kleban. A solution space for a system of null-state partial differential equations, part IV . Commun. Math. Phys. , 333:669--715, 2015

    2015

  15. [23]

    Gwynne, J

    E. Gwynne, J. Miller, and S. Sheffield. The Tutte embedding of the mated- CRT map converges to Liouville quantum gravity, 2017. arXiv:1705.11161

    2017 arXiv

  16. [24]

    K. Graham. On multiple Schramm--Loewner evolutions. J. Stat. Mech. , 2007:P03008, 2007

    2007

  17. [25]

    Guillarmou, R

    C. Guillarmou, R. Rhodes, and V. Vargas. Polyakov's formulation of 2d bosonic string theory. Publ. math. lHES , 130:111--185, 2019

    2019

  18. [26]

    T. Hida. Brownian Motion , volume 11 of Applications of Mathematics . Springer-Verlag New York Heidelberg Berlin, 1980

    1980

  19. [27]

    Huang, R

    Y. Huang, R. Rhodes, and V. Vargas. Liouville quantum gravity on the unit disk. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar \'e Probab. Statist. , 54:1694--1730, 2018

    2018

  20. [28]

    Izyurov and Kyt \"o l \"a

    K. Izyurov and Kyt \"o l \"a . Hadamard's formula and couplings of SLEs with free field. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields , 155:35--69, 2013

    2013

  21. [29]

    N.-G. Kang. Boundary behavior of SLE . J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 20:185--210, 2007

    2007

  22. [30]

    Katori and K

    M. Katori and K. Koshida. Conformal welding problem, flow line problem, and multiple Schramm--Loewner evolution. J. Math. Phys. , 61:083301, 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    Katori and S

    M. Katori and S. Koshida. Gaussian free fields coupled with multiple SLEs driven by stochastic log-gases, 2020. to appear in Adv. Stud. Pure Math

    2020

  24. [32]

    Katori and S

    M. Katori and S. Koshida. Three phases of multiple SLE driven by non-colliding Dyson's Brownian motions, 2020. arXiv:2011.10291

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Kozdron and G

    M. Kozdron and G. Lawler. The configuration measure on mutually avoiding SLE paths. In Universality and Renormalization, Volume 50 of Fields Institute Communications , pages 199--224. American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2007

    2007

  26. [34]

    A. W. Knapp. Representation Theory of Semisimple Groups: An Overview Based on Examples , volume 36 of Princeton Mathematical Series . Princeton University Press, 1986

    1986

  27. [35]

    S. Koshida. Local martingales associated with Schramm--Loewner evolutions with internal symmetry. J. Math. Phys. , 59:101703, 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    Kyt \"o l \"a and E

    K. Kyt \"o l \"a and E. Peltola. Pure partition functions of multiple SLE s. Commun. Math. Phys. , 346:237--292, 2016

    2016

  29. [37]

    Kyt \"o l \"a and E

    K. Kyt \"o l \"a and E. Peltola. Conformally covariant boundary correlation functions with a quantum group. J. Eur. Math. Soc. , 22:55--118, 2020

    2020

  30. [38]

    Kupiainen, R

    A. Kupiainen, R. Rhodes, and V. Vargas. Local conformal structure of Liouville quantum gravity. Commun. Math. Phys. , 371:1005--1069, 2019

    2019

  31. [39]

    G. Lawler. Partition functions, loop measure, and versions of SLE . J. Stat. Phys. , 134:813--837, 2009

    2009

  32. [40]

    G. F. Lawler. Multifractal analysis of the reverse flow for the Schramm--Loewner evolution. Progress in Probability , 61:73--107, 2009

    2009

  33. [41]

    J. Lind. H \"o lder regularity of the SLE trace. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 360:3557--3578, 2008

    2008

  34. [42]

    Miller and S

    J. Miller and S. Sheffield. Imaginary geometry I : interacting SLEs . Probab. Theory Relat. Fields , 164:553--705, 2016

    2016

  35. [43]

    Miller and S

    J. Miller and S. Sheffield. Imaginary geometry II : reversibility of SLE _ ( _ 1 , _ 2 ) for (0,4) . Ann. Prob. , 44:1647--1722, 2016

    2016

  36. [44]

    Miller and S

    J. Miller and S. Sheffield. Imaginary geometry III : reversibility of SLE _ for (4,8) . Ann. Math. , 184:455--486, 2016

    2016

  37. [45]

    Miller and S

    J. Miller and S. Sheffield. Imaginary geometry IV : interior rays, whole-plane reversibility, and space-filling trees. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields , 169:729--869, 2017

    2017

  38. [46]

    Murayama

    T. Murayama. On the slit motion obeying chordal Komatu -- Loewner equation with finite explision time. J. Evol. Equ. , 20:233--255, 2020

    2020

  39. [47]

    Mackey and D

    B. Mackey and D. Zhan. Decomposition of backward SLE in the capacity parametrization. Stat. Prob. Lett. , 146:27--35, 2019

    2019

  40. [48]

    A. M. Polyakov. Quantum geometry of bosonic strings. Phys. Lett. B , 103:207--210, 1981

    1981

  41. [49]

    A. M. Polyakov. Quantum geometry of fermionic strings. Phys. Lett. B , 103:211--213, 1981

    1981

  42. [50]

    Peltola and H

    E. Peltola and H. Wu. Global and local multiple SLE for 4 and connection probabilities for level line of GFF . Commun. Math. Phys. , 366:469--536, 2019

    2019

  43. [51]

    Qian and W

    W. Qian and W. Werner. Coupling the Gaussian free fields with free and with zero boundary conditions via common level lines. Commun. Math. Phys. , 361:53--80, 2018

    2018

  44. [52]

    Rohde and O

    S. Rohde and O. Schramm. Basic properties of SLE . Ann. Math. , 161:883--924, 2005

    2005

  45. [53]

    Roth and S

    O. Roth and S. Schleissinger. The Schramm--Loewner equation for multiple slits. J. Anal. Math. , 131:73--99, 2017

    2017

  46. [54]

    Rhodes and V

    R. Rhodes and V. Vargas. Gaussian multiplicative chaos and Liouville quantum gravity. In Stochastic Processes and Random Matrices: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School: Volume 104, July 2015 . Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017

    2015

  47. [55]

    Rohde and D

    S. Rohde and D. Zhan. Backward SLE and the symmetry of the welding. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields , 164:815--863, 2016

    2016

  48. [56]

    O. Schramm. Scaling limits of loop-eraced random walks and uniform spanning trees. Israel J. Math. , 118:221--288, 2000

    2000

  49. [57]

    Sheffield

    S. Sheffield. Gaussian free fields for mathematicians. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields , 139:521--541, 2007

    2007

  50. [58]

    Sheffield

    S. Sheffield. Conformal weldings of random surfaces: SLE and the quantum gravity zipper. Ann. Prob. , 44:3474--3545, 2016

    2016

  51. [59]

    Schramm and S

    O. Schramm and S. Sheffield. Contour lines of the two-dimensional discrete Gaussian free field. Acta Math. , 202:21--137, 2009

    2009

  52. [60]

    Schramm and S

    O. Schramm and S. Sheffield. A contour line of the continuum Gaussian free field. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields , 157:47--80, 2013

    2013

  53. [61]

    Schramm and D

    O. Schramm and D. B. Wilson. SLE coordinate changes. New York J. Math. , 11:659--669, 2005

    2005

  54. [62]

    T. Takebe. Dispersionless BKP hierarchy and quadrant L \"o wner equation. SIGMA , 10:023, 2014

    2014

  55. [63]

    W. Werner. Girsanov 's transformation for SLE ( , ) processes, intersection exponents and hiding exponents. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. , 13:121--147, 2004

    2004

  56. [64]

    D. Zhan. Stochastic Loewner evolution in doubly connected domains. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields , 129:340--380, 2004

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.