The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2505.07581 · v3 · pith:KHEDRD2Q · submitted 2025-05-12 · cs.AI · cs.CY

YuLan-OneSim: Towards the Next Generation of Social Simulator with Large Language Models

Reviewed by Pithpith:KHEDRD2Qopen to challenge →

classification cs.AI cs.CY
keywords simulationsocialsimulatorautomaticallyresearcherscenariosyulan-onesimlanguage
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Leveraging large language model (LLM) based agents to simulate human social behaviors has recently gained significant attention. In this paper, we introduce a novel social simulator called YuLan-OneSim. Compared to previous works, YuLan-OneSim distinguishes itself in five key aspects: (1) Code-free scenario construction: Users can simply describe and refine their simulation scenarios through natural language interactions with our simulator. All simulation code is automatically generated, significantly reducing the need for programming expertise. (2) Comprehensive default scenarios: We implement 50 default simulation scenarios spanning 8 domains, including economics, sociology, politics, psychology, organization, demographics, law, and communication, broadening access for a diverse range of social researchers. (3) Evolvable simulation: Our simulator is capable of receiving external feedback and automatically fine-tuning the backbone LLMs, significantly enhancing the simulation quality. (4) Large-scale simulation: By developing a fully responsive agent framework and a distributed simulation architecture, our simulator can handle up to 100,000 agents, ensuring more stable and reliable simulation results. (5) AI social researcher: Leveraging the above features, we develop an AI social researcher. Users only need to propose a research topic, and the AI researcher will automatically analyze the input, construct simulation environments, summarize results, generate technical reports, review and refine the reports--completing the social science research loop. To demonstrate the advantages of YuLan-OneSim, we conduct experiments to evaluate the quality of the automatically generated scenarios, the reliability, efficiency, and scalability of the simulation process, as well as the performance of the AI social researcher.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Stop Drawing Scientific Claims from LLM Social Simulations Without Robustness Audits

    physics.soc-ph 2026-05 accept novelty 6.0

    Minor perturbations in persona format, instruction framing, and network structure shift cooperation by up to 76 percentage points and polarization metrics consistently, showing that LLM social simulations require per-...

  2. SOCIA-EVO: Automated Simulator Construction via Dual-Anchored Bi-Level Optimization

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SOCIA-EVO generates statistically consistent simulators by separating structural refinement from parameter calibration via bi-level optimization and falsifying strategies through execution feedback in a Bayesian-weigh...