Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 45 references

This paper constructs a curve integral formula for the Möbius strip by doubling it to an annulus and projecting the data down.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 19:14 UTC pith:KHK7VGTV

load-bearing objection First curve integral for a non-orientable surface, with a genuine string-theory check, but the doubling projection is asserted and needs proof — worth refereeing. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2603.03393 v2 pith:KHK7VGTV submitted 2026-03-03 hep-th

Curve integral formula for the M\"obius strip

Amit Suthar This is my paper
classification hep-th MSC 13F6081T1881T30
keywords curve integral formulaMöbius stripnon-orientable surfacesquasi-cluster algebrasg-vector fanheadlight functionssurface Symanzik polynomialstropicalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper extends the curve integral formula — a single global Schwinger parameter integral whose cones reproduce all Feynman diagrams of a massless scalar theory — from orientable surfaces to non-orientable ones, starting with the Möbius strip. The author's strategy is to embed the Möbius strip in a doubled orientable annulus, project the annulus's g-vector fan, headlight functions, and curve momenta onto the Möbius strip along the identifications t'_i + t_i = 0 and p'_i = p_{i-1}, and write the resulting amplitude as one integral over the projected Schwinger space. The payoff is a combinatorial construction that works where handedness (left/right turning of curves) is not defined, and it is validated by matching the eight box diagrams that emerge from the tropical (field-theory) limit of the type-I Möbius-strip superstring amplitude at four points. The construction also produces surface Symanzik polynomials via spanning subsurfaces and is illustrated for a two-loop non-orientable surface. A sympathetic reader would care because non-orientable worldsheets are the subleading 1/N contributions to SO(N) and Sp(N) gauge theories, and this gives them the same single-integral moduli-space structure that orientable surfaces enjoy.

Core claim

For a Möbius strip with n marked points, define every curve's Schwinger data by lifting it to two curves on the doubled annulus: the g-vector components on the two boundaries are identified by t'_i + t_i = 0 and the doubled external momenta by p'_i = p_{i-1}, which fixes the loop-momentum assignment P^⊗_{ij} = l + P_{1i} + P_{1j}. Headlight functions are then pulled back from the annulus's g-vector fan. With the cross-cap curve C^⊗ turned off (the t0 > 0 sector), the integral A_n = ∫ d^n t d^D l exp(-Σ_C α_C X_C) has as its cones exactly the Schwinger parameter spaces of the trivalent graphs dual to quasi-triangulations of the Möbius strip; at n = 4 this yields the eight box diagrams that th

What carries the argument

The doubling projection: embed the non-orientable surface into an orientable double (annulus), identify the two copies' Schwinger coordinates and momenta by t'_i + t_i = 0 and p'_i = p_{i-1}, and define each Möbius curve's g-vector, headlight function, and momentum as the image of the annulus data. The quasi-cluster algebra polytope M_n provides the combinatorial skeleton of compatibilities and mutations, while the headlight functions are the piecewise-linear duals of the projected g-vector fan; the tropical limit of theta functions in the string amplitude selects the same cones.

Load-bearing premise

The identifications t'_i + t_i = 0 and p'_i = p_{i-1}, introduced by inspection, are assumed to be the correct projection of doubled-annulus data onto the Möbius strip; if they are the wrong quotient, every g-vector, headlight function, and momentum in the paper is built from incorrect data.

What would settle it

Pick n = 5. Compute the curve integral from the projected g-vector fan of the Möbius strip and the set of Schwinger cones it produces; then tropicalize the five-point type-I Möbius superstring amplitude and list the Feynman diagrams it yields. Any mismatch — a diagram in the string limit absent from the fan, or a cone with no string-limit counterpart — would show the projection rules are not the correct quotient.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, the curve integral formula — so far limited to orientable surfaces — now covers the Möbius strip, and the same doubling-plus-projection recipe is claimed to generalize to arbitrary non-orientable surfaces.
  • At four points the projected curve integral and the α'→0 limit of the type-I Möbius superstring amplitude produce the same eight box diagrams, with a common loop-momentum choice across non-planar diagrams.
  • The surface Symanzik polynomials U, F, Z for the Möbius strip can be read off from spanning-1 and spanning-2 subsurfaces, giving a shortcut to loop integrands without explicit loop integration.
  • The two-loop non-orientable surface (disk with cross-cap and puncture) has its curves, momenta, and Symanzik polynomials enumerated; its infinite mapping class group requires a Mirzakhani-style kernel.
  • The t0 > 0 restriction decouples the C^⊗ tadpole-type curves, which is consistent with the absence of triangles and bubbles in the N=4 SYM field-theory limit.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is n=5: the projected fan predicts a specific number of cones (from triangulation counts of the Möbius strip) and momentum assignments; tropicalizing the five-point Möbius string amplitude and comparing diagram-by-diagram would confirm or refute the projection rules beyond four points.
  • The doubling projection, if correct, should also apply to the Klein bottle (sphere with two cross-caps), where the closed-string/uncolored sector contributes; the paper explicitly leaves such surfaces out, so this is an untested corollary.
  • The paper's 'by inspection' projection suggests that the true mathematical statement is a quotient of the annulus's cluster fan by the Z_2 twist; understanding the quotient as a piecewise-linear fan map might let one derive the projection rules from the twist action rather than guess them.
  • The t0 > 0 restriction effectively removes the C^⊗ cones; if those cones correspond to tadpole renormalization, a renormalized curve integral (along the decapitation idea the paper mentions) would restore them — a concrete direction for extending the formula.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper extends the curve integral formula to non-orientable surfaces, focusing on the Möbius strip. After reviewing quasi-triangulations of the Möbius strip, the author doubles the Möbius strip into an annulus and projects annulus data—g-vectors, headlight functions, and momenta—onto the Möbius strip via the rules t_i + t'_i = 0 and p'_i = p_{i-1}. This yields the global Schwinger integral (3.12), from which surface Symanzik polynomials are derived both by loop integration (Appendix B) and by spanning subsurfaces (Section 4). The construction is checked at four points against the field-theory limit of the type-I superstring Möbius amplitude (Section 6), where eight box diagrams are recovered. A two-loop non-orientable surface is discussed, with curves, momenta, and surface Symanzik polynomials listed, though explicit g-vectors and headlights are not constructed.

Significance. If the construction is sound, it represents a genuine extension of the curve-integral/surfaceology program to non-orientable surfaces, with applications to SO(N)/Sp(N) Tr(phi^3) theory and a useful connection to the type-I superstring. The paper does ship concrete new data: explicit g-vector fans and headlight functions for n=1,2,3, an explicit loop-momentum integration reproducing the spanning-surface Symanzik polynomials, and a tropicalization check against a known string amplitude. These are valuable benchmarks. However, the central projection construction is asserted, not proven, and there is a sign inconsistency in the half-space truncation; the advertised higher-genus generalization is programmatic. The four-point string check is an external benchmark but does not exercise the headlight functions.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eqs. (3.3),(3.5)] The doubling projection is asserted 'by inspection' and the g-vector/headlight data are verified only for n=1,2,3. The existence of the curve integral for all n requires that the projected images of the 2n-dimensional annulus g-vector fan form a complete unimodular fan in R^n. A linear projection of a fan is not in general a fan: cones can develop overlapping interiors or fail unimodularity. The manuscript contains no theorem or general argument preventing this. Since every headlight function and the global integral (3.12) are built from this projection, the central construction is conditional. The n=4 tropicalization check does not fix this gap because it does not compare the headlight functions.
  2. [Sec. 3 (end) vs. Sec. 4 vs. App. B] There is a direct sign contradiction in the half-space restriction that turns off alpha⊗. Sec. 3 (with the tadpole reference triangulation) restricts to t0 > 0, and App. B states 'restrict ourselves to the t0 > 0 region, and have consistently alpha⊗ = 0.' Sec. 4, with the same reference triangulation, states 'we restrict to the region in the global Schwinger space t0 < 0 ... so that the headlight alpha⊗ is turned off.' The loop integration (B.2)-(B.8) and the Symanzik polynomials (4.11)-(4.13) depend on this truncation, so the inconsistency is load-bearing and must be resolved.
  3. [Sec. 5 and Sec. 3 (MCG)] The two-loop non-orientable surface S^(2) is explicitly said to have a nontrivial mapping class group and an infinite number of curves. The amplitude (5.12) is written with a Mirzakhani kernel, but no explicit g-vector fan or headlights are constructed; the text admits 'no simpler way other than analysing the curves on the doubled orientable surface is known.' Thus the claimed generalisation to arbitrary non-orientable surfaces is programmatic. Separately, in Sec. 3 the omission of K(t_i) from (3.12) relies on the claim 'There is no non-trivial Mapping Class Group for the Möbius strip,' which is used without proof or reference. Since the MCG of a Möbius band is not obviously trivial, this assertion needs justification or a citation.
  4. [Sec. 6.2, Eq. (6.33)] The tropicalization check demonstrates that the eight box diagrams of Table 1 emerge with the same momentum assignments P⊗_ij. This is a valuable external check, but it does not probe the headlight functions α_C or the projected fan structure beyond the set of quasi-triangulations. In the regions that would turn on triangle/bubble contributions—where the piecewise-linear nature of α_C becomes relevant—the superstring measure is argued to make the contribution vanish, so α_C never affects the final integrand. A direct comparison of the full curve integral (3.12) with the string limit, or at least a check of the headlights in a sector where they are nonzero, is needed to validate the projected headlight data.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are many typos and minor notational inconsistencies, e.g., 'calcualtions' (App. B), 'unorientable' vs 'non-orientable', and 'coulmn' (Table 1). Please proofread carefully.
  2. [Eq. (3.11) and (B.10)] The explicit headlight functions are long and hard to verify from the text. It would help to provide them as a supplementary file or to state how they were checked.
  3. [Fig. 15 caption] The caption refers to 'Figure 8.13 of [4]' but the bibliography entry [4] does not contain figure numbers in a way that is self-contained. Please specify the exact reference or remove the pointer.
  4. [Eq. (4.8)] The notation for headlight functions is inconsistent: α_{C'_i} appears on the left of (4.8) but α_{C_i} on the right; the same symbol should be used throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; the Möbius construction is self-contained and its string-amplitude check is external.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The Möbius g-vectors, headlight functions and momenta are defined by an explicit projection from the doubled annulus (t'_i + t_i = 0 and p'_i = p_{i-1}); this is a construction, not a fitted prediction, and no target amplitude is used to determine those data. The paper's central check is external: the standard type-I superstring Möbius amplitude from [4] is tropicalized without adjusting parameters, and the resulting eight box-diagram topologies match the quasi-cluster polytope M4. The projection is introduced 'by inspection' and checked in examples, but an ansatz is not circular unless the claimed result is assumed by it; here the independent string tropicalization is the falsifiable benchmark. The one author self-citation, [29] (Laddha–Suthar), is used only to review g-vector combinatorics and Corolla operators, while the curve-integral machinery itself is cited to independent works [16,17]; it is therefore not load-bearing. The paper explicitly leaves the two-loop g-vector fan unfinished and questions whether complete string-loop amplitudes can be obtained from surfaceology, but those are acknowledged limitations, not circular reductions. The sign discrepancy between t0>0 (Sec. 3, App. B) and t0<0 (Sec. 4) is a consistency/correctness concern, not an equivalence-by-construction. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input, so the circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or fields are introduced. The load-bearing inputs are geometric/algebraic choices: the doubling projection (t'_i = -t_i, p'_i = p_{i-1}) and the t0>0 restriction. These are asserted by inspection rather than derived, so they carry a burden comparable to fitted parameters even though no numerical fitting is done. Standard string amplitude formulae and θ-function identities are background axioms.

free parameters (3)
  • Doubling projection t'_i + t_i = 0 = 0 (imposed)
    Chosen by inspection in Eq. (3.3) so that the two annulus lifts of each Möbius curve collapse to one g-vector. All Möbius g-vectors and headlight functions depend on this choice.
  • Doubling momentum identification p'_i = p_{i-1} = p_n (with p'_1 = p_n)
    Eq. (3.5), chosen so both lifts of C^⊗_ij carry the same momentum; yields P^⊗_ij = l + P_{1i} + P_{1j}.
  • Half-space restriction t0 > 0 (α^⊗ = 0) = n/a (region choice)
    Excludes C^⊗ quasi-triangulations so tadpoles are avoided; the amplitude (B.8) is defined on this restricted region, not the full g-vector fan.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Quasi-cluster algebras of Dupont–Palesi [33] govern triangulations of non-orientable surfaces
    Used to classify chords C_ij, C^⊗_ij, C^⊗ and their compatibility on the Möbius strip; not re-derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption Triangulation count of the Möbius strip (4^{n-1} + 2^{n-2} C_{n-1}) from [34]
    Used only as a consistency check on the number of triangulations; not load-bearing for the amplitude construction.
  • domain assumption Type-I superstring Möbius amplitude formula (6.17)-(6.18) from [4]
    Starting point for the tropical check; standard string-theory input, unproved inside the paper.
  • standard math θ_1 product representation and its tropical limit (6.11)-(6.13)
    Used to show that theta-function ratios tend to 1 in the α'→0 limit with Schwinger parameters held fixed.
  • domain assumption No non-trivial Mapping Class Group for the Möbius strip
    Asserted in Sec. 3 to omit the MCG-fixing kernel from the curve integral; no proof or citation given, and the same paper later needs a Mirzakhani kernel for the two-loop surface.
  • ad hoc to paper Doubling map: blowing up the crosscap gives an annulus with identical marked points on both boundaries
    The embedding (3.1) is the foundation of the projection construction; accepted as a geometric fact, but the specific marking and momentum identification is a choice made by this paper.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 32278 in / 16230 out tokens · 140961 ms · 2026-08-02T19:14:25.456464+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The scattering amplitudes for colored scalars can be calculated using the so-called curve integral formula, relying on simple combinatorics. It introduces a set of global Schwinger parameters for all Feynman diagrams that contribute to an amplitude. We extend this construction to non-orientable surfaces by making use of the quasi-cluster algebras defined for non-orientable surfaces. We embed the non-orientable surface in a doubled orientable surface, and project the appropriate features onto the non-orientable surface. The curve integral formula can also be thought of as the high-tension limit of an appropriate string amplitude. As a check of our construction, we take a superstring amplitude with the M\"obius strip topology and take its field theory limit to obtain the same Feynman diagrams as in the corresponding curve integral. Our construction can be generalized to arbitrary higher genus non-orientable surfaces. To illustrate this, we list the possible curves and their dual momenta for a two-loop non-orientable surface, and construct the surface Symanzik polynomials using the surface generalization of spanning trees.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 33 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2007

    2007

  2. [2]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2007

    2007

  3. [3]

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten,SUPERSTRING THEORY. VOL. 1: INTRODUCTION. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. 7, 1988

    1988

  4. [4]

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten,SUPERSTRING THEORY. VOL. 2: LOOP AMPLITUDES, ANOMALIES AND PHENOMENOLOGY. 7, 1988

    1988

  5. [5]

    Arkani-Hamed, J

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, S. Caron-Huot, and J. Trnka,The All-Loop Integrand For Scattering Amplitudes in Planar N=4 SYM,JHEP01(2011) 041, [arXiv:1008.2958]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    Arkani-Hamed, J

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A. B. Goncharov, A. Postnikov, and J. Trnka, Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes. Cambridge University Press, 4, 2016

    2016

  7. [7]

    Cachazo, S

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan,Scattering of Massless Particles in Arbitrary Dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014), no. 17 171601, [arXiv:1307.2199]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    Cachazo, S

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan,Scattering of Massless Particles: Scalars, Gluons and Gravitons,JHEP07(2014) 033, [arXiv:1309.0885]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  9. [9]

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and L. Brink,N=4 Yang-Mills and N=8 Supergravity as Limits of String Theories,Nucl. Phys. B198(1982) 474–492

    1982

  10. [10]

    Bern and D

    Z. Bern and D. C. Dunbar,A Mapping between Feynman and string motivated one loop rules in gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B379(1992) 562–601

    1992

  11. [11]

    Bern,String based perturbative methods for gauge theories, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles, pp

    Z. Bern,String based perturbative methods for gauge theories, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles, pp. 0471–536, 6, 1992. hep-ph/9304249

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  12. [12]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and D. A. Kosower,New QCD results from string theory, in International Conference on Strings 93, 5, 1993.hep-th/9311026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  13. [13]

    Di Vecchia, L

    P. Di Vecchia, L. Magnea, A. Lerda, R. Marotta, and R. Russo,Two loop scalar diagrams from string theory,Phys. Lett. B388(1996) 65–76, [hep-th/9607141]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  14. [14]

    Di Vecchia, L

    P. Di Vecchia, L. Magnea, A. Lerda, R. Russo, and R. Marotta,String techniques for the calculation of renormalization constants in field theory,Nucl. Phys. B469(1996) 235–286, [hep-th/9601143]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  15. [15]

    Tourkine,Tropical Amplitudes,Annales Henri Poincare18(2017), no

    P. Tourkine,Tropical Amplitudes,Annales Henri Poincare18(2017), no. 6 2199–2249, [arXiv:1309.3551]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Arkani-Hamed, H

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Frost, G. Salvatori, P.-G. Plamondon, and H. Thomas,All loop scattering as a counting problem,JHEP08(2025) 194, [arXiv:2309.15913]. – 43 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Arkani-Hamed, H

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Frost, G. Salvatori, P.-G. Plamondon, and H. Thomas,All loop scattering for all multiplicity,JHEP09(2025) 033, [arXiv:2311.09284]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Fomin and A

    S. Fomin and A. Zelevinsky,Cluster algebras i: Foundations,math/0104151

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    V. V. Fock and A. B. Goncharov,Moduli spaces of local systems and higher teichmuller theory,math/0311149

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    L. K. Williams,Cluster algebras: an introduction,arXiv:1212.6263

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Fomin, L

    S. Fomin, L. Williams, and A. Zelevinsky,Introduction to cluster algebras. chapters 1-3, arXiv:1608.05735

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Arkani-Hamed, Y

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Bai, S. He, and G. Yan,Scattering Forms and the Positive Geometry of Kinematics, Color and the Worldsheet,JHEP05(2018) 096, [arXiv:1711.09102]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    Arkani-Hamed, S

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. He, and T. Lam,Stringy canonical forms,JHEP02(2021) 069, [arXiv:1912.08707]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Arkani-Hamed, S

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. He, T. Lam, and H. Thomas,Binary geometries, generalized particles and strings, and cluster algebras,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 6 066015, [arXiv:1912.11764]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Arkani-Hamed, S

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. He, G. Salvatori, and H. Thomas,Causal diamonds, cluster polytopes and scattering amplitudes,JHEP11(2022) 049, [arXiv:1912.12948]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Arkani-Hamed, Q

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo, and S. He,Hidden zeros for particle/string amplitudes and the unity of colored scalars, pions and gluons,JHEP10 (2024) 231, [arXiv:2312.16282]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Arkani-Hamed, Q

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo, and S. He,Scalar-Scaffolded Gluons and the Combinatorial Origins of Yang-Mills Theory,arXiv:2401.00041

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    Arkani-Hamed, Q

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo, and S. He,Nonlinear Sigma model amplitudes to all loop orders are contained in the Tr(Φ3) theory,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 6 065018, [arXiv:2401.05483]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Laddha and A

    A. Laddha and A. Suthar,Positive geometries, corolla polynomial and gauge theory amplitudes,JHEP02(2025) 071, [arXiv:2405.10601]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    S. G. Naculich and A. Osathapan,All-loop group-theory constraints for four-point amplitudes of SU(N), SO(N), and Sp(N) gauge theories,JHEP10(2024) 221, [arXiv:2407.03403]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    J. L. Bourjaily, M. Plesser, and C. Vergu,The Many Colours of Amplitudes, arXiv:2412.21189

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    J. L. Bourjaily, M. Plesser, and C. Vergu,The Colour Dependence of Amplitudes, arXiv:2512.23806

    arXiv

  33. [33]

    Dupont and F

    G. Dupont and F. Palesi,Quasi-cluster algebras from non-orientable surfaces,Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics42(2015), no. 2 429–472, [arXiv:1105.1560]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    Bazier-Matte, R

    V. Bazier-Matte, R. Huang, and H. Luo,Number of triangulations of a möbius strip,Involve, a Journal of Mathematics16(2023), no. 4 547–562, [arXiv:2009.05785]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Bazier-Matte,Quasi-cluster algebras: An overview,Representations of Algebras and Related Topics85

    V. Bazier-Matte,Quasi-cluster algebras: An overview,Representations of Algebras and Related Topics85

  36. [36]

    Jagadale and A

    M. Jagadale and A. Laddha,Positive Geometries of S-matrix without Color, arXiv:2304.04571. – 44 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Jagadale and A

    M. Jagadale and A. Laddha,Towards Positive Geometries of Massive Scalar field theories, arXiv:2206.07979

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals,arXiv:2201.03593

    S. Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals,arXiv:2201.03593

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    V. A. Smirnov,Analytic tools for Feynman integrals, vol. 250. Springer, 2012

    2012

  40. [40]

    V. A. Smirnov,Evaluating feynman integrals, vol. 211. Springer Science & Business Media, 2004

    2004

  41. [41]

    Eberhardt and S

    L. Eberhardt and S. Mizera,Evaluating one-loop string amplitudes,SciPost Phys.15(2023), no. 3 119, [arXiv:2302.12733]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    R. Pius, A. Rudra, and A. Sen,Mass Renormalization in String Theory: Special States, JHEP07(2014) 058, [arXiv:1311.1257]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  43. [43]

    R. Pius, A. Rudra, and A. Sen,Mass Renormalization in String Theory: General States, JHEP07(2014) 062, [arXiv:1401.7014]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  44. [44]

    Banerjee, Harsh, and A

    P. Banerjee, Harsh, and A. Laddha,Towards the Parametric Renormalization of the S-matrix – I,arXiv:2509.18283

    arXiv

  45. [45]

    Arkani-Hamed, H

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Frost, and G. Salvatori,The Cut Equation,arXiv:2412.21027. – 45 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv