Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Attacker Attribution of Audio Deepfakes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.15563 v1 pith:KI32L3NC submitted 2022-03-28 cs.CR cs.LGcs.SD

classification cs.CRcs.LGcs.SD
keywords attackeraudioembeddingsattributiondeepfakesdeepfakefakehowever
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deepfakes are synthetically generated media often devised with malicious intent. They have become increasingly more convincing with large training datasets advanced neural networks. These fakes are readily being misused for slander, misinformation and fraud. For this reason, intensive research for developing countermeasures is also expanding. However, recent work is almost exclusively limited to deepfake detection - predicting if audio is real or fake. This is despite the fact that attribution (who created which fake?) is an essential building block of a larger defense strategy, as practiced in the field of cybersecurity for a long time. This paper considers the problem of deepfake attacker attribution in the domain of audio. We present several methods for creating attacker signatures using low-level acoustic descriptors and machine learning embeddings. We show that speech signal features are inadequate for characterizing attacker signatures. However, we also demonstrate that embeddings from a recurrent neural network can successfully characterize attacks from both known and unknown attackers. Our attack signature embeddings result in distinct clusters, both for seen and unseen audio deepfakes. We show that these embeddings can be used in downstream-tasks to high-effect, scoring 97.10% accuracy in attacker-id classification.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Explainable Spoofed Speech Attribution and Detection:a Probabilistic Approach for Characterizing Speech Synthesizer Components

    eess.AS 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Probabilistic attribute embeddings derived from countermeasure embeddings match raw embedding performance on spoofed speech detection and attack attribution while providing component-level explanations.

  2. Investigating Prosodic Signatures via Speech Pre-Trained Models for Audio Deepfake Source Attribution

    eess.AS 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    x-vector embeddings and a Rényi divergence fusion loss achieve the best audio deepfake source attribution on ASVspoof 2019 and CFAD, though the benchmark protocol is non-standard.

Pith tools