Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Birational Transformations and 2d (0,2) Quiver Gauge Theories beyond Toric Fano 3-folds

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that mass deformations of brane brick models realize the birational transformations that relate toric Fano 3-folds, and extends this correspondence to non-reflexive toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds.

desk verdict A checkable set of four worked examples extending the mass-deformation/birational correspondence to non-reflexive toric diagrams, packaged inside a general conjecture that is not yet proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08741 v2 pith:KJ3TIDUU submitted 2025-02-12 hep-th math-phmath.AGmath.MP

Dongwook Ghim , Minsung Kho , Rak-Kyeong Seong This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.AGmath.MP MSC 14M2514E0514J3281T60
keywords branebrickmodels2d(02)supersymmetricgaugetheoriestoricCalabi-Yau4-foldsbirationaltransformationsalgebraicmutationsmassdeformationsHilbertseriesreflexivepolytopes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that mass deformations of 2d (0,2) supersymmetric quiver gauge theories, realized as brane brick models, are the physical counterpart of birational transformations on toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds. It extends this identification beyond the reflexive polytopes that define toric Fano 3-folds to non-reflexive toric diagrams with no internal points or with two or more internal points. In the four worked examples, the mass-deformed theories and their birational partners have mesonic moduli spaces with the same number of generators and the same Hilbert series when refined only under the $\mathrm{U}(1)_R$ symmetry. If the paper is right, mass deformation gives a gauge-theory realization of algebraic and combinatorial mutations, organizing quiver gauge theories into nontrivial equivalence classes.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Newton polynomial $P(x,y,z)$ of the toric diagram, whose zero locus is the holomorphic surface $\Sigma$ wrapped by the NS5-brane in the brane brick model. The transformation is the birational map $\varphi_A$ with $A(x,y)$ chosen so that $A^{|m|}$ divides the negative-height coefficient $C_m(x,y)$, composed with $\mathrm{GL}(3,\mathbb{Z})$ maps to form an algebraic mutation; the same move is encoded combinatorially by the mutation formula $\mu_w(\Delta,F;\{G_h\})$, which cuts a polytope at negative heights and re-glues shifted positive slices. This machinery lets the paper translate a mass deformation into a direct polytope mutation and then compare generator counts and Hilbert series through the plethystic logarithm.

What would settle it

A concrete check is to recompute the $\mathrm{U}(1)_R$-refined Hilbert series for any claimed pair in Section 4 directly from the quiver data of the two brane brick models; if the plethystic logarithms give different numbers of generators or unequal series, the paper's central invariance claim would be false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that birational transformations of the type introduced for reflexive toric Fano 3-folds are not merely geometric: they are realized by mass deformations of the corresponding brane brick models. Specifically, whenever two brane brick models are related by a mass deformation of their J- and E-terms, their underlying toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds are related by an algebraic mutation, meaning a birational transformation $\varphi_A:(x,y,z)\mapsto(x,y,A(x,y)z)$ composed with $\mathrm{GL}(3,\mathbb{Z})$ changes of coordinates, and equivalently by a combinatorial mutation of the toric diagram. The paper shows this for one reflexive pair, $F_{0,+-}$ and $Q^{1,1,1}/\mathbb{Z}_2$, and for three non-reflexive pairs, $C_{++}$ with $H_4$, $C_{+-}$ with $Q^{1,1,1}$, and $P^1_{+-}[\mathbb{C}^3/\mathbb{Z}_5(1,1,3)]$ with $P^2_{+-}[\mathbb{C}^3/\mathbb{Z}_5(1,1,3)]$. In each case the mesonic moduli spaces of the two theories have the same number of generators and the same $\mathrm{U}(1)_R$-refined Hilbert series, while the transformations preserve the number of fully internal points and the period of the toric variety.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every mass deformation can be completed by higher-order coupling redefinitions that keep the J- and E-terms as binomial (two-term) equations, and that the coefficient prescription adopted for non-reflexive diagrams makes the birational transformations close on convex lattice polytopes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The reflexive pair $F_{0,+-}$ and $Q^{1,1,1}/\mathbb{Z}_2$ is a working example where a mass deformation realizes the algebraic mutation studied earlier for toric Fano 3-folds.
  • The non-reflexive pairs $C_{++}/H_4$, $C_{+-}/Q^{1,1,1}$, and $P^1_{+-}[\mathbb{C}^3/\mathbb{Z}_5(1,1,3)]/P^2_{+-}[\mathbb{C}^3/\mathbb{Z}_5(1,1,3)]$ extend the correspondence beyond reflexive polytopes.
  • For each pair, the mesonic moduli spaces have equal numbers of generators and identical $\mathrm{U}(1)_R$-refined Hilbert series, so the R-charge content is an invariant of the mutation class.
  • The transformations preserve the number of fully internal lattice points and the period, providing extra invariants that may characterize the equivalence classes.
  • These results support a conjectural Minimal Model Program for quiver gauge theories, in which mass deformations walk through the birational equivalence classes of toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the conjectured dictionary holds generally, sequences of mass deformations give a physical algorithm for exploring the 'buckets' of toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds, since each mass deformation moves through the mutation class.
  • The invariance of the $\mathrm{U}(1)_R$-refined Hilbert series suggests that R-charge data are the gauge-theoretic shadow of the period and Ehrhart invariants preserved by the underlying birational transformations; flavor-refined Hilbert series would then be needed to distinguish members of the same class.
  • The non-reflexive examples invite a systematic test: apply the same coefficient prescription to other non-reflexive toric diagrams and ask whether the mutation class always preserves internal-point count and generator count, which would extend the 'buckets' picture far beyond the 4319 reflexive polytopes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a family of birational transformations, originally introduced for toric Fano 3-folds in [8], can be realized as mass deformations of abelian 2d (0,2) quiver gauge theories and brane brick models, and that this correspondence extends to non-reflexive toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds. Four explicit examples are presented, covering the reflexive pair F0,+− / Q1,1,1/Z2, two non-reflexive pairs with no internal points, and one non-reflexive pair with two or more internal points. For each pairing, the authors give toric diagram data, Newton polynomials, algebraic and combinatorial mutation data, and Hilbert series numerators in Appendix A. The paper further claims that paired moduli spaces have the same number of generators and the same Hilbert series when refined only by the U(1)_R fugacity, and it conjectures that any mass deformation of brane brick models induces a birational transformation of the corresponding toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds.

Significance. If the identification is correct, the paper provides concrete evidence for a broad and interesting correspondence: mass deformations in 2d (0,2) gauge theories would realize algebraic/combinatorial mutations of toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds, including beyond the reflexive polytope setting. The explicit, checkable nature of the four examples is a genuine strength: the manuscript supplies toric diagrams, Newton polynomials, mutation data (w, F, G_h), and Hilbert series numerators, so each step can be independently verified. At the same time, the significance is weakened by two gaps: the existence of binomiality-preserving coupling redefinitions after integrating out massive pairs is assumed rather than proved, and the coefficient prescription for non-reflexive Newton polynomials is adopted ad hoc so that the transformations close. The Hilbert series and generator-count statements are also presented as consequences of known birational invariants, not as independent new predictions. The paper is best read as a set of well-documented examples plus a conjecture, not as the proof of a general theorem.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.3, Eq. (2.13)] The central identification of mass deformations with birational transformations rests on the existence of higher-order coupling redefinitions c_h^{(jk)} that restore binomiality after integrating out massive chiral–Fermi pairs. The paper states that these redefinitions are needed, but it does not give a general existence or uniqueness argument; the examples in Sections 4.1–4.4 handle them case by case. Without such an argument, a mass deformation could leave the brane brick model class, and the abstract's unqualified statement that mass deformations are identified with birational transformations would be stronger than what is actually demonstrated.
  2. [§3.3] The coefficient prescription for Newton polynomials of non-reflexive polytopes (extremal coefficients equal to 1, edge coefficients equal to binomial coefficients, internal-point coefficients in C*) is introduced so that the birational transformations close on convex lattice polytopes. This prescription is not derived from brane brick model data or from the mass-deformation procedure of Eqs. (2.11)–(2.13). Consequently, the extension beyond toric Fano 3-folds is a consistent set of examples together with a conjecture, rather than a theorem. The paper should make this limitation explicit whenever it claims to 'show' the extension.
  3. [§3.1 and abstract] The claimed invariance of the U(1)_R-refined Hilbert series and of the number of generators is not an independent test of the proposed dictionary. The paper itself notes that the birational transformations φA preserve the period and the Ehrhart polynomial of the dual polytope, and these objects are closely tied to the U(1)_R Hilbert series and to the lattice-point count that determines the number of generators. The examples therefore largely confirm that known birational invariants are transported through the mass-deformation correspondence, rather than providing new evidence for that correspondence. This dependence should be stated where the abstract highlights the Hilbert-series equality.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.1] There is a duplicated article in 'the the corresponding 2d (0,2) supersymmetric gauge theory' in the paragraph introducing brane brick models.
  2. [§3.3] The phrase 'refined soley in terms' should read 'refined solely in terms'.
  3. [Eq. (2.8)] The displayed formula uses the notation ¯d, but the surrounding text defines only d and later refers only to d; please define ¯d explicitly.
  4. [Appendix A] Appendix A is titled 'Numerators for the fully refined Hilbert Series', but the main text's invariant claim concerns only the U(1)_R-refined Hilbert series. Please clarify whether the appendix numerators are fully refined, and if so, state explicitly whether the fully refined Hilbert series are equal or only the U(1)_R-refined ones.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Hilbert-series and generator-count invariances are imported from external birational-geometry results or explicitly computed in examples, while the non-reflexive extension rests on an openly stated coefficient convention rather than a concealed reuse of the conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that mass deformations of brane brick models realize the birational/algebraic mutations of [8], and that the U(1)_R-refined Hilbert series and generator counts are unchanged. In the reflexive case, this invariance is not presented as a new prediction: Section 3.1 states that [8] preserves the period and the Ehrhart polynomial of the dual polytope, and the paper explicitly notes that the properties from [22] 'directly relate to the properties found in [8]'. Since the U(1)_R Hilbert series of a toric Calabi-Yau cone is the Ehrhart series of the dual polytope, this is an imported theorem, not a circular definition. For the non-reflexive cases, the examples in Sections 4.2-4.4 compute the Hilbert series from the brane brick model data rather than assuming equality; the equality is a checked output, not an input. The coefficient prescription in Section 3.3 (extremal coefficients 1, edge coefficients binomial, internal coefficients in C*) is an explicit convention chosen so that the birational transformations close on lattice polytopes. This is an openly stated ansatz for the non-reflexive extension, not a smuggled assumption, and it does not by itself force the Hilbert-series or generator-count statements. The remaining concern is a missing general existence proof for the higher-order coupling redefinitions c_h^{(jk)} in (2.13), which the paper imports from [23] and verifies case by case. That is a completeness or correctness risk, not circularity, because the examples do not assume the conclusion they are checking. The self-citation to [22] is used as background and motivating evidence, but the current work's explicit examples carry the derivation; no load-bearing step reduces to that self-citation alone.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the brane brick model dictionary, the binomiality of abelian J/E-terms, the invariance theorems of [8] for birational transformations, the mass deformation formalism of [23], and this paper's coefficient prescription for non-reflexive polytopes. No genuinely new entities are postulated. The free parameters are the internal-point coefficient c, the mass deformation scale m, the binomiality-preserving redefinition coefficients in (2.13), and the per-example mutation data A(x,y), w, F, G_h.

free parameters (4)
  • internal point coefficient c = c in C*, arbitrary
    In Newton polynomials such as (4.2) and (4.6), the coefficient of the origin/internal lattice point is a free complex parameter; the paper notes the algebraic mutation is independent of its value.
  • mass deformation parameter m = m, cancels in (2.12)
    The mass terms in (2.11) introduce m; after integrating out massive chiral-Fermi pairs the replacements (2.12) are independent of m up to overall scale, so no value is fitted.
  • redefinition coefficients c^{(jk)}_h = chosen by hand per example
    In (2.13) the higher-order coupling redefinitions used to preserve binomiality of the J/E-terms have coefficients specific to the redefinition; no general formula or existence proof is given.
  • mutation data A(x,y), w, F, G_h = chosen per example
    A(x,y) is selected to satisfy the divisibility condition (3.8), and the height vector w, factor F, and slices G_h are fixed example by example (e.g., (4.3), (4.7)); these choices make the algebraic and combinatorial mutations close on lattice polytopes.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Brane brick model dictionary: D4-branes suspended on an NS5-brane wrapping Sigma define the 2d (0,2) gauge theory with bifundamental chirals and Fermis per brick face (Section 2.1).
    The entire identification of toric data with gauge theory data rests on the brane brick model construction of [15, 16] and the dictionary in Figures 2-4.
  • domain assumption J- and E-terms of an abelian brane brick model are binomial and generate the ideal defining the mesonic moduli space as the probed toric Calabi-Yau 4-fold (Section 2.2).
    The forward algorithm (2.8) and the quotient (2.6) are taken from [15, 16, 36]; the paper states the binomial property holds 'by construction' for U(1) gauge groups.
  • standard math Birational transformations phi_A preserve the period and the Ehrhart polynomial of the dual polytope (results of [8], used in Section 3.1).
    The U(1)_R-refined Hilbert series equality of the paired moduli spaces is presented as following from these invariants; this transfers a theorem from the cited literature.
  • domain assumption Mass deformations of brane brick models behave as described by the massive/moving/unaffected brick matching classification of [23] (Section 2.3).
    The identification of which toric diagram points move or stay under mass deformation is imported from [23] and is the input for matching mass deformations to combinatorial mutations.
  • ad hoc to paper Coefficient prescription for Newton polynomials of non-reflexive polytopes: extremal coefficients 1, edge coefficients binomial, internal coefficients in C* (Section 3.3).
    This prescription is introduced here so that the birational transformations phi_A map non-reflexive polytopes to convex lattice polytopes; a different coefficient choice could break the closure of the construction.
  • standard math Hilbert series of the mesonic moduli space is computed by the Molien integral (2.9) and the plethystic logarithm (2.10) extracts generators and relations.
    Standard toric Hilbert series technology [37-41], used throughout Section 4 to compare generator counts and series.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Birational Transformations and 2d (0,2) Quiver Gauge Theories beyond Toric Fano 3-folds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KJ3TIDUU

@misc{pith2026250208741,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Birational Transformations and 2d (0,2) Quiver Gauge Theories beyond Toric Fano 3-folds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KJ3TIDUU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08741}
}
read the original abstract

We show that a family of birational transformations that relate toric Fano 3-folds defined by reflexive lattice polytopes can be identified with mass deformations of corresponding 2d (0,2) supersymmetric quiver gauge theories. These theories are realized by a Type IIA brane configuration known as brane brick models. We further show that the same family of birational transformations extends to more general toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds, including those defined by non-reflexive toric diagrams. Under these birational transformations, the mesonic moduli spaces of the associated abelian 2d (0,2) supersymmetric gauge theories and brane brick models share the same number of generators and the same Hilbert series when refined only under the U(1)R symmetry. Since these transformations categorize toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds and their corresponding 2d (0,2) supersymmetric gauge theories into non-trivial equivalence classes, we anticipate that our findings will pave the way for a `Minimal Model Program' for quiver gauge theories corresponding to toric Calabi-Yau manifolds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quiver-Invariant Dualities between Brane Tilings

    hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A tilting mutation of brane tilings yields distinct superpotentials on the same quiver with identical mesonic moduli space, equivalent to a sequence of Seiberg dualities.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [22]

    D. Ghim, M. Kho and R.-K. Seong, Combinatorial and algebraic mutations of toric Fano 3-folds and mass deformations of 2d(0,2) quiver gauge theories , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 086001, [ 2407.19924]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [8]

    Akhtar, T

    M. Akhtar, T. Coates, S. Galkin, A. M. Kasprzyk et al., Minkowski polynomials and mutations, SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications 8 (2012) 094. – 81 –

    work page 2012

  3. [1]

    Mori, Projective manifolds with ample tangent bundles , Annals of Mathematics 110 (1979) 593–606

    S. Mori, Projective manifolds with ample tangent bundles , Annals of Mathematics 110 (1979) 593–606

    work page 1979

  4. [2]

    Mori, Threefolds whose canonical bundles are not numerically effective , Annals of Mathematics 116 (1982) 133–176

    S. Mori, Threefolds whose canonical bundles are not numerically effective , Annals of Mathematics 116 (1982) 133–176

    work page 1982

  5. [3]

    Mori, Flip theorem and the existence of minimal models for 3-folds , Journal of the American Mathematical Society 1 (1988) 117–253

    S. Mori, Flip theorem and the existence of minimal models for 3-folds , Journal of the American Mathematical Society 1 (1988) 117–253

    work page 1988

  6. [4]

    Kawamata, Pluricanonical systems on minimal algebraic varieties , Inventiones mathematicae 79 (1985) 567–588

    Y. Kawamata, Pluricanonical systems on minimal algebraic varieties , Inventiones mathematicae 79 (1985) 567–588

    work page 1985

  7. [5]

    Koll´ ar, Y

    J. Koll´ ar, Y. Miyaoka and S. Mori,Rationally connected varieties, J. Algebraic Geom. 1 (1992) 429–448

    work page 1992

  8. [6]

    Koll´ ar and S

    J. Koll´ ar and S. Mori,Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties . Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 1998

    work page 1998

Show all 78 references
  1. [7]

    Birkar, P

    C. Birkar, P. Cascini, C. Hacon and J. McKernan, Existence of minimal models for varieties of log general type , Journal of the American Mathematical Society 23 (2010) 405–468

    2010

  2. [9]

    Gross, P

    M. Gross, P. Hacking and S. Keel, Birational geometry of cluster algebras , 1309.2573

    arXiv

  3. [10]

    Coates, A

    T. Coates, A. Corti, S. Galkin and A. Kasprzyk, Quantum periods for 3–dimensional fano manifolds , Geometry & Topology 20 (2016) 103–256

    2016

  4. [11]

    Kasprzyk, B

    A. Kasprzyk, B. Nill and T. Prince, Minimality and mutation-equivalence of polygons , in Forum of mathematics, Sigma , vol. 5, p. e18, Cambridge University Press, 2017

    2017

  5. [12]

    Coates, A

    T. Coates, A. M. Kasprzyk, G. Pitton and K. Tveiten, Maximally mutable laurent polynomials, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 477 (2021) 20210584

    2021

  6. [13]

    Coates, L

    T. Coates, L. Heuberger and A. M. Kasprzyk, Mirror symmetry, laurent inversion and the classification of Q-fano threefolds, 2210.07328

    arXiv

  7. [14]

    Corti, Cluster varieties and toric specializations of fano varieties , 2304.04141

    A. Corti, Cluster varieties and toric specializations of fano varieties , 2304.04141

    arXiv

  8. [15]

    Franco, D

    S. Franco, D. Ghim, S. Lee, R.-K. Seong and D. Yokoyama, 2d (0,2) Quiver Gauge Theories and D-Branes , JHEP 09 (2015) 072, [ 1506.03818]

    2015 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Franco, S

    S. Franco, S. Lee and R.-K. Seong, Brane Brick Models, Toric Calabi-Yau 4-Folds and 2d (0,2) Quivers , JHEP 02 (2016) 047, [ 1510.01744]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Franco, S

    S. Franco, S. Lee and R.-K. Seong, Brane brick models and 2d (0, 2) triality , JHEP 05 (2016) 020, [ 1602.01834]

    2016 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Franco, S

    S. Franco, S. Lee, R.-K. Seong and C. Vafa, Brane Brick Models in the Mirror , JHEP 02 (2017) 106, [ 1609.01723]

    2017 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Kreuzer and H

    M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke, On the classification of reflexive polyhedra , Commun. Math. Phys. 185 (1997) 495–508, [ hep-th/9512204]

    1997 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Kreuzer and H

    M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke, Classification of reflexive polyhedra in three-dimensions , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 853–871, [ hep-th/9805190]

    1998 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Kreuzer and H

    M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke, Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four-dimensions, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4 (2000) 1209–1230, [ hep-th/0002240]

    2000 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Franco, D

    S. Franco, D. Ghim, G. P. Goulas and R.-K. Seong, Mass deformations of brane brick models, JHEP 09 (2023) 176, [ 2307.03220]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Davey, A

    J. Davey, A. Hanany and R.-K. Seong, Counting Orbifolds , JHEP 06 (2010) 010, [1002.3609]

    2010 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Hanany and R.-K

    A. Hanany and R.-K. Seong, Symmetries of Abelian Orbifolds , JHEP 01 (2011) 027, [1009.3017]

    2011 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Franco and R.-K

    S. Franco and R.-K. Seong, Fano 3-folds, reflexive polytopes and brane brick models , JHEP 08 (2022) 008, [ 2203.15816]. – 82 –

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Hori and C

    K. Hori and C. Vafa, Mirror symmetry, hep-th/0002222

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    K. Hori, A. Iqbal and C. Vafa, D-branes and mirror symmetry , hep-th/0005247

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Cachazo, B

    F. Cachazo, B. Fiol, K. A. Intriligator, S. Katz and C. Vafa, A Geometric unification of dualities , Nucl. Phys. B 628 (2002) 3–78, [ hep-th/0110028]

    2002 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Feng, Y.-H

    B. Feng, Y.-H. He, K. D. Kennaway and C. Vafa, Dimer models from mirror symmetry and quivering amoebae , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 12 (2008) 489–545, [hep-th/0511287]

    2008 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Franco, S

    S. Franco, S. Lee, R.-K. Seong and C. Vafa, Quadrality for Supersymmetric Matrix Models, JHEP 07 (2017) 053, [ 1612.06859]

    2017 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Seong, Unsupervised machine learning techniques for exploring tropical coamoeba, brane tilings and Seiberg duality , Phys

    R.-K. Seong, Unsupervised machine learning techniques for exploring tropical coamoeba, brane tilings and Seiberg duality , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 106009, [ 2309.05702]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Seong, Generative AI for Brane Configurations, Tropical Coamoeba and 4d N=1 Quiver Gauge Theories , 2411.16033

    R.-K. Seong, Generative AI for Brane Configurations, Tropical Coamoeba and 4d N=1 Quiver Gauge Theories , 2411.16033

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Fulton, Introduction to Toric Varieties

    W. Fulton, Introduction to Toric Varieties. Annals of mathematics studies. Princeton University Press, 1993

    1993

  27. [35]

    D. A. Cox, The Homogeneous coordinate ring of a toric variety, revised version , alg-geom/9210008

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    B. Feng, A. Hanany and Y.-H. He, D-brane gauge theories from toric singularities and toric duality , Nucl. Phys. B 595 (2001) 165–200, [ hep-th/0003085]

    2001 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Benvenuti, B

    S. Benvenuti, B. Feng, A. Hanany and Y.-H. He, Counting BPS Operators in Gauge Theories: Quivers, Syzygies and Plethystics , JHEP 11 (2007) 050, [ hep-th/0608050]

    2007 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Hanany and C

    A. Hanany and C. Romelsberger, Counting BPS operators in the chiral ring of N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories or N=2 braine surgery , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 11 (2007) 1091–1112, [ hep-th/0611346]

    2007 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Butti, D

    A. Butti, D. Forcella, A. Hanany, D. Vegh and A. Zaffaroni, Counting Chiral Operators in Quiver Gauge Theories , JHEP 11 (2007) 092, [ 0705.2771]

    2007 arXiv

  32. [40]

    B. Feng, A. Hanany and Y.-H. He, Counting gauge invariants: The Plethystic program , JHEP 03 (2007) 090, [ hep-th/0701063]

    2007 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Hanany, Counting BPS operators in the chiral ring: The plethystic story , AIP Conf

    A. Hanany, Counting BPS operators in the chiral ring: The plethystic story , AIP Conf. Proc. 939 (2007) 165–175

    2007

  34. [42]

    Forcella, A

    D. Forcella, A. Hanany, Y.-H. He and A. Zaffaroni, The Master Space of N=1 Gauge Theories, JHEP 08 (2008) 012, [ 0801.1585]

    2008 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Forcella, A

    D. Forcella, A. Hanany, Y.-H. He and A. Zaffaroni, Mastering the Master Space , Lett. Math. Phys. 85 (2008) 163–171, [ 0801.3477]. – 83 –

    2008 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Kho and R.-K

    M. Kho and R.-K. Seong, On the master space for brane brick models , JHEP 09 (2023) 150, [2306.16616]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Gray, Y.-H

    J. Gray, Y.-H. He, V. Jejjala and B. D. Nelson, Exploring the vacuum geometry of N=1 gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 750 (2006) 1–27, [ hep-th/0604208]

    2006 arXiv

  38. [46]

    V. V. Batyrev, Toroidal fano 3-folds, Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya 19 (feb,

  39. [47]

    V. V. Batyrev, Dual polyhedra and mirror symmetry for calabi-yau hypersurfaces in toric varieties , alg-geom/9310003

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Borisov, Towards the mirror symmetry for calabi-yau complete intersections in gorenstein toric fano varieties , alg-geom/9310001

    L. Borisov, Towards the mirror symmetry for calabi-yau complete intersections in gorenstein toric fano varieties , alg-geom/9310001

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    V. V. Batyrev and L. A. Borisov, Dual cones and mirror symmetry for generalized calabi-yau manifolds, alg-geom/9402002

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    V. V. Batyrev and L. A. Borisov, On Calabi-Yau complete intersections in toric varieties, alg-geom/9412017

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    V. V. Batyrev, On the classification of toric fano 4-folds , Journal of Mathematical Sciences 94 (1999) 1021–1050

    1999

  44. [52]

    He, R.-K

    Y.-H. He, R.-K. Seong and S.-T. Yau, Calabi–Yau Volumes and Reflexive Polytopes , Commun. Math. Phys. 361 (2018) 155–204, [ 1704.03462]

    2018 arXiv

  45. [53]

    J. Bao, E. Choi, Y.-H. He, R.-K. Seong and S.-T. Yau, Futaki Invariants and Reflexive Polygons, 2410.18476

  46. [54]

    D. A. Cox, J. B. Little and H. K. Schenck, Toric varieties, vol. 124. American Mathematical Society, 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    Ewald, On the classification of toric fano varieties , Discrete & computational geometry 3 (1988) 49–54

    G. Ewald, On the classification of toric fano varieties , Discrete & computational geometry 3 (1988) 49–54

    1988

  48. [56]

    Watanabe and M

    K. Watanabe and M. Watanabe, The classification of fano 3-folds with torus embeddings, Tokyo Journal of Mathematics 5 (1982) 37–48

    1982

  49. [57]

    Nill, Gorenstein toric fano varieties , manuscripta mathematica 116 (2005) 183–210

    B. Nill, Gorenstein toric fano varieties , manuscripta mathematica 116 (2005) 183–210

    2005

  50. [58]

    A. B. Givental, Equivariant gromov-witten invariants , alg-geom/9603021

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    M. Beck, S. V. Sam and K. M. Woods, Maximal periods of (ehrhart) quasi-polynomials , Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 115 (2008) 517–525

    2008

  52. [60]

    Ehrhart, Polynomes arithmetiques et methode de polyedres en combinatoire

    E. Ehrhart, Polynomes arithmetiques et methode de polyedres en combinatoire . International Series of Numerical Mathematics. Birkh¨ auser Basel, 1977

    1977

  53. [61]

    R. P. Stanley, Decompositions of rational convex polytopes, Ann. Discrete Math 6 (1980) 333–342. – 84 –

    1980

  54. [62]

    Hanany and R

    A. Hanany and R. Kalveks, Highest Weight Generating Functions for Hilbert Series , JHEP 10 (2014) 152, [ 1408.4690]

    2014 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Franco, D

    S. Franco, D. Ghim, S. Lee and R.-K. Seong, Elliptic Genera of 2d (0,2) Gauge Theories from Brane Brick Models , JHEP 06 (2017) 068, [ 1702.02948]

    2017 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Franco, S

    S. Franco, S. Lee and R.-K. Seong, Orbifold Reduction and 2d (0,2) Gauge Theories , JHEP 03 (2017) 016, [ 1609.07144]

    2017 arXiv

  57. [65]

    M. R. Douglas, B. R. Greene and D. R. Morrison, Orbifold resolution by D-branes , Nucl. Phys. B 506 (1997) 84–106, [ hep-th/9704151]

    1997 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Hanany and K

    A. Hanany and K. D. Kennaway, Dimer models and toric diagrams , hep-th/0503149

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    Franco, A

    S. Franco, A. Hanany, K. D. Kennaway, D. Vegh and B. Wecht, Brane dimers and quiver gauge theories , JHEP 01 (2006) 096, [ hep-th/0504110]

    2006 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Franco, A

    S. Franco, A. Hanany, D. Martelli, J. Sparks, D. Vegh and B. Wecht, Gauge theories from toric geometry and brane tilings , JHEP 01 (2006) 128, [ hep-th/0505211]

    2006 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Hanany and R.-K

    A. Hanany and R.-K. Seong, Brane Tilings and Reflexive Polygons , Fortsch. Phys. 60 (2012) 695–803, [ 1201.2614]

    2012 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Bianchi, S

    M. Bianchi, S. Cremonesi, A. Hanany, J. F. Morales, D. Ricci Pacifici and R.-K. Seong, Mass-deformed Brane Tilings , JHEP 10 (2014) 027, [ 1408.1957]

    2014 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Cremonesi and J

    S. Cremonesi and J. S´ a,Zig-zag deformations of toric quiver gauge theories. Part I. Reflexive polytopes, JHEP 05 (2024) 114, [ 2312.13909]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Higashitani, Y

    A. Higashitani, Y. Nakajima et al., Deformations of dimer models , SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications 18 (2022) 030

    2022

  65. [73]

    Benini, S

    F. Benini, S. Benvenuti and Y. Tachikawa, Webs of five-branes and N=2 superconformal field theories, JHEP 09 (2009) 052, [ 0906.0359]

    2009 arXiv

  66. [74]

    van Beest, A

    M. van Beest, A. Bourget, J. Eckhard and S. Schafer-Nameki, (Symplectic) Leaves and (5d Higgs) Branches in the Poly(go)nesian Tropical Rain Forest , JHEP 11 (2020) 124, [2008.05577]

    2020 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Franco and R.-K

    S. Franco and R.-K. Seong, Twin theories, polytope mutations and quivers for GTPs , JHEP 07 (2023) 034, [ 2302.10951]

    2023 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Arias-Tamargo, S

    G. Arias-Tamargo, S. Franco and D. Rodr ´ ıguez-G´ omez,The geometry of GTPs and 5d SCFTs, JHEP 07 (2024) 159, [ 2403.09776]

    2024 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Carre˜ no Bolla, S

    I. Carre˜ no Bolla, S. Franco and D. Rodr ´ ıguez-G´ omez,The 5d Tangram: Brane Webs, 7-Branes and Primitive T-cones , 2411.01510

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    Franco and A

    S. Franco and A. Hasan, 3 d printing of 2d N = (0, 2) gauge theories, JHEP 05 (2018) 082, [1801.00799]. – 85 –

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.