Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 57 references

Non-Hermitian Spin-Spin Interaction Mediated by Chiral Phonons

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Chiral phonons in a crystal can mediate a spin-spin interaction that is intrinsically directional, transferring angular momentum one way but not the other.

desk verdict Fresh idea: chiral phonons as a mediator for non-Hermitian spin-spin interactions, but the proposed finite-resonator realization doesn't actually implement the unidirectional coupling the theory requires. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14545 v2 pith:KKRLS7WJ submitted 2024-11-21 quant-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Haowei Xu , Guoqing Wang , Changhao Li , Hao Tang , Paola Cappellaro , Ju Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords chiralphononsnon-Hermitianspin-spininteractionspin-phononcouplingangularmomentumlockingcascadedquantumsystemsmany-bodyphysicsalpha-quartzdefectspins
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that the lattice vibrations of a chiral crystal—phonons whose atomic motion rotates clockwise or counterclockwise—can mediate an effective spin-spin interaction that is directional, i.e., non-Hermitian. The key is momentum-angular-momentum locking: in a chiral material such as alpha-quartz, a phonon traveling to the right with angular momentum +1 is not frequency-degenerate with the left-traveling +1 phonon, so only the right-moving channel is near resonance with a spin transition. On this basis the authors derive a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian whose off-diagonal term transfers spin angular momentum from spin A to spin B but not in reverse, with the reverse coupling suppressed by roughly five orders of magnitude. They estimate the forward coupling at 0.1–1 kHz for electron spins in a micrometer-scale resonator, strong enough to be observable with millisecond spin coherence, and note that the long-range nature of acoustic phonons allows the same directional interaction to couple many spins at once. If correct, this provides a concrete solid-state route to cascaded quantum systems, non-Hermitian many-body physics, and non-Hermitian cooling.

What carries the argument

The argument has two load-bearing parts. The first is chirality-induced locking between phonon momentum and pseudoangular momentum: in a chiral crystal the transverse acoustic modes with $(+k_z, +L)$ and $(-k_z, +L)$ are split in frequency, here by about 20% in $\alpha$-SiO2, so a given spin transition is near resonance for one propagation direction and far off resonance for the other. The second is the angular-momentum-conserving spin-phonon coupling $H_{Sp} = g(S^- a^\dagger + S^+ a)$, which lets a $+L$ phonon be emitted only when the spin is lowered. Combining these with a cascaded quantum master equation and adiabatic elimination of the phonon field yields the effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian of Eq. (8), whose off-diagonal term $S^-_A S^+_B$ is not balanced by its reverse.

What would settle it

Compute the full strain response tensor $\partial D_{ij}/\partial u_{kl}$ for the CO defect in $\alpha$-SiO2 under the circularly polarized strain of a chiral phonon; if the counter-rotating coupling $S^+ a^\dagger$ has a matrix element comparable to $g$, the chiral selection rule is violated and the predicted suppression $\gamma'/\gamma < 10^{-5}$ fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that chiral phonons can mediate an off-diagonal non-Hermitian spin-spin interaction, described by the effective Hamiltonian $$H_{\rm NH} = -i\gamma\bigl(S^+_A S^-_A + S^+_B S^-_B + $2e^{{ikd}}$ S^-_A S^+_B\bigr),$$ where the last term is non-reciprocal: spin A transfers its angular momentum to spin B, while the reverse process is suppressed. The suppression follows from chirality: for a $(+k_z, +L)$ phonon the spin-phonon coupling $g(S^- a^\dagger + S^+ a)$ is near resonance, giving an interaction strength $\gamma = 2g^2/\Delta$ with $\Delta \sim 10$ kHz; the $(-k_z, +L)$ phonon would mediate the reverse interaction, but because left- and right-propagating transverse acoustic phonons in a chiral crystal differ in frequency, its detuning is $\Delta' \sim 0.1$ GHz and the resulting $\gamma'$ is below 1 Hz. The authors support the frequency split with ab initio calculations for $\alpha$-SiO2 and estimate $g \approx 1$ kHz for electron spins in a 1 $\mu$m resonator, or about 100 Hz for nuclear spins when the mechanical wave is externally driven. Because acoustic phonons propagate over many lattice spacings, the same non-Hermitian coupling can be extended to chains of spins.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that a defect spin in a chiral crystal couples to a chiral phonon only through the angular-momentum-conserving term $g(S^- a^\dagger + S^+ a)$, with no comparable counter-rotating or symmetry-breaking coupling that would restore the reverse direction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Electron spins in a micrometer-scale chiral mechanical resonator should exhibit a non-reciprocal spin-spin coupling of about 0.1–1 kHz, observable with millisecond spin coherence times.
  • The reverse coupling, mediated by the left-propagating same-helicity phonon, is suppressed to below 0.01 Hz because that mode is detuned by about 0.1 GHz in alpha-quartz.
  • Because acoustic phonons are long-range, the directional interaction can couple more than two spins, forming cascaded quantum systems with unidirectional excitation transfer.
  • Externally driving the mechanical wave raises the coupling for nuclear spins to roughly 100 Hz, at the cost of adding decoherence that scales with the same factor.
  • The tunable propagation phase of the interaction makes the many-spin Hamiltonian a candidate for non-Hermitian many-body physics and for exponentially enhanced non-Hermitian cooling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same momentum–angular-momentum locking may also operate for optical phonons or for other chiral point groups, so the non-reciprocity need not be confined to the transverse acoustic branch studied here.
  • Editorial inference: the suppression ratio is set by the fractional frequency splitting of the two transverse branches, so a two-spin experiment that measures the reverse coupling would provide a direct, material-independent check of the mechanism.
  • Editorial inference: tuning the resonator mode index and spin spacing changes the phase acquired by the phonon, which could turn a single directional pair into a synthetic one-way lattice—an application the paper gestures at but does not develop.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an off-diagonal non-Hermitian spin-spin interaction mediated by chiral phonons in chiral crystals. It assumes that a +L chiral phonon couples to a localized spin via H_sp = g(S- a+ + S+ a), and that momentum-angular momentum locking makes the (+kz,+L) mode strongly directional while the reverse (-kz,+L) mode is far off resonance. After adiabatic elimination and a cascaded master equation treatment, the authors obtain an effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian H_NH = -i*gamma*(S+_A S-_A + S+_B S-_B + 2 e^{ikd} S-_A S+_B), with forward coupling gamma ~ 0.1-1 kHz for electron spins in an alpha-SiO2 resonator and reverse coupling gamma' < 1 Hz. They also discuss nuclear spins enhanced by driven strain and extensions to multi-spin cascaded systems.

Significance. The idea of using the momentum-angular momentum locking of chiral phonons to generate a directional, vacuum-mediated spin-spin interaction is novel and connects two active fields, chiral phonons and non-Hermitian quantum systems. The manuscript provides ab initio-based estimates of strain response tensors and a transparent scaling argument for the coupling strength. If a suitable chiral phonon waveguide were realized, the proposal would offer a route to cascaded quantum systems and non-Hermitian many-body spin physics in the solid state. However, the current manuscript does not establish that the proposed finite-resonator geometry implements the unidirectional interaction, and a key adiabatic-elimination step is incorrect for the single-mode Hamiltonian stated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Experimental Realizations, Eqs. (5)-(8)] The proposed mechanical resonator with k_z = n*pi/l supports standing-wave modes rather than unidirectional traveling waves. Time-reversal symmetry maps (+kz,+L) to (-kz,-L) at the same frequency, so the near-resonant standing mode at omega+ contains both of these components, while the (-kz,+L) mode is far off-resonant. The standing-wave mode therefore couples to both spins through the same near-resonant S- a+ + S+ a terms, and adiabatic elimination produces a Hermitian exchange with equal forward and backward amplitudes, not the non-reciprocal term in Eq. (8). The kHz estimate in the text is thus for a Hermitian interaction unless a genuinely unidirectional phonon waveguide (e.g., a ring or a terminated guide with suppressed backscattering) is specified. This is the central experimental claim and needs to be reworked.
  2. [Eqs. (3)-(4)] Adiabatic elimination of the single common phonon mode in Eq. (3) does not yield the coherent Hamiltonian H_AB = i*gamma*(S+_A S-_B - S-_A S+_B). Second-order perturbation theory for that single-mode Hamiltonian gives a real symmetric exchange proportional to S+_A S-_B + S-_A S+_B, not the antisymmetric imaginary combination. The form in Eq. (4) is instead the coherent part of a cascaded master equation for a unidirectional continuum. The authors should derive Eq. (4) from an explicit chiral-waveguide Hamiltonian or state it as a separate assumption. As written, the derivation of the central Hamiltonian is not supported.
  3. [Chiral Spin-Phonon Interactions, Eq. (2)] The reduction of the full strain coupling H_Sp = sum of Xi^S_{ij,kl} S_i S_j u_{kl} to the single term g(S- a+ + S+ a) is asserted on the basis of angular momentum conservation, but it is not derived for the specific defect. The pseudo-angular momentum is defined for the host lattice; a defect breaks the local symmetry, and the strain pattern of an acoustic mode is not purely circular in general. The paper should provide the derivation from the D-tensor response for C0_O in alpha-SiO2 or state the conditions under which this reduction holds. Because Eq. (2) is the foundation of the spin-phonon coupling, this missing step is load-bearing.
  4. [Fig. 3 and Eq. (1)] The computational details behind the strain response functions are not disclosed; the functional, pseudopotentials, supercell size, and strain protocol used to obtain D(uxx) and Q(uxx) should be provided so that the values Xi^S ~ 10 GHz and Xi^I ~ 1 MHz can be independently assessed. Since these numbers determine the predicted coupling strengths, they are essential for the quantitative claims of the paper.
minor comments (6)
  1. [General] The paper refers to 'SI Section A/B/C' but the posted manuscript does not include a supplementary file; the referenced derivations cannot be checked.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption does not identify which components of D and Q are plotted, nor the units of the vertical axis.
  3. [Eq. (1)] The notation Xi^S = dD/du is ambiguous because D and u are tensors; the relevant components should be specified.
  4. [Table I] Table I lists Delta' ~ 0.1 GHz while the text states a 20% difference in omega+-, which at ~1 GHz would be ~0.2 GHz; the relation between these numbers should be clarified.
  5. [General] There are minor typos, including 'As a example' and 'variances' where 'variations' is meant; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
  6. [Experimental Realizations] The claim that gamma >~ 1 kHz can be achieved with a smaller resonator or a larger Xi^S should be accompanied by an explicit check of the Delta >> g condition and of the Markovianity condition for the cascaded master equation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the non-Hermitian spin-spin Hamiltonian follows from a stated chiral-selection-rule Hamiltonian and the standard cascaded-master-equation framework, with parameter estimates taken as first-principles inputs rather than fits to the target effect.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its own output. The paper's central non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, Eq. (8), is obtained by combining (i) the spin-phonon Hamiltonian of Eq. (3), whose form is justified by an angular-momentum conservation selection rule and by computed strain-response tensors, and (ii) the standard Gardiner-Carmichael cascaded master equation, Eqs. (5)-(6), citing Refs. [42,49-51]. Neither input is defined in terms of the target nonreciprocal interaction. The reverse-direction suppression gamma'/gamma << 1 follows from the calculated frequency splitting of the +/-kz transverse modes and from the chosen spin-phonon detunings, not from fitting the desired gamma or gamma'. The quoted parameter values Xi_S = 10 GHz and Xi_I = 1 MHz are presented as order-of-magnitude inputs obtained from ab initio response calculations for specific defects and are not extracted from the non-Hermitian coupling being claimed. The only self-citation, Ref. [10], appears as a possible future application in the introduction and discussions ("non-Hermitian cooling [10] may also be demonstrated") and is not load-bearing for Eq. (8). A skeptical concern about finite-resonator standing waves versus unidirectional traveling waves is a physical modeling or correctness issue about whether the proposed realization supplies the assumed chiral reservoir; it is not a circularity of the derivation chain. No step in the paper defines a quantity in terms of the predicted result, fits a parameter to a subset of data and then calls the related output a prediction, or imports a uniqueness theorem from the authors' own prior work. The score is therefore 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the angular momentum selection rule for spin-phonon coupling, the rotating-wave approximation, and the standard cascaded quantum-optics elimination. The numerical estimates use chosen detunings and order-of-magnitude strain responses from unpublished DFT. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (5)
  • Spin-phonon detuning Δ = 10 kHz
    Chosen by hand to make γ = 2g²/Δ ~ 0.1-1 kHz while nominally satisfying Δ >> g. The estimate is linearly sensitive to this choice.
  • Zero-field-splitting strain response ΞS = 10 GHz
    Order-of-magnitude value adopted from DFT for C_O in α-SiO2; enters g = ΞS u_zpf. A smaller value would reduce the kHz interaction proportionally.
  • Nuclear quadrupole strain response ΞI = 1 MHz
    Order-of-magnitude value from DFT for Al_Si in α-SiO2; underlies the nuclear spin proposal with driven strain.
  • Reverse-mode detuning Δ' = 0.1 GHz
    Computed from the ~20% group velocity difference between TA modes; the claimed suppression γ' < 1 Hz depends on this detuning being ~10^4 larger than Δ.
  • Driven strain amplitude u = 1e-4
    Assumed external mechanical drive to raise nuclear spin-phonon coupling to ~100 Hz; not derived from any specific transducer design.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption A localized spin interacting with a chiral phonon obeys strict pseudo-angular-momentum conservation: creating a +L phonon lowers the spin projection by 1, and the interaction reduces to g(S- a† + S+ a).
    Invoked to write Eq. (2); not derived from the full zero-field-strain tensor for the specific defect, and may break down for defects lacking the lattice rotation symmetry.
  • domain assumption Counter-rotating terms such as S+ a for a +L phonon are far off-resonance and can be neglected (rotating-wave approximation).
    Used to justify keeping only the near-resonant term in Eq. (2) and to dismiss the (+kz,-L) and (-kz,-L) modes in Table I.
  • domain assumption Adiabatic elimination of the phonon mode in the large-detuning limit yields the effective spin-spin Hamiltonian Eq. (4) and the cascaded master equation Eq. (5) with the jump operator z = S-_A + e^{-ikd} S-_B.
    Standard quantum-optics result (Refs [42-44]); the paper does not rederive it for a phonon resonator and assumes a running-wave field with phase factor e^{ikd}.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-Hermitian Spin-Spin Interaction Mediated by Chiral Phonons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KKRLS7WJ

@misc{pith2026241114545,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-Hermitian Spin-Spin Interaction Mediated by Chiral Phonons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KKRLS7WJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14545}
}
read the original abstract

Non-Hermiticity and chirality are two fundamental properties known to give rise to various intriguing phenomena. However, the interplay between these properties has been rarely explored. In this work, we bridge this gap by introducing an off-diagonal non-Hermitian spin-spin interaction mediated by chiral phonons. This interaction arises from the spin-selectivity due to the locking between phonon momentum and angular momentum in chiral materials. The resulting non-Hermitian interaction mediated by the vacuum field of chiral phonons can reach the kHz range for electron spins and can be further enhanced by externally driven mechanical waves, potentially leading to observable effects in the quantum regime. Moreover, the long-range nature of phonon-mediated interactions enables the realization of the long-desired non-Hermitian interaction among multiple spins. The effect proposed in this work may have wide-ranging applications in cascaded quantum systems, non-Hermitian many-body physics, and non-Hermitian cooling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14545 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Chiral phonons in chiral materials. (a, b) Top view of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Zero field splitting tensor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Exceptional points in optics and photonics,

    Mohammad-Ali Miri and Andrea Alu, “Exceptional points in optics and photonics,” Science 363, eaar7709 (2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity,

    Weijian Chen, S ¸ahin Kaya ¨Ozdemir, Guangming Zhao, Jan Wiersig, and Lan Yang, “Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity,” Nature 548, 192–196 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Topological energy transfer in an optomechanical sys- tem with exceptional points,

    Haitan Xu, David Mason, Luyao Jiang, and JGE Harris, “Topological energy transfer in an optomechanical sys- tem with exceptional points,” Nature 537, 80–83 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    A review on non-hermitian skin effect,

    Xiujuan Zhang, Tian Zhang, Ming-Hui Lu, and Yan- Feng Chen, “A review on non-hermitian skin effect,” Ad- vances in Physics: X 7, 2109431 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Non-hermitian bulk–boundary correspondence in quantum dynamics,

    Lei Xiao, Tianshu Deng, Kunkun Wang, Gaoyan Zhu, Zhong Wang, Wei Yi, and Peng Xue, “Non-hermitian bulk–boundary correspondence in quantum dynamics,” Nature Physics 16, 761–766 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Topological funneling of light,

    Sebastian Weidemann, Mark Kremer, Tobias Helbig, To- bias Hofmann, Alexander Stegmaier, Martin Greiter, Ronny Thomale, and Alexander Szameit, “Topological funneling of light,” Science 368, 311–314 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Exceptional topology of non-hermitian systems,

    Emil J Bergholtz, Jan Carl Budich, and Flore K Kunst, “Exceptional topology of non-hermitian systems,” Re- views of Modern Physics 93, 015005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Topological band theory for non-hermitian hamiltonians,

    Huitao Shen, Bo Zhen, and Liang Fu, “Topological band theory for non-hermitian hamiltonians,” Physical review letters 120, 146402 (2018). 6

    work page 2018

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Symmetry and topology in non- hermitian physics,

    Kohei Kawabata, Ken Shiozaki, Masahito Ueda, and Masatoshi Sato, “Symmetry and topology in non- hermitian physics,” Physical Review X 9, 041015 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Exponentially enhanced non-hermitian cooling,

    Haowei Xu, Uroˇ s Deli´ c, Guoqing Wang, Changhao Li, Paola Cappellaro, and Ju Li, “Exponentially enhanced non-hermitian cooling,” Physical Review Letters 132, 110402 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir en- gineering,

    Anja Metelmann and Aashish A Clerk, “Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir en- gineering,” Physical Review X 5, 021025 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    Noise- less non-reciprocity in a parametric active device,

    Archana Kamal, John Clarke, and MH Devoret, “Noise- less non-reciprocity in a parametric active device,” Na- ture Physics 7, 311–315 (2011)

    2011

  5. [13]

    Reconfigurable josephson circulator/directional amplifier,

    KM Sliwa, M Hatridge, A Narla, S Shankar, L Frun- zio, RJ Schoelkopf, and MH Devoret, “Reconfigurable josephson circulator/directional amplifier,” Physical Re- view X 5, 041020 (2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    Asymmetric scattering of polarized electrons by organized organic films of chiral molecules,

    K Ray, SP Ananthavel, DH Waldeck, and Ron Naa- man, “Asymmetric scattering of polarized electrons by organized organic films of chiral molecules,” Science 283, 814–816 (1999)

    1999

  7. [15]

    Chi- ral molecules and the electron spin,

    Ron Naaman, Yossi Paltiel, and David H Waldeck, “Chi- ral molecules and the electron spin,” Nature Reviews Chemistry 3, 250–260 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Chirality-driven topological electronic structure of dna- like materials,

    Yizhou Liu, Jiewen Xiao, Jahyun Koo, and Binghai Yan, “Chirality-driven topological electronic structure of dna- like materials,” Nature materials 20, 638–644 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Angular momentum of phonons and the einstein–de haas effect,

    Lifa Zhang and Qian Niu, “Angular momentum of phonons and the einstein–de haas effect,” Physical Re- view Letters 112, 085503 (2014)

    2014

  10. [18]

    Chiral phonons at high- symmetry points in monolayer hexagonal lattices,

    Lifa Zhang and Qian Niu, “Chiral phonons at high- symmetry points in monolayer hexagonal lattices,” Phys- ical review letters 115, 115502 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Truly chiral phonons in α-hgs,

    Kyosuke Ishito, Huiling Mao, Yusuke Kousaka, Yoshihiko Togawa, Satoshi Iwasaki, Tiantian Zhang, Shuichi Mu- rakami, Jun-ichiro Kishine, and Takuya Satoh, “Truly chiral phonons in α-hgs,” Nature Physics 19, 35–39 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Chiral phonons in quartz probed by x-rays,

    Hiroki Ueda, Mirian Garc ´ ıa-Fern´ andez, Stefano Agres- tini, Carl P Romao, Jeroen van den Brink, Nicola A Spaldin, Ke-Jin Zhou, and Urs Staub, “Chiral phonons in quartz probed by x-rays,” Nature618, 946–950 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Chiral-phonon-activated spin seebeck effect,

    Kyunghoon Kim, Eric Vetter, Liang Yan, Cong Yang, Ziqi Wang, Rui Sun, Yu Yang, Andrew H Comstock, Xiao Li, Jun Zhou, et al., “Chiral-phonon-activated spin seebeck effect,” Nature Materials 22, 322–328 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Nonreciprocal phonon propagation in a metal- lic chiral magnet,

    T Nomura, X-X Zhang, R Takagi, K Karube, A Kikkawa, Y Taguchi, Y Tokura, Sergei Zherlitsyn, Y Kohama, and S Seki, “Nonreciprocal phonon propagation in a metal- lic chiral magnet,” Physical Review Letters 130, 176301 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Quantum guidelines for solid-state spin defects,

    Gary Wolfowicz, F Joseph Heremans, Christopher P An- derson, Shun Kanai, Hosung Seo, Adam Gali, Giulia Galli, and David D Awschalom, “Quantum guidelines for solid-state spin defects,” Nature Reviews Materials 6, 906–925 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Semiconductor qubits in practice,

    Anasua Chatterjee, Paul Stevenson, Silvano De Franceschi, Andrea Morello, Nathalie P de Leon, and Ferdinand Kuemmeth, “Semiconductor qubits in practice,” Nature Reviews Physics 3, 157–177 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Difference between angular momentum and pseudoangular momentum,

    Simon Streib, “Difference between angular momentum and pseudoangular momentum,” Physical Review B103, L100409 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Spin–orbit inter- actions of light,

    Konstantin Yu Bliokh, Francisco J Rodr ´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, Franco Nori, and Anatoly V Zayats, “Spin–orbit inter- actions of light,” Nature Photonics 9, 796–808 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Chiral quantum op- tics,

    Peter Lodahl, Sahand Mahmoodian, Søren Stobbe, Arno Rauschenbeutel, Philipp Schneeweiss, J¨ urgen Volz, Hannes Pichler, and Peter Zoller, “Chiral quantum op- tics,” Nature 541, 473–480 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    Orbital magnetic moments of phonons,

    Dominik M Juraschek and Nicola A Spaldin, “Orbital magnetic moments of phonons,” Physical Review Mate- rials 3, 064405 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Phonon magnetic moment from electronic topolog- ical magnetization,

    Yafei Ren, Cong Xiao, Daniyar Saparov, and Qian Niu, “Phonon magnetic moment from electronic topolog- ical magnetization,” Physical review letters 127, 186403 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    A large effective phonon magnetic moment in a dirac semimetal,

    Bing Cheng, T Schumann, Youcheng Wang, X Zhang, D Barbalas, S Stemmer, and NP Armitage, “A large effective phonon magnetic moment in a dirac semimetal,” Nano letters 20, 5991–5996 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Magnetic control of soft chiral phonons in pbte,

    Andrey Baydin, Felix GG Hernandez, Martin Rodriguez- Vega, Anderson K Okazaki, Fuyang Tay, G Timothy Noe, Ikufumi Katayama, Jun Takeda, Hiroyuki Nojiri, Paulo HO Rappl, et al., “Magnetic control of soft chiral phonons in pbte,” Physical review letters 128, 075901 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    John Wertz, Electron spin resonance: elementary theory and practical applications(Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Phonon- induced spin-spin interactions in diamond nanostruc- tures:¡? format?¿ application to spin squeezing,

    SD Bennett, Norman Ying Yao, Johannes Otterbach, Pe- ter Zoller, Peter Rabl, and Mikhail D Lukin, “Phonon- induced spin-spin interactions in diamond nanostruc- tures:¡? format?¿ application to spin squeezing,” Physi- cal review letters 110, 156402 (2013)

    2013

  26. [34]

    Phonon cooling and lasing with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond,

    KV Kepesidis, SD Bennett, Stefano Portolan, Mikhail D Lukin, and Peter Rabl, “Phonon cooling and lasing with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond,” Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 88, 064105 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    Coherent acoustic control of a single silicon va- cancy spin in diamond,

    Smarak Maity, Linbo Shao, Stefan Bogdanovi´ c, Srujan Meesala, Young-Ik Sohn, Neil Sinclair, Benjamin Pin- gault, Michelle Chalupnik, Cleaven Chia, Lu Zheng, et al., “Coherent acoustic control of a single silicon va- cancy spin in diamond,” Nature communications 11, 193 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Mechanical control of a single nuclear spin,

    Smarak Maity, Benjamin Pingault, Graham Joe, Michelle Chalupnik, Daniel Assump¸ c˜ ao, Eliza Cornell, Linbo Shao, and Marko Lonˇ car, “Mechanical control of a single nuclear spin,” Physical Review X 12, 011056 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Kenneth S Krane, Introductory nuclear physics (John Wiley & Sons, 1991)

    1991

  30. [38]

    A quan- tum spin transducer based on nanoelectromechanical res- onator arrays,

    Peter Rabl, Shimon Jacob Kolkowitz, FHL Koppens, JGE Harris, P Zoller, and Mikhail D Lukin, “A quan- tum spin transducer based on nanoelectromechanical res- onator arrays,” Nature Physics 6, 602–608 (2010)

    2010

  31. [39]

    Scaling phononic quantum networks of solid-state spins with closed me- chanical subsystems,

    Mark C Kuzyk and Hailin Wang, “Scaling phononic quantum networks of solid-state spins with closed me- chanical subsystems,” Physical Review X 8, 041027 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Efficient entanglement of spin qubits mediated by a hot mechanical oscillator,

    Emma Rosenfeld, Ralf Riedinger, Jan Gieseler, Martin Schuetz, and Mikhail D Lukin, “Efficient entanglement of spin qubits mediated by a hot mechanical oscillator,” Physical Review Letters 126, 250505 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Programmable quantum processors 7 based on spin qubits with mechanically-mediated inter- actions and transport,

    F Fung, E Rosenfeld, JD Schaefer, A Kabcenell, J Gieseler, TX Zhou, T Madhavan, N Aslam, A Yacoby, and MD Lukin, “Programmable quantum processors 7 based on spin qubits with mechanically-mediated inter- actions and transport,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12193 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Quantum trajectory theory for cascaded open systems,

    Howard J Carmichael, “Quantum trajectory theory for cascaded open systems,” Physical review letters 70, 2273 (1993)

    1993

  35. [43]

    Adiabatic elimination in a lambda system,

    Etienne Brion, Line Hjortshøj Pedersen, and Klaus Mølmer, “Adiabatic elimination in a lambda system,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 40, 1033 (2007)

    2007

  36. [44]

    Quasi-degenerate perturbation the- ory,

    Roland Winkler, “Quasi-degenerate perturbation the- ory,” Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Two-Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems , 201–205 (2003)

    2003

  37. [45]

    Quantum computations with cold trapped ions,

    Juan I Cirac and Peter Zoller, “Quantum computations with cold trapped ions,” Physical review letters 74, 4091 (1995)

    1995

  38. [46]

    Programmable quantum simulations of spin sys- tems with trapped ions,

    Christopher Monroe, Wes C Campbell, L-M Duan, Z- X Gong, Alexey V Gorshkov, Paul W Hess, Rajibul Islam, Kihwan Kim, Norbert M Linke, Guido Pagano, et al., “Programmable quantum simulations of spin sys- tems with trapped ions,” Reviews of Modern Physics 93, 025001 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Photon-mediated interactions between distant artificial atoms,

    Arjan F Van Loo, Arkady Fedorov, Kevin Lalumiere, Barry C Sanders, Alexandre Blais, and Andreas Wallraff, “Photon-mediated interactions between distant artificial atoms,” Science 342, 1494–1496 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    Photon-mediated in- teractions between quantum emitters in a diamond nanocavity,

    Ruffin E Evans, Mihir K Bhaskar, Denis D Sukachev, Christian T Nguyen, Alp Sipahigil, Michael J Burek, Bartholomeus Machielse, Grace H Zhang, Alexander S Zibrov, Edward Bielejec, et al., “Photon-mediated in- teractions between quantum emitters in a diamond nanocavity,” Science...

    2018

  41. [49]

    Driving a quantum system with the out- put field from another driven quantum system,

    CW Gardiner, “Driving a quantum system with the out- put field from another driven quantum system,” Physical review letters 70, 2269 (1993)

    1993

  42. [50]

    Driven- dissipative preparation of entangled states in cascaded quantum-optical networks,

    Kai Stannigel, Peter Rabl, and Peter Zoller, “Driven- dissipative preparation of entangled states in cascaded quantum-optical networks,” New Journal of Physics 14, 063014 (2012)

    2012

  43. [51]

    Chiral quan- tum optics with v-level atoms and coherent quantum feedback,

    Pierre-Olivier Guimond, Hannes Pichler, Arno Rauschenbeutel, and Peter Zoller, “Chiral quan- tum optics with v-level atoms and coherent quantum feedback,” Physical Review A 94, 033829 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    Non-hermitian physics and master equations,

    Federico Roccati, G Massimo Palma, Francesco Cic- carello, and Fabio Bagarello, “Non-hermitian physics and master equations,” Open Systems & Information Dy- namics 29, 2250004 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Quantum exceptional points of non-hermitian hamiltonians and liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps,

    Fabrizio Minganti, Adam Miranowicz, Ravindra W Chhajlany, and Franco Nori, “Quantum exceptional points of non-hermitian hamiltonians and liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps,” Physical Review A 100, 062131 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    Observation of parity-time symmetry breaking in a single-spin system,

    Yang Wu, Wenquan Liu, Jianpei Geng, Xingrui Song, Xi- angyu Ye, Chang-Kui Duan, Xing Rong, and Jiangfeng Du, “Observation of parity-time symmetry breaking in a single-spin system,” Science 364, 878–880 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    Enhancing spin-phonon and spin-spin interactions using linear resources in a hybrid quantum system,

    Peng-Bo Li, Yuan Zhou, Wei-Bo Gao, and Franco Nori, “Enhancing spin-phonon and spin-spin interactions using linear resources in a hybrid quantum system,” Physical Review Letters 125, 153602 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    Generalized scaling of spin qubit coher- ence in over 12,000 host materials,

    Shun Kanai, F Joseph Heremans, Hosung Seo, Gary Wolfowicz, Christopher P Anderson, Sean E Sullivan, Mykyta Onizhuk, Giulia Galli, David D Awschalom, and Hideo Ohno, “Generalized scaling of spin qubit coher- ence in over 12,000 host materials,” Proceedings of the National Acade...

    2022

  49. [57]

    High-fidelity hot gates for generic spin-resonator systems,

    Martin JA Schuetz, Geza Giedke, Lieven MK Vander- sypen, and J Ignacio Cirac, “High-fidelity hot gates for generic spin-resonator systems,” Physical Review A 95, 052335 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.