Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Supersymmetric Suspicion From Accelerating Black Hole Shadows

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.02594 v1 pith:KLDUAWQX submitted 2024-09-04 hep-th

classification hep-th
keywords blackholesupersymmetryacceleratingalignmentobservedquantitiesshadows
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In light of the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) images of the supermassive black holes $\textrm{Sgr A}^\star$ and $\textrm{M87}^\star$, we explore a potential supersymmetry suspicion within the observational data. Specifically, we investigate the shadow of a supersymmetric accelerating black hole and compare our findings with observed quantities such as the angular diameter $\mathcal{D}$ and the fractional deviation $\bm{\delta}$. Our analysis reveals a significant alignment between the calculated quantities and the EHT collaboration measurements. This alignment suggests that the features of the black hole shadows observed by the EHT exhibit characteristics consistent with the supersymmetry framework. Our results provide compelling evidence for supersymmetry from a gravitational perspective, which remains absent from the particle physics viewpoint till now.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stability and Criticality Behaviors of Accelerating Charged AdS Black Holes in Rainbow Gravity

    gr-qc 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper claims a charge-independent critical ratio for accelerating charged AdS black holes in rainbow gravity, but the derivation is internally inconsistent.

Pith tools