Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DIRAS: Efficient LLM Annotation of Document Relevance in Retrieval Augmented Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.14162 v4 pith:KMHBSPUO submitted 2024-06-20 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.CL
keywords relevanceannotationdirasinformationretrievaldocumentdomain-specificneed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is widely employed to ground responses to queries on domain-specific documents. But do RAG implementations leave out important information when answering queries that need an integrated analysis of information (e.g., Tell me good news in the stock market today.)? To address these concerns, RAG developers need to annotate information retrieval (IR) data for their domain of interest, which is challenging because (1) domain-specific queries usually need nuanced definitions of relevance beyond shallow semantic relevance; and (2) human or GPT-4 annotation is costly and cannot cover all (query, document) pairs (i.e., annotation selection bias), thus harming the effectiveness in evaluating IR recall. To address these challenges, we propose DIRAS (Domain-specific Information Retrieval Annotation with Scalability), a manual-annotation-free schema that fine-tunes open-sourced LLMs to consider nuanced relevance definition and annotate (partial) relevance labels with calibrated relevance scores. Extensive evaluation shows that DIRAS enables smaller (8B) LLMs to achieve GPT-4-level performance on annotating and ranking unseen (query, document) pairs, and is helpful for real-world RAG development. All code, LLM generations, and human annotations can be found in \url{https://github.com/EdisonNi-hku/DIRAS}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Likert or Not: LLM Absolute Relevance Judgments on Fine-Grained Ordinal Scales

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Pointwise LLM scoring with an 11-point ordinal scale is statistically competitive with listwise ranking for 31 of 40 model-dataset combinations on NDCG@10.

Pith tools