REVIEW 2 cited by
Logic-Consistency Text Generation from Semantic Parses
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Text generation from semantic parses is to generate textual descriptions for formal representation inputs such as logic forms and SQL queries. This is challenging due to two reasons: (1) the complex and intensive inner logic with the data scarcity constraint, (2) the lack of automatic evaluation metrics for logic consistency. To address these two challenges, this paper first proposes SNOWBALL, a framework for logic consistent text generation from semantic parses that employs an iterative training procedure by recursively augmenting the training set with quality control. Second, we propose a novel automatic metric, BLEC, for evaluating the logical consistency between the semantic parses and generated texts. The experimental results on two benchmark datasets, Logic2Text and Spider, demonstrate the SNOWBALL framework enhances the logic consistency on both BLEC and human evaluation. Furthermore, our statistical analysis reveals that BLEC is more logically consistent with human evaluation than general-purpose automatic metrics including BLEU, ROUGE and, BLEURT. Our data and code are available at https://github.com/Ciaranshu/relogic.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
LLaSA: Large Language and Structured Data Assistant
A single hypergraph encoder and G-Former, pretrained on 25 million tables, can be appended to different LLMs to improve their performance on table, knowledge graph, and database structured knowledge grounding tasks.
-
TrustDataFilter:Leveraging Trusted Knowledge Base Data for More Effective Filtering of Unknown Information
The self-NLI-TDF framework filters domain knowledge by comparing candidate statements with trusted knowledge using NLI reasoning and reports 1 to 5 percent accuracy gains over direct LLM filtering.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.